Refining Auxiliary Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (AOLT) Improves Outcomes in Adult Patients With Acute Liver Failure.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether and how experience accumulation and technical refinements simultaneously implemented in auxiliary orthotopic liver transplantation (AOLT) may impact on outcomes. BACKGROUND: AOLT for acute liver failure (ALF) provides the unique chance of complete immunosuppression withdrawal after adequate native liver remnant regeneration but is a technically demanding procedure. Our department is a reference center for ALF and an early adopter of AOLT. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective before/after study of a prospectively maintained cohort of 48 patients with ALF who underwent AOLT between 1993 and 2019. In 2012, technical refinements were implemented to improve outcomes: (i) favoring the volume of the graft rather than that of the native liver, (ii) direct anastomosis of graft hepatic artery with recipient right hepatic artery instead of the use of large size vessels, (iii) end-to-side hepaticocholedocostomy instead of bilioenteric anastomosis. Early experience (1993-2011) group (n=26) and recent experience (2012-2019) group (n=22) were compared. Primary endpoint was 90-day severe morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa) and secondary endpoints were overall patient survival and complete immunosuppression withdrawal rates. RESULTS: Compared with the earlier experience group, the recent experience group was associated with a lower severe complication rate (27% vs 65%, P <0.001), as well as less biliary (18% vs 54%, P =0.017) and arterial (0% vs 15%, P =0.115) complications. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival was significantly improved (91%, 91%, 91% vs 76%, 61%, 60%, P =0.045). The rate of complete immunosuppression withdrawal increased to 94% vs 70%, ( P =0.091) with no need of long-term graft explant. CONCLUSION: These technical refinements favoring the liver graft and reducing morbidity may promote AOLT implementation among LT centers.

Are patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumour thrombosis candidates for liver transplantation?

In this debate, the authors consider whether patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumour thrombosis are candidates for liver transplantation (LT). The argument for LT in this context is based on the premise that, following successful downstaging treatment, LT confers a much greater clinical benefit in terms of survival outcomes than the available alternative (palliative systemic therapy). A major argument against relates to limitations in the quality of evidence for LT in this setting - in relation to study design, as well as heterogeneity in patient characteristics and downstaging protocols. While acknowledging the superior outcomes offered by LT for patients with portal vein tumour thrombosis, the counterargument is that expected survival in such patients is still below accepted thresholds for LT and, indeed, the levels achieved for other patients who receive transplants beyond the Milan criteria. Based on the available evidence, it seems too early for consensus guidelines to recommend such an approach, however, it is hoped that with higher quality evidence and standardised downstaging protocols, LT may soon be more widely indicated, including for this population with high unmet clinical need.

Ileocolic invagination in adults: A totally minimally invasive endoscopic and laparoscopic staged approach.

Adult intussusception of the bowel is a rare clinical entity, and its management remains debated. The timing of treatment is not yet standardised, and no guidelines exist. We report a case of an 83-year-old woman presenting to the emergency department of our hospital with a history of increasing abdominal pain in the right iliac fossa. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan showed the presence of a large ileocolic intussusception with evidence of the terminal ileus invaginated within the right colon and the ileocolic vessels dragged and trapped into the intussusception. A colonoscopy confirmed the ileocolic invagination with a large right colonic lesion as leading point, and a partial pneumatic (carbon dioxide) and hydrostatic reduction was achieved. Subsequent laparoscopic right colectomy was performed according to oncological principles. A totally minimally invasive approach of this rare condition has been achieved but the literature lacks about the correct management of this entity.

Inferior vena cava resection without reconstruction for retroperitoneal malignancies.

Inferior vena cava (IVC) involvement in retroperitoneal malignancies is a rare occurrence and radical surgery with major vascular resection represents the only potential curative treatment. IVC replacement after resection is still controversial and only small series and few prospective data are available. We report a series of three patients affected by retroperitoneal masses involving IVC treated with vena cava resection without replacement. All patients were treated by a radical R0 surgical procedure associated with infrarenal IVC resection and no reconstruction. Based on preoperative radiologic imaging and intraoperative findings, one patient also underwent right nephrectomy, while another patient underwent left renal vein ligation without nephrectomy. Neither early nor late severe post-operative complications related to the absence of IVC outflow were observed. Resection without replacement of the infrarenal IVC results in acceptable morbidity, thus specific risks related to the use of prosthetic grafts can be avoided.