RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the addition of ofranergene obadenovec (ofra-vec, VB-111), a novel gene-based anticancer targeted therapy, to once a week paclitaxel in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). METHODS: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03398655) randomly assigned patients with PROC 1:1 to receive intravenous ofra-vec every 8 weeks with once a week IV paclitaxel or placebo with paclitaxel until disease progression. The dual primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and March 2022, 409 patients were randomly assigned. The median PFS was 5.29 months in the ofra-vec arm and 5.36 months in the control arm, hazard ratio (HR) 1.03 (CI, 0.83 to 1.29; P = .7823). The median OS with ofra-vec was 13.37 months versus 13.14 months, HR 0.97 (CI, 0.75 to 1.27; P = .8440). Objective response rates (ORRs) per RECIST 1.1 were similar in both arms: 28.9% with ofra-vec versus 29.6% with control. In both treatment arms, response to CA-125 was a substantial prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. In the ofra-vec arm, the HR in CA-125 responders compared with that in nonresponders for PFS was 0.2428 (CI, 0.1642 to 0.3588), and for OS, the HR was 0.3343 (CI, 0.2134 to 0.5238). Safety profile was characterized by common transient flu-like symptoms such as fever and chills. CONCLUSION: The addition of ofra-vec to paclitaxel did not improve PFS or OS. The PFS and ORR in the control arm exceeded the results that were anticipated on the basis of the AURELIA chemotherapy control arm. CA-125 response was a substantial prognostic biomarker for PFS and OS in patients with PROC treated with paclitaxel.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/tratamento farmacológico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify social needs of gynecologic oncology patients using a self-administered social needs assessment tool (SNAT), compare the SNAT to a formal social work assessment performed by cancer care navigators (CCN), and provide SNAT-informed community resources. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from a performance improvement initiative in a safety-net gynecologic oncology clinic between October 2021 and July 2022. We screened for eight social needs domains, health literacy, desire for social work, and presence of urgent needs. Clinicodemographic data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Univariate descriptive statistics were used. Inter-rater reliability for social needs domains was assessed using percent agreement. RESULTS: 1010 unique patients were seen over this study period. 488 (48%) patients completed the SNAT, of which 265 (54%) screened positive for ≥1 social need. 83 (31%) patients were actively receiving cancer treatment, 140 (53%) were in post-treatment surveillance, and 42 (16%) had benign gynecologic diagnoses. Transportation (19% vs 25%), housing insecurity (18% vs 19%), and desire to speak with a social worker (16% vs 27%) were the 3 most common needs in both the entire cohort and among patients actively receiving cancer treatment. 78% patients in active treatment were seen by a CCN and received SNAT informed community resources. The percent agreement between the SNAT and formal CCN assessment ranged from 72%-94%. CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered SNAT identified many unmet social needs among gynecologic oncology patients, corresponded well with the formal social work CCN assessment, and informed the provision of community resources.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Letramento em Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Apoio SocialRESUMO
Objective: Current standard nonsurgical management of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer (g1EEC) is the Mirena levonorgestrel intrauterine device (M-IUD). This retrospective study was designed primarily to determine noninferiority of the Liletta IUD (L-IUD) for pathologic regression of EIN and g1EEC compared to the M-IUD at 6 months of continuous use. Secondary objectives include to determine noninferiority as above at 3, 9, and 12 months of continuous use and to identify factors including DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status associated with pathologic regression after LNG-IUD use. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed with patients treated for EIN or g1EEC and managed continuously with M- or L-IUD. Patients with recent (within 6 months) or concurrent progesterone use were excluded. For the EIN group, the noninferiority margin of odds ratio was predetermined to be 0.58, and for the g1EEC group it was 0.64. Results: 62 patients from an academic center and a safety-net hospital were identified with continuous M-IUD (n = 44) or L-IUD (n = 18) use for EIN or g1EEC. 85% of patients treated with L-IUD were from a safety-net hospital, which had 63% with public insurance. At 3/6/9 months, 54/71/73% of patients with M-IUD and 80/83/100% with L-IUD had pathologic regression of EIN (95% confidence interval of estimated odds ratio 1.00-2.07/0.84-2.03/0.69-2.10). Lifetime smoking status, not MMR status, was significantly associated with pathologic regression. Conclusions: L-IUD is an effective fertility-sparing treatment for EIN. L-IUD is noninferior to M-IUD for pathologic regression of EIN after 3,6, and 9 months. Further larger studies are warranted to validate findings in EIN and g1EEC.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the most recent publications highlighting the trends and disparities among patients diagnosed with high-risk endometrial cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Endometrial cancer mortality continues to rise, driven by the increasing incidence of high-risk histologic subtypes that accounts for a disproportionate number of endometrial cancer deaths. The lack of progress made in endometrial cancer treatment, particularly of high-risk histologic subtypes, disproportionately affects black women who are more likely to be diagnosed with these aggressive tumor types. Even when accounting for high-risk histology, various factors across the spectrum of care may influence the survival disparities between black and white women, including timely access to guideline-concordant care, clinical trial enrollment, and systemic racism that impacts cancer outcomes. SUMMARY: In this review, we highlight the disproportionate impact of worsening endometrial cancer mortality and healthcare inequalities contributing to the endometrial cancer survival disparity between black and white women.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , BrancosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)) stage IVA-B (distant stage) is a rare diagnosis with an approximate 5 year survival rate of 17% and with limited treatment options. The objective of this study was to determine the trends in distant stage cervical cancer in the USA and identify possible factors related to these trends. METHODS: Data were obtained from the United States Cancer Statistics program from 2001 to 2018. Rates of cervical cancer screening and vaccination were evaluated using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and TeenVaxView. SEER*Stat 8.3.8.9.2 and Joinpoint regression program 4.9.0.0 were used to calculate incidence trends. RESULTS: Over the last 18 years, 29 715 women were diagnosed with distant stage cervical carcinoma. Black women have disproportionately higher rates at 1.55/100 000 versus 0.92/100 000 in White women (p<0.001). When examining the trends over time, there has been an annual increase in distant stage cervical cancer at a rate of 1.3% per year (p<0.001). The largest increase is seen in cervical adenocarcinoma with an average annual percent change of 2.9% (p<0.001). When performing an intersection analysis of race, region and age, White women in the South aged 40-44 have the highest rise in distant cervical cancer at a rate of 4.5% annually (p<0.001). Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and TeenVax data, compared with Black women, we found that White women have a nearly two-fold higher rate of missed or lack of guideline screening, 26.6% vs 13.8%. White teenagers (13-17 years) have the lowest human papillomavirus vaccination rate at 66.1% compared with others at 75.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Black women have a higher incidence of distant stage disease compared with White women. However, White women have a greater annual increase, particularly in adenocarcinomas. Compared with Black women, White women also have lower rates of guideline screening and vaccination.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of financial toxicity (FT) among inpatients undergoing gynecologic cancer resections and the association of insurance status with clinical and financial outcomes. METHODS: Using the 2008-2019 National Inpatient Sample, we identified adult hospitalizations for hysterectomy or oophorectomy with a diagnosis of cancer. Hospitalization costs, length of stay (LOS), mortality, and complications were assessed by insurance status. Risk of FT was defined as health expenditure exceeding 40% of post-subsistence income. Multivariable regressions were used to analyze costs and factors associated with FT risk. RESULTS: Of 462,529 patients, 49.4% had government-funded insurance, 44.3% private, and 3.2% were uninsured. Compared to insured, uninsured patients were more commonly Black and Hispanic, admitted emergently, and underwent open operations. Uninsured patients experienced similar mortality but greater rates of complications, LOS, and costs. Overall, ovarian cancer resections had the highest median costs of $17,258 (interquartile range: 12,187-25,491) compared to cervical and uterine. Approximately 52.8% of uninsured and 15.4% of insured patients were at risk of FT. As costs increased across both cohorts over the 12-year study period, the disparity in FT risk by payer status broadened. After risk adjustment, perioperative complications were associated with nearly 2-fold increased risk of FT among uninsured (adjusted odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.46-2.09, p < 0.001). Among the insured, Black and Hispanic race, public insurance, and open operative approach exhibited greater odds of FT. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing gynecologic cancer operations are at substantial risk of FT, particularly those uninsured. Targeted cost-mitigation strategies are warranted to minimize financial burden.
Assuntos
Estresse Financeiro , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Seguro Saúde , Adulto , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Frailty has been associated with poorer surgical outcomes and is a critical factor in procedural risk assessment. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of frailty on surgical outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients undergoing inpatient gynecologic surgery for endometrial cancer were identified using the 2005-2017 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. The Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator was used to designate frailty. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the association of frailty with postoperative outcomes and resource use. RESULTS: Of 339 846 patients, 2.9% (9868) were considered frail. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, frailty was associated with a four-fold increase in inpatient mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) 4.1; p<0.001), non-home discharge (aOR 5.2; p<0.001), as well as increased respiratory (aOR 2.6; p<0.001), neurologic (aOR 3.3; p<0.001), renal (aOR 2.0; p<0.001), and infectious (aOR 3.2; p<0.001) complications. While frail patients exhibited increased mortality with age, the rate of mortality in this cohort decreased significantly over time. Compared with non-frail counterparts, frail patients had longer lengths of stay (7.6 vs 3.4 days; p<0.001) and increased hospitalization costs with surgical admission ($25 093 vs $13 405; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is independently associated with worse surgical outcomes, including increased mortality and resource use, in women undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer. Though in recent years there have been improvements in mortality in the frail population, further efforts to mitigate the impact of frailty should be explored.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with extended surgical cytoreduction in the treatment of ovarian cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database identified women hospitalized for surgery to remove an ovarian malignancy between 2013 and 2017. Extended cytoreduction (ECR) was defined as surgery involving the bowel, liver, diaphragm, bladder, stomach, or spleen. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to analyze patient and hospital demographics related to ECR, and trends were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. RESULTS: Of the estimated 79,400 patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery, 22% received ECR. Decreased adjusted odds of ECR were found in patients with lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores (OR 0.61, p<0.001 for ECI 2, versus ECI≥3) or residence outside the top income quartile (OR 0.71, p<0.001 for Q1, versus Q4), and increased odds were seen at hospitals with high ovarian cancer surgical volume (OR 1.25, p<0.001, versus low volume). From 2013 to 2017, there was a decrease in the proportion of cases with extended procedures (19% to 15%, p<0.001). There were significant decreases in the proportion of cases with small bowel, colon, and rectosigmoid resections (p<0.001). Patients who underwent ECR were more likely treated at a high surgical volume hospital (37% vs 31%, p<0.001) over the study period. For their hospital admission, patients who underwent ECR had increased mortality (1.6% vs. 0.5%, p<0.001), length of stay (9.6 days vs. 5.2 days, p<0.001), and mean cost ($32,132 vs. $17,363, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Likelihood of ECR was associated with increased medical comorbidity complexity, higher income, and undergoing the procedure at high surgical volume hospitals. The proportion of ovarian cancer cases with ECR has decreased from 2013-17, with more cases performed at high surgical volume hospitals.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/tendências , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/economia , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Previous research has identified factors associated with publication of plenary presentations at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology annual meeting. However, there are no detailed comprehensive trends analyses on the publications of these oral and video presentations over time. In this analysis of 11 annual meetings, we found an increase in clinical rather than translational science publications over time. There was a greater focus on chemotherapy clinical studies and palliative care medicine, with a corresponding decline in publications on surgery. Furthermore, the time interval from presentation to publication shortened over our study period. The evaluation of trends in research publications can inform clinicians and researchers about the quality, competitiveness, and neglected areas of study from national meeting presentations.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of a society-based robotic surgery training program for fellows in gynecologic oncology. METHODS: All participants underwent a 2-day robotic surgery training course between 2015-2017. The course included interactive didactic sessions with video, dry labs, and robotic cadaver labs. The labs encompassed a wide range of subject matter including troubleshooting, instrument variation, radical hysterectomies, and lymph node dissections. Participants completed a pre- and post-course survey using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not confident" to "extremely confident" on various measures. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics v. 24. RESULTS: The response rate was high with 86% of the 70 participants completing the survey. Sixteen (26.7%) of these individuals were attending physicians and 44 (73.3%) were fellows. In general, there was a significant increase in confidence in more complex procedures and concepts such as radical hysterectomy (p=0.01), lymph node dissection (p=0.01), troubleshooting (p=0.001), and managing complications (p=0.004). Faculty comfort and practice patterns were cited as the primary reason (58.9%) for limitations during robotic procedures followed secondarily by surgical resources (34.0%). CONCLUSION: In both gynecologic oncology fellows and attendings, this educational theory-based curriculum significantly improved confidence in the majority of procedures and concepts taught, emphasizing the value of hands-on skill labs.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Currículo , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente InvasivosRESUMO
The goal of this study was to determine the characteristics associated with publication of oral and video presentations presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology annual meetings. Abstracts were reviewed using publication booklets from 2006 to 2016. PubMed and internet searches were used to determine publication status. Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. Of 585 oral plenary sessions, 502 (85.8%) led to publications in peer-reviewed journals. The majority (75.7%) of presentations were clinical rather than translational (24.3%). Compared to single institution studies, multicenter presentations led to a higher publication rate (89.9% 80.5%; p = 0.001). Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies had publication rates of over 90%, while chart reviews and translational research were published at a rate of 87.1% and 80%, respectively (p = 0.004). 41.4% of all publications were in the specialty journal Gynecologic Oncology. Of 56 surgical videos, 23 (41.1%) advanced to publication in either peer-reviewed journals or as online videos: 32.1% were in print media, 5.4% were posted as accessible online videos (YouTube, Google Video, university websites). On multivariate analysis of oral presentations, multicenter studies (OR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.15-3.31; p = 0.01), cohort studies (OR: 3.13; 95% CI: 1.30-7.58; p = 0.01), and international studies (OR: 4.02; 95% CI: 1.20-13.40; p = 0.02) were most likely to be published. Over 11 Society of Gynecologic Oncology annual meetings, >85% of oral plenary sessions led to peer-reviewed publication and 41% of surgical videos were published or accessible online. Multicenter, international, and cohort studies were more likely to be published.
RESUMO
The delivery of cancer care has never changed as rapidly and dramatically as we have seen with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. During the early phase of the pandemic, recommendations for the management of oncology patients issued by various professional societies and government agencies did not recognize the significant regional differences in the impact of the pandemic. California initially experienced lower than expected numbers of cases, and the health care system did not experience the same degree of the burden that had been the case in other parts of the country. In light of promising trends in COVID-19 infections and mortality in California, by late April 2020, discussions were initiated for a phased recovery of full-scale cancer services. However, by July 2020, a surge of cases was reported across the nation, including in California. In this review, the authors share the response and recovery planning experience of the University of California (UC) Cancer Consortium in an effort to provide guidance to oncology practices. The UC Cancer Consortium was established in 2017 to bring together 5 UC Comprehensive Cancer Centers: UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Irvine Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, and the UC San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. The interventions implemented in each of these cancer centers are highlighted, with a focus on opportunities for a redesign in care delivery models. The authors propose that their experiences gained during this pandemic will enhance pre-pandemic cancer care delivery.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Neoplasias/terapia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Teste para COVID-19 , California/epidemiologia , Saúde Global , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organização & administraçãoAssuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/tendências , Radiocirurgia/tendências , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Braquiterapia/tendências , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/tendências , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/imunologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/mortalidade , Humanos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/efeitos adversos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, sentinel lymph node excision and ultrastaging have been performed in endometrial carcinomas to obtain information about lymph node status, avoiding unnecessary complete pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. The purpose of this retrospective study was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the pathological features of endometrial carcinomas and their significance in association with sentinel lymph node involvement. METHODS: Patients with endometrial carcinomas, preceded by sentinel lymph node mapping, were classified into Group-I and Group-II with negative and positive involvement, respectively. The pathological features, associated with sentinel lymph node involvement, were statistically analyzed, including determination of test performance parameters. RESULTS: Among 70 patients who had undergone hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node excision, 61 had carcinoma and 9 had atypical hyperplasia. There were 50 patients in Group-I and 10 in Group-II. In Group-II, the significant pathological features were: 1) lower uterine segment involvement (100%), 2) an average tumor size of ≥5 CM, 3) lymphovascular invasion (50%), 4) cervical stromal invasion (40%), and 5) depth of myometrial invasion of ≥50% (50%). The incidences of these pathological features were significantly less in Group-I. Statistical analyses singled out "lower uterine segment involvement" as the most important feature. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified five pathological features which are associated with sentinel lymph node involvement. Since lower uterine segment involvement has occurred in all cases of the Group-II cohort, we recommend FIGO and other organizations that determine staging rules should consider whether tumors that involve the lower uterine segment should be staged as higher than "1a", if the findings in this small series are confirmed by other studies. The results of this study may guide pathologists and oncologists in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to management of endometrial carcinomas.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Histerectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Endométrio/classificação , Neoplasias do Endométrio/metabolismo , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Útero/metabolismo , Útero/patologia , Útero/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize factors associated with high-cost inpatient admissions for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Operative hospitalizations for ovarian cancer patients ≥65 years of age were identified using the 2010-2017 National Inpatient Sample. Admissions with high-cost were defined as those incurring ≥90th percentile of hospitalization costs each year, while the remainder were considered low-cost. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to assess independent predictors of being in the high-cost cohort. RESULTS: During the study period, an estimated 58,454 patients met inclusion criteria. 5827 patient admissions (9.98%) were classified as high-cost. Median hospitalization cost for this high-cost group was $55,447 (interquartile range (IQR) $46,744-$74,015) compared to $16,464 (IQR $11,845-$23,286, p < 0.001) for the low-cost group. Patients with high-cost admissions were more likely to have received open (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.23, 1.31-3.79) or extended (AOR 5.64, 4.79-6.66) procedures and be admitted non-electively (AOR 3.32, 2.74-4.02). Being in the top income quartile (AOR 1.77, 1.39-2.27) was also associated with high-cost. Age and hospital factors, including bed size and volume of gynecologic oncology surgery, did not affect cost group. CONCLUSION: High-cost ovarian cancer admissions were three times more expensive than low-cost admissions. Fewer open and extended procedures with subsequently shorter lengths of stay may have contributed to decreasing inpatient costs over the study period. In this cohort of patients largely covered by Medicare, clinical factors outweigh socioeconomic factors as cost drivers. Understanding the relationship of disease-specific and social factors to cost will be important in informing future value-based quality improvement efforts in gynecologic cancer care.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Geografia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative readmissions are often used to assess quality of surgical care. This study compared 30-day vs 31- to 90-day readmission following surgery for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study of the 2010-2015 Nationwide Readmissions Database characterized 90-day readmissions following cytoreductive surgery for these cancers. Each patient's first postoperative hospitalization was included. Univariate analysis compared patient demographics and reasons for readmission. Multivariable regression identified independent predictors of readmission. RESULTS: Of an estimated 76 652 patients, 10 264 (13.4%) were readmitted within 30 days, and 6942 (9.1%) between 31 and 90 days. The 30-day readmissions were more frequently associated with postoperative infection, while 31- to 90-day readmissions were more frequently associated with renal or hematologic diagnoses. Predictors of any 90-day readmission included index hospitalization longer than 7 days (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.61 [1.48-1.75], P < .001), extended surgical procedure (AOR 1.41 [1.30-1.53], P < .001), pulmonary circulation disorder (AOR = 1.34 [1.13-1.60], P = .001), and diabetes mellitus (AOR = 1.12 [1.02-1.24], P = .020). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission rates remain high during the 31- to 90-day postoperative period in ovarian cancer patients, although these readmissions are less frequently related to postoperative complications. Prospective study is merited to optimize surveillance beyond the initial 30 days after ovarian cancer surgery.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
In addition to the well-characterized BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes, many other syndromes that are associated with genetic mutations predispose individuals to an increased risk of breast and gynecologic malignancies. Many mutated genes encode for tumor-suppressor products and are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Mutations markedly increase an individual's lifetime risk of cancers in different organ systems, depending on the associated syndrome. These syndromes include Lynch syndrome, the most common hereditary cause of endometrial cancer, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, which increases the risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and cervical adenoma malignum. Li-Fraumeni syndrome and Cowden syndrome increase the risk of breast cancer, and Gorlin syndrome increases the risk of ovarian fibromas. With advances in genetic testing, clinicians' knowledge and awareness of the numerous additional genes associated with breast and ovarian cancers, such as ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, are rapidly expanding. Radiologists have essential roles in patient management, which include developing optimal screening protocols for these patients and closely monitoring them for the development or recurrence of disease-specific malignancies. Radiologists' roles continue to increase and evolve as more mutations are identified and high-risk imaging screening recommendations expand to identify these patients. Understanding the epidemiologic, genetic, and pathophysiologic features and the cancers associated with these syndromes enables radiologists to appropriately contribute to patient management, ensure accurate and timely diagnosis, and make syndrome-specific imaging recommendations. ©RSNA, 2020.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/genética , Síndromes Neoplásicas Hereditárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Predisposição Genética para Doença , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes for stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery followed by up to three versus more cycles of post-operative chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a multi-institution retrospective cohort study of patients treated from January 2005 to February 2016 with neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy followed by interval surgery and post-operative chemotherapy. The following were exclusion criteria: more than four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bevacizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, non-platinum therapy, prior chemotherapy, and elevated CA125 values after three post-operative chemotherapy cycles. Progression-free and overall survival and toxicity profiles were compared between groups receiving up to three cycles versus more that three cycles post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients met inclusion criteria: 41 received up to three cycles and 59 received more than three cycles. The groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, performance status, tumor histology, optimal cytoreduction rates, and median number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. Median progression-free survival was 14 vs 16.6 months in those receiving up to three cycles versus more than three cycles, respectively (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.68, p=0.97). Similarly, median overall survival was not different at 47.1 vs 69.4 months, respectively (HR 1.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 4.42, p=0.10). There were no differences in grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Extending post-operative chemotherapy beyond three cycles in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery with normalization of CA125 levels was not associated with improved survival or greater toxicity. Future study in a larger cohort is warranted to define optimal length of cytotoxic treatment.