Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
1.
Urology ; 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754790

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare early urethroplasty outcomes in non-obese, obese and morbidly obese patients undergoing urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease. The impact of obesity on outcomes is poorly understood but will be increasingly important as obesity continues to rise. METHODS: Patients underwent urethroplasty at one of the 5 institutions between January 2016 and December 2020. Obese (BMI 30-39.9, n = 72) and morbidly obese (BMI >40, n = 49) patients were compared to normal weight (BMI <25, n = 29) and overweight (BMI 25-29.9, n = 51) patients. Demographics, comorbidities, and stricture characteristics were collected. Outcomes including complications, recurrence, and secondary interventions were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and one patients (Mean BMI 34.1, Range 18.4-65.2) with mean age 52.2 years (SD=17.2) were analyzed. Median follow-up time was 3.71 months. Obese patients were younger (P = .008), had more anterior (P <.001), iatrogenic and LS-associated strictures (P = .036). Sixty-day complication rate was 26.3% with no differences between cohorts (P = .788). Around 9.5% of patients had extravasation at catheter removal, 18.9% reported stricture recurrence, and 7.4% required additional interventions. Obese patients had greater estimated blood loss (P = .001) and length of stay (P = .001). On multivariate analysis, smoking associated with contrast leak (OR 7.176, 95% CI 1.13-45.5) but not recurrence or need for intervention (P = .155, .927). CONCLUSION: Obese patients in our cohort had more anterior, iatrogenic, and LS-related strictures. However, obesity is not associated with complications, contrast leak, secondary interventions, or recurrence. Obese had higher blood loss and length of stay. Urethroplasty is safe and effective in obese patients.

2.
Eur Urol ; 86(1): 61-68, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212178

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The transrectal biopsy approach is traditionally used to detect prostate cancer. An alternative transperineal approach is historically performed under general anesthesia, but recent advances enable transperineal biopsy to be performed under local anesthesia. We sought to compare infectious complications of transperineal biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis versus transrectal biopsy with targeted prophylaxis. METHODS: We assigned biopsy-naïve participants to undergo transperineal biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis versus transrectal biopsy with targeted prophylaxis (rectal culture screening for fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria and antibiotic targeting to culture and sensitivity results) through a multicenter, randomized trial. The primary outcome was post-biopsy infection captured by a prospective medical review and patient report on a 7-d survey. The secondary outcomes included cancer detection, noninfectious complications, and a numerical rating scale (0-10) for biopsy-related pain and discomfort during and 7-d after biopsy. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 658 participants were randomized, with zero transperineal versus four (1.4%) transrectal biopsy infections (difference -1.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.2%, 0.3%; p = 0.059). The rates of other complications were very low and similar. Importantly, detection of clinically significant cancer was similar (53% transperineal vs 50% transrectal, adjusted difference 2.0%; 95% CI -6.0, 10). Participants in the transperineal arm experienced worse periprocedural pain (0.6 adjusted difference [0-10 scale], 95% CI 0.2, 0.9), but the effect was small and resolved by 7-d. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Office-based transperineal biopsy is tolerable, does not compromise cancer detection, and did not result in infectious complications. Transrectal biopsy with targeted prophylaxis achieved similar infection rates, but requires rectal cultures and careful attention to antibiotic selection and administration. Consideration of these factors and antibiotic stewardship should guide clinical decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this multicenter randomized trial, we compare prostate biopsy infectious complications for the transperineal versus transrectal approach. The absence of infectious complications with transperineal biopsy without the use of preventative antibiotics is noteworthy, but not significantly different from transrectal biopsy with targeted antibiotic prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Períneo , Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Reto , Humanos , Masculino , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reto/microbiologia , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
J Urol ; 210(6): 865-873, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37651378

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients may remain catheterized after artificial urinary sphincter surgery to prevent urinary retention, despite a lack of evidence to support this practice. Our study aims to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient, catheter-free continence surgery using a multi-institutional database. We hypothesize that between catheterized controls and patients without a catheter, there would be no difference in the rate of urinary retention or postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing first-time artificial urinary sphincter placement from 2009-2021. Patients were stratified by postoperative catheter status into either no-catheter (leaving the procedure without a catheter) or catheter (postoperative indwelling catheter for ∼24 hours). The primary outcome, urinary retention, was defined as catheterization due to subjective voiding difficulty or documented postvoid residual over 250 mL. RESULTS: Our study identified 302 catheter and 123 no-catheter patients. Twenty (6.6%) catheter and 9 (7.3%) no-catheter patients developed urinary retention (P = .8). On multivariable analysis, controlling for age, cuff size, radiation history and surgeon, there was no statistically significant association between omitting a catheter and urinary retention (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.13-1.58; P = .2). Furthermore, at 30 months follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that device survival was 70% (95% CI: 62%-76%) vs 69% (95% CI: 48%-82%) for the catheter and no-catheter group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our multi-institutional cohort, overall retention rates were low (7%) in groups with a catheter and without. Obviating postoperative catheterization facilitates outpatient incontinence surgery without altering reoperation over medium-term follow-up.


Assuntos
Incontinência Urinária , Retenção Urinária , Humanos , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Micção , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
4.
Urol Pract ; 10(1): 67-72, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37103442

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We examined contemporary patterns in treatment of male stress urinary incontinence and identified predictors of undergoing specific surgical procedures. METHODS: Utilizing the AUA Quality Registry, we identified men with stress urinary incontinence utilizing International Classification of Disease codes and related procedures for stress urinary incontinence performed from 2014 to 2020 utilizing Current Procedural Terminology codes. Characteristics of the patient, surgeon, and practice were included in a multivariate analysis of predictors of management type. RESULTS: We identified 139,034 men with stress urinary incontinence in the AUA Quality Registry, of whom only 3.2% underwent surgical intervention during the study period. Artificial urinary sphincter was the most common procedure with 4,287/7,706 (56%) performed, followed by urethral sling with 2,368/7,706 (31%), and lastly urethral bulking with 1,040/7,706 (13%). There was no significant change by year in volume of each procedure performed during the study period. A large proportion of urethral bulking was performed by a disproportionately small number of practices; 5 high-volume practices performed 54% of the total urethral bulking over the study period. Open surgical procedure was more likely in patients with prior radical prostatectomy, urethroplasty, or care at an academic enter. Urethral bulking was more likely in patients with a history of bladder cancer or care by a surgeon of increasing age or female gender. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of artificial urinary sphincter and urethral sling now exceeds utilization of urethral bulking for male stress urinary incontinence, though some practices continue to perform a disproportionate volume of bulking. Using data from the AUA Quality Registry, we can identify areas for quality improvement to facilitate guideline-adherent care.


Assuntos
Cirurgiões , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Próstata
5.
Urology ; 176: 243-245, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36894030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mid-to-proximal ureteral strictures pose a surgical challenge that historically required ileal ureter substitution, downward nephropexy, or renal autotransplantation. Ureteral reconstruction techniques involving buccal mucosa or appendix have gained traction with success rates approaching 90%. OBJECTIVES: In this video we describe surgical technique for a robotic-assisted augmented roof ureteroplasty using an appendiceal onlay flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our patient is a 45-year-old male with recurrent impacted ureteral stones requiring multiple right-sided interventions including ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, ureteral dilation, and laser incision of ureteral stricture. Despite adequate treatment of his stone disease, he had deterioration of his renal split function with worsening right hydroureteronephrosis to the level of the mid-to-proximal ureter consistent with failed endoscopic management of his stricture. We proceeded with simultaneous endoscopic evaluation and robotic repair with plan for either ureteroureterostomy or augmented roof ureteroplasty using buccal mucosa or an appendiceal flap. RESULTS: Reteroscopy and retrograde pyelogram revealed a 2-3 cm near-obliterative stricture in the mid-to-proximal ureter. The ureteroscope was left in situ and the patient was placed in the modified flank position to allow concurrent endoscopic access during reconstruction. The right colon was reflected revealing significant scar tissue overlying the ureter. With the ureteroscope in situ, we utilized firefly imaging to aid in our dissection. The ureter was spatulated and mucosa of the diseased segment of ureter excised in a nontransecting manner. The mucosal edges of the posterior ureter were re-approximated with the ureteral backing left in place. Intraoperatively, we identified a healthy, robust appearing appendix and thus planned for an appendiceal onlay flap. If an atretic or diseased appendix was encountered, a buccal mucosa graft with omental wrap would be utilized. The appendix was harvested on its mesentery, spatulated, and interposed in a pro-peristaltic fashion. A tension-free anastomosis was performed between ureteral mucosa and the open appendix flap. A double-J stent was placed under direct vision and Indocyanine Green (ICG) green was used to evaluate blood supply to the margins of the ureter and the appendix flap. The stent was removed 6 weeks postoperatively, and on 3-month follow-up imaging he had resolution of his right hydroureteronephrosis and has had no further episodes of stone formation, infections, or flank pain with 8-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Augmented roof ureteroplasty with appendiceal onlay is a valuable tool in the urologists arsenal of reconstructive techniques. Use of intraoperative ureteroscopy with firefly imaging can aid in delineating anatomy during difficult ureteral dissections.


Assuntos
Apêndice , Hidronefrose , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ureter/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia
6.
Urology ; 170: 209-215, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055419

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe rates of urology consultation following renal trauma and assess subsequent impact on imaging and intervention. Renal trauma may be initially managed by either trauma or urologic surgeons alone or collaboratively. Differences in management between the specialties are not well studied. METHODS: We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective review of patients at a Level I trauma center sustaining renal trauma between 2014 and 2021. Demographic, injury, radiologic, and intervention variables were extracted. Frequencies and medians were compared using chi-squared and Fischer's exact tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Analyses were performed using STATA with P <.05 considered significant. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2021, 118 patients with median age 29 (IQR 22-41) sustained renal trauma. Urology was consulted in 18 (15.3%) cases. Demographic and injury characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. AAST renal injury grade was transcribed in the initial radiologic reports for 49 (41.5%) of patients. Those in the urology consult group were more likely to receive delayed contrast imaging during their admission (50.0% vs 17.0%, P <.01). Among those with high-grade injuries, those with urology consult were less likely to undergo nephrectomy (36.4% vs 78.8%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: We observed differences in imaging patterns between renal trauma patients who are managed primarily by trauma surgery versus urology. However, the impact of these differences in imaging remains to be elucidated. Among patients with high-grade renal trauma, urology consult was associated with decreased rate of nephrectomy, emphasizing the feasibility of renal salvage in a multidisciplinary trauma setting.


Assuntos
Urologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Adulto , Rim/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento
7.
Urology ; 168: 227-233, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35618138

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine opioid use following Urological trauma. Increased opioid use is associated with inferior outcomes and risk of dependence, particularly in vulnerable populations. In contrast, multimodal analgesia following trauma allows decreased pain and readmission. Currently there is a paucity of data describing opioid usage following urological trauma. The purpose of this study was to assess utilization of opioids and multimodal pain regimens following urologic trauma. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 116 patients hospitalized following urologic trauma from 2016-2021. Inpatient and discharge utilization of opioids, multimodal analgesia and length of stay were stratified by affected organ. Analyses were performed in STATA with p<0.05 reaching significance. RESULTS: 116 patients were assessed; 84 (72.4%) required surgery. In the first 10 days, bladder injuries incurred higher mean and median OMEQ than other urological injuries. In nearly all groups, OMEQ prescribed at discharge is less than average inpatient OMEQ. Eighty-six (74.1%) patients received at least 2 different opioid medications while inpatient. Those with a history of opioid use received a significantly higher OMEQ dose per day (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between opioid prescribing patterns or average OMEQ dosages prescribed at discharge between those patients managed either surgically or non-operatively. Only 24 (20.7%) patients met the criteria for utilization of multimodal analgesia. CONCLUSION: Multimodal analgesia is severely underutilized following urological trauma. Combined with the development of opioid tolerance over long hospital stays, this creates an avenue for opioid misuse following discharge and provides an opportunity for improvement.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Tolerância a Medicamentos
8.
J Patient Saf ; 18(2): e401-e406, 2022 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35188929

