Utilization of TandemHeart in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the THEME registry.

BACKGROUND: TandemHeart has been demonstrated to improve hemodynamic and metabolic complications in cardiogenic shock (CS). Contemporary outcomes have not been reported. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of the TandemHeart (LivaNova) in contemporary real-world use. METHODS: We analyzed baseline characteristics, hemodynamic changes, and outcomes of all patients treated with TandemHeart who were enrolled in the THEME registry, a multicenter, prospective, observational study. RESULTS: Between May 2015 and June 2019, 50 patients underwent implantation of the TandemHeart device. 22% of patients had TandemHeart implanted within 12 h, 32% within 24 h, and 52% within 48 h of CS diagnosis. Cardiac index (CI) was significantly improved 24 h after implantation (median change 1.0, interquartile range (IQR) (0.5-1.4 L/min/m2 ). In survivors, there was a significant improvement in CI (1.0, IQR (0.5-2.25 L/min/m2 ) and lactate clearance -2.3 (-5.0 to -0.7 mmol/L). The 30-day and 180-day survival were 74% (95% confidence interval: 60%-85%) and 66% (95% confidence interval: 51%-79%), respectively. Survival was similarly high in those in whom TandemHeart has been used as a bridge to surgery (85% 180-day survival). CONCLUSION: In a contemporary cohort of patients presenting in CS, the use of TandemHeart is associated with a 74% 30-day survival and a 66% 180-day survival.

Hyperacute graft dysfunction in an orthotopic heart transplant in the presence of non-HLA antibodies.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplants in the absence of anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) is not well studied or documented. This case reviews hyperacute fulminant graft dysfunction suspected to be mediated by non-HLA antibodies. After cross clamp removal, the patient developed severe pulmonary edema, profound coagulopathy, and biventricular failure. The patient's presumed AMR, cardiogenic shock, and coagulopathy were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), multiple blood products, and prothrombin complex concentrate. The recipient was 0% panel-reactive antibody (PRA), ABO, and crossmatch compatible. Intraoperative biopsy sample revealed a thrombotic process suggestive of a coagulation pathway activated by AMR; however, no C4d deposition was detected. Postmortem biopsies also suggested AMR. Retrospective testing of the patient's pretransplant serum revealed strong antiangiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antibodies and a strongly positive endothelial cell crossmatch. Anti-AT1R antibodies are known to be AT1 receptor agonists and may trigger inflammation and activate the extrinsic coagulation pathway. Given the potential effects of signaling through the AT1R, the patient's preexisting anti-AT1R antibodies and procoagulant therapy may have adversely affected the patient's clinical course.