[Anticoagulation impact on bleeding risk during HoLEP: Monocentric study of 156 patients]. / Impact des anticoagulants sur le risque hémorragique au cours de l'HoLEP : étude monocentrique de 156 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the length of hospital stay and the complications after HoLEP between three groups of patients: a control group, a group with antiplatelet therapy, a group with anticoagulation therapy. MATERIALS: Retrospective cohort study that included all consecutive patients who underwent HoLEP for prostatic hyperplasia in our center from may 2013 to may 2016. Anticoagulated patients and patients under clopidogrel had respectively a relay with heparine and aspirine. Patients were seen after surgery at 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: A hundred and fifty six patients were analysed, mean age was 70.7 years (DS 6.8), mean prostate volume 88.8g (DS 34.1). 106 patients were in the control group, 34 had antiplatelet therapy and 16 had anticoagulation therapy. There were no difference between the 3 groups for mean age, mean prostatic volume, PSA. There was also no difference for length of intervention, irrigated volume and length of morcellation between the three groups. There were no difference between patients in the control group and patients with antiplatelet therapy for length of hospital stay (2.1 days vs 2.0 days), lenght of urethral catheterization (1.6 days vs 1.5 days). There was a statistical difference between patients in the control group and patients with anticoagulation therapy for lenght of hospital stay (2.0 days vs 4.4 days; P=0.01), length of bladder irrigation (0.9 day vs 1.8 days; P=0.01), lenght of urethral catheterization (1.6 days vs 3.5 days; P=0.01). Transfusion rate was 18.75% (n=3) for patients with anticoagulation, 2.9% (n=1) for patients under antiplatelet therapy and 0.9% (n=1) for patients in the control group. CONCLUSION: Anticoagulation during HoLEP is a valid option but need to be proceed with carefully management. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

[Pediatric kidney transplantation]. / Transplantation rénale pédiatrique.

AIMS: To describe indications, surgical aspects, results and outcomes of kidney transplantation in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An exhaustive systematic review of the scientific literature was performed in the Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of the following keywords (MESH): "kidney transplantation", "pediatric", "children", "outcomes". Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language, date of publication (last 10 years) and relevance. Prospective and retrospective studies, in English or French, review articles; meta-analysis and guidelines were selected and analyzed. This search found 2608 articles. After reading titles and abstracts, 18 were included in the text based on their relevance. RESULTS: Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end stage renal kidney disease in children. The surgical procedure is well standardized with a retroperitoneal approach when child and kidney size allow it or a transperitoneal approach in child less than 15 kg and big size kidney graft. Anastomosis sites include iliac vessels in the retroperitoneal approach, and inferior vena cava and aorta in case of transperitoneal procedure. Ureteral reimplantation used most of the time a Campos Freire technique. Sometimes, particular conditions in the recipient (such as vena cava thrombosis) required procedure adaptation. CONCLUSION: Graft survival dramatically increased over the past few years and is now superior to those observed in adult kidney transplantation, particularly in experienced team with microsurgery skills. Immunosuppressive treatments are similar to adults. Viral infections and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder are the main complications of renal transplantation in children and may lead to lethal outcomes. An increase graft loss is observed during boyhood due to immunosuppressive drugs uncompliance.

Nephron sparing surgery for De Novo kidney graft tumor: results from a multicenter national study.

Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) results in the transplanted population remain unknown because they are only presented in small series or case reports. Our objective was to study renal sparing surgery for kidney graft renal cell carcinomas (RCC) in a multicenter cohort. Data were collected from 32 French transplantation centers. Cases of renal graft de novo tumors treated as RCC since the beginning of their transplantation activity were included. Seventy-nine allograft kidney de novo tumors were diagnosed. Forty-three patients (54.4%) underwent renal sparing surgery. Mean age of grafted kidneys at the time of diagnosis was 47.5 years old (26.1-72.6). The mean time between transplantation and tumor diagnosis was 142.6 months (12.2-300). Fifteen tumors were clear cell carcinomas (34.9%), and 25 (58.1%) were papillary carcinomas. Respectively, 10 (24.4%), 24 (58.3%) and 8 (19.5%) tumors were Fuhrman grade 1, 2 and 3. Nine patients had postoperative complications (20.9%) including four requiring surgery (Clavien IIIb). At the last follow-up, 41 patients had a functional kidney graft, without dialysis and no long-term complications. NSS is safe and appropriate for all small tumors of transplanted kidneys with good long-term functional and oncological outcomes, which prevent patients from returning to dialysis.

