Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
1.
J Appalach Health ; 1(2): 56-68, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35769900

RESUMO

Introduction: Few studies have examined the association of geography and quality of life (QOL) among breast cancer patients, particularly differences between Appalachian and non-Appalachian Kentucky women, which is important given the cancer and socioeconomic disparities present in Appalachia. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether women with breast cancer residing in Appalachian Kentucky experience poorer health outcomes in regards to depression, stress, QOL, and spiritual wellbeing, relative to those living in non-Appalachian Kentucky after adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors. Methods: Women, aged 18-79, recruited from the Kentucky Cancer Registry between 2009 and 2013 with an incident, primary breast cancer diagnosis completed a telephone interview within 12 months of diagnosis. In this cross-sectional study, sociodemographic characteristics and mental and physical health status were assessed, including number of comorbid conditions, symptoms of depression and stress, and QOL. Results: Among 1245 women with breast cancer, 334 lived in Appalachia and 911 in non-Appalachian counties of Kentucky. Appalachian breast cancer patients differed from non-Appalachian patients on race, education, income, health insurance status, rurality, smoking, and stage at diagnosis. In unadjusted analysis, Appalachian residence was associated with having significantly more comorbid conditions, more symptoms of stress in the past month, and lower Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast scores compared to non-Appalachian residence. Implications: However, adjustment for sociodemographic and health-related differences by region appear to explain geographic differences in these poorer QOL indicators for women living in Appalachian Kentucky relative to non-Appalachian Kentucky. Policy-, provider-, and individual-level implications are discussed.

2.
Qual Life Res ; 27(5): 1347-1356, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29374856

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine whether Appalachian residence alone or in combination with violence was linked to poorer quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Women recently diagnosed and included in either the Kentucky or North Carolina Cancer Registries were interviewed by phone between 2009 and 2015 (n = 3320; mean age = 56.74). Response rates were similar by state (40.1 in Kentucky and 40.9% in North Carolina). Appalachian (N = 990) versus non-Appalachian residents (N = 2330) were hypothesized to have poorer QOL defined as (a) lower Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores and (b) more symptoms of depression, stress, or comorbid physical conditions. Lifetime intimate partner or sexual violence was first investigated as a moderator then mediator of regional differences. Multiple analyses of covariance (MANCOVA) models were used. RESULTS: Violence modified the effect of Appalachian residence on poorer QOL outcomes; FACT-G total scores (p = .02) were lowest for women living in Appalachia who had additionally experienced violence. Socioeconomic indicators appeared to mediate or explain differences in QOL outcomes by Appalachian residence such that when adjusting for income, education and insurance, Appalachian residence remained associated only with poorer physical QOL outcomes (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: While violence rates did not differ by residence, the combined effect of living in Appalachia and experiencing violence resulted in significantly greater impact on poorer QOL among women recently diagnosed with cancer. Clinical consideration of patients' residence, socioeconomic status and violence experienced may help identify and mitigate the longer-term impact of these identifiable factors associated with poorer QOL.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Neoplasias/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Região dos Apalaches , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Psychooncology ; 26(8): 1205-1214, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27246006

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Because partners are an important and unpaid resource in cancer care, understanding how destructive, controlling or interfering partner behaviors influence women's cancer care may be particularly relevant for health care providers seeking to provide cancer care and enhance recovery. Using a new measure of partner interfering behaviors in cancer care (PIB-C), we investigated whether women with a recent cancer diagnosis who additionally endorsed any PIB-C would report (a) more symptoms of depression and stress, and (b) lower Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) and lower Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-SP) scale scores indicating poorer quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Women aged 18-79 included in cancer registries as having an incident, primary, biopsy-confirmed cancer in the past 12 months were eligible for this study. Consenting women completed a phone interview 9-12 months following cancer diagnosis between 2009 and 2015. Interviews provided data to measure outcomes (perceived stress and depressive symptoms, FACIT-SP and FACT-G scores), partner supportive and interfering behaviors, and other potentially confounding factors. RESULTS: Of the 2376 women in a relationship at cancer diagnosis, 14.7% endorsed one or more of 14 PIB-C items. Women endorsing any PIB-C item reported more symptoms of depression and stress and lower FACT-G and FACIT-SP scores than partnered women reporting no PIB-C even when controlling for partner supportive behaviors and lifetime intimate partner violence. Increasing PIB-C scores were also correlated, in a dose-response pattern, with these same outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Partner interfering behaviors during cancer care impact patients' QOL across multiple domains. © 2016 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Cônjuges/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Jovem
4.
Cancer Causes Control ; 28(1): 23-39, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27943059

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Because intimate partner violence (IPV) may disproportionately impact women's quality of life (QOL) when undergoing cancer treatment, women experiencing IPV were hypothesized to have (a) more symptoms of depression or stress and (b) lower QOL as measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-B) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-SP) Scales relative to those never experiencing IPV. METHODS: Women, aged 18-79, who were included in one of two state cancer registries from 2009 to 2015 with a recent incident, primary, invasive biopsy-confirmed cancer diagnosis were recruited and asked to complete a phone interview, within 12 months of diagnosis. This interview measured IPV by timing (current and past) and type (physical, sexual, psychological), socio-demographics, and health status. Cancer registries provided consenting women's cancer stage, site, date of diagnosis, and age. RESULTS: In this large cohort of 3,278 women who completed a phone interview, 1,221 (37.3%) disclosed lifetime IPV (10.6% sexual, 24.5% physical, and 33.6% psychological IPV). Experiencing IPV (particularly current IPV) was associated with poorer cancer-related QOL defined as having more symptoms of depression and stress after cancer diagnosis and lower FACIT-SP and FACT scores than women not experiencing IPV and controlling for confounders including demographic factors, cancer stage, site, and number of comorbid conditions. Current IPV was more strongly associated with poorer QOL. When compared with those experiencing past IPV (and no IPV), women with cancer who experienced current IPV had significantly higher depression and stress symptoms scores and lower FACIT-SP and FACT-G scores indicating poorer QOL for all domains. While IPV was not associated with being diagnosed at a later cancer stage, current IPV was significantly associated with having more than one comorbid physical conditions at interview (adjusted rate ratio = 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54) and particularly for women diagnosed with cancer when <55 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Current and past IPV were associated with poorer mental and physical health functioning among women recently diagnosed with cancer. Including clinical IPV screening may improve women's cancer-related QOL.


Assuntos
Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/psicologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Saúde da Mulher , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Psychooncology ; 25(12): 1500-1506, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26426995

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of complementary and novel measures of partner interfering and partner supportive behaviors in cancer care (PIB-C and PSB-C). METHODS: Structured telephone interviews were conducted with 378 women (aged 18-79) in partnered relationships and recruited from the Kentucky Cancer Registry. Psychometric analyses of PIB-C and PSB-C were used to determine scale reliability, and scale construct and predictive validity (correlations with indicators of partner abuse, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress after cancer). RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha and split-half calculations indicated excellent internal consistency of the 20-item PIB-C (0.936 and 0.87, respectively) and 12-item PSB-C (0.930 and 0.89). Three thematic clusters for the PIB-C and two for the PSB-C were identified through factor analyses. Regarding construct validity, higher PIB-C and lower PSB-C scores were associated with a measure of psychological impacts from abuse. Predictive validity was suggested through (1) lower PSB-C associated with depression, (2) higher PIB-C associated with anxiety, and (3) higher perceived stress associated with higher PIB-C/lower PSB-C scores. CONCLUSION: Both PIB-C and PSB-C have strong psychometric properties and distinguish partner behaviors more likely to negatively impact women's depression, anxiety, and stress during cancer care/recovery. Use of these measures may assist clinical teams in comprehensively assessing women patients' home environment to best ensure cancer care/recovery. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Entrevista Psicológica , Neoplasias/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Cônjuges/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Kentucky , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Meio Social , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 26(4): 1440-55, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26548691

RESUMO

A clinic-based intervention study was conducted among high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-infected Latinas aged 18-64 years between April 2006 and May 2008 on the Texas-Mexico border. Women were randomly assigned to receive a printed material intervention (n=186) or usual care (n=187) and were followed at three months, six months, and 12 months through telephone surveys and review of medical records. The HPV knowledge of nearly all women had increased greatly, but only two-thirds of women reported they had received follow-up care within one year of diagnosis regardless of additional health education messaging. Our findings suggest that, regardless of type of health education messaging, Latinas living on the Texas-Mexico border are aware that follow-up care is recommended, but they may not receive this care. Individual, familial and medical care barriers to receipt of follow-up care may partially account for the higher rates of cervical cancer mortality in this region.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/educação , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/etnologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Texas , Adulto Jovem
7.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(10): 1893-9, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23860952

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Prior studies conducted primarily among white men find a reduced risk of prostate cancer associated with time since developing diabetes. While biologic explanations are plausible, the association may in part arise from more frequent prostate cancer screening among those with a diabetes diagnosis. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between diabetes and prostate cancer screening. METHODS: We examined differences in prostate cancer screening (prostate-specific antigen and/or digital rectal examination) testing practices after a diabetes diagnosis among lower-income persons living in the southeastern United States and enrolled in the Southern Community Cohort Study between 2002 and 2009. Baseline in-person interviews collected information on history of diabetes and prostate cancer screening from 18,809 black and 6,404 white men aged 40-79 years. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding, diabetic black [odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.25] and white (OR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.03-1.51) men were more likely to undergo recent prostate cancer screening compared to non-diabetic men of the same race. The increased risk for prostate cancer screening, however, occurred primarily within the first 12 months after diabetes diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a diabetes diagnosis modestly increases the likelihood of having a prostate cancer screening test for both black and white men. The prevalence of screening was higher nearer to the time of diabetes diagnosis, which may contribute to an early increase in prostate cancer detection followed by lower prostate cancer detection after an extended time.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia
8.
Am J Mens Health ; 7(4): 306-16, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23339130

RESUMO

Whether the African American race remains a significant predictor of poorer prostate cancer survival after adjusting for other sociodemographic and treatment-related factors remains unclear. We examined whether disparities in survival among 18,900 African American and Caucasian men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Kentucky remained after adjusting for health insurance (payor source), cancer treatment, cancer stage at diagnosis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, smoking status, and Appalachian region. After adjusting for these predictors, African American men living in Kentucky had poorer prostate cancer survival after 5 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.33; 95% confidence interval = 1.11, 1.59) and 10 years (HR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.18, 1.28) of follow-up, and for the entire follow-up period (HR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.26, 1.65) compared to their Caucasian counterparts. Thus, health insurance status, cancer treatment, cancer stage at diagnosis, PSA level at diagnosis, smoking status, and geographic location did not explain the racial gap in survival in Kentucky.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Kentucky , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Racismo , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Análise de Sobrevida , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 21(12): 1222-9, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23210490

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent among adolescent and adult women, with significant physical, sexual, and mental health consequences. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine's Clinical Preventive Services for Women consensus report recommended universal screening for violence as a component of women's preventive services; this policy has been adopted by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). These policy developments require that effective clinic-based interventions be identified, easily implemented, and taken to scale. METHODS: To foster dialogue about implementing effective interventions, we convened a symposium entitled "Responding to Violence Against Women: Emerging Evidence, Implementation Science, and Innovative Interventions," on May 21, 2012. Drawing on multidisciplinary expertise, the agenda integrated data on the prevalence and health impact of IPV violence, with an overview of the implementation science framework, and a panel of innovative IPV screening interventions. Recommendations were generated for developing, testing, and implementing clinic-based interventions to reduce violence and mitigate its health impact. RESULTS: The strength of evidence supporting specific IPV screening interventions has improved, but the optimal implementation and dissemination strategies are not clear. Implementation science, which seeks to close the evidence to program gap, is a useful framework for improving screening and intervention uptake and ensuring the translation of research findings into routine practice. CONCLUSIONS: Findings have substantial relevance to the broader research, clinical, and practitioner community. Our conference proceedings fill a timely gap in knowledge by informing practitioners as they strive to implement universal IPV screening and guiding researchers as they evaluate the success of implementing IPV interventions to improve women's health and well-being.


Assuntos
Difusão de Inovações , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/prevenção & controle , Saúde da Mulher , Adolescente , Adulto , Congressos como Assunto , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Parceiros Sexuais , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/diagnóstico , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/psicologia
10.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 21(11): 1180-8, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22946631

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence suggests that intimate partner violence (IPV) may be associated with poorer cancer outcomes. We hypothesized that timing and type of IPV as well as childhood sexual abuse (CSA) may negatively affect depression, perceived stress, and cancer-related well-being. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of women diagnosed with either breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer in the prior 12 months included in the Kentucky Cancer Registry. Consenting women were interviewed by phone (n=553). Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was used to determine the association between IPV (37% lifetime prevalence) and type, timing, and the range of correlated cancer-related well-being indicators, adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: IPV (p=0.002) and CSA (p=0.03) were associated with the six correlated well-being indicators. Specifically, lifetime and current IPV were associated with lower Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) (p=0.006) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-SP) (p=0.03) scores, higher perceived stress at diagnosis (p=0.006), and depressive symptom scores at diagnosis (p<0.0001), whereas CSA was associated with lower FACT-B (p=0.02), increased number of comorbid conditions (p=0.03), and higher current stress levels (p=0.04). Current and past IPV, as well as psychologic abuse, were associated with poorer well-being among women with a recent cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence that both IPV and CSA negatively influence cancer-related well-being indicators. These data suggest that identification of lifetime IPV and other stressors may provide information that healthcare providers can use to best support and potentially improve the well-being of female cancer patients.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes Adultos de Maus-Tratos Infantis/psicologia , Mulheres Maltratadas/psicologia , Violência Doméstica/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Sobreviventes Adultos de Maus-Tratos Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Mulheres Maltratadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Violência Doméstica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Parceiros Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
11.
Environ Health ; 10: 21, 2011 Mar 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21418645

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is increasing concern regarding the potential adverse health effects of air pollution, particularly hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). However, quantifying exposure to these pollutants is problematic. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to explore the utility of kriging, a spatial interpolation method, for exposure assessment in epidemiologic studies of HAPs. We used benzene as an example and compared census tract-level kriged predictions to estimates obtained from the 1999 U.S. EPA National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA), Assessment System for Population Exposure Nationwide (ASPEN) model. METHODS: Kriged predictions were generated for 649 census tracts in Harris County, Texas using estimates of annual benzene air concentrations from 17 monitoring sites operating in Harris and surrounding counties from 1998 to 2000. Year 1999 ASPEN modeled estimates were also obtained for each census tract. Spearman rank correlation analyses were performed on the modeled and kriged benzene levels. Weighted kappa statistics were computed to assess agreement between discretized kriged and modeled estimates of ambient air levels of benzene. RESULTS: There was modest correlation between the predicted and modeled values across census tracts. Overall, 56.2%, 40.7%, 31.5% and 28.2% of census tracts were classified as having 'low', 'medium-low', 'medium-high' and 'high' ambient air levels of benzene, respectively, comparing predicted and modeled benzene levels. The weighted kappa statistic was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.20, 0.31), indicating poor agreement between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: There was a lack of concordance between predicted and modeled ambient air levels of benzene. Applying methods of spatial interpolation for assessing exposure to ambient air pollutants in health effect studies is hindered by the placement and number of existing stationary monitors collecting HAP data. Routine monitoring needs to be expanded if we are to use these data to better assess environmental health risks in the future.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Benzeno/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Substâncias Perigosas/análise , Modelos Químicos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Texas/epidemiologia
12.
Cancer ; 117(5): 1080-8, 2011 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21351084

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, few studies to date have examined racial differences in prostate cancer survival while controlling for socioeconomic status (SES). No such studies have examined this association in Texas, a large state with significant ethnic and racial diversity. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether racial disparities in survival for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Texas from 1995 through 2002 remained after adjusting for SES, rural residence, and stage of disease. METHODS: A cohort of 87,449 men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer was identified from the Texas Cancer Registry. The SES measure was based on census tract data reflecting median household income, median home value, and percentages of men living below poverty, with a college education, and with a management or professional occupation. The 5-year survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for race and all-cause and disease-specific mortality. RESULTS: After adjusting for SES, age, stage of disease, tumor grade, year of diagnosis, and rural residence, both black and Hispanic men were more likely (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.70 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.58-1.83] and aHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02-1.20], respectively) to die of prostate cancer compared with white men. The pattern of survival disadvantage for black men held for those diagnosed with localized disease and advanced disease, and for those with an unknown stage of disease at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial racial disparities in prostate cancer survival were found for men in Texas. Future studies should incorporate treatment data as well as comorbid conditions because this information may explain noted survival disparities.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/etnologia , Carcinoma/mortalidade , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Programa de SEER , Classe Social , Taxa de Sobrevida , Texas/epidemiologia
13.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 19(2): 558-65, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20142250

RESUMO

There is a known inverse association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and prostate cancer (PrCa) that is poorly understood. Genetic studies of the T2D-PrCa association may provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of this association. We evaluated associations in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study between PrCa and nine T2D single nucleotide polymorphisms from genome-wide association studies of T2D (in CDKAL1, CDKN2A/B, FTO, HHEX, IGF2BP2, KCNJ11, PPARG, SLC30A8, and TCF7L2) and four T2D single nucleotide polymorphisms from pre-genome-wide association studies (in ADRB2, CAPN10, SLC2A2, and UCP2). From 1987 to 2000, there were 397 incident PrCa cases among 6,642 men ages 45 to 64 years at baseline. We used race-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations between PrCa and increasing number of T2D risk-raising alleles. PrCa was positively associated with the CAPN10 rs3792267 G allele [hazard ratio (HR) 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.44] and inversely associated with the SLC2A2 rs5400 Thr110 allele (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72, 1.00), the UCP2 rs660339 Val55 allele (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73, 0.97) and the IGF2BP2 rs4402960 T allele (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02; blacks only). The TCF7L2 rs7903146 T allele was inversely associated with PrCa using a dominant genetic model (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97). Further knowledge of T2D gene-PrCa mechanisms may improve understanding of PrCa etiology.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Aterosclerose/genética , Calpaína/genética , Estudos de Coortes , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Transportador de Glucose Tipo 2/genética , Humanos , Canais Iônicos/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Mitocondriais/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Proteínas de Ligação a RNA/genética , Fatores de Transcrição TCF/genética , Proteína 2 Semelhante ao Fator 7 de Transcrição , Proteína Desacopladora 2
14.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 18(11): 1793-9, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19951213

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether Latina mothers who were and were not human papillomavirus (HPV) positive differed in their knowledge and acceptance of the HPV vaccine for their children. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among women aged 18-64 years between April 2007 and April 2008. Data collectors conducted in-person interviews in community clinics with 215 HPV-negative women and 190 HPV-positive women (with respective response rates of 64% and 84%). Most (83%) HPV-positive women were recruited at dysplasia clinics. Although no HPV-negative women were recruited at dysplasia clinics, they were recruited at other low-income public and private clinics. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, marital status, and health insurance, women who were HPV positive were more likely than HPV-negative women to have heard about the HPV vaccine, to indicate they would have their daughters and sons vaccinated against cervical cancer even if they had to pay themselves, and to be in favor of the proposed Texas law requiring girls to receive the HPV vaccine before entry into sixth grade but less likely to be in favor of girls receiving the vaccine at age > or =13. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that >90% of Latinas living on the Texas-Mexico border find the HPV vaccine acceptable for their own daughters and sons.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/etnologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Proteção da Criança/etnologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Mãe-Filho , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Texas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Saúde da Mulher/etnologia , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 18(10): 1577-83, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19788363

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to determine whether minority women are more likely to die of cervical cancer. A population-based cohort study was performed using Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) data from 1998 to 2002. METHODS: A total of 5,166 women with cervical cancer were identified during 1998-2002 through the TCR. Measures of socioeconomic status (SES) and urbanization were created using census block group-level data. Multilevel logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of dying from cervical cancer by race, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for cervical cancer-specific survival analysis. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, SES, urbanization, stage, cell type, and treatment, Hispanic women were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic White women to die from cervical cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.69; 95% CI [confidence interval] = 0.59-0.80), whereas Black women were more likely to die (aHR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.06-1.50). Black and Hispanic women were more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage than White women. Black women were significantly less likely to receive surgery among those diagnosed with localized disease (p = 0.001) relative to both White and Hispanic women. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to non-Hispanic White women, Black women were more likely to die of cervical cancer while Hispanic women were less likely to die; these survival differences were not explained by SES, urbanization, age, cell type, stage at diagnosis, or treatment.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/etnologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Medição de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Texas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 18(8): 1179-85, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19630537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An emerging literature suggests that violence against women (VAW), particularly sexual violence, may increase the risk of acquiring a sexually transmitted infection (STI) and, therefore, may be associated with cervical cancer development. The purpose of this cross-sectional analysis was to determine if women who had experienced violence had higher prevalence rates of invasive cervical cancer. METHODS: Women aged 18-88 who joined the Kentucky Women's Health Registry (2006-2007) and completed a questionnaire were included in the sample. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to adjust odds ratio (OR) for confounders (e.g., age, education, current marital status, lifetime illegal drug use, and pack-years of cigarette smoking). RESULTS: Of 4732 participants with no missing data on violence, cervical cancer, or demographic factors, 103 (2.1%) reported ever having cervical cancer. Adjusting for demographic factors, smoking, and illegal drug use, experiencing VAW was associated with an increased prevalence of invasive cervical cancer (adjusted OR [aOR] = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.7-3.9). This association remained significant when looking at three specific types of VAW: intimate partner violence (IPV) (aOR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.8-4.0), adult exposure to forced sex (aOR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.6-4.3), and child exposure to sexual abuse (aOR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.4-4.0). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of cervical cancer were highest for those experiencing all three types of VAW relative to those never experiencing VAW. Because VAW is common and has gynecological health effects, asking about VAW in healthcare settings and using this information to provide tailored healthcare may improve women's health outcomes.


Assuntos
Mulheres Maltratadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Vítimas de Crime/estatística & dados numéricos , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mulheres Maltratadas/psicologia , Intervalos de Confiança , Vítimas de Crime/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Estupro/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 18(4): 547-52, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19361323

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine if women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES) are more likely than unexposed women to receive recommended or additional breast cancer screening examinations. METHODS: 1994 Diethylstilbestrol-Adenosis (DESAD) cohort data are used to assess the degree of recommended compliance of breast cancer screenings found in 3140 DES-exposed and 826 unexposed women. Participants were enrolled at four sites: Houston, Boston, Rochester, and Los Angeles. Logistic regression modeling was used to analyze mailed questionnaire data that included reported frequency over the preceding 5 years (1990-1994) of breast-self examinations (BSEs), clinical breast examinations (CBEs), and mammograms. RESULTS: DES-exposed women exceeded annual recommendations for CBEs (aOR 2.20, 95% CI, 1.04-4.67) among women without a history of benign breast disease (BBD) compared with unexposed women. There were no other statistically significant differences between exposed and unexposed women who reported performing BSEs, CBEs (<40 years of age), and mammographies, regardless of BBD history. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of DES-exposed women receive breast cancer screenings at least at recommended intervals, but over two thirds do not perform monthly BSEs. Future efforts should be focused on further educating this and other at-risk populations through mailed reminders and during patient consultations on the benefits of screening examinations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Dietilestilbestrol/efeitos adversos , Estrogênios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Estados Unidos
18.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 19(1): 13-20, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19258935

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: To determine predictors of cervical cancer survival by socioeconomic status (SES), urbanization, race/ethnicity, comorbid conditions, and treatment among elderly Medicare-eligible women whose conditions were diagnosed with cervical cancer in a multiethnic population. METHODS: : A total of 538 women with cervical cancer aged 65 years or older were identified from 1999 to 2001 from the Texas Cancer Registry and were linked with the state Medicare data and Texas Vital Records to determine survival times. All women had similar access to care through Medicare fee-for-services insurance. A composite measure of SES was created using census tract-level data as was urbanization. Treatment and comorbid conditions were available from the Medicare data. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for all-cause and cervical cancer-specific survival analysis. RESULTS: : Increased age (P < 0.0001) and advanced tumor stage (P < 0.0001) were associated with poorer all-cause and cervical cancer-specific survival. Having a comorbid condition was associated with all-cause survival (P < 0.01) but not cervical cancer-specific mortality. After adjusting for confounders, women receiving some form of treatment were almost half as likely to die with cervical cancer (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.89). After adjustment for all confounders, Hispanic women consistently had lower all-cause and cervical cancer-specific mortality rates relative to non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black women. CONCLUSIONS: : Among women with similar health care coverage, Hispanic women had consistently lower all-cause and cervical cancer-specific mortality rates than other older women whose conditions were diagnosed with this disease in Texas. The presence of comorbid conditions and treatment were important predictors of survival, yet these factors do not explain the survival advantage for Hispanic women.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Medicare , Sistema de Registros , Classe Social , Texas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , População Urbana , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/etnologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia
19.
Gynecol Oncol ; 112(2): 365-9, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19036421

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether smokers with cervical cancer were more likely to die from cervical cancer compared with non smokers after adjusting for confounding factors. METHODS: A population-based survival analysis was conducted among 2661 women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer and reported to the Kentucky Cancer Registry from 1995-2005 and linked with state vital records and the National Death Index through 12/31/2005. A standard Kaplan - Meier approach was used in this survival analysis and Cox Proportional Hazards modeling was used to estimate adjusted hazard [aHR] ratios and 95% confidence intervals [CI] for smoking and survival for all cause and cervical cancer specific cause of death. RESULTS: Almost half of women diagnosed with cervical cancer (48.6%) were known to be current smokers based the medical record review and reporting to KCR. For another 19.4% no tobacco status was documented (missing) and 32.1% were known non smokers. After adjustment for age and stage at diagnosis, cell type, rural residence, race, insurance coverage, and treatment received, current smoker were 35% more likely to die of any cause (aHR=1.35; 95% CI=1.17-1.56) and 21% more likely to die of cervical cancer (aHR=1.21; 95% CI=1.01-1.46) compared with known non smoking cases. CONCLUSION: These data strongly suggest that smoking reduces cervical cancer survival.


Assuntos
Fumar/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Programa de SEER , Fumar/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia
20.
Environ Health Perspect ; 116(11): 1576-80, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19057714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second leading cause of death among U.S. children with few known risk factors. There is increasing interest in the role of air pollutants, including benzene and 1,3-butadiene, in the etiology of childhood cancers. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to assess whether census tracts with the highest benzene or 1,3-butadiene ambient air levels have increased childhood lymphohematopoietic cancer incidence. METHODS: Our ecologic analysis included 977 cases of childhood lymphohematopoietic cancer diagnosed from 1995-2004. We obtained the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 1999 modeled estimates of benzene and 1,3-butadiene for 886 census tracts surrounding Houston, Texas. We ran Poisson regression models by pollutant to explore the associations between pollutant levels and census-tract cancer rates. We adjusted models for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and community-level socioeconomic status (cSES). RESULTS: Census tracts with the highest benzene levels had elevated rates of all leukemia [rate ratio (RR) = 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05, 1.78]. This association was higher for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (RR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.03-3.96) than for acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.92-1.66). Among census tracts with the highest 1,3-butadiene levels, we observed RRs of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.07-1.81), 1.68 (95% CI, 0.84-3.35), and 1.32 (95% CI, 0.98-1.77) for all leukemia, AML, and ALL, respectively. We detected no associations between benzene or 1,3-butadiene levels and lymphoma incidence. Results that examined joint exposure to benzene and 1,3-butadiene were similar to those that examined each pollutant separately. CONCLUSIONS: Our ecologic analysis suggests an association between childhood leukemia and hazardous air pollution; further research using more sophisticated methodology is warranted.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Classe Social , Texas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA