Arthroscopic synovectomy versus intra-articular injection of corticosteroids for the management of refractory psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ARCTIC trial).

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are inflammatory diseases that often affect the wrist and, when affected, can lead to impaired wrist function and progressive joint destruction if inadequately treated. Standard care consists primarily of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), often supported by systemic corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI). IACSI, despite their use worldwide, show poor response in a substantial group of patients. Arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist is the surgical removal of synovitis with the goal to relieve pain and improve wrist function. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate wrist function following arthroscopic synovectomy compared to IACSI in therapy-resistant patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis. Secondary objectives include radiologic progress, disease activity, health-related quality of life, work participation and cost-effectiveness during a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This protocol describes a prospective, randomized controlled trial. RA and PsA patients are eligible with prominent wrist synovitis objectified by a rheumatologist, not responding to at least 3 months of conventional DMARDs and naïve to biological DMARDs. For 90% power, an expected loss to follow-up of 5%, an expected difference in mean Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE, range 0-100) of 11 and α = 0.05, a total sample size of 80 patients will be sufficient to detect an effect size. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio for arthroscopic synovectomy with deposition of corticosteroids or for IACSI. Removed synovial tissue will be stored for an ancillary study on disease profiling. The primary outcome is wrist function, measured with the PRWE score after 3 months. Secondary outcomes include wrist mobility and grip strength, pain scores, DAS28, EQ-5D-5L, disease progression on ultrasound and radiographs, complications and secondary treatment. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed, based on healthcare costs (iMCQ questionnaire) and productivity loss (iPCQ questionnaire). Follow-up will be scheduled at 3, 6 and 12 months. Patient burden is minimized by combining study visits with regular follow-ups. DISCUSSION: Persistent wrist arthritis continues to be a problem for patients with rheumatic joint disease leading to disability. This is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect, safety and feasibility of arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist in these patients compared to IACSI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry (CCMO), NL74744.100.20. Registered on 30 November 2020. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04755127. Registered after the start of inclusion on 15 February 2021.

Sural hypersensitivity after nerve transection depends on anatomical differences in the distal tibial nerve of mice and rats.

INTRODUCTION: Various mouse and rat models of neuropathic pain after nerve injury exist. Whilst some models involve a proximal nerve lesion or ligation of the sciatic trifurcation in mice and rats, others consists of a transection or ligation of distal nerves at the tibial bifurcation in mice or rats. The level of nerve cut directly affects the magnitude of hypersensitivity, and anatomical differences between mice and rats might therefore impact the development of hypersensitivity after distal tibial nerve transection as well. METHODS: The bifurcation of the distal tibial nerve into the medial and lateral plantar nerve (MPN and LPN), and the presence of anatomical differences in sural and tibial nerve distribution between mice and rat was evaluated. Sural mechanical sensitivity after transection of the MPN or whole tibial nerve was assessed using von Frey test until 8 weeks after surgery in 48 rats and 16 mice. RESULTS: The bifurcation of the tibial nerve into the MPN and LPN is situated proximal to the ankle in both mice and rats. The sural nerve joins the LPN in mice, but not in rats. A proximal communicating branch is present between the LPN and MPN in rats, but not in mice. MPN transection in mice caused hypersensitivity of the hindpaw innervated by the sural nerve, but not in rats. In rats, sural hypersensitivity only developed when both MPN and LPN were cut. CONCLUSION: Inter-species variation in nerve anatomy should be taken in consideration when performing surgery to induce plantar hypersensitivity in rodents.

Clinical variation in the treatment of trigger finger: An international survey of orthopaedic and plastic surgeons.

Trigger finger is a common condition affecting the hand. Therapeutic variability surrounds the management of trigger finger, especially in the mild cases. The aim of this study was to survey secondary care surgeons to describe the current management of trigger fingers. The steering group developed a survey for hand surgeons. Following piloting, the survey was distributed to hand surgeons in the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. A total of 713 plastic surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the online survey and 440 (62%) surgeons completed the survey. In both mild and moderate cases of trigger finger, steroid injection was the preferred treatment option. Open surgery was the treatment of choice for severe cases. However, there was variation in delivery of care, including type and dosage of steroid, site of injection, interval between injections, maximum number of injections, type of incision and treatment of patients with diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis. This highlights the need for a better evidence base for the treatment of trigger fingers.

