Ongoing randomized clinical trials on HSCT in multiple sclerosis.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is emerging as a potent treatment for highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), potentially surpassing the efficacy of traditional disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated AHSCT's superiority in reducing relapse rates and delaying disability progression compared to standard DMTs. Despite the evolution of treatment guidelines, questions persist regarding patient selection criteria and optimal conditioning regimens. Notably, ongoing clinical trials in the United Kingdom, the United States, Italy, and Norway aim to address these uncertainties by evaluating the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of AHSCT vs. high efficacy DMTs in both DMT-experienced and treatment-naïve patients with active RRMS or aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS). These trials promise to provide valuable insights into the positioning of AHSCT within the treatment landscape of MS.

Drugs Targeting CD20 in Multiple Sclerosis: Pharmacology, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability.

Currently, there are four monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the cluster of differentiation (CD) 20 receptor available to treat multiple sclerosis (MS): rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab. B-cell depletion therapy has changed the therapeutic landscape of MS through robust efficacy on clinical manifestations and MRI lesion activity, and the currently available anti-CD20 mAb therapies for use in MS are a cornerstone of highly effective disease-modifying treatment. Ocrelizumab is currently the only therapy with regulatory approval for primary progressive MS. There are currently few data regarding the relative efficacy of these therapies, though several clinical trials are ongoing. Safety concerns applicable to this class of therapeutics relate primarily to immunogenicity and mechanism of action, and include infusion-related or injection-related reactions, development of hypogammaglobulinemia (leading to increased infection and malignancy risk), and decreased vaccine response. Exploration of alternative dose/dosing schedules might be an effective strategy for mitigating these risks. Future development of biosimilar medications might make these therapies more readily available. Although anti-CD20 mAb therapies have led to significant improvements in disease outcomes, CNS-penetrant therapies are still needed to more effectively address the compartmentalized inflammation thought to play an important role in disability progression.

Predicting disability and mortality in CV2/CRMP5-IgG associated paraneoplastic neurologic disorders.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors associated with clinical outcomes in CV2/Collapsin response-mediator protein 5 (CRMP5)-IgG paraneoplastic neurologic disorders (PND). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with CV2/CRMP5-IgG PND evaluated between 2002-2022. We examined the association of clinical variables (including age, clinical phenotype [autoimmune encephalopathy, myelopathy, polyneuropathy/radiculopathy, MG, cerebellar ataxia, chorea, optic neuropathy], cancer) with three clinical outcomes (wheelchair dependence, modified Rankin Scale [mRS], mortality) using univariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine the probability of survival. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (56% female) with CV2/CRMP5-IgG PND were identified with a median follow-up of 54 months (IQR = 11-102). An underlying tumor was identified in 15 patients (56%) including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (8, [53%]), thymoma (4, [27%]), and other histologies (3, [20%]). At last follow-up, 10 patients (37%) needed a wheelchair for mobility and this outcome was associated with myelopathy (HR = 7.57, 95% CI = 1.87-30.64, P = 0.005). Moderate-severe mRS = 3-5 was associated with CNS involvement (encephalopathy, myelopathy, or cerebellar ataxia) (OR = 7.00, 95% CI = 1.18-41.36, P = 0.032). The probability of survival 4 years after symptom onset was 66%. Among cancer subtypes, SCLC (HR = 18.18, 95% CI = 3.55-93.04, P < 0.001) was significantly associated with mortality, while thymoma was not. INTERPRETATION: In this retrospective longitudinal study of CV2/CRMP5-IgG PND, patients with CNS involvement, particularly myelopathy, had higher probability of disability. SCLC was the main determinant of survival in this population.

Longitudinal Disability, Cognitive Impairment, and Mood Symptoms in Patients With Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Longitudinal outcomes in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARe) are still not fully understood and may not be adequately captured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), often the sole reported outcome. We aim to characterize longitudinal outcomes in anti-NMDARe using multiple outcome measures. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study examined outcome measures (mRS and Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis [CASE]) in adults with NMDA receptor-IgG in CSF at short- and long-term follow-ups using linear and logistic regression modeling. Patients with evaluations for cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment/Mini-Mental State Examination), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7) >6 months from symptom onset were correlated with final CASE scores. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (76% female, median disease onset age = 28 years, range = 1-75 years) were included. The majority received first-line immunosuppressants (97%) at a median of 3.9 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.1-9.7) from symptom onset and 68% received second-line therapies. At baseline, median/mean mRS and CASE were 4 (IQR = 3-5) and 12.9 (SD = 7.2), respectively. At short-term follow-up (median = 10 weeks, IQR = 6-17), factors associated with higher CASE and mRS included dysautonomia, coma/lethargy, seizures/status epilepticus, and intensive care unit admission (p < 0.05). At long-term follow-up (median = 70 weeks, IQR = 51-174), median/mean mRS and CASE were 2 (IQR = 1-3) and 4.4 (SD = 4.2), respectively. Only weakness at symptom onset predicted higher mRS scores (odds ratio = 5.6, 95% confidence interval 1.02-30.9, p = 0.047). Despite both mRS and CASE improving from baseline (p < 0.001), only 9 patients (31%) returned to their premorbid function. Among patients with cognitive and mood evaluations >6 months from onset, moderate-severe cognitive impairment (42%), depression (28%), and anxiety (30%) were frequent. Cognitive and depression measures were associated with final CASE subscores (including memory, language, weakness, and psychiatric). DISCUSSION: Multiple clinical factors influenced short-term outcomes, but only onset weakness influenced long-term mRS, highlighting that mRS is predominantly affected by global motor function. Although mRS and CASE improved over time for most patients, these outcome measures did not capture the full extent of long-term functional impairment in terms of mood, cognition, and the ability to return to premorbid function. This emphasizes the need for increased utilization of more nuanced cognitive and mood outcome measures.

Concurrent administration of serotonergic antidepressants and ozanimod in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis from the open-label extension DAYBREAK trial.

BACKGROUND: Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors can interact with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). There is clinical interest surrounding use of ozanimod with SSRIs/SNRIs because the major metabolites of ozanimod are weak inhibitors of MAO-B in vitro. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) potentially related to serotonin accumulation (SA) during concomitant ozanimod and SSRI/SNRI use by performing analyses of data from an open-label, oral ozanimod 0.92 mg trial (DAYBREAK; NCT02576717). METHODS: SA narrow (serotonin syndrome, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and hyperthermia malignant) and broad (terms potentially associated with SA) MedDRA v24.0 searches were performed using TEAE data from participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis who entered DAYBREAK from phase 3 studies (cutoff February 1, 2022). Incidences of TEAEs matching terms from each search were stratified by SSRI/SNRI use. RESULTS: Of 2257 DAYBREAK participants, 274 (12.1%) used an SSRI/SNRI. No participants had TEAEs matching the SA narrow search terms. There was no significant difference in the percentage of participants with ⩾1 TEAE matching the SA broad search for those on versus off SSRIs/SNRIs (on: 12.4%, n = 34/274; off: 15.6%, n = 310/1982, nominal p = 0.1630). CONCLUSION: MedDRA searches showed no increase in TEAEs potentially associated with SA with concomitant SSRI/SNRI and ozanimod use.