Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Health Econ ; 21(4): 621-634, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32026155

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A centralised approach to health technology assessment (HTA) may facilitate optimal use of HTA resources. A regional approach may increase the chances of local implementation of recommendations. This study aimed to compare assessment procedures in England (centralised HTA approach) with Spain (regional HTA approach) discussing key challenges and opportunities from both approaches. METHODS: We compared technology assessments of anticancer medicines in the two jurisdictions from 2008 to 2015. To assess the implementation of HTA recommendations, we assessed trends in medicine usage using regression methods. We used IQVIA data, from 2011 to 2016, for a sample of 11 medicines. We used CatSalut data from Catalonia to assess the implementation of local recommendations. RESULTS: In England, 66 assessments were undertaken by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), using a standardised methodology. In Spain, there were 79 reports undertaken by a range of bodies using a shared process and coordinated through the GENESIS collaboration; the assessment methods used varied substantially. Overall, the recommendations in the two jurisdictions were similar. Regression analyses indicate that where there is a positive recommendation by HTA bodies, the usage of the medicine responds most strongly (p < 0.001) in Catalonia (4.892), followed by England (3.120) and Spain (1.693). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that medicine utilisation does respond to the positive recommendations of HTA bodies. However, if HTA capacity is organised primarily regionally, considerable effort may be required in coordination, to ensure consistent and rigorous assessments and adequate implementation of HTA findings.


Assuntos
Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/organização & administração , Análise Custo-Benefício , Inglaterra , Humanos , Espanha
2.
Bone Joint J ; 99-B(3): 383-392, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28249980

RESUMO

AIMS: The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) randomised clinical trial compared the operative and non-operative treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term treatment effects beyond the two-year follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the original 250 trial participants, 176 consented to extended follow-up and were sent postal questionnaires at three, four and five years after recruitment to the trial. The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS; the primary outcome), EuroQol 5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L), and any recent shoulder operations and fracture data were collected. Statistical and economic analyses, consistent with those of the main trial were applied. RESULTS: OSS data were available for 164, 155 and 149 participants at three, four and five years, respectively. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between operative and non-operative treatment at each follow-up point. No participant had secondary shoulder surgery for a new complication. Analyses of EQ-5D-3L data showed no significant between-group differences in quality of life over time. CONCLUSION: These results confirm that the main findings of the PROFHER trial over two years are unchanged at five years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:383-92.


Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas do Ombro/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fraturas do Ombro/cirurgia , Articulação do Ombro/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Bone Joint J ; 98-B(2): 152-9, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26850418

RESUMO

AIMS: A pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (PROFHER) was conducted in United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of surgery compared with non-surgical treatment for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck in adults. METHODS: A cost utility analysis from the NHS perspective was performed. Differences between surgical and non-surgical treatment groups in costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at two years were used to derive an estimate of the cost effectiveness of surgery using regression methods. RESULTS: Patients randomised to receive surgical intervention accumulated mean greater costs and marginally lower QALYs than patients randomised to non-surgery. The surgical intervention cost a mean of £1758 more per patient (95% confidence intervals (CI) £1126 to £2389). Total QALYs for the surgical group were smaller than those for non-surgery -0.0101 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.11). The probability of surgery being cost effective was less than 10% given the current NICE willingness to pay at a threshold of £20 000 for an additional QALY. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that current surgical treatment is not cost effective for the majority of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck in the United Kingdom's NHS. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The results of this trial do not support the trend of increased surgical treatment for patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck within the United Kingdom NHS.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Ombro/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fraturas do Ombro/terapia , Medicina Estatal/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Br J Surg ; 100(9): 1205-13, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23775366

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication surgery has been shown to be a cost-effective alternative to continued medical management over 1 year for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The longer-term cost-effectiveness is, however, uncertain. This study evaluated the long-term health benefits, costs and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication compared with continued medical management in patients with GORD. METHODS: Individual patient data were used from the 5-year follow-up of the REFLUX trial, a large multicentre, pragmatic, randomized trial in which 357 patients with GORD for at least 12 months at trial entry were allocated randomly to early laparoscopic fundoplication or continued medical management. Health outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). A UK National Health Service perspective was used for costs. RESULTS: The group randomized to surgery experienced better health outcomes in each year of follow-up, but the difference narrowed over time. At 5 years, the surgery group had experienced 0.216 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.021 to 0.412) more QALYs but also accrued €1832 (1214 to 2448) more costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €8481 per QALY gained. The probability that surgery is the most cost-effective intervention was 0.932 at a threshold of €24,134/QALY (£20,000/QALY). Results were robust to most sensitivity analyses, except where patients with missing data randomized to surgery were assumed to have worse health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic fundoplication is a cost-effective alternative to continued medical management over 5 years. No evidence was found to suggest that the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication diminishes over time.


Assuntos
Fundoplicatura/economia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Health Technol Assess ; 17(22): 1-167, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23742987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite promising evidence that laparoscopic fundoplication provides better short-term relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) than continued medical management, uncertainty remains about whether benefits are sustained and outweigh risks. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery among people with GORD requiring long-term medication and suitable for both surgical and medical management. DESIGN: Five-year follow-up of a randomised trial (with parallel non-randomised preference groups) comparing a laparoscopic surgery-based policy with a continued medical management policy. Cost-effectiveness was assessed alongside the trial using a NHS perspective for costs and expressing health outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). SETTING: Follow-up was by annual postal questionnaire and selective hospital case notes review; initial recruitment in 21 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaire responders among the 810 original participants. At entry, all had documented evidence of GORD and symptoms for > 12 months. Questionnaire response rates (years 1-5) were from 89.5% to 68.9%. INTERVENTIONS: Three hundred and fifty-seven participants were recruited to the randomised comparison (178 randomised to surgical management and 179 randomised to continued medical management) and 453 to the preference groups (261 surgical management and 192 medical management). The surgeon chose the type of fundoplication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: disease-specific outcome measure (the REFLUX questionnaire); secondary: Short Form questionnaire-36 items (SF-36), European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), NHS resource use, reflux medication, complications. RESULTS: The randomised groups were well balanced. By 5 years, 63% in the randomised surgical group and 13% in the randomised medical management group had received a total or partial wrap fundoplication (85% and 3% in the preference groups), with few perioperative complications and no associated deaths. At 1 year (and 5 years) after surgery, 36% (41%) in the randomised surgical group - 15% (26%) of those who had surgery - were taking proton pump inhibitor medication compared with 87% (82%) in the randomised medical group. At each year, differences in the REFLUX score significantly favoured the randomised surgical group (a third of a SD; p< 0.01 at 5 years). SF-36 and EQ-5D scores also favoured surgery, but differences attenuated over time and were generally not statistically significant at 5 years. The worse the symptoms at trial entry, the larger the benefit observed after surgery. Those randomised to medical management who subsequently had surgery had low baseline scores that markedly improved after surgery. Following fundoplication, 3% had surgical treatment for a complication and 4% had subsequent reflux-related operations - most often revision of the wrap. Dysphagia, flatulence and inability to vomit were similar in the two randomised groups. The economic analysis indicated that surgery was the more cost-effective option for this patient group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for surgery in the base case was £7028 per additional QALY; these findings were robust to changes in approaches and assumptions. The probability of surgery being cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per additional QALY was > 0.80 for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: After 5 years, laparoscopic fundoplication continues to provide better relief of GORD symptoms with associated improved health-related quality of life. Complications of surgery were uncommon. Despite being initially more costly, a surgical policy is highly likely to be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15517081. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 17, No. 22. See the HTA programme website for further project information.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/economