Cancer, diabetes, survival and glycemic control: a large multisite analysis.

Aim: To determine overall survival (OS) and glycemic control in patients with cancer and diabetes. Materials & methods: Patients of our institution with breast, colon, lung, pancreas and prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. OS was compared between matched patients with and without diabetes, and changes in glucose value over time were assessed. Results: For 3934 patients each with and without diabetes, adjusted analysis showed no difference in OS according to diabetes status (hazard ratio: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.96-1.20). Mean glucose values decreased over time in patients with and without diabetes (p = 0.01). Conclusion: In this large study of patients with five common cancers, the co-occurrence of diabetes did not affect OS. Cancer did not adversely affect glucose levels.

The aim of this study was to evaluate survival and glucose control in patients with cancer and diabetes at three separate geographic locations in a single health system. From an institutional cancer registry, we identified patients with breast, colon, lung, pancreas and prostate cancers. Patients with and without diabetes were matched by age, sex, cancer type, staging, geographic location and year of cancer diagnosis. In this study, the co-occurrence of diabetes did not affect overall survival. Cancer did not adversely affect glucose levels.

Implications of neuroendocrine tumor and diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes and care: a matched case-control study.

AIM: We aimed to determine the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and of NETs on glycemic control. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed NETs with/without DM were matched 1:1 by age, sex and diagnosis year (2005-2017), and survival compared (Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards). Mixed models compared hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose during the year after cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Three-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI: 60-86%) for DM patients versus 80% (95% CI: 70-92%) for non-DM patients (p = 0.82). Hazard ratio was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.56-3.16; p = 0.51); mean DM HbA1c, 7.3%. CONCLUSION: DM did not adversely affect survival of patients with NET. NET and its treatment did not affect glycemic control.

Assessing the relationship between institutional cancer and diabetes mortality rates using National Death Index data.

AIM: To evaluate overall survival (OS), glycemic control in cancer patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients (2010-2015) with newly diagnosed prostate, breast, lung, colorectal and pancreatic cancers were identified in institutional cancer registry. Data linked to National Death Index for vital status. 5-year OS estimated; glucose and hemoglobin A1c assessed during year postdiagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 1404 patients (non-DM, n = 936; DM, n = 468). DM cohort had 168 deaths (36%); non-DM, 267 (29%). 5-year OS estimated at 58% (95% CI: 53-64%) for DM and 67% (95% CI: 64-71%) for controls; for matched pairs, hazard ratio: 1.35 (95% CI: 1.02-1.79). Cancer did not harm glycemic control. CONCLUSION: OS among cancer patients with DM was lower than without DM.

Mortality and glycemic control among patients with acute and chronic myeloid leukemia and diabetes: a case-control study.

AIM: We examined the association between diabetes and survival in patients with acute and chronic myeloid leukemia and the association of leukemia with glycemic control. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients with leukemia with and without diabetes (2007-2015) were retrospectively identified and matched 1:1 (n = 70 per group). Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hemoglobin A1c and glucose levels the year after leukemia diagnosis were compared by mixed models. RESULTS: Among 25 of 70 patients with diabetes, mean hemoglobin A1c during the year after leukemia diagnosis was 6.8%. Kaplan-Meier-estimated 3-year survival was 46% for diabetes patients versus 45% for controls (p = 0.79). CONCLUSION: No associations were found between leukemia, diabetes, survival and glycemic control.

Survival and glycemic control in patients with coexisting lymphoma and diabetes: a case-control analysis.

AIM: We examined the effect of diabetes on survival in patients with lymphoma and the effect of lymphoma on glycemic control. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients with lymphoma with and without diabetes (2005-2016) were retrospectively identified and matched 1:1. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose levels during the year after cancer diagnosis were compared by mixed models. RESULTS: For patients with diabetes, mean HbA1c during the year after lymphoma diagnosis was 6.7%. Estimated 5-year progression-free survival for patients with versus without diabetes was 63% (95% CI: 53-76%) versus 58% (95% CI: 46-71%) (p = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Lymphoma and its treatment did not affect glycemic control. Diabetes did not decrease lymphoma-specific survival.

Mortality and glycemic control among patients with diabetes mellitus and uterine or ovarian cancer.

AIM: To evaluate associations between survival and glycemic control in age-matched patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer, with/without diabetes mellitus (DM). PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian or endometrial cancer with and without DM were compared. RESULTS: The study included 84 patients with ovarian cancer (28, DM); 96 with endometrial cancer (48 with, 48 without DM). DM patients did not have worse overall or progression-free survival than non-DM patients. Glycemic control was not associated with either cancer. CONCLUSION: There was no association between DM and survival for patients with uterine or ovarian cancer. In addition, there was no association between uterine and ovarian cancer and glycemic control. Additional studies to confirm these observations in larger populations are required.

Prognosis and outcome of small (<=1 cm), node-negative breast cancer on the basis of hormonal and HER-2 status.

Long-term outcomes and hence the role of adjuvant therapy in patients with small (≤1 cm), node-negative breast cancer remain unclear. This study's objective was to evaluate whether human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 status is an independent, poor prognostic marker in patients with these tumors and to identify a subgroup of patients with these small tumors who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. All patients with a diagnosis of a node-negative breast tumor measuring ≤1 cm and available HER-2 test results between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, at the three Mayo Clinic sites were identified. Clinicopathologic data were compared in three groups: HER-2(-), HER-2(+), and triple-negative (TN) tumors. Of the 421 tumors identified, 364 (86.5%) were HER-2(-), 28 (6.7%) were HER-2(+), and 29 (6.9%) were TN. The median follow-up time was 1,015 days (range, 1-2,549 days). Groups were balanced in terms of patient age and tumor histology. Eleven patients with HER-2(-) tumors (3.0%), seven with HER-2(+) tumors (25.0%), and eight with TN tumors (27.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Follow-up data were available for 357, 28, and 28 patients in the three groups, respectively. Death rates in the three groups were 6.4% (23 of 357) (one recurrence-related death), 0% (0 of 28), and 7.1% (2 of 28) (one recurrence-related death), respectively. During follow-up, the tumor recurred in nine patients: four were HER-2(-) tumors (1.1%), two were HER-2(+) tumors (7.1%), and three were TN tumors (10.7%). Patients with small, node-negative breast tumors have an excellent prognosis, but HER-2(+) and TN tumors appear to have a higher recurrence rate, warranting consideration for broad use and optimization of systemic adjuvant treatments.