The Association between the Gut Microbiome and Development and Progression of Cancer Treatment Adverse Effects.

Adverse effects are a common consequence of cytotoxic cancer treatments. Over the last two decades there have been significant advances in exploring the relationship between the gut microbiome and these adverse effects. Changes in the gut microbiome were shown in multiple clinical studies to be associated with the development of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects, including diarrhoea and mucositis. However, more recent studies showed that changes in the gut microbiome may also be associated with the long-term development of psychoneurological changes, cancer cachexia, and fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this review was to examine the literature to identify potential contributions and associations of the gut microbiome with the wide range of adverse effects from cytotoxic cancer treatments.

Advanced statistics identification of participant and treatment predictors associated with severe adverse effects induced by fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Adverse effects following fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are common. However, there are no current accepted diagnostic markers for prediction prior to treatment, and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to determine genetic and non-genetic predictors of adverse effects. METHODS: Genomic DNA was analyzed for 25 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Demographics, comorbidities, cancer and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen types, and adverse effect data were obtained from clinical records for 155 Australian White participants. Associations were determined by bivariate analysis, logistic regression modeling and Bayesian network analysis. RESULTS: Twelve different adverse effects were observed in the participants, the most common severe adverse effect was diarrhea (12.9%). Bivariate analysis revealed associations between all adverse effects except neutropenia, between genetic and non-genetic predictors, and between 8 genetic and 12 non-genetic predictors with more than 1 adverse effect. Logistic regression modeling of adverse effects revealed a greater/sole role for six genetic predictors in overall gastrointestinal toxicity, nausea and/or vomiting, constipation, and neutropenia, and for nine non-genetic predictors in diarrhea, mucositis, neuropathy, generalized pain, hand-foot syndrome, skin toxicity, cardiotoxicity and fatigue. The Bayesian network analysis revealed less directly associated predictors (one genetic and six non-genetic) with adverse effects and confirmed associations between six adverse effects, eight genetic predictors and nine non-genetic predictors. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to link both genetic and non-genetic predictors with adverse effects following fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Collectively, we report a wealth of information that warrants further investigation to elucidate the clinical significance, especially associations with genetic predictors and adverse effects.

Contribution of TLR4 to colorectal tumor microenvironment, etiology and prognosis.

PURPOSE: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is increasingly recognized for its ability to govern the etiology and prognostic outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) due to its profound immunomodulatory capacity. Despite widespread interest in TLR4 and CRC, no clear analysis of current literature and data exists. Therefore, translational advances have failed to move beyond conceptual ideas and suggestions. METHODS: We aimed to determine the relationship between TLR4 and CRC through a systematic review and analysis of published literature and datasets. Data were extracted from nine studies that reported survival, CRC staging and tumor progression data in relation to TLR4 expression. Primary and metastatic tumor samples with associated clinical data were identified through the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. RESULTS: Systematic review identified heterogeneous relationships between TLR4 and CRC traits, with no clear theme evident across studies. A total of 448 datasets were identified through the TCGA database. Analysis of TCGA datasets revealed TLR4 mRNA expression is decreased in advanced CRC stages (P < 0.05 for normal vs Stage II, Stage III and Stage IV). Stage-dependent impact of TLR4 expression on survival outcomes were also found, with high TLR4 expression associated with poorer prognosis (stage I vs III (HR = 4.2, P = 0.008) and stage I vs IV (HR = 11.3, P < 0.001)). CONCLUSION: While TLR4 mRNA expression aligned with CRC staging, it appeared to heterogeneously regulate survival outcomes depending on the stage of disease. This underscores the complex relationship between TLR4 and CRC, with unique impacts dependent on disease stage.

Structural insight and analysis of TLR4 interactions with IAXO-102, TAK-242 and SN-38: an in silico approach.

Introduction: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has attracted interest due to its role in chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal inflammation. This structural study aimed to provide in silico rational of the recognition and potential binding of TLR4 ligands IAXO-102, TAK-242, and SN-38 (the toxic metabolite of the chemotherapeutic irinotecan hydrochloride), which could contribute to rationale development of therapeutic anti-inflammation drugs targeting TLR4 in the gastrointestinal tract. Methods: In silico docking was performed between the human TLR4-MD-2 complex and ligands (IAXO-102, TAK-242, SN-38) using Autodock Vina, setting the docking grids to cover either the upper or the lower bound of TLR4. The conformation having the lowest binding energy value (kcal/mol) was processed for post-hoc analysis of the best-fit model. Hydrogen bonding was calculated by using ChimeraX. Results: Binding energies of IAXO-102, TAK-242 and SN-38 at the upper bound of TLR4-MD-2 ranged between - 3.8 and - 3.1, - 6.9 and - 6.3, and - 9.0 and - 7.0, respectively. Binding energies of IAXO-102, TAK-242 and SN-38 at the lower bound ranged between - 3.9 and - 3.5, - 6.5 and - 5.8, and - 8.2 and - 6.8, respectively. Hydrogen bonding at the upper bound of TLR4/MD-2 with IAXO-102, TAK-242 and SN-38 was to aspartic acid 70, cysteine 133 and serine 120, respectively. Hydrogen bonding at the lower bound of TLR4-MD-2 with IAXO-102, TAK-242 and SN-38 was to serine 528, glycine 480 and glutamine 510, respectively. Conclusion: The in silico rational presented here supports further investigation of the binding activity of IAXO-102 and TAK-242 for their potential application in the prevention of gastrointestinal inflammation caused by SN-38.

Investigation of TLR4 Antagonists for Prevention of Intestinal Inflammation.

Activation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has been shown to be a major influence on the inflammatory signalling pathways in intestinal mucositis (IM), as demonstrated by TLR4 knock-out mice. Pharmacological TLR4 inhibition has thus been postulated as a potential new therapeutic approach for the treatment of IM but specific TLR4 inhibitors have yet to be investigated. As such, we aimed to determine whether direct TLR4 antagonism prevents inflammation in pre-clinical experimental models of IM. The non-competitive and competitive TLR4 inhibitors, TAK-242 (10 µM) and IAXO-102 (10 µM), respectively, or vehicle were added to human T84, HT-29, and U937 cell lines and mouse colonic explants 1 h before the addition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (in vitro: 100 µg/mL; ex vivo: 10 µg/mL), SN-38 (in vitro: 1 µM or 1 nM; ex vivo: 2 µM), and/or tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (5 µg/mL). Supernatant was collected for human IL-8 and mouse IL-6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), as a measure of inflammatory signalling. Cell viability was measured using XTT assays. Explant tissue was used in histopathological and RT-PCR analysis for genes of interest: TLR4, MD2, CD14, MyD88, IL-6, IL-6R, CXCL2, CXCR1, CXCR2. SN-38 increased cytostasis compared to vehicle (P < 0.0001). However, this was not prevented by either antagonist (P > 0.05) in any of the 3 cell lines. Quantitative histological assessment scores showed no differences between vehicle and treatment groups (P > 0.05). There were no differences in in vitro IL-8 (P > 0.05, in all 3 cells lines) and ex vivo IL-6 (P > 0.05) concentrations between vehicle and treatment groups. Transcript expression of all genes was similar across vehicle and treatment groups (P > 0.05). TLR4 antagonism using specific inhibitors TAK-242 and IAXO-102 was not effective at blocking IM in these pre-clinical models of mucositis. This work indicates that specific epithelial inhibition of TLR4 with these compounds is insufficient to manage mucositis-related inflammation. Rather, TLR4 signalling through immune cells may be a more important target to prevent IM.

Effects of a novel toll-like receptor 4 antagonist IAXO-102 in a murine model of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) is a side effect of high-dose irinotecan (CPT-11), causing debilitating symptoms that are often poorly managed. The role of TLR4 in the development of GIM has been clearly demonstrated. We, therefore, aimed to investigate the potential of the TLR4 antagonist, IAXO-102, to attenuate gastrointestinal inflammation as well as supress tumour activity in a colorectal-tumour-bearing mouse model of GIM induced by CPT-11. METHODS: 24 C57BL/6 mice received a vehicle, daily i.p. IAXO-102 (3 mg/kg), i.p. CPT-11 (270 mg/kg) or a combination of CPT-11 and IAXO-102. GIM was assessed using validated toxicity markers. At 72 h, colon and tumour tissue were collected and examined for histopathological changes and RT-PCR for genes of interest; TLR4, MD-2, CD-14, MyD88, IL-6, IL-6R, CXCL2, CXCR1, and CXCR2. RESULTS: IAXO-102 prevented diarrhoea in mice treated with CPT-11. Tumour volume in IAXO-102-treated mice was lower compared to vehicle at 48 h (P < 0.05). There were no differences observed in colon and tumour weights between the treatment groups. Mice who received the combination treatment had improved tissue injury score (P < 0.05) in the colon but did not show any improvements in cell proliferation or apoptotic rate. Expression of all genes was similar across all treatment groups in the tumour (P > 0.05). In the colon, there was a difference in transcript expression in vehicle vs. IAXO-102 (P < 0.05) and CPT-11 vs. combination (P < 0.01) in MD-2 and IL-6R, respectively. CONCLUSION: IAXO-102 was able to attenuate symptomatic parameters of GIM induced by CPT-11 as well as reduce tissue injury in the colon. However, there was no effect on cell proliferation and apoptosis. As such, TLR4 activation plays a partial role in GIM development but further research is required to understand the specific inflammatory signals underpinning tissue-level changes.

Intestinal toll-like receptor 4 knockout alters the functional capacity of the gut microbiome following irinotecan treatment.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan can cause high levels of diarrhea caused by toxic injury to the gastrointestinal microenvironment. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and the gut microbiome have previously been implicated in gastrointestinal toxicity and diarrhea; however, the link between these two factors has not been definitively determined. We used a tumor-bearing, intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) TLR4 knockout model (Tlr4ΔIEC) to assess microbiome changes following irinotecan treatment. We then determined if a fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) between Tlr4ΔIEC and wild-type (WT) mice altered irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. METHODS: MC-38 colorectal cancer cells were injected into WT and Tlr4ΔIEC mice. Fecal samples were collected prior to tumor inoculation, prior to irinotecan treatment and at cull. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to assess changes in the microbiome. Next, FMT was used to transfer the microbiome phenotype between Tlr4ΔIEC and WT mice prior to irinotecan treatment. Gastrointestinal toxicity symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: In study 1, there were no compositional differences in the microbiome between Tlr4ΔIEC and WT mice at baseline. However, predicted functional capacity of the microbiome was different between WT and Tlr4ΔIEC at baseline and post-irinotecan. In study 2, Tlr4ΔIEC mice were protected from grade 3 diarrhea. Additionally, WT mice who did not receive FMT had more colonic damage in the colon compared to controls (P = 0.013). This was not seen in Tlr4ΔIEC mice or WT mice who received FMT (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tlr4ΔIEC and WT had no baseline compositional microbiome differences, but functional differences at baseline and following irinotecan. FMT altered some aspects of irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) antagonists as potential therapeutics for intestinal inflammation.

Gastrointestinal inflammation is a hallmark of highly prevalent disorders, including cancer treatment-induced mucositis and ulcerative colitis. These disorders cause debilitating symptoms, have a significant impact on quality of life, and are poorly managed. The activation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has been proposed to have a major influence on the inflammatory signalling pathways of the intestinal tract. Inhibition of TLR4 has been postulated as an effective way to treat intestinal inflammation. However, there are a limited number of studies looking into the potential of TLR4 antagonism as a therapeutic approach for intestinal inflammation. This review surveyed available literature and reported on the in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo effects of TLR4 antagonism on different models of intestinal inflammation. Of the studies reviewed, evidence suggests that there is indeed potential for TLR4 antagonists to treat inflammation, although only a limited number of studies have investigated treating intestinal inflammation with TLR4 antagonists directly. These results warrant further research into the effect of TLR4 antagonists in the intestinal tract.

Site-specific contribution of Toll-like receptor 4 to intestinal homeostasis and inflammatory disease.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is a highly conserved protein of innate immunity, responsible for the regulation and maintenance of homeostasis, as well as immune recognition of external and internal ligands. TLR4 is expressed on a variety of cell types throughout the gastrointestinal tract, including on epithelial and immune cell populations. In a healthy state, epithelial cell expression of TLR4 greatly assists in homeostasis by shaping the host microbiome, promoting immunoglobulin A production, and regulating follicle-associated epithelium permeability. In contrast, immune cell expression of TLR4 in healthy states is primarily centred on the maturation of dendritic cells in response to stimuli, as well as adequately priming the adaptive immune system to fight infection and promote immune memory. Hence, in a healthy state, there is a clear distinction in the site-specific roles of TLR4 expression. Similarly, recent research has indicated the importance of site-specific TLR4 expression in inflammation and disease, particularly the impact of epithelial-specific TLR4 on disease progression. However, the majority of evidence still remains ambiguous for cell-specific observations, with many studies failing to provide the distinction of epithelial versus immune cell expression of TLR4, preventing specific mechanistic insight and greatly impacting the translation of results. The following review provides a critical overview of the current understanding of site-specific TLR4 activity and its contribution to intestinal/immune homeostasis and inflammatory diseases.

Diarrhea Induced by Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Compared With Chemotherapy: Potential Role of the Microbiome.

Small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (SM-TKIs) are among a group of targeted cancer therapies, intended to be more specific to cancer cells compared with treatments, such as chemotherapy, hence reducing adverse events. Unfortunately, many patients report high levels of diarrhea, the pathogenesis of which remains under investigation. In this article, we compare the current state of knowledge of the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) in comparison to SM-TKI-induced diarrhea, and investigate how a similar research approach in both areas may be beneficial. To this end, we review evidence that both treatment modalities may interact with the gut microbiome, and as such the microbiome should be investigated for its ability to reduce the risk of diarrhea.

Systematic review of agents for the management of cancer treatment-related gastrointestinal mucositis and clinical practice guidelines.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to update the clinical practice guidelines for the use of agents for the prevention and/or treatment of gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: Recommendation, Suggestion, and No Guideline Possible. RESULTS: A total of 78 papers across 13 interventions were examined of which 25 were included in the final review. No new guidelines were possible for any agent due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence. Existing guidelines for probiotics and hyperbaric oxygen were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Of the agents studied for the prevention and treatment of GIM, the evidence continues to support use of probiotics containing Lactobacillus spp. for prevention of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with pelvic malignancy, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat radiation-induced proctitis. Additional well-designed research is encouraged to enable a decision regarding palifermin, glutamine, sodium butyrate, and dietary interventions, for the prevention or treatment of GIM.

Is There a Temporal Relationship Between Trough Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentration and Acute Rejection in the First 14 Days After Kidney Transplantation?

BACKGROUND: There are inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between trough whole blood tacrolimus concentration (TAC C0) and acute kidney rejection in recipients undergoing TAC therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). However, studies have not always assessed TAC C0 at the time of rejection or accounted for variability in hematocrit. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the temporal relationship between TAC C0 and acute rejection, including when accounting for variation in hematocrit. METHODS: For 38 recipients who developed biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in the first 14 days after kidney transplantation, daily TAC C0 from TDM and hematocrit was collected from case notes. Differences in log10-transformed TAC C0 between the day of BPAR (log Cr), 1 day before BPAR (log Cr-1), and 2 days before BPAR (log Cr-2) and the combined median concentrations for the days preceding these (log Cprior) were examined by repeated-measures analysis of variance with Dunnett post hoc testing. Generalized linear mixed-effects regression (glmer) examined the ability of TAC C0 to predict acute rejection episodes with and without controlling for hematocrit. RESULTS: Log Cr-1 [mean difference (95% confidence interval) = -0.13 (-0.21 to -0.048), post hoc P = 0.002] and log Cr [-0.13 (-0.24 to -0.025), post hoc P = 0.013] were significantly lower than log Cprior. TAC C0 was a significant (P = 0.0078) predictor of rejection episodes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.79) only in glmer models accounting for variability in hematocrit. CONCLUSIONS: In recipients who developed BPAR, there was a significant temporal relationship between TAC C0 and BPAR incidence under TAC TDM that may not be detected in cross-sectional studies, especially if variability in hematocrit is not addressed. This supports a TAC C0-rejection relationship, which differs between recipients, and may explain why some recipients do or do not experience rejection within or below the TDM range, respectively. However, studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this finding.

Relationship between allograft cyclosporin concentrations and P-glycoprotein expression in the 1st month following renal transplantation.

The immunosuppressant cyclosporin is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate whose impaired function has been associated with an increased risk of cyclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity following renal transplantation. This study investigated the relationship between blood and allograft cyclosporin concentration, and the effect of P-gp expression. Fifty biopsy samples were obtained from 39 renal transplant recipients who received cyclosporin as part of maintenance immunosuppression. Blood cyclosporin concentrations (2 hours postdose) were obtained from clinical records, matching allograft cyclosporin concentrations were measured in frozen biopsy tissue by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and allograft P-gp expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Blood and allograft cyclosporin concentrations in the 1st month post-transplantation ranged from 505-2005 µg/L and 0.01-16.7 ng/mg tissue, respectively. Dose was the only significant predictor of allograft cyclosporin concentrations (adjusted R2  = .24, F-statistic = 11.52, P = .0019), with no effect of P-gp expression or blood cyclosporin concentrations. P-gp expression is not the major determinant of allograft cyclosporin concentrations.

The bidirectional interaction of the gut microbiome and the innate immune system: Implications for chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

Chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity (CIGT) occurs in up to 80% of all patients undergoing cancer treatment, and leads to symptoms such as diarrhoea, abdominal bleeding and pain. There is currently limited understanding of how to predict an individual patient's risk of CIGT. It is believed the gut microbiome and its interactions with the host's innate immune system plays a key role in the development of this toxicity and potentially other toxicities, however comprehensive bioinformatics modelling has not been rigorously performed. The innate immune system is strongly influenced by the microbial environment and vice-versa. Ways this may occur include the immune system controlling composition and compartmentalisation of the microbiome, the microbiome affecting development of antigen-presenting cells, and finally, the NLRP6 inflammasome orchestrating the colonic host-microbiome interface. This evidence calls into question the role of pre-treatment risk factors in the development of gastrointestinal toxicity after chemotherapy. This review aims to examine evidence of a bidirectional interaction between the gut microbiome and innate immunity, and how these interactions occur in CIGT. In the future, knowledge of these interactions may lead to improved personalised cancer medicine, predictive risk stratification methods and the development of targeted interventions to reduce, or even prevent, CIGT severity.

Toll-like receptor/interleukin-1 domain innate immune signalling pathway genetic variants are candidate predictors for severe gastrointestinal toxicity risk following 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Severe gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is a common adverse effect following 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy treatment. The presence of severe GI toxicity leads to treatment revisions, sub-optimal therapy outcomes, and decreases to patients' quality of life. There are no adequate predictors for 5-FU-induced severe GI toxicity risk. The Toll-like receptor/interleukin-1 (TIR) domain innate immune signalling pathway is known to be a mediating pathway in the development of GI toxicity. Hence, genetic variability in this signalling pathway may alter the pathophysiology of GI toxicity and, therefore, be predictive of risk. However, little research has investigated the effects of TIR domain innate immune signalling pathway single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) on the risk and development of severe GI toxicity. METHODS: This critical review surveyed the literature and reported on the in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo effects, as well as the genetic association, of selected TIR domain innate immune signalling pathway SNPs on disease susceptibility and gene functioning. RESULTS: Of the TIR domain innate immune signalling pathway SNPs reviewed, evidence suggests interleukin-1 beta (IL1B) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) SNPs have the greatest potential as predictors for severe GI toxicity risk. These results warrant further research into the effect of IL1B and TNF SNPs on the risk and development of severe GI toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SNPs of the TIR domain innate immune signalling pathway have profound effects on disease susceptibility and gene functioning, making them candidate predictors for severe GI toxicity risk. The identification of a predictor for 5-FU-induced severe GI toxicity will allow the personalization of supportive care measures.

Potential safety concerns of TLR4 antagonism with irinotecan: a preclinical observational report.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan-induced gut toxicity is mediated in part by Toll-Like receptor 4 (TLR4) signalling. The primary purpose of this preclinical study was to determine whether blocking TLR4 signalling by administering (-)-naloxone, a TLR4 antagonist, would improve irinotecan-induced gut toxicity. Our secondary aim was to determine the impact of (-)-naloxone on tumour growth. METHODS: Female Dark Agouti (DA) tumour-bearing rats were randomly assigned to four treatments (n = 6 in each); control, (-)-naloxone (100 mg/kg oral gavage at -2, 24, 48, and 72 h), irinotecan (175 mg/kg intraperitoneal at 0 h), and (-)-naloxone and irinotecan. Body weight and tumour growth were measured daily, and diarrhoea incidence and severity were recorded 4× per day up to 72 h post-treatment. RESULTS: At 72 h, all rats that received irinotecan lost weight compared to controls (p = 0.03). In addition, rats that received (-)-naloxone and irinotecan lost significantly more weight compared to controls (p < 0.005) than irinotecan only compared to controls (p = 0.001). (-)-Naloxone did not attenuate irinotecan-induced severe diarrhoea at 48 and 72 h. Finally, (-)-naloxone caused increased tumour growth compared to control at 72 h (p < 0.05) and significantly reduced the efficacy of irinotecan (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (-)-Naloxone in our preclinical model was unable to block irinotecan-induced gut toxicity and decreased the efficacy of irinotecan. As (-)-naloxone-oxycodone combination is used for cancer pain, this may present a potential safety concern for patients receiving (-)-naloxone-oxycodone and irinotecan concurrently and requires further investigation.

TLR4-Dependent Claudin-1 Internalization and Secretagogue-Mediated Chloride Secretion Regulate Irinotecan-Induced Diarrhea.

We have previously shown increased intestinal permeability, to 4-kDa FITC-dextran, in BALB/c mice treated with irinotecan. Importantly, genetic deletion of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4; Tlr4-/-) protected against loss of barrier function, indicating that TLR4 is critical in tight junction regulation. The current study aimed (i) to determine the molecular characteristics of intestinal tight junctions in wild-type and Tlr4-/- BALB/c mice and (ii) to characterize the secretory profile of the distal colon. Forty-two female wild-type and 42 Tlr4-/- BALB/c mice weighing between 18 and 25 g received a single 270 mg/kg [intraperitoneal (i.p.)] dose of irinotecan hydrochloride or vehicle control and were killed at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. The secretory profile of the distal colon, following carbachol and forksolin, was assessed using Ussing chambers at all time points. Tight junction integrity was assessed at 24 hours, when peak intestinal permeability and diarrhea were reported, using immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and RT-PCR. Irinotecan caused internalization of claudin-1 with focal lesions of ZO-1 and occludin proteolysis in the ileum and colon of wild-type mice. Tlr4-/- mice maintained phenotypically normal tight junctions. Baseline conductance, a measure of paracellular permeability, was increased in irinotecan-treated wild-type mice at 24 hours (53.19 ± 6.46 S/cm2; P = 0.0008). No change was seen in Tlr4-/- mice. Increased carbachol-induced chloride secretion was seen in irinotecan-treated wild-type and Tlr4-/- mice at 24 hours (wild-type: 100.35 ± 18.37 µA/cm2; P = 0.022; Tlr4-/-: 102.72 ± 18.80 µA/cm2; P = 0.023). Results suggest that TLR4-dependent claudin-1 internalization and secondary anion secretion contribute to irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(11); 2767-79. ©2016 AACR.

Irinotecan-Induced Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Pain Are Mediated by Common TLR4-Dependent Mechanisms.

Strong epidemiological data indicate that chemotherapy-induced gut toxicity and pain occur in parallel, indicating common underlying mechanisms. We have recently outlined evidence suggesting that TLR4 signaling may contribute to both side effects. We therefore aimed to determine if genetic deletion of TLR4 improves chemotherapy-induced gut toxicity and pain. Forty-two female wild-type (WT) and 42 Tlr4 null (-/-) BALB/c mice weighing between 18 and 25 g (10-13 weeks) received a single 270 mg/kg (i.p.) dose of irinotecan hydrochloride or vehicle control and were killed at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. Bacterial sequencing was conducted on cecal samples of control animals to determine the gut microbiome profile. Gut toxicity was assessed using validated clinical and histopathologic markers, permeability assays, and inflammatory markers. Chemotherapy-induced pain was assessed using the validated rodent facial grimace criteria, as well as immunologic markers of glial activation in the lumbar spinal cord. TLR4 deletion attenuated irinotecan-induced gut toxicity, with improvements in weight loss (P = 0.0003) and diarrhea (P < 0.0001). Crypt apoptosis was significantly decreased in BALB/c-Tlr4(-/-billy) mice (P < 0.0001), correlating with lower mucosal injury scores (P < 0.005). Intestinal permeability to FITC-dextran (4 kDa) and LPS translocation was greater in WT mice than in BALB/c-Tlr4(-/-billy) (P = 0.01 and P < 0.0001, respectively). GFAP staining in the lumbar spinal cord, indicative of astrocytic activation, was increased at 6 and 72 hours in WT mice compared with BALB/c-Tlr4(-/-billy) mice (P = 0.008, P = 0.01). These data indicate that TLR4 is uniquely positioned to mediate irinotecan-induced gut toxicity and pain, highlighting the possibility of a targetable gut/CNS axis for improved toxicity outcomes. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6); 1376-86. ©2016 AACR.

Chemotherapy-induced gut toxicity and pain: involvement of TLRs.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced gut toxicity is associated with significant pain, and pain influences gut function. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that regulate gut homeostasis are activated by tissue damage and microbes, and their altered expression following chemotherapy may change cellular responses. This study examined the interaction between chemotherapy-induced gut toxicity and pain and related these to gut TLR and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression. METHODS: Female tumor bearing Dark Agouti rats received irinotecan (175 mg/kg, n = 34) or vehicle (n = 5) and were assessed over 120 h for gut toxicity (diarrhea, weight loss), pain (facial), and GFAP, TLR2, 4, 5, and 9 gut expression. RESULTS: Irinotecan caused diarrhea (72 % of animals grade ≥ 1), weight loss (11.1 ± 6.6 %, P < 0.0001), and pain (5 (0-5), P < 0.0001) all peaking at 72 h. Higher pain scores were observed in rats with diarrhea versus those without: median (range) of 2.0 (0-5) versus 0 (0-5), P = 0.01. Irinotecan also caused a decrease in TLR4 and 5, and an increase in GFAP expression in jejuna crypt at 96 and 120 h (all P < 0.05); with lower TLR4 expression associated with lower pain (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The association between gut toxicity and pain suggests these toxicities are linked, possibly via TLR-mediated inflammatory pathways. Further, as TLR4 and 5 expression was absent during recovery in the jejuna and GFAP expression was increased in the jejuna, this implies expression of these may be critical in the healing phase following chemotherapy. Detailed studies of gut TLRs and GFAP are now warranted.