Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic radiotherapy may improve the prognosis of oligometastatic patients. In the literature, there is very little data available that is specific to breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study. The primary objective was to estimate progression-free survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using Cyberknife of breast cancer oligometastases. The secondary objectives were to estimate overall survival, local control, and toxicity. The inclusion criteria were oligometastatic breast cancer with a maximum of five lesions distributed in one to three different organs, diagnosed on PET/CT and/or MRI, excluding brain metastases and oligoprogressions. This was combined with systemic medical treatment. FINDINGS: Forty-four patients were enrolled from 2007 to 2017, at three high-volume cancer centers. The patients mostly had one to two lesion(s) whose most widely represented site was bone (24 lesions or 44.4%), particularly in the spine, followed by liver (22 lesions or 40.7%), then pulmonary lesions (six lesions or 11.1%). The primary tumor expressed estrogen receptors in 33 patients (84.6%); the status was HER2+++ in 7 patients (17.9%). The median dose was 40 Gy (min-max: 15-54) prescribed at 80% isodose, the median number of sessions was three (min-max: 3-10). The median D50% was 42 Gy (min max 17-59). After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, progression-free survival (PFS) at one year, two years, and three years was 81% (95% CI: 66-90%), 58% (95% CI: 41-72%), and 45% (95% CI: 28-60%), respectively. The median PFS was 2.6 years (95% CI: 1.3 - 4.9). Overall survival at three years was 81% (95% CI: 63-90%). The local control rate at two and three years was 100%. Three patients (7.3%) experienced G2 acute toxicity, no grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: The PFS of oligometastatic breast cancer patients treated with SBRT appears long, with low toxicity. Local control is high. SBRT for oligometastases is rarely applied in breast cancer in light of the population in our study. Phase III studies are ongoing.

Evaluation of an ultrasound bladder scanner in supine and standing position.

PURPOSE: This study examined the performance of a bladder volume measuring device, the BladderScan (BS) BVI9400. The use of the BS offers the possibility of assessing the bladder volume before positioning the patient and performing the daily image-guided radiotherapy procedure. Patients often cannot lie down before entering the treatment vault. Therefore, the BS was also assessed in a standing position. METHODS: The repeatability precision was first evaluated, which is the variability of immediate repeated measures of the BS with same operator and subject. This was followed by the reproducibility precision of the BS in which the operator and subjects differ. Finally, the trueness was evaluated in terms of fixed and proportional bias of the results by applying weighted least-squares fitting. Note that 53 and 85 patient measurements were carried out in supine and standing position, respectively, each consisting of three repeated BS measurements. These were compared with the computed tomography (CT)-delineated bladder volume. RESULTS: Repeatability was dependent on measurement value (heteroscedasticity) with σrepeatability (BS) = ±15 cm3  ± 10%. However, the total agreement between BS and CT was low with the 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) exceeding ±200 cm3 due to poor patient reproducibility and presence of fixed and proportional bias. Only in the best case of male patients in the supine position, three BS measurements, and correction for the fixed and proportional bias, 95% LOAs of [-147, +114] cm3 were obtained between CT and BS. CONCLUSION: The agreement of the BVI9400 BS with CT was found to be too low for radiotherapy applications.

Locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the cervix on uterus didelphys: a case report.

In November 2013, a woman with Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich (HWW) syndrome was diagnosed with a locally advanced left cervical adenocarcinoma. The patient's malformation consisted of two uteri with two cervixes, a obstructed vagina, and a left renal agenesis. Classification FIGO: stage IIIa because of infiltration of the inferior third of the vagina wall. Locoregional management comprised an infrarenal lateral aortic lymphadenectomy followed by concomitant radio-chemotherapy to the pelvic (inguinal, pelvic, and infrarenal para aortic nodes) volumes. A total of 50.4 Gy were delivered (1.8 Gy/fraction/day) to the node (inguinal, pelvic, and aortic infrarenal) and pelvic volume; a concomitant boost to the primary cervical tumor and macroscopic nodes to 59.92 Gy (2.14 Gy/fraction/day) was performed. 20 Gy were delivered with intracavitary brachytherapy boost with mold technique and a pulsed-dose-rate technique due to the rarity of this uterine malformation. After 30 months of follow-up, there was no evidence of locoregional or distant recurrence.

Feasibility study of pelvic helical IMRT for elderly patients with endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: Standard treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer involves surgery (when possible) followed by brachytherapy or external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk tumors. EBRT is not without toxicity, meaning that it could be difficult to complete for elderly patients, who typically have decreased reserve and resistance to stressors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 70 and over treated between April 2009 and May 2013 for endometrial cancer and received IMRT (Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy) were included in this observational study. IMRT could be performed as adjuvant treatment or as an exclusive treatment for patients not amenable to surgery. The primary endpoints of this study were to assess the feasibility and toxicity of pelvic IMRT in this population. Secondary endpoints were to assess disease-specific survival, overall survival, and local control. Predictors of toxicity were also explored. RESULTS: Forty seven consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 75 years (range, 70-89 years). Eleven patients were aged 80 years and older. Toxicities were found in thirty four patients (72%) during treatment. Among these, toxicity did not exceed grade 2 for 32 patients (68%). Two patients had a grade 3 toxicity (4%). Overall survival rates were 87% and 83% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Six patients (12.8%) had a local relapse and nine others (19.1%) had distant relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic helical IMRT for patients aged 70 and older is feasible with full standard radiation doses, showing that age greater than 70 should not be considered as a reason not to perform optimal treatment.