Multicentre randomised trial of screening with sFlt1/PlGF and planned delivery to prevent pre-eclampsia at term: protocol of the PE37 study.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-eclampsia affects ~5%-7% of pregnancies. Although improved obstetric care has significantly diminished its associated maternal mortality, it remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the world. Term pre-eclampsia accounts for 70% of all cases and a large proportion of maternal-fetal morbidity related to this condition. Unlike in preterm pre-eclampsia, the prediction and prevention of term pre-eclampsia remain unsolved. Previously proposed approaches are based on combined third-trimester screening and/or prophylactic drugs, but these policies are unlikely to be widely implementable in many world settings. Recent evidence shows that the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (s-Flt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio measured at 35-37 weeks' gestation predicts term pre-eclampsia with an 80% detection rate. Likewise, recent studies demonstrate that induction of labour beyond 37 weeks is safe and well accepted by women. We hypothesise that a single-step universal screening for term pre-eclampsia based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-37 weeks followed by planned delivery beyond 37 weeks reduces the prevalence of term pre-eclampsia without increasing the caesarean section rates or worsening the neonatal outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We propose an open-label randomised clinical trial to evaluate the impact of a screening of term pre-eclampsia with the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio followed by planned delivery in asymptomatic nulliparous women at 35-37 weeks. Women will be assigned 1:1 to revealed (sFlt-1/PlGF known to clinicians) versus concealed (unknown) arms. A cut-off of >90th centile is used to define the high risk of subsequent pre-eclampsia and offer planned delivery from 37 weeks. The efficacy variables will be analysed and compared between groups primarily following an intention-to-treat approach, by ORs and their 95% CI. This value will be computed using a Generalised Linear Mixed Model for binary response (study group as fixed effect and the centre as intercept random effect). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is conducted under the principles of Good Clinical Practice. This study was accepted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Clinic Barcelona on 20 November 2020. Subsequent approval by individual ethical committees and competent authorities was granted. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04766866.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 families with first-degree relatives harbouring distinct NF1 pathogenic variants. Genetic counselling and familial diagnosis: what should be offered?

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in NF1 Recently, NF1 testing has been included as a clinical criterion for NF1 diagnosis. Additionally, preconception genetic counselling in patients with NF1 focuses on a 50% risk of transmitting the familial variant as the risk of having a sporadic NF1 is considered the same as the general population. METHODS: 829 individuals, 583 NF1 sporadic cases and 246 patients with NF1 with documented family history, underwent genetic testing for NF1. Genotyping and segregation analysis of NF1 familial variants was determined by microsatellite analysis and NF1 sequencing. RESULTS: The mutational analysis of NF1 in 154 families with two or more affected cases studied showed the co-occurrence of two different NF1 germline pathogenic variants in four families. The estimated mutation rate in those families was 3.89×10-3, 20 times higher than the NF1 mutation rate (~2×10-4) (p=0.0008). Furthermore, the co-occurrence of two different NF1 germline pathogenic variants in these families was 1:39, 60 times the frequency of sporadic NF1 (1:2500) (p=0.003). In all cases, the de novo NF1 pathogenic variant was present in a descendant of an affected male. In two cases, variants were detected in the inherited paternal wild-type allele. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, together with previous cases reported, suggest that the offspring of male patients with NF1 could have an increased risk of experiencing de novo NF1 pathogenic variants. This observation, if confirmed in additional cohorts, could have relevant implications for NF1 genetic counselling, family planning and NF1 genetic testing.

Cumulative sum plots and retrospective parameters in first-trimester ductus venosus quality assurance.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the application of two quality assurance methods to the ductus venosus pulsatility index (DVPI), as a first-trimester aneuploidy marker, including retrospective assessment of distribution parameters and cumulative sum (CUSUM) plots. METHODS: The DVPI was measured in 14 444 singleton fetuses at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks in two Fetal Medicine centers during a 4-year period. Sonologist-specific quality assurance distribution parameters, previously described for nuchal translucency, were assessed: the median multiples of the median (MoM), the logarithmic standard deviation of DVPI MoMs and the weekly DVPI percent decrease. Quality assurance results were compared between median MoMs and MoM-based CUSUM plots. RESULTS: When sonologist-specific DVPI distribution parameters were retrospectively applied for quality assurance, a 1.0 median MoM, a 0.1 median logarithmic standard deviation and a 3.4 median weekly DVPI drop percentage were observed. CUSUM plots showed good agreement with 0.9-1.1 MoMs range for median MoM, in the assessment of sonologist-specific performances. CONCLUSION: Retrospective and prospective DVPI quality assurance methods appear to be applicable to DVPI at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks. Its use should be encouraged if DVPI is to be added to first-trimester Down syndrome or cardiac defects screening.

First trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies combining nuchal translucency and first trimester biochemical markers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to describe the performance of first-trimester combined risk assessment in twin pregnancies. METHODS: Maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) were determined at 8 to 12 weeks and fetal nuchal translucency (NT) was measured at 11 to 13+6 weeks. The individual risk was estimated for each fetus using the combined test in dichorionic twins. In monochorionic twins, the mean risk assessment of the two fetuses was used. An invasive diagnostic procedure was offered when the risk was ≥ 1 : 270 in either one of the fetuses. RESULTS: From February 2007 to June 2011, 447 twin pregnancies were enrolled in this study. There were 402 (89.9%) dichorionic and 45 (10.1%) monochorionic twins. In dichorionic twins, mean crown-rump length (CRL) was 63.9 mm; median NT multiples of the median (MoM) was 0.97; median Β-hCG was MoM 1.74; median PAPP-A was 1.72. In monochorionic twins, mean CRL was 61.9 mm; median NT MoM was 0. 98; median Β-hCG MoM was 1.44; and median PAPP-A was 1.51. Two pregnancies with Down syndrome were detected by first trimester screening, both in dichorionic twins. The false positive rate was 5.7% (95% confidence interval 4.1-7.3) and 4.4% (95% confidence interval 0.1-8.8%) in dichorionic and monochorionic twins, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combined test in twins appears to be a good method for Down syndrome screening with a high detection rate and an acceptable false-positive rate.

Early first-trimester free-ß-hCG and PAPP-A serum distributions in monochorionic and dichorionic twins.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the distribution of first-trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy in twins according to chorionicity. METHODS: Maternal serum free-ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) were measured between 8-13 + 6 weeks as a part of a routine first-trimester screening program in conjunction with fetal nuchal translucency measured at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation. Data from 279 twin pregnancies were extracted from our fetal databases. Down syndrome cases were excluded. Individual marker concentrations were expressed as weight, ethnicity, smoking and maternal diabetes corrected. To compare the distributions of the biochemical parameters, a generalized additive model was used adjusted to a smoothing regression model with the values transformed with base 10'' logarithm using R software (generalized additive model-smoothing spline regression). RESULTS: Free-ß-hCG and PAPP-A distributions, analyzed with a generalized additive model adjusted to a smoothing regression model, were significantly different depending on the chorionicity. We graphically displayed the relationship between the predicted concentration of the free-ß-hCG and PAPP-A and the gestational age in days for monochorionic and dichorionic twins adjusted by weight. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free-ß-hCG values are gestational age specific. It is necessary to make a distinction between monochorionic and dichorionic twins because biochemical markers are lower in monochorionic than in dichorionic twins.

Measurement of nuchal translucency as a single strategy in trisomy 21 screening: should we use any other marker?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of nuchal translucency thickness as a single marker in screening for trisomy 21 at 10-16 weeks' gestation. METHODS: From December 1996 to October 2001, nuchal translucency was measured in 11,281 consecutive early second trimester fetuses referred to our unit for prenatal care and delivery. Scans were performed by eight experienced ultrasonographers, under strict methodological criteria. RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 118 cases (52 trisomy 21). Using nuchal translucency greater than the 95th centile as a cut-off, the overall detection rate was 71.2% with a specificity of 95.4%, and a positive predictive value of 14%. In the trisomy 21 selected group, detection rate, specificity, and positive predictive value for nuchal translucency were 92.3%, 95.4%, and 8.5%, respectively. The detection rate of trisomy 21 reached 100% when nuchal translucency was measured between 10 and 14 weeks' gestation, maintaining the same specificity. CONCLUSION: Early second trimester nuchal translucency measurement can achieve prenatal detection rates of trisomy 21 greater than 95% with a 5% false-positive rate. With a detection rate so high, the benefits of using additional markers may be less than previously considered. Although maternal age, other sonographic or Doppler markers, and maternal serum biochemistry might play a role in prenatal strategies to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities, the high detection rate of trisomy 21 fetuses using nuchal translucency as a single parameter suggests that early nuchal translucency measurement between 10 and 14 weeks' gestation can be a simple screening strategy for this condition.