Patient symptoms, self-management, and unscheduled healthcare use during the first 6 months of targeted oral anticancer agent therapy: protocol for a mixed-methods US study.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted oral anticancer agents (OAAs) are increasingly used to treat cancer, including haematological malignancies and ovarian cancer, but they can cause serious symptomatic side effects such as arrhythmias, hypertension, and hyperglycaemia. Unaddressed OAA symptoms or inadequately managed symptoms may also lead to unnecessary and unscheduled healthcare use that decreases patient quality of life and financially burdens both patients and the healthcare system. Limited information is available about patient symptoms, self-management behaviours, and use of healthcare services over time while taking targeted OAAs, but is needed to ensure successful OAA therapy. The primary objective is to understand patient experiences and behaviours on initiating targeted OAA, and elicit cancer care clinicians' (ie, physicians, advanced practice practitioners, nurses, and pharmacists) perspectives on supporting patients during therapy. Study results will inform comprehensive and realistic interventions that minimise disruptions to therapy while maximising quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a remote single-arm, convergent-parallel mixed-methods cohort study within a large academic medical centre. A minimum of 60 patients will be enrolled. Patients will complete several validated patient-reported outcome measures at six timepoints over 6 months. Mixed-effects logistic regression will be used to predict the primary binary outcome of unscheduled healthcare use by patient self-efficacy for symptom self-management. Semistructured interviews will be conducted with patients and clinicians and thematically analysed. Triangulated quantitative and qualitative results will be reported using cross-case comparison joint display. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol is approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Michigan Medical School (IRBMED). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences, and disseminated to study participants.

The Impact of Rurality and Age on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Michigan Residents.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent cause of cancer-related deaths in Michigan, but not all Michigan adults had appropriate CRC screening. Objective: To assess the relationship between rurality and age on CRC screenings to inform how pharmacists could focus their efforts to educate, facilitate, or offer CRC health screenings. Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study using 2018 Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (MiBRFSS) survey data. Michigan participants aged ≥ 50 years were included. Outcomes included the utilization of stool-based tests, sigmoidoscopies, colonoscopies, and the most recent CRC screening. Demographic variables included age, sex, income, race/ethnicity, relationship status, education level, employment status, income, rurality, and health insurance. Representative sampling weights were used to adjust for the complex survey design. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. IBM SPSS version 28.0.1.0 was used and an a priori p-value of <0.05 was deemed significant. Results: A weighted total of 3,762,540 participants were included, of which 21.3% (n = 781,907) reported living in a rural area and approximately 70% (n = 2,616,646) were between the ages of 50-69 years old. Most participants reported being White, non-Hispanic (n = 3,104,117, 84.5%), having health insurance (n = 3,619,801, 96.4%), and having a colonoscopy (74.6%, n= 2,620,581). There was no difference based on rurality. Compared to those aged 50-59 years, adults 60-69 years (AOR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.58,2.45), 70-79 years (AOR = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.40,4.51), and ≥ 80 years (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.54,3.24) had higher odds of receiving a colonoscopy. Lack of insurance was associated with lower odds of receiving a colonoscopy (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.56). Conclusion: Most participants reported having a CRC screening but efforts to increase CRC screening in Michigan adults aged 50-59 are warranted.

Predictors of Receipt of Comprehensive Medication Reviews in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent among older adults. This study's purpose was to provide nationally representative estimates of self-reported comprehensive medication review (CMR) receipt among older adults and describe factors associated with their receipt, as CMRs are available through the Medicare Part D program. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Poll on Healthy Aging (NPHA), a nationally representative online survey of community-dwelling adults aged 50-80, administered in December 2019. Participants included older adults aged 65-80 with any health insurance (n = 960). Outcomes were self-reported CMR receipt, awareness of CMR insurance coverage, and interest in a future CMR with a pharmacist. Sociodemographic and health-related variables were included. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression with NPHA population sampling weights were used. RESULTS: Among older adults on 2 or more prescription medications, only 20.8% had received a CMR while 34.3% were interested in a future CMR. Among individuals who had not received a CMR, most (83.4%) were unaware their insurance might cover a CMR. Factors associated with higher odds of receiving a CMR included taking 5 or more prescription medications (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.59-4.38) and reporting food insecurity (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.07-7.93). Having fair or poor self-reported physical health was associated with lower odds of receiving a CMR (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.25-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Most older adults on 2 or more prescription medications with health insurance had not received a CMR and many were interested in one. Targeted strategies to increase older adults' awareness and receipt of CMRs are warranted.

Concurrent Use of Thyroid Hormone Therapy and Interfering Medications in Older US Veterans.

CONTEXT: Thyroid hormone management in older adults is complicated by comorbidities and polypharmacy. OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of concurrent use of thyroid hormone and medications that can interfere with thyroid hormone metabolism (amiodarone, prednisone, prednisolone, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, tamoxifen), and patient characteristics associated with this practice. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study between 2004 and 2017 (median follow-up, 56 months). SETTING: Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 538 137 adults ≥ 65 years prescribed thyroid hormone therapy during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Concurrent use of thyroid hormone and medications interfering with thyroid hormone metabolism. RESULTS: Overall, 168 878 (31.4%) patients were on at least 1 interfering medication while on thyroid hormone during the study period. In multivariable analyses, Black/African-American race (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.21-1.28, compared with White), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09-1.15, compared with non-Hispanic), female (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08-1.15, compared with male), and presence of comorbidities (eg, Charlson/Deyo Comorbidity Score ≥ 2; OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 2.45-2.54, compared with 0) were more likely to be associated with concurrent use of thyroid hormone and interfering medications. Older age (eg, ≥ 85 years; OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.47-0.48, compared with age 65-74 years) was less likely to be associated with this practice. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Almost one-third of older adults on thyroid hormone were on medications known to interfere with thyroid hormone metabolism. Our findings highlight the complexity of thyroid hormone management in older adults, especially in women and minorities.

Primary healthcare policy and vision for community pharmacy and pharmacists in the United States.

The United States (US) has a complex healthcare system with a mix of public, private, nonprofit, and for-profit insurers, healthcare institutions and organizations, and providers. Unlike other developed countries, there is not a single payer healthcare system or a national pharmaceutical benefits scheme/plan. Despite spending over USD 10,000 per capita in healthcare, the US is among the worst performers compared to other developed countries in outcomes including life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, safety during childbirth, and unmanaged chronic conditions (e.g., asthma, diabetes). Primary care is delivered by physicians and advanced practice providers (i.e., nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in a variety of settings including large health systems, federally qualified health centers or free clinics that provide care to the underserved, or specific facilities for veterans or American Indian and Alaska native peoples. Since 2010, primary care delivery has shifted toward providing patient-centered, coordinated, comprehensive care focused on providing proactive, rather than reactive, population health management, and on the quality, versus volume, of care. Community pharmacy comprises a mix of independently owned, chain, supermarket and mass merchant pharmacies. Community pharmacies provide services such as immunizations, medication therapy management, medication packaging, medication synchronization, point-of-care testing and, in specific states where legislation has been passed, hormonal contraception, opioid reversal agents, and smoking cessation services. There has been criticism regarding the lack of standard terminology for services such as medication synchronization and medication therapy management, their components and how they should be provided, which hampers comparability across studies. One of the main challenges for pharmacists in the US is the lack of provider status at the federal level. This means that pharmacists are not allowed to use existing fee-for-service health insurance billing codes to receive reimbursement for non-dispensing services. In addition, despite there being regulatory infrastructure in multiple states, the extent of service implementation is either low or unknown. Research found that pharmacists face numerous barriers when providing some of these services. State fragmentation and the lack of a single pharmacy organization and vision for the profession are additional challenges.

Utilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Survivors.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with decreased mortality and rehospitalization rates for patients with a variety of cardiac conditions. Although CR referral rates for STEMI patients have improved, rates for heart failure have remained low. Many of these patients are admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). However, it is unknown how often CICU survivors qualify for cardiac rehabilitation, how often they are referred, and why eligible patients are not referred. This is a retrospective single-center study of 417 consecutive patients admitted to CICU for >48 hours from March 30, 2016 to March 30, 2017. We excluded patients with in-hospital mortality or those discharged AMA, to hospice or transferred. Chart abstraction was used to determine CR indications based on known American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. If CR was indicated, medical records through September 2017 were reviewed to determine both referral and participation rates. In the absence of a referral, medical records were reviewed for potential barriers. A total of 296 CICU survivors were identified upon discharge with 185 (63%) having guideline-directed indications for CR referral. The most common indications were heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, 38%), cardiothoracic surgery (26%), and STEMI (23%). Upon discharge, only 30% of patients were referred to CR. The referral rate increased by 33% to 63% by 18 months postdischarge. CR referrals were most frequently placed following STEMI (91%), NSTEMI (80%), and postpercutaneous coronary intervention (80%). Only 35% of HFrEF discharges were referred to CR. Of patients not referred to CR, no explanation for a lack of referral was documented 87% of the time. In conclusion, nearly 2 of 3 patients discharged from the CICU had CR indications, most commonly HFrEF. CR referrals are frequently not placed and reason for nonreferral is rarely documented. CICU admission may provide a defined event to prompt referral.