Infusion of dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen peptides: a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial involving patients with hormone-refractory metastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: A phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of infusions of dendritic cells (DC) and two HLA-A2-specific PSMA peptides (PSM-P1 and -P2). This report describes thirty three subjects with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer without prior vaccine therapy history who were evaluated and reported as a group. METHODS: All subjects received six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 at six week intervals. Clinical monitoring was conducted pre-, during, and post- phase II study. Data collected include: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, chest x-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses. RESULTS: Six partial and two complete responders were identified in the phase II study based on NPCP criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or resolution in previously measurable lesions on ProstaScint scan. CONCLUSIONS: Over 30% of study participants in this group showed a positive response at the conclusion of the trial. This study suggested that DC-based cancer vaccines may provide an alternative therapy for prostate cancer patients whose disease no longer responds to hormone therapy.

Method for identifying prostate cells in semen using flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cannot differentiate benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), from prostatitis, or prostate cancer in the range of 4.0-10 ng/ml. An accurate cytologic or histologic assessment is necessary to confirm the proper diagnosis. The nature of a biopsy tends to make it a selective test not frequently repeated. We are reporting a technique employing semen as a source for the differential diagnosis of prostate epithelial cells. METHODS: Eleven vasectomized and nonvasectomized prostate cancer patients provided semen samples (stage T1 to T2). Two patients provided repeat samples. In addition, 15 vasectomized or nonvasectomized individuals without evidence of disease provided semen samples. Three million cells fixed with 50% ethanol were stained by an antibody (7E11.C5) to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), Hybritech Antibody (399) to PSA, and cytokeratin 8 and 18. In addition to the antibodies described, a DNA stain To-Pro 3 was used to identify 2n-4n DNA containing cells. A dual laser, Becton Dickinson FACSCaliber cytometer, was used to analyze the samples. RESULTS: All semen specimens contained diploid, cytokeratin 18-positive epithelial cells regardless of disease status. A clear difference between prostate cancer and normal prostate cell samples was observed using staining with 7E11.C5. The ratio of prostatic cells in the total epithelial cell population (PSMA:cytokeratin ratios) was calculated for each specimen. A retrospective study of sixteen semen samples from 11 prostate cancer patients had a mean PSMA:cytokeratin ratio of 0.57, whereas the samples from 15 patients without evidence of cancer had a mean PSMA:cytokeratin ratio of 0.11. This difference was significant. PSA staining was variable and inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates that human semen contains prostate cells that can be characterized and used in the clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Evaluation of phase I/II clinical trials in prostate cancer with dendritic cells and PSMA peptides.

BACKGROUND: A phase I trial involving patients with advanced prostate cancer was conducted to assess the safe administration of dendritic cells (DC) and HLA-A0201-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides (PSM-P1 or -P2). Thirty-three of the phase I participants were subsequently enrolled in a phase II trial, which involved six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 peptides. METHODS: Clinical monitoring was conducted up to 770 days from the start of the phase I study. Data collected included: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, and chest X-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses. RESULTS: Nine partial responders were identified in the phase II study based on National Prostate Cancer Project (NPCP) criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen. Four of the partial responders were also responders in the phase I study, with an average response duration of 225 days. Their combined average total response period was over 370 days. Five other responders were nonresponders in the phase I study. Their average partial response period was 196 days. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed in the phase I and II clinical trials were significant and of long duration. The partial-responder group included patients who continued to respond from phase I, as well as those who started to respond during the phase II trial.

Evaluation of PSA, free PSA, PSMA, and total and bone alkaline phosphatase levels compared to bone scans in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer clinical evaluation is difficult. A revaluation of new prostate markers with regard to bone scans was performed. METHODS: Serial markers, including bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), total alkaline phosphatase (TAP), prostate-specific antigen, total (PSA) and free (fPSA), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), were obtained in patients under evaluation and treatment for possible or known metastatic prostate cancer. These were correlated with bone scan results (BSR). RESULTS: Seventy patients were observed from mid-October 1996-January 1997, during which time 171 serum samples were obtained and correlated with semiquantitative bone scan status. PSA and fPSA provided some correlation with BAP and BSR, but only at high levels (> 16-50 ng/ml). Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that BAP and TAP had a significant discriminating ability for positive and negative bone scans (> .78), compared to PSMA, PSA, and fPSA. However, percent BAP and TAP only correlated with BSR at a level above six lesions. As the lesions detected by BSR increased, the correlation increased. CONCLUSIONS: BAP is a valuable marker for clinical response evaluations to use in the serial follow-up of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and correlates well with the bone scan as the number of lesions increase to > 6. PSA or fPSA show comparable results, but only at high levels (> 16-50 ng/ml).

Follow-up evaluation of prostate cancer patients infused with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with PSMA peptides.

BACKGROUND: We recently conducted a phase I clinical trial administering autologous dendritic cells pulsed with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides to advanced prostate cancer patients. Participants were divided into 5 groups receiving 4 or 5 infusions of peptides alone (PSM-P1 or -P2; groups 1 and 2, respectively), autologous DC (group 3), or DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2 (groups 4 and 5, respectively). Seven partial responders were observed. Follow-up evaluation of these responders is presented in this report. METHODS: Clinical monitoring for hematological studies and prostate markers was conducted up to 370 days from the start of the phase I study. Data collected include: lymphocyte, hematocrit, alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and PSMA levels. RESULTS: Groups 4 and 5 (patients infused with DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2) represented 5/7 responders. The length of response was between 100 days (1 patient) to 200 days or above (6 patients). Four patients still remained responsive at the end of the period of observation. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed in this phase I clinical trial are significant and of long duration. Most of the responders were in treatment groups infused with DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2, suggesting the requirement of both components for effective immunotherapy.

Prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound for screening.

A prostate cancer screening study of 315 asymptomatic men comparing digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound identified 23 cancers, for a detection rate of 7.3%. Of the cancers 17 (5.4%) were diagnosed by digital rectal examination. Contrary to the experience of others, this was a higher rate than achieved by transrectal ultrasound (14 cases or 4.4%). Systematic multiple needle biopsies of both lobes with ultrasound guidance were routinely performed. As a result of this technique 7 of 23 cancers (30%) were fortuitously diagnosed. In addition, only unilateral disease was suspected in 4 of 7 patients with bilateral disease on biopsy. Digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound identified the same number of patients with small (less than 1.5 cm.) cancers, contrary to other reports that found transrectal ultrasound to be superior. Digital rectal examination is considered an effective screening examination, equivalent to transrectal ultrasound and preferable because of lower cost. An algorithm for screening is outlined with digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen determinations.

Prostate cancer: correlation of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen levels with tumor volumes in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Volume and distribution of prostatic carcinoma were measured in 30 radical prostatectomy specimens. Obtaining these data was facilitated by the use of whole tissue mounts. Similar measurements were obtained from preoperative transrectal ultrasound studies. With this information the ability of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound to predict tumor burden was analyzed. It was concluded that both of these examinations are poor predictors of tumor volume, distribution and pathological stage. Preoperative prostate specific antigen levels were correlated with the pathological data. It appeared that prostate specific antigen levels of greater than 10 presage [corrected] tumor volumes of greater than 3 cc, and that levels of more than 50 are suggestive of stages C and D disease.