Case Report: Comorbid Hyper-IgD Syndrome and Hidradenitis Suppurativa - A New Syndromic Form of HS? A Report of Two Cases.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a chronic suppurative disease of the pilosebaceous unit. The current model of HS pathophysiology describes the condition as the product of hyperkeratinisation and inflammation at the hair follicular unit. Environmental factors (such as smoking and obesity), gender, genetic predisposition, and skin dysbiosis are considered the main pathogenic drivers of the disease. Autoinflammatory syndromes associated with HS are rare but may help to highlight the potential roles of autoinflammation and dysregulated innate immune system in HS. Therefore, it is of major relevance to increase the awareness about these diseases in order to improve the understanding of the disease and to optimize the management of the patients. Herein, we report for the first time, to our knowledge, two clinical cases of Hyper-IgD syndrome-associated HS. Hyper-IgD is an autoinflammatory syndrome caused by a mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), a key kinase in the sterol and isoprenoid production pathway. We describe the potentially shared pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning comorbid MKD-HS and propose therapeutic options for the management of these patients.

Rapid Progression of Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma Following BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Booster Shot: A Case Report.

Since nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines strongly activate T follicular helper cells, it is important to explore the possible impact of approved SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines on neoplasms affecting this cell type. Herein, we report and discuss unexpected rapid progression of lymphomatous lesions after administration of a BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine booster in a man recently diagnosed with AITL.

CD3-CD4+ Lymphocytic Variant Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: Diagnostic Tools Revisited.

BACKGROUND: Identification of patients with lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) is challenging, and has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess diagnostic tools for L-HES and to develop evidence-based diagnostic recommendations. METHODS: Biomarkers of T-cell-driven disease were compared between patients with L-HES versus idiopathic HES (I-HES) variants. Those performed routinely (serum immunoglobulin levels, T-cell phenotyping, T-cell receptor [TCR] gene rearrangement patterns) were collected from medical files, whereas others were prospectively assessed on stored blood samples (serum CCL17/thymus and activation regulated chemokine [TARC] levels, in vitro cytokine production). RESULTS: This study included 48 patients with I-HES and 20 with L-HES associated with a CD3-CD4+ T-cell subset, including 7 with less than 5% aberrant cells. Neither increased serum immunoglobulin levels nor clonal TCR gene rearrangements were sufficiently sensitive or specific for L-HES. In contrast, systematically enhanced expression of the T-cell surface antigens CD2, CD5, CD45RO, and CD95 by these cells allowed for accurate detection by flow cytometry. Serum CCL17/TARC levels were significantly higher in patients with L-HES compared with those with I-HES, and a threshold of 3000 pg/mL allowed for detection of all subjects with L-HES with 75% specificity. Quantification of intracytoplasmic cytokine production by flow cytometry is the most reliable method for detection of enhanced type 2 cytokine expression, most notably for IL-4 and IL-13. CONCLUSION: Adapting the standard of procedure for T-cell phenotyping in patients with unexplained hypereosinophilia is currently the most reliable means of identifying those with CD3-CD4+ L-HES.

Eosinophilia Associated With CD3-CD4+ T Cells: Characterization and Outcome of a Single-Center Cohort of 26 Patients.

Background: Lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome is characterized by marked over-production of eosinophilopoietic factor(s) by dysregulated T cells leading to eosinophil expansion. In most cases, these T cells are clonal and express a CD3-CD4+ phenotype. As this is a rare disorder, presenting manifestations, disease course, treatment responses, and outcome are not well-characterized. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study, we reviewed medical files of all patients with persistent hypereosinophilia seen between 1994 and 2019 in whom CD3-CD4+ T cells were detected. Data collection included clinical and biological findings at presentation, treatment responses, disease course, and serial CD3-CD4+ T cell counts. Results: Our cohort comprises 26 patients, including 2 with hypereosinophilia of undetermined significance. All 24 symptomatic patients had cutaneous lesions and/or angioedema, and fasciitis was present in several cases. The aberrant T cell subset represented 2% or less total lymphocytes in 11 subjects. TCR gene rearrangement patterns on whole blood were polyclonal in these cases, while they all had serum CCL17/TARC levels above 1,500 pg/ml. Disease manifestations were mild and did not require maintenance therapy in roughly one third of the cohort, while two thirds required long-term oral corticosteroids and/or second-line agents. Among these, interferon-alpha was the most effective treatment option with a response observed in 8/8 patients, one of whom was cured of disease. Treatment had to be interrupted in most cases however due to poor tolerance and/or development of secondary resistance. Anti-interleukin-5 antibodies reduced blood eosinophilia in 5/5 patients, but clinical responses were disappointing. A sub-group of 5 patients had severe treatment-refractory disease, and experienced significant disease- and treatment-related morbidity and mortality, including progression to T cell lymphoma in three. Conclusions: This retrospective longitudinal analysis of the largest monocentric cohort of CD3-CD4+ T cell associated lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome published so far provides clinicians confronted with this rare disorder with relevant new data on patient presentation and outcome that should help tailor therapy and follow-up to different levels of disease severity. It highlights the need for novel therapeutic options, especially for the subset of patients with severe treatment-refractory disease. Future research efforts should be made toward understanding CD3-CD4+ T cell biology in order to develop new treatments that target primary pathogenic mechanisms.

Methylprednisolone-Induced Lymphocytosis in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Transient acute reversible lymphopenia occurring within hours after glucocorticoid administration is a well-known phenomenon. The objective of this study was to establish the impact of chronic methylprednisolone (mPDN) administration on lymphocyte counts in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. METHODS: The charts of 44 women and 17 men (median age, 59 years) with several immune-mediated inflammatory disorders receiving oral mPDN for at least 4 months were reviewed. Morning lymphocyte counts measured during treatment (LP) were compared with pretreatment values (LA). In addition, the acute effect of mPDN on lymphocyte counts was evaluated in 43 of these patients by quantifying lymphocyte subpopulations before and 8 hours after mPDN administration. Values are expressed as median with 25%-75% interquartile range. RESULTS: The initial daily oral mPDN dose was 28 mg (12-32 mg). An increase in morning lymphocyte counts was detected 13 days (8.5-16 days) after initiation of mPDN treatment (LP: 2130/µL vs LA: 1650/µL; P = .0121) and persisted over time. Morning lymphocytosis (LP ≥4000/µL) was observed in 15 patients, including 7 with hyperlymphocytosis (LP ≥5000/µL). The increase in morning lymphocyte counts during treatment was most marked for CD4 T cells. In the subset of patients who agreed to a second blood test after mPDN absorption, a 49% decrease in the lymphocyte count (P <.0001) was transiently observed at the 8-hour time point. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase of the morning lymphocyte count is frequently observed in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders chronically treated with oral mPDN. Heightened awareness that the timing of blood sampling in corticosteroid-treated patients affects lymphocyte counts, with possible hyperlymphocytosis before absorption, should help avoid unnecessary investigations and worry.

Positron emission tomography scanning in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitis.

Tools for evaluation of disease activity in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) include scoring clinical manifestations, determination of biochemical parameters of inflammation, and obtaining tissue biopsies. These tools, however, are sometimes inconclusive. 2-deoxy-2-[F]-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scans are commonly used to detect inflammatory or malignant lesions. Our objective is to explore the ability of PET scanning to assess the extent of disease activity in patients with AAV.Consecutive PET scans made between December 2006 and March 2014 in Maastricht (MUMC) and between July 2008 and June 2013 in Brussels (EUH) to assess disease activity in patients with AAV were retrospectively included. Scans were re-examined and quantitatively scored using maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax). PET findings were compared with C-reactive protein (CRP) and ANCA positivity at the time of scanning.Forty-four scans were performed in 33 patients during a period of suspected active disease. All but 2 scans showed PET-positive sites, most commonly the nasopharynx (n = 22) and the lung (n = 22). Forty-one clinically occult lesions were found, including the thyroid gland (n = 4 patients), aorta (n = 8), and bone marrow (n = 7). The amount of hotspots, but not the highest observed SUVmax value, was higher if CRP levels were elevated. Seventeen follow-up scans were made in 13 patients and showed decreased SUVmax values.FDG PET scans in AAV patients with active disease show positive findings in multiple sites of the body even when biochemical parameters are inconclusive, including sites clinically unsuspected and difficult to assess otherwise.

Clinical management of the hypereosinophilic syndromes.

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HESs) are rare disorders characterized by marked hypereosinophilia that is directly responsible for organ damage or dysfunction. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been discovered in patient subgroups leading to the characterization of myeloproliferative and lymphocytic disease variants. In the updated terminology, idiopathic HES is now restricted to patients with HES of undetermined etiology. The practical clinical approach of patients with the different HES variants is reviewed herein, focusing on specific diagnostic tools and therapeutic options. Corticosteroids, hydroxyurea and IFN-α remain the classical agents for treatment of most patients with HESs. The specific role of therapeutic compounds that have become available more recently, namely, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and IL-5 antagonists, is discussed.

Mepolizumab as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Mepolizumab, a monoclonal anti-IL-5 antibody, is an effective corticosteroid-sparing agent for patients with Fip1-like 1/platelet-derived growth factor receptor α fusion (F/P)-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) is characterized by marked overproduction of IL-5 by dysregulated T cells. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with L-HES respond to mepolizumab in terms of corticosteroid tapering and eosinophil depletion to the same extent as corticosteroid-responsive F/P-negative patients with HES and a normal T-cell profile. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the mepolizumab trial were evaluated for L-HES on the basis of T-cell phenotyping and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement patterns, and their serum thymus-and-activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels were measured. Response to treatment was compared in patient subgroups based on results of these analyses. RESULTS: Lymphocytic variant HES was diagnosed in 13 of 63 patients with HES with complete T-cell assessments. The ability to taper corticosteroids on mepolizumab was similar in patients with L-HES and those with a normal T-cell profile, although a lower proportion of patients with L-HES maintained eosinophil levels below 600/µL. Increased serum TARC levels (>1000 pg/mL) had no significant impact on the ability to reduce corticosteroid doses, but a lower proportion of patients with elevated TARC achieved eosinophil control on mepolizumab. CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab is an effective corticosteroid-sparing agent for patients with L-HES. In some cases however, eosinophil levels remain above 600/µL, suggesting incomplete neutralization of overproduced IL-5 or involvement of other eosinophilopoietic factors.

Optic neuropathy, renal failure and pulmonary sarcoidosis in a 50-year-old man: where is the link?

Eye disorders are frequently associated with renal diseases, mostly linked to underlying causes such as hypertension, diabetes or autoimmune diseases. Conversely, advanced uraemic states may also lead to progressive vision impairment. The present report concerns a 50-year-old patient who presented with a bilateral, painless, progressive vision loss, a moderate systemic inflammation and chronic renal failure due to hypertension nephrosclerosis. Steroids were given and haemodialysis was initiated, resulting in vision improvement. At 4 months later when the steroids were stopped, the patient developed dyspnoea, cough, fever and fatigue of unclear origin. A lung biopsy showed non-caseating granuloma consistent with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Re-challenge with steroids rapidly improved the respiratory disease. Ophthalmological examinations performed early and later in the course excluded anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and ocular manifestations of sarcoidosis, leading to a diagnosis of uraemic optic neuropathy. This rare ophthalmological disorder should be promptly recognised since haemodialysis and steroid therapy are highly effective.

Lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndromes.

A large body of evidence establishing the existence of an underlying T-cell disorder in a subset of patients fulfilling hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) diagnostic criteria has accumulated over the past decade, resulting in the definition of a novel HES variant termed "lymphocytic" HES. Although end-organ complications of hypereosinophilia are generally benign, with predominant cutaneous manifestations, long-term prognosis is overshadowed by an increased risk of developing T-cell lymphoma, as a result of malignant transformation of aberrant T cells years after HES diagnosis. Therapeutic strategies should target pathogenic T cells in addition to eosinophils, but the practical implications remain largely unexplored.

Hypereosinophilic syndromes.

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) constitute a rare and heterogeneous group of disorders, defined as persistent and marked blood eosinophilia (> 1.5 x 10(9)/L for more than six consecutive months) associated with evidence of eosinophil-induced organ damage, where other causes of hypereosinophilia such as allergic, parasitic, and malignant disorders have been excluded. Prevalence is unknown. HES occur most frequently in young to middle-aged patients, but may concern any age group. Male predominance (4-9:1 ratio) has been reported in historic series but this is likely to reflect the quasi-exclusive male distribution of a sporadic hematopoietic stem cell mutation found in a recently characterized disease variant. Target-organ damage mediated by eosinophils is highly variable among patients, with involvement of skin, heart, lungs, and central and peripheral nervous systems in more than 50% of cases. Other frequently observed complications include hepato- and/or splenomegaly, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and coagulation disorders. Recent advances in underlying pathogenesis have established that hypereosinophilia may be due either to primitive involvement of myeloid cells, essentially due to occurrence of an interstitial chromosomal deletion on 4q12 leading to creation of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene (F/P+ variant), or to increased interleukin (IL)-5 production by a clonally expanded T cell population (lymphocytic variant), most frequently characterized by a CD3-CD4+ phenotype. Diagnosis of HES relies on observation of persistent and marked hypereosinophilia responsible for target-organ damage, and exclusion of underlying causes of hypereosinophilia, including allergic and parasitic disorders, solid and hematological malignancies, Churg-Strauss disease, and HTLV infection. Once these criteria are fulfilled, further testing for eventual pathogenic classification is warranted using appropriate cytogenetic and functional approaches. Therapeutic management should be adjusted to disease severity and eventual detection of pathogenic variants. For F/P+ patients, imatinib has undisputedly become first line therapy. For others, corticosteroids are generally administered initially, followed by agents such as hydroxycarbamide, interferon-alpha, and imatinib, for corticosteroid-resistant cases, as well as for corticosteroid-sparing purposes. Recent data suggest that mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 antibody, is an effective corticosteroid-sparing agent for F/P-negative patients. Prognosis has improved significantly since definition of HES, and currently depends on development of irreversible heart failure, as well as eventual malignant transformation of myeloid or lymphoid cells.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome: lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative variants.

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome is a largely heterogeneous disorder defined as persistent, marked hypereosinophilia of unknown origin complicated by end-organ damage. Recent research in cellular and molecular biology has led to the characterization of distinct underlying hematological disorders, primitively involving cells of the myeloid or lymphoid lineage. The ability to classify many hypereosinophilic syndrome patients on the basis of pathogenesis of hypereosinophilia has radically changed therapeutic perspectives. Indeed, imatinib mesylate has become first-line therapy for patients in whom the FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha fusion gene is detected, whereas corticosteroids remain the mainstay for management of patients in whom hypereosinophilia is secondary to the overproduction of interleukin 5 by abnormal T-cells. Use of monoclonal anti-interleukin-5 antibodies in the latter group of patients has a strong rationale and could decrease cumulative corticosteroid doses and toxicity. As far as prognosis of these disease variants is concerned, hypereosinophilic syndrome patients with the FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha fusion gene may develop acute myelogenous (eosinophilic) leukemia, whereas those with clonal interleukin-5-producing T-cells have an increased risk of developing T-cell lymphoma. It is currently unclear whether timely therapeutic intervention in such patients could interfere with long-term progression toward malignant hematological disorders.

The hypereosinophilic syndrome revisited.

Clinical and biological features of patients with the idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) are heterogeneous. Recent evidence suggests at least two distinct underlying hematological disorders involving myeloid and lymphoid cells, respectively. We therefore suggest that the term idiopathic should be abandoned in the classification of HES. This review defines the "myeloproliferative" and "lymphocytic" variants of the HES and addresses the management of each variant, focusing on diagnosis and treatment of the newly identified lymphocytic variant.

High serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine levels in the lymphocytic variant of the hypereosinophilic syndrome.

The idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome is associated with expansion of an IL-5-producing T-cell subset in a subgroup of patients. Identification of such patients is critical to adequate management because there is some evidence that they present an increased risk for development of T-cell lymphoma. Although the T(H)2-like cells often bear an aberrant surface phenotype and can readily be detected with flow cytometry, we now show that lymphocyte phenotyping might be normal in some cases. In contrast, serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine levels are consistently increased in such patients compared with others with persistent idiopathic hyper-eosinophilia and could therefore represent a useful diagnostic tool.