Treatment and survival differences across tumor sites in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a SEER database analysis and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Currently, literature is scarce on differences across all possible tumor sites in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). To determine differences in treatment and survival across tumor sites and assess possible predictors for survival, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: MPNST cases were obtained from the SEER database. Tumor sites were recoded into: intracranial, spinal, head and neck (H&N), limbs, core (thorax/abdomen/pelvis), and unknown site of origin. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival were extracted. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression hazard models. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed per tumor site for OS and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: A total of 3267 MPNST patients were registered from 1973 to 2013; 167 intracranial (5.1%), 119 spinal (3.6%), 449 H&N (13.7%), 1022 limb (31.3%), 1307 core (40.0%), and 203 unknown (6.2%). The largest tumors were found in core sites (80.0 mm, interquartile range [IQR]: 60.0-115.0 mm) and the smallest were intracranial (37.4 mm, IQR: 17.3-43.5 mm). Intracranial tumors were least frequently resected (58.1%), whereas spinal tumors were most often resected (83.0%). Radiation was administered in 35.5% to 41.8%. Independent factors associated with decreased survival were: older age, male sex, black race, no surgery, partial resection, large tumor size, high tumor grade, H&N site, and core site (all P < .05). Intracranial and pediatric tumors show superior survival (both P < .05). Intracranial tumors show superior OS and DSS curves, whereas core tumors have the worst (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Superior survival is seen in intracranial and pediatric MPNSTs. Core and H&N tumors have a worse prognosis.

Modification of the use of the extensor retinaculum for reducible distal radioulnar joint instability: technique and results.

Different surgical techniques have been described for chronic distal radioulnar joint instability: they are often complicated, quite invasive and may not be recommended for bidirectional instability. We describe a procedure using a radial-based extensor retinaculum strip and a capsular plication. This is a simple technique and less invasive than 'anatomic' radioulnar ligament reconstructions. We report the results of 38 patients (38 wrists) who we treated. After a minimum of 8 months we quantified the outcomes of the patients objectively by assessing ranges of motion, grip strength and clinical assessment of stability, and subjectively using questionnaires. Overall, 36 out of 38 patients were stable after surgery. The operated forearm and wrist had approximately 3° less range of motion in all planes and 3 kgf less grip strength compared with the unoperated side. The median Mayo modified wrist score was 90; the median visual analogue scale score was 2. This surgical technique appears to successfully treat patients with chronic reducible distal radioulnar joint instability. Anatomic reconstruction of both radioulnar ligaments is not always necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The anatomical relationship of the superficial radial nerve and the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve: A possible factor in persistent neuropathic pain.

The superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) is known for developing neuropathic pain syndromes after trauma. These pain syndromes can be hard to treat due to the involvement of other nerves in the forearm. When a nerve is cut, the Schwann cells, and also other cells in the distal segment of the transected nerve, produce the nerve growth factor (NGF) in the entire distal segment. If two nerves overlap anatomically, similar to the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) and SBRN, the increase in secretion of NGF, which is mediated by the injured nerve, results in binding to the high-affinity NGF receptor, tyrosine kinase A (TrkA). This in turn leads to possible sprouting and morphological changes of uninjured fibers, which ultimately causes neuropathic pain. The aim of this study was to map the level of overlap between the SBRN and LACN. Twenty arms (five left and 15 right) were thoroughly dissected. Using a new analysis tool called CASAM (Computer Assisted Surgical Anatomy Mapping), the course of the SBRN and LACN could be compared visually. The distance between both nerves was measured at 5-mm increments, and the number of times they intersected was documented. In 81% of measurements, the distance between the nerves was >10 mm, and in 49% the distance was even <5 mm. In 95% of the dissected arms, the SBRN and LACN intersected. On average, they intersected 2.25 times. The close (anatomical) relationship between the LACN and the SBRN can be seen as a factor in the explanation of persistent neuropathic pain in patients with traumatic or iatrogenic lesion of the SBRN or the LACN.

The role of proximal pulleys in preventing tendon bowstringing: pulley rupture and tendon bowstringing.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate factors that contribute to tendon bowstringing at the proximal phalanx. We hypothesised that: (1) a partial rupture of the A2 pulley leads to significant bowstringing, (2) the location of the A2 rupture, starting proximally or distally, influences bowstringing, (3) an additional A3 pulley rupture causes a significant increase in bowstringing following a complete A2 pulley rupture and (4) the skin and tendon sheath may prevent bowstringing in A2 and A3 pulley ruptures. METHODS: Index, middle and ring fingers of eight freshly frozen cadaver arms were used. A loading device pulled with 100 N force was attached to the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) was preloaded with 5 N. Bowstringing was measured and quantified by the size of the area between the FDP tendon and the proximal phalanx over a distance of 5 mm with ultrasonography (US). RESULTS: US images showed that already a 30% excision of the A2 pulley resulted in significant bowstringing. In addition, a partial distal incision of the A2 pulley showed significantly more bowstringing compared to a partial proximal incision. Additional A3 pulley incision and excision of the proximal tendon sheath did not increase bowstringing. Subsequently, removing the skin did increase the bowstringing significantly. CONCLUSION: A partial A2 pulley rupture causes a significant bowstringing. A partial rupture of the A2 pulley at the distal rim of the A2 pulley resulted in more bowstringing than a partial rupture at the proximal rim.

How to treat Guyon's canal syndrome? Results from the European HANDGUIDE study: a multidisciplinary treatment guideline.

BACKGROUND: Although Guyon's canal syndrome is not highly prevalent, a considerable knowledge of anatomy is needed to localise and treat the pathology. Data on the effectiveness of interventions for this disorder are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To achieve consensus on a multidisciplinary treatment guideline for this disorder based on experts' opinions. METHODS: A European Delphi consensus strategy was initiated. In total, 35 experts (hand surgeons/hand therapists selected by the national member associations of their European federations and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation physicians) participated in the Delphi consensus strategy. Each Delphi round consisted of a questionnaire, an analysis and a feedback report. RESULTS: After three Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved on the description, symptoms and diagnosis of Guyon's canal syndrome. The experts agreed that patients with this disorder should always receive instructions and that these instructions should be combined with another form of treatment. Instructions combined with splinting or with surgery were considered as suitable treatment options. Details on the use of instructions, splinting and surgery were described. Main factors for selecting one of the aforementioned treatment options were identified: severity and duration of the syndrome and previous treatments given. A relation between the severity/duration and choice of therapy was indicated by the experts and reported in the guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Although this disorder is less prevalent and not easy to diagnose, this guideline may contribute to better insight into and treatment of Guyon's canal syndrome.

The incidence of symptomatic neuroma in amputation and neurorrhaphy patients.

PURPOSE: The incidence of symptomatic neuroma in finger nerve injuries varies widely in the literature. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the incidence of symptomatic neuroma after repair of digital nerve injuries (neurorrhaphy) and after amputation of one or more fingers. We also determined the need for re-operation on symptomatic neuroma patients. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we collected data from medical files. All patients who were treated for a hand trauma in the emergency department during the last 10 years were included. We gathered data on the presence of symptomatic neuroma and re-operation of the patients. RESULTS: In our database, 583 people had a peripheral nerve injury of whom 177 people had an amputation. The incidence of digital nerve injury without amputation followed by neurorrhaphy was 1%. In digital nerve injuries with amputation the incidence was 7.8%, which is significantly higher than after digital nerve injuries without amputation. CONCLUSIONS: People with an amputation injury have significantly more symptomatic neuroma than people who undergo neurorrhaphy. People who have a symptomatic neuroma after digital nerve injuries have been operated significantly more than people who have a non-symptomatic neuroma or no neuroma at all. This information can be of help when treating digital nerve injuries. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (LOE): Prognostic.

Cerebral consequences of dynamic immobilisation after primary digital flexor tendon repair.

Current treatment protocols for flexor tendon injuries of the hand generally result in an acceptable function, which can be quantified by objective parameters such as range of motion. The latter does not always match the patients' subjective experiences of persisting dysfunction. This raises the question whether changes in the cerebral control of movement might contribute to the perceived deficit. The main objective of the present positron emission tomography (PET) study was to characterise the cerebral responses in movement-associated areas during simple finger flexion immediately after dynamic immobilisation and after a subsequent 6-week period of active training. Ten subjects with flexor tendon injury participated in the PET study. Electromyography (EMG) recordings were made during finger flexion and extension in an additional subject. The main finding was that the (ventral) putamen contralateral to flexor movement was not activated immediately after release from splinting, while such activation reappeared after a period of training. This indicates a temporary loss of efficient motor control of over-learnt movements. The increase of unwanted co-contractions during flexion in a first EMG session, and not during extension, supports a concept of lost skills.

High-resolution ultrasonography of the cutaneous nerve branches in the hand and wrist.

Ultrasonography can be used in the diagnosis of various neuropathies, including nerve injury. Nerves often involved in traumatic and iatrogenic injury are small cutaneous branches in the hand and wrist, which cannot be seen in detail using current ultrasound probes. This study explored the potential of high-resolution ultrasonography in seeing these nerve branches in the human. The VisualSonics Vevo 770 system with a 15-82.5 MHz probe was compared to a commonly used 5-12 MHz probe and ultrasound machine. The accuracy was validated by ultrasound guided dye injection into cadaver nerves, with subsequent anatomical dissection and verification. Results were confirmed in two healthy volunteers. The Vevo 770 system was able to accurately identify the small cutaneous nerves. It could also depict the median nerve and its fascicles in greater detail. This may be useful for clinical diagnosis, localisation and follow-up of neuropathies and nerve injuries.

Clinical implications of cerebral reorganisation after primary digital flexor tendon repair.

After flexor tendon injury, most attention is given to the quality of the tendon repair and postoperative early passive dynamic mobilisation. Schemes for active mobilisation have been developed to prevent tendon adhesions and joint stiffness. This paper describes five patients to demonstrate the cerebral consequences of immobilisation allowing only passive movements, which implies a prolonged absence of actual motor commands. At the end of such immobilisation, PET imaging revealed reduced blood flow in specific motor areas, associated with temporary loss of efficient motor control. Effective motor control was regained after active flexion exercises which was reflected in normalised cerebral activations. This suggests that temporary, reversible cerebral dysfunction may affect the outcome of flexor tendon injuries.

US Food and Drug Administration /Conformit Europe- approved absorbable nerve conduits for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial nerves.

Several absorbable nerve conduits are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformit Europe (CE) for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial nerves . Surgeons are often not aware of the different(bio) materials of these conduits when performing nerve repair. An overview of these FDA- and CE-approved absorbable nerve conduits for clinical use is presented . PubMed, MEDLINE, and the companies selling the conduits were consulted . The available FDA and CE absorbable nerve conduits for peripheral and cranial nerve repair are 2 collagen- and 2 synthetic- polyester based conduits. The available clinical data, the price, the length, and the composition of the tube show significant differences. Based on the available data in this paper at this moment, we favor the PGA (Neurotube) nerve conduit for repair of peripheral and cranial nerve defects because of its advantages in length, price, and availability of clinical data. However, no prospective studies comparing the available nerve conduits have been published.

US Food and Drug Administration/Conformit Europe-approved absorbable nerve conduits for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial nerves.

Several absorbable nerve conduits are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformit Europe (CE) for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial nerves. Surgeons are often not aware of the different (bio)materials of these conduits when performing nerve repair. An overview of these FDA- and CE-approved absorbable nerve conduits for clinical use is presented. PubMed, MEDLINE, and the companies selling the conduits were consulted. The available FDA and CE absorbable nerve conduits for peripheral and cranial nerve repair are 2 collagen- and 2 synthetic-polyester-based conduits. The available clinical data, the price, the length, and the composition of the tube show significant differences. Based on the available data in this paper at this moment, we favor the PGA (Neurotube) nerve conduit for repair of peripheral and cranial nerve defects because of its advantages in length, price, and availability of clinical data. However, no prospective studies comparing the available nerve conduits have been published.

Comparison of assessment tools to score recovery of function after repair of traumatic lesions of the median nerve.

In this paper the recovery after repair of the median nerve has been used to compare different assessment tools for evaluation of peripheral nerve function: touch (moving 2-point discrimination (2PD); Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament, motor (Medical Research Council (MRC) scale), combined motor and sensory (Dellon modification of the Moberg pick up test; Moberg Recognition test), and pain (visual analogue scale; pinprick-test). The mean (SD) age of our 28 patients was 28 (12) years. The mean (SD) follow-up period was 5 years, 2 months (2 years, 8 months). On the operated side three patients (11%) had a moving 2PD of less than 4 mm. The results of the moving 2PD were compared with those of the SW monofilaments, but with a poor correlation. The MRC score correlated well with opposition movement of the thumb and muscle wasting (p<0.01). We recommend a number of tests to evaluate (the chronological return of) peripheral nerve function.

Impairment and employment issues after nerve repair in the hand and forearm.

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively subjective impairments, experienced disabilities, job and leisure restrictions and job changes in patients at least 2 years after repair of a peripheral nerve injury in the forearm, wrist or hand. METHODS: Between January 1,997 and January 2,000, 125 patients were treated surgically for a peripheral nerve injury in the hand and forearm at the Department of Plastic Surgery of a University Hospital. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Using a questionnaire the ability to return to work (RTW), the possible consequences on Activities of Daily Life (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Life (IADL), job, hobby and housekeeping related disabilities and subjective pain were assessed. RESULTS: Forty of the 61 included patients returned the questionnaire. As a result of the injury, seven patients (19%) were not able to return to their own job and eight patients (20%) needed to quit or change their hobbies. Mean Time Off Work (TOW) was significantly longer (p=0.024) in non-digital nerve lesions (21.4 weeks) as compared to digital nerve lesions (9.5 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: From this study it was concluded that digital nerve lesions have little consequence on the ability to return to work and the time off work. However, the patients' hobbies are significantly affected. At least 2 years after the injury, the effects on ADL and IADL are minor.

Clinical use of nerve conduits in peripheral-nerve repair: review of the literature.

The use of nerve conduits has evolved from a previous experimental idea to a clinical reality over the last ten years. An overview of the literature on the clinical use of nerve conduits in peripheral-nerve repair is presented.