[New ultrasound navigational system in extracorporeal lithotripsy: decreased fluoroscopy and radiation]. / Nouveau repérage échographique en lithotritie extracorporelle: diminution des temps de scopie et de l'irradiation.

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the most common method of treatment for kidney stones. Both fluoroscopy and ultrasound imaging can be used to locate stones, but fluoroscopy is more frequently employed. Evaluation of a new stereotaxic navigational system: the stone was located using an ultrasound probe, and its 3D location was saved. The table automatically moved to position the stone at the focal point. A real-time follow-up was possible during treatment. Our objective was to demonstrate a decrease in the use of fluoroscopy to locate kidney stones for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy through the use of a 3D ultrasound stone locking system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of the case records of the 20 patients preceding and the 20 patients succeeding the arrival of the ultrasound stone locking system Visio-Track (EDAP-TMS). We used a Student test to compare age, BMI, kidney stone size, number of shock waves and administered energy. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable. The average age was 55 years old and the average kidney stone size was 10.7 mm. Radiation duration was 174.8 seconds in the group without Visio-Track versus 57.1 seconds in the group with it (P<0.0001). A similar result was observed for radiation doses: 5197.25 mGy x cm2 for the group without versus 1987.6 mGy x cm2 for the group with Visio-Track (P=0.0033). CONCLUSION: The stone locking system Visio-Track reduced fluoroscopy in our first group of patients, which decreased the patient's individual absorbed irradiation dose.

De novo kidney graft tumors: results from a multicentric retrospective national study.

De novo tumors in renal allografts are rare and their prevalence is underestimated. We therefore analyzed renal cell carcinomas arising in renal allografts through a retrospective French renal transplant cohort. We performed a retrospective, multicentric survey by sending questionnaires to all French kidney transplantation centers. All graft tumors diagnosed after transplantation were considered as de novo tumors. Thirty-two centers participated in this study. Seventy-nine tumors were identified among 41 806 recipients (Incidence 0.19%). Patients were 54 men and 25 women with a mean age of 47 years old at the time of diagnosis. Mean tumor size was 27.8 mm. Seventy-four (93.6%), 53 (67%) and 44 tumors (55.6%) were organ confined (T1-2), low grade (G1-2) and papillary carcinomas, respectively. Four patients died of renal cell carcinomas (5%). The mean time lapse between transplantation and RCC diagnosis was 131.7 months. Thirty-five patients underwent conservative surgery by partial nephrectomy (n = 35, 44.3%) or radiofrequency (n = 5; 6.3%). The estimated 5 years cancer specific survival rate was 94%. Most of these tumors were small and incidental. Most tumors were papillary carcinoma, low stage and low grade carcinomas. Conservative treatment has been preferred each time it was feasible in order to avoid a return to dialysis.

[Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: results of the artificial urinary sphincter after suburethral sling failure]. / Traitement de l'incontinence urinaire d'effort après prostatectomie : résultats du sphincter urinaire artificiel après échec de bandelette sous-urétrale.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence of a previously implanted suburethral sling for post-prostatic surgery incontinence influences the outcomes of subsequent AUS implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing 15 patients who underwent AUS placement after suburethral sling failure between November 2004 and December 2009 to 15 patients who underwent AUS placement as first-line treatment during the same period. Demographic characteristics, preoperative assessment of urinary incontinence and technique of implantation of the AUS were similar in the both arms. A USP(®) continence questionnaire was sent to patients by mail. Success was defined as a subjective improvement of the incontinence in patients using less than one pad per day. RESULTS: No perioperative incidents were noted in either arm. Mean operative time, the size of implanted cuffs, duration of catheterisation, length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rate, as well as the rate of surgical revision, were similar in both arms. The follow-up was slightly lower in the first arm (21 vs. 28.8 months, P=0.83). Stress incontinence and bladder overactivity scores of the USP(®) questionnaire, as well as success rates (73.3 vs. 80%, P=0.67), were equivalent in both arms. CONCLUSION: The results associated with the AUS procedure were not significantly different between men who had a suburethral male sling implanted before and those who had the AUS implanted as a first-line treatment.