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The California Department of Public Health investigates compliance with hospital licensure and issues an administrative penalty when there is an immediate jeopardy. Immediate jeopardies are situations in which a hospital's noncompliance of licensure requirements causes serious injury or death to patient. In this study, we critically examine immediate jeopardies between 2007 and 2017 in California. METHODS: All immediate jeopardies reported between 2007 and 2017 were abstracted for hospital, location, date, details of noncompliance, and patient's health outcome. RESULTS: Of 385 unique immediate jeopardies, 141 (36.6%) caused mortality, 120 (31.2%) caused morbidity, 96 (24.9%) led to a second surgery, 9 (2.3%) caused emotional trauma without physical trauma, and 19 (4.9%) were caught before patients were harmed. Immediate jeopardy categories included the following: surgical (34.2%), medication (18.9%), monitoring (14.2%), falls (7.8%), equipment (5.4%), procedural (5.4%), resuscitation (4.4%), suicide (3.9%), MD/RN miscommunication (3.4%), and abuse (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance to hospital licensure causes significant morbidity and mortality. Statewide hospital licensure policies should focus on enacting standardized reporting requirements of immediate jeopardies into an Internet-based form that public health officials can regularly analyze to improve hospital safety.


Assuntos
Hospitais , Licenciamento Hospitalar , California/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Morbidade
9.
J Urol ; 207(6): 1268-1275, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35050698

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In order to accurately characterize how a history of radiation therapy affects the lifespan of replacement artificial urinary sphincters (AUSs), all possible sources of device failure must be considered. We assessed the competing risks of device failure based on radiation history in men with replacement AUSs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified men who had a replacement AUS in a single institutional, retrospective database. To assess survival from all-cause device failure based on radiation history and other factors, we conducted Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional-hazards and competing risks analyses. RESULTS: Among 247 men who had a first replacement AUS, men with a history of radiation had shorter time to all-cause device failure (median 1.4 vs 3.5 years for men with radiation vs without radiation history, p=0.02). On multivariable Cox-proportional hazards analysis, previous radiation was associated with increased risk of all-cause device failure (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.30-3.43, p=0.002). On multivariable cause-specific hazards analysis, prior radiation was associated with a higher risk of erosion/infection (HR: 7.57, 95% CI: 2.27-25.2, p <0.001), but was not associated with risk of urethral atrophy (p=0.5) or mechanical failure (p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Among men with a replacement AUS, a history of pelvic radiation was associated with shorter time to device failure of any cause. Radiation was also specifically associated with a sevenfold increase in the risk of erosion or infection of replacement AUS, but not with urethral atrophy or mechanical failure. Patients with a replacement AUS should be appropriately counseled on how radiation history may impact outcomes of future revisions.


Assuntos
Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Atrofia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Falha de Prótese , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reimplante/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/efeitos adversos
10.
Urology ; 164: 211-217, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063462

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To quantify benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patient preferences to promote guidelines-compliant, patient-centered care. Discordance between patient and urologist priorities for the treatment of BPH hinders patient-centered care. Physician assumptions regarding patient preferences lead to dissatisfied patients; a poor outcome in any quality of life surgery. American Urologic Association guidelines urge urologists to consider patient preferences when recommending a BPH treatment. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, online survey study using researchmatch.org, participants were required to decide between theoretical BPH treatments in a balanced, choice-based conjoint analysis. The treatments had varying levels of four attributes: efficacy, recovery difficulty, risk of complications (Clavien-Dindo 2+), and risk of de novo ejaculatory dysfunction. Demographic information and International Prostate Symptom Score were collected and analyzed using comparative statistics. Each attribute was analyzed using a conditional logit model, and attribute importance (range in utility between attribute-levels) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 1235 recruited participants, 812 (66%) completed the study. Median International Prostate Symptom Score and age was 6 (IQR 3-12) and 56 (IQR 38-67), respectively. Complication risk was the most important attribute, followed by efficacy, recovery difficulty, and risk of ejaculatory dysfunction. In a subgroup analysis of age quartiles, participants age <38 and >67 held efficacy (31%) and complication risk (47%) to the highest relative importance, respectively. CONCLUSION: Males valued BPH treatments that minimize complication risks, while ejaculatory dysfunction was least impactful. Variation in results between age subgroups emphasizes the need for individualized care to maximize patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Masculino , Preferência do Paciente , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Urology ; 161: 19-24, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34929239

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the pain requirements of urologic patients in the post-operative outpatient setting. Healthcare providers are one of the leading contributors to the current opioid epidemic. Understanding opioid prescribing practices and patients' narcotic requirements while not over-prescribing opioids is a public health priority. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study to examine opioid consumption among adult patients who presented for outpatient urologic surgery at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and Zuckerberg San Francisco General (ZSFG) hospitals. We administered a Pre-Operative Pain Requirement Assessment Tool (POPRAT) electronically via text message 3 days prior to surgery to identify objective factors that may predict post-operative pain and opioid requirements. Patients were followed for 7 days post-operatively, in a similar fashion, to assess daily pain, and opioid use. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four participants were eligible for the study and 211 completed the study. Urology patients undergoing outpatient elective procedures used a mean of 5 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (SD = 14.9) in a 7-day period. Women and patients less than 45 years of age had the highest opioid use. Based on the POPRAT, major predictors of post-operative pain were pre-operative anxiety (0.34 estimate, P value <.001) and anticipated pain (0.34 estimate, P value <.001). Anticipated opioid use, however, did not predict actual opioid use. CONCLUSION: Urologic outpatient surgeries require minimal opioids for pain management. The POPRAT may help identify which patients may experience more pain after surgery. Certain factors such as age and gender may need to be considered when prescribing opioids.


Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Urologia , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Prospectivos
12.
Urology ; 160: 227, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34780843

RESUMO

Hemangiomas are benign proliferations of blood vessels, and urethral hemangiomas are extremely rare presentations of this condition. As the condition is quite rare, there is very little literature about best management strategies. The best resources for determining management are case reports which focus on treatment via transurethral ablation or endoscopic resection. However, there is no guidance on management of urethral hemangiomas which are refractory to these minimally invasive methods. Herein, we summarize the literature for urethral hemangioma management, present the case of a male presenting with refractory hematuria due to a hemangioma in the penile urethra, and describe the operative technique for the open excision and reconstruction of this hemangioma.


Assuntos
Hemangioma , Neoplasias Uretrais , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemangioma/complicações , Hemangioma/diagnóstico , Hemangioma/cirurgia , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Uretra/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uretrais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uretrais/cirurgia
13.
Urology ; 157: 253-256, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343563

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of immediate artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) reactivation in patients after urethral cuff replacement. It is common practice to delay reactivation of an AUS for four to six weeks following surgery to replace a failed urethral cuff. This is due to concerns about local tissue edema risking obstruction and concerns for urethral erosion. Despite these concerns, there are no published data to support this practice. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of single surgeon procedures performed from 2005-2020. Patients with urethral cuff replacement for recurrent stress incontinence due to compression or mechanical failure were included. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were identified who had immediate reactivation of the AUS following urethral cuff exchange. Thirty of these patients (88.2%) had radical prostatectomy and five patients also underwent further radiation therapy (14.7%). At 6 months follow-up, there was no reported events of erosion. Likewise, 32/34 (94%) of patients had no complications and reported expected urinary function of the AUS. Urinary retention was not observed. One patient required further re-exploration for a complication within his AUS system (2.9%), and another was ultimately unsatisfied with their unchanged baseline continence despite a fully functioning AUS (2.9%). CONCLUSION: In this series, we observe that immediate reactivation of the AUS after urethral cuff exchange is a safe and reasonable management approach. Limitations of this analysis include a single institution, retrospective study. However, early AUS reactivation after device revision has not been reported in the literature and warrants further investigation given the impact on patient quality of life.


Assuntos
Falha de Prótese , Uretra/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Cancer Med ; 10(13): 4564-4574, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34102000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients incur high care costs; however, there is a paucity of literature characterizing unmet financial obligations for patients with urologic cancers. Kidney cancer patients are particularly burdened by costs associated with novel systemic treatments. This study aimed to ascertain the characteristics of GoFundMe® crowdfunding campaigns for patients with kidney cancer, in order to better understand the financial needs of this population. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, quantitative, and qualitative analysis of all kidney cancer GoFundMe® campaigns since 2010. Fundraising metrics such as goal funds and amount raised, were extracted. Eight independent investigators collected patient, disease and campaign-level variables from campaign stories (κ = 0.72). In addition, we performed a content analysis of campaign narratives spotlighting the primary appeal of the patient's life story. RESULTS: A total of 486 GoFundMe® kidney cancer campaigns were reviewed. The median goal funds were 10,000USD [IQR = 5000, 20,000] and the median amount raised was 1450USD [IQR = 578, 4050]. Most campaigns were for adult males (53%) and 62% of adults had children. A minority were for pediatric patients (17%). Thirty-seven percent of adult patients were primary wage earners and 43% reported losing their job or substantially reducing hours due to illness. Twenty-nine percent reported no insurance or insufficient coverage. Campaigns most frequently sought funds for medical bills (60%), nonmedical bills (27%), and medical travel (23%). Qualitative campaign narratives mostly emphasized patients' hardship (46.3%) or high moral character (35.2%). Only 8% of campaigns achieved their target funds. CONCLUSIONS: Despite fundraising efforts, patients with kidney cancer face persistent financial barriers, incurring both medical and nonmedical cost burdens. This may be compounded by limited or no insurance. Cancer care providers should be aware of financial constraints placed on kidney cancer patients, and consider how these may impact treatment regimens.


Assuntos
Obtenção de Fundos/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Renais/economia , Adulto , Criança , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Estudos Transversais , Crowdsourcing , Feminino , Estresse Financeiro , Obtenção de Fundos/economia , Obtenção de Fundos/organização & administração , Obtenção de Fundos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Narrativas Pessoais como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa
15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(5): e217058, 2021 05 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33938938

RESUMO

Importance: Despite widespread recognition and known harms, serious surgical errors, known as surgical never events, endure. The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has developed an oversight system to capture never events and a platform for process improvement that has not yet been critically appraised. Objectives: To examine surgical never events occurring in hospitals in California and summarize recommendations to prevent future events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study identified 386 CDPH hospital administrative penalty reports, of which 142 were ascribable to never events occurring during surgery. These never events were identified and summarized from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. A directed qualitative approach was used to analyze CDPH-mandated corrective steps to reduce future errors in this multicenter study of all accredited hospitals in California. Inclusion of surgical never event records was based on definitions established by the US Department of Health and Human Services National Quality Forum. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2019, to November 30, 2020. Exposures: Never events include death or disability of an American Society of Anesthesiologists class I patient, wrong site or wrong surgery, retained foreign objects, burns, equipment failure leading to intraoperative injury, nonapproved experimental procedures, insufficient surgeon presence or privileges, or fall from the operating room table. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident rates, consequences, and improvement plans to prevent additional never events were outcomes of interest. Results: A total of 142 never events were reported to the CDPH (1 per 200 000 operations). Annual surgical volume for hospitals with events was 9203 vs 3251 cases for hospitals without events (P < .001). A total of 94 of 142 events (66.2%) were retained foreign objects ranging from Kocher clamps to drain sponges. Wrong site or patient surgery accounted for 22 events (15.5%), surgical burns for 11 (7.7%), and other for 15 (10.6%). Other included insufficient surgeon presence, equipment failure, or falls in the operating room. Improvement plans included 18 unique categories of recommendations from regulators, many focusing on proper use of checklists. Regulators mandated a mean (SD) of 13 (7) corrective actions in the improvement plans. Policy adherence monitoring (119 [90.2%]), revision of existing policy (84 [63.6%]), and education regarding policy (83 [62.9%]) were common action items, whereas disciplinary action toward staff was rare (11 [8.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Surgical never events are a rare issue in California. Numerous strategies have evolved to reduce errors, many involving the thorough and proper use of intraoperative checklists.


Assuntos
Hospitais/normas , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , California , Lista de Checagem , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Administração Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade
16.
J Urol ; 206(2): 427-433, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33780282

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We explored the patterns and distribution of National Institutes of Health grant funding for urological research in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Institutes of Health RePORTER database was queried for all grants awarded to urology departments between 2010 and 2019. Information regarding the value of the grant, funded institution, successful publication of the research, and the category of urological subspecialty were collected. Data on principal investigators were extracted from publicly available information. RESULTS: There were 509 grants awarded to Urology between 2010 and 2019 for a total value of $640,873,867, and a median per-project value of $675,484 (IQR 344,170-1,369,385). Over the study period, total funding decreased by 15.6% and was lower compared to other surgical subspecialties. Most grants were awarded by the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (85%) to Western or North Central institutions (52.5%), and had principal investigators specialized in urologic oncology (56.4%), followed by general urologists (21.5%). Female principal investigators led 21.6% of Urology grants and were more likely PhD basic scientists than males (64.4% vs 38.2%, p=0.001). In total, 10,404 publications linked to the 509 grants were produced, of which 28.5% were published in journals with an impact factor ≥10. CONCLUSIONS: Urology is underrepresented in National Institutes of Health grant funding compared to other surgical fields. During the past decade there was a further decrease in the total budget of National Institutes of Health grants to Urology.


Assuntos
Financiamento Governamental/tendências , Departamentos Hospitalares , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/tendências , Urologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Financiamento Governamental/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Patentes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Editoração/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos
17.
Urology ; 146: 265-270, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32777368

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of contemporary practice variation for the treatment of urethral stricture disease (USD) given repeated endoscopic management yields poor long-term success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The AUA Quality (AQUA) Registry collects data from participating urologists across practice settings by direct interface with local electronic health record systems. We identified procedures used for USD using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-9/-10) codes. We assessed the association between patient and provider factors and repeated endoscopic treatment using generalized linear models. Provider details were derived from AUA Census. RESULTS: We identified 20,640 male patients with USD treated surgically in AQUA from 2014-2018. The patients were cared for by 1343 providers at 171 practices, 95% of these community-based. Among patients with USD who had treatment, 20,101(97.9%) underwent endoscopic management. 6218(31%) underwent repeated endoscopic treatment during the study period. Urethroplasty was performed in 539(2.6%) patients.  Median patient age at first procedure for endoscopic surgery vs. urethroplasty was 73 vs. 39 years old, respectively (p<0.001). At the practice level, significant variation in rates of repeated endoscopic management was noted. Patients of older age (OR=1.08, 95%CI: 1.06-1.11 for ages ≥80) and patients with a bladder cancer diagnosis (OR=1.17, 95%CI: 1.15-1.20) had higher odds of receiving repeated endoscopic management. Increasing practitioner age was also associated with increased odds of repeated endoscopic management. (OR=1.13, 95%CI: 1.11- 1.16, for practitioners ≥64). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated endoscopic management for USD is overused. The utilization of endoscopic management is variable across practices and frequently guideline-discordant, presenting an opportunity for quality improvement.


Assuntos
Endoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Uretra/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
18.
Urology ; 145: 262-268, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763321

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate our hypothesis that the presence of extravasation on postoperative urethrogram is inconsequential for disease recurrence in urethroplasty postoperative follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons database to assess 1691 patients who underwent urethroplasty and post-operative urethrogram. Anatomic and functional recurrence were defined as <17 Fr stricture documented at 12-month cystoscopy and need for a secondary procedure during 1 year of follow-up, respectively. Our primary outcomes were the sensitivity and positive predictive value of post-operative urethrogram for predicting anatomic and functional recurrence of urethral stricture disease. RESULTS: Among 1101 patients with cystoscopy follow-up, 54 (4.9%) had extravasation on initial postoperative urethrogram. Among those 54, 74.1% developed an anatomic recurrence vs 13% without extravasation (P <.001). Similarly, functional recurrence was 9.3% with extravasation vs 3.2 % without extravasation (P = .04). Patients with extravasation more often reported a postoperative urinary tract infection (12.9% vs 2.7%; P <.01) or wound infection (7.4% vs 2.6%; P = .04). Sensitivity of postoperative urethrogram in predicting any recurrence was 27.3%, specificity 98.7%, positive predictive value 77.8%, and negative predictive value 89.3%. Fourty-five of 54 patients with extravasation had a recurrence of some kind, equating to a 22.2% urethroplasty success rate at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Postoperative urethrogram has a high specificity but low sensitivity for anatomic and functional recurrence during short term follow-up. The positive predictive value of urinary extravasation is high: patients with extravasation incur a high risk of anatomic recurrence within 1 year and such patients may warrant increased monitoring.


Assuntos
Extravasamento de Materiais Terapêuticos e Diagnósticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Estreitamento Uretral/diagnóstico por imagem , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Urografia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Cistoscopia , Extravasamento de Materiais Terapêuticos e Diagnósticos/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recidiva , Estreitamento Uretral/etiologia
19.
Urology ; 143: e12-e16, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32531464

RESUMO

CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old Caucasian man presented with a debilitating anogenital lesion. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: The differential diagnosis of anogenital lesions includes infectious (syphilis, herpes simplex virus), noninfectious (hidradenitis suppuritiva, lymphedema), benign (condyloma acuminata), and malignant pathologies (squamous cell carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma). DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT, MANAGEMENT, AND OUTCOME: Biopsy of an anogenital lesion will determine any oncologic potential. Further imaging can better characterize the disease. Once in the operating room, oncologic principles should be adhered to and quality of life concerns prioritized. Reconstruction of large defects may require a multidisciplinary team. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal diversions should be considered to improve wound healing, decrease infection risk, and optimize graft take. DISCUSSION: A multidisciplinary approach to medical and surgical reconstruction of anogenital lesions should be considered for extensive malformations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/patologia , Idoso , Neoplasias do Ânus/cirurgia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Masculinos/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino
20.
Urology ; 140: 56-63, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145240

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of Lean in urology at Zuckerberg San Francisco General, a community safety-net and trauma hospital that serves as a major teaching site for the University of California San Francisco. METHODS: We examined our process improvement activities from 2016 to 2018. Our Lean Daily Management System (DMS) includes a 15-minute team huddle ("urology Lean work") of service residents, faculty, clinic and operating room nursing staff, and anesthesia liaisons. Our DMS also includes a 5-minute preoperative huddle. Besides team-building, urology Lean work surfaces logistics, safety or equipment improvement ideas, and ensures progress and completion of initiated projects. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period we developed and completed 67 projects. Projects impacted the outpatient setting (57%), followed by the operating room (22%), the Urology service (12%), and inpatient setting (9%). We completed projects in the following domains: safety (26%), quality (22%), care experience (21%), workforce care and development (13%), equity (11%), and financial stewardship (7%). Urology Lean work reduced new patient clinic access time (119-21 days) and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in clinic treatment time (180-105 minutes). The average proportion of urology on-time surgeries was better than the overall surgery on-time surgeries (71% v 61%). CONCLUSION: Urology Lean work successfully applied DMS in a service specific yet holistic approach. Urology Lean work improved resident engagement in quality and safety endeavors and served as a DMS model throughout perioperative and clinic areas.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Urologia/educação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA