Is minimally-invasive spinal surgery a reliable treatment option in symptomatic spinal metastasis?

OBJECTIVE: Up to 70% of patients with cancer are likely to develop spine metastasis. Radiation therapy is the standard of care for painful spinal metastases in absence of unstable or impending fractures. More frequently these patients require open palliative surgery for pain, vertebral collapse and neurological deficits. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MISS) techniques using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation may be considered as an alternative to open surgery in selected cases. MISS techniques are thought to be associated with fewer tissues damages resulting in early pain relief,  they also allow for early mobilization and optimization of function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2011 to 2018, 52 patients affected by spinal metastasis were treated with MISS techniques in Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute of Bologna and in Cisanello Hospital of Pisa, Italy. All patients underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixations (PPSF) coupled with mini-decompressions in case it was required by spinal cord compressions. All patients were evaluated pre and post-operatively by Frenkel classification and VAS scores. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 19,4 months. Preoperatively, Frankel scores were E in 37 patients, D3 in 6 patients, D2 in 3 cases, D1 in 3 patients, B in one patient and C in two. The Frankel score improved in 10 patients, remained stable in 40 patients and worsened in two patients. Preoperatively, the mean VAS score in 29 patients treated with PPSF procedure with spinal decompression was 7, while postoperatively, it became 5. In 23 patients who underwent only PPSF procedure without spinal decompression mean VAS score was 5, postoperatively it became 3. CONCLUSIONS: In selected cases, MISS surgeries may be considered as a valid alternative to open surgery. Although the efficacy of PPSF has been well documented in trauma or degenerative spine surgery, there is not sufficient literature about MISS techniques in spinal metastasis and further studies are needed to elucidate the most appropriate patient in which this approach could represent the gold standard of treatment.

Giant cell tumor of extremities, surgical treatment and local adjuvants: which is the most effective?

Giant cell tumour (GCT) represents 5% of all primitive bone tumours. Standard surgical treatment of GCT includes intralesional excision or segmental resection. Curettage has a higher recurrence rate (10-25% in stage 2 or 3 but does preserve adjacent joint function. The use of local adjuvants such as phenol, alcohol, H2O2, Argon or cement may decrease recurrence rate, yet which local adjuvant works best is still, to this day, controversial. A series of 109 patients with GCT of the extremity, surgical treated in a single Institution from 2016 to 2018, were analysed in a retrospective study. The purpose of our study was to report the incidence of recurrence rate in patients with GCT of limbs treated in a single institution with different local adjuvants. The results of the present study suggests that curettage in association to cryoablation seems to reduce the recurrence rate compared to "classic" local adjuvants.

Cryotherapy efficacy and safety as local therapy in surgical treatment of musculoskeletal tumours. A retrospective case series of 143 patients.

Cryotherapy, also called Cryoablation (CA), is a technique that provides a local treatment to various pathological conditions. In Musculoskeletal tumours management, Cryoablation is well accepted and validated as a treatment in palliative cures for metastatic patients. Recently, CA has been proposed also as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation in osteoid osteoma and other benign tumour treatment with promising results. Cryotherapy with argon ice-balls as local adjuvant in open surgery is a tool that can provide enlargement of surgical margins if used properly. There is still not enough evidence supporting use of cryotherapy as local adjuvant in Musculoskeletal open surgery as the series cited above are very small and there is no comparative RCT between local adjuvant therapies including CA. One-hundred-and-eighty-three patients were treated with Cryoablation from 2000 and 2018 in the Musculoskeletal Tumours Surgery Unit of Careggi (Florence) and the University 2nd Clinic of Pisa. In our study group, 38 patients (26.6%) were affected by bone metastasis, 16 patients (11.1%) by aneurismal bone cysts or angiomas, 22 patients (15.4%) by low-grade malignant musculoskeletal tumours, 2 patients (1,4%) by fibromatosis, 63 patients (44.1%) by benign musculoskeletal tumours (principally Giant Cell Tumours-GCT) and 2 patients (1.4%) by Osteosarcomas. In 125 cases (87.4%), CA has been used as an adjuvant therapy, in 12 cases (8.4%) as a percutaneous ablation therapy and in 6 cases (4.2%) as adjuvant to remove tumoral lesions 'en bloc' or as a 'poor technique' for its sterilizing effect on previously resected bones. Mean follow-up was 10 years. Twenty-three patients (16%) were classified as Alive with Disease (AWD) due to local recurrence or tumour progression (14 metastases, 5 low-grade malignant bone tumours, 4 Giant Cell Tumours). Eight patients died due to the disease (6 metastases, 2 osteosarcomas), while 1 died from leukaemia. One-hundred-and-eleven patients (78%) were classified as Continues Disease Free (CDF). All patients reported decrease in pain-related symptoms after surgery and all surgeons reported better control of blood loss. Three cases (2%) of local skin necrosis or wound dehiscence were reported. No local recurrences were reported after fibromatosis ablation. Our results confirm that CA could be considered as a safe and effective technique to treat various conditions as adjuvant and palliative therapy. In particular, in open surgery, cryotherapy as an adjuvant treatment could lead to very low rates of recurrence in locally aggressive tumours like Giant Cell Tumours. These results could be generalized but a better understanding about indications and outcomes can be reached studying CA in specific populations with comparation to other adjuvant techniques.

Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented fenestreted pedicle-screw fixation in low bone quality patients: a case series and literature review.

The use of pedicle screws in low bone quality patients implicates risks of secondary implant loosening for grip lack. In fact, the result is a reduced mechanical stability at bone-screw interface and consequently an increased chance of pullout and hardware failure. Augmentation techniques have been described for many years and fenestrated screws that allow cement injection is one of them. This is a retrospective observational study of patients treated at our department with polymethylmethacrylate- (PMMA) augmented fenestrated screws. Indications for posterior instrumentation were traumatic fracture in osteoporotic spine, oncological disease, post-traumatic deformity, degenerative disease, revision surgery and sickle cell disease fractures. Implant stability was evaluated with X-Rays and CT scan performed 3 days after surgery and every 3 months during the follow-up. Accuracy of screw placement was evaluated with Heary classification. Fifty-three surgical treatments in 52 patients were performed and 247 PMMA augmented fenestrated screws were placed. According to the Heary classification, 96.21% resulted Grade I, 1.8% Grade II, 2% Grade IV. A total of 17 complications occurred. Fenestrated screw augmentation should be performed in selected patients in whom the bone quality is insufficient to guarantee implant stability. These screws may result useful in complex cases as revision surgeries, osteoporosis and tumour affections where bone quality is highly compromised.

Fluid-fluid levels detected on MRI and mimicking primary aneurismal bone cysts in a case of spinal bone metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal bone metastases may be lytic or sclerotic lesions. Sometimes aneurismal bone cyst (ABC)-like areas (also called "secondary ABC") can be found in giant-cell tumors, osteoblastomas and chondroblastomas but are rare in metastatic tumors. CASE REPORT: A retrospective study on 518 patients surgically treated for metastatic lesions of the spine from 1995 to 2012 was performed to evaluate the radiographic presentation. We propose a case report of a metastatic lesion associated with imaging features suggestive of aneurismal bone cyst. The patient was treated by intralesional surgery, after embolization of the lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid-fluid levels detected on imaging can be found in bone metastases and may be similar to a primary aneurismal bone cyst. Embolization of metastastic tumor was useful to help the surgeon.

Myoepithelioma of the spine: first case in the literature.

Myoepithelioma is a very rare tumour. This tumor type has been reported in the soft tissue, ear, sinonasal cavity, breast and lung. Although rare, myoepithelioma can occur in bone. We present the first case of myoepithelioma in the spine, documenting the clinical, radiographic and pathological features.

Is lumbar drainage of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula after spine surgery effective?

AIM: This study is a retrospective consecutive case series analysis of 198 patients who underwent spine surgery between 2009 and 2010. The aim of this paper was to assess the efficacy and safeness of bed rest and lumbar drainage in treating postoperative CSF fistula. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula is a well-known complication in spine surgery which lead to a significant change in length of hospitalization and possible postoperative complications. Management of CSF leaks has changed little over the past 20 years with no golden standard advocated from literature. METHODS: Postoperative CSF fistulas were described in 16 of 198 patients (8%) who underwent spine surgery between 2009 and 2010. The choice of the therapeutic strategy was based on the clinical condition of the patients, taking into account the possibility to maintain the prone position continuously and the risk of morbidity due to prolonged bed rest. Six patients were treated conservatively (position prone for three weeks), ten patients were treated by positioning an external CSF lumbar drainage for ten days. The mean follow-up period was ten months. RESULTS: All patients healed their wound properly and no adverse events were recorded. Patients treated conservatively were cured in a mean period of 30 days, while patients treated with CSF drainage were cured in a mean period of 10 days. CONCLUSION: Lumbar drainage seems to be effective and safe both in preventing CSF fistula in cases of large dural tears and debilitated/irradiated patients and in treating CSF leaks.

Navigation-assisted surgery for tumors of the spine.

PURPOSE: Computer-assisted navigation systems are largely used for pedicle screws positioning in degenerative and traumatic spine surgery. In oncologic spine surgery its use is still developing and could be extended for tumor identification and excision. Aim of this paper is to present our experience. METHODS: Seven selected patients (5 females, 2 males), mean age 44 years (min 17-max 62) affected by primary benign or malignant tumors of the spine or spine metastases were surgically treated with the use of computer-assisted navigation system from March to October 2011. RESULTS: At 18 months mean F.U. (min 15-max 23), no LR were observed. Revision surgery was necessary only in one case for C1 pedicle screw malpositioning. CONCLUSIONS: Navigation system can improve surgical accuracy in screws placement and tumor localization and excision. Learning curve and technical aspects must be considered to avoid potential serious mistakes.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a disabling and expensive disease of our century. A minimally invasive surgical technique to reduce the pain, the hospitalization, and restore the function.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive spine surgery has gained a great consent in the treatment of vertebral osteoporotic fractures. We perform a retrospective clinical and radiographic review on 32 consecutive patients (22 female and 10 male) surgically treated for a thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture (type A) by a minimally invasive system. By this study, we propose to determine the safety and efficacy of an expandable, percutaneous, minimally invasive technique to reduce the disability caused by vertebral osteoporotic fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients who were operated on between 2003 and 2004 by means of an innovative technique which employs an expandable system inserted by a minimally invasive approach into the vertebral body. Average age at surgery was 64.8 years (range, 27-82). All patients were mobilized in first post-operative day with no external immobilization and discharged from the Hospital in the second post-operative day. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This innovative technique which employs an expandable system inserted by a minimally-invasive approach into the vertebral body permits to obtain a double mechanical support for the vertebral plate, to partially reduce the fracture, to mobilize the patient immediately, reducing disability and costs related to the vertebral osteoporotic fractures.

Management of bone metastases.

Bone metastases are only apparently similar lesions, considering the large varieties of istotypes and the spread of the primary tumour. Although these metastases develop early and are not terminal events, they have to be considered as severe complications. When possible, surgical treatment can improve the history of the patient in terms of life expectancy and quality of life. The approach to these lesions should be multidisciplinary in collaboration with oncologists and radiotherapists. In fact the average of survival of these patients has increased in recent years. The evolution of anesthesiological techniques permits surgical treatments that once were considered prohibitive. The application of new adjuvant therapies increases the effectiveness for surgical treatment. Controversy exists over the most appropriate treatment for patients with bone metastatic disease. The purpose was to determine the best sequential process to arrive at the most appropriate treatment considering the individual general conditions and the parameters of the metastases. As the number of treatment options for metastatic bone disease has grown, it has become clear that effective implementation of these treatments can only be achieved by a multidisciplinary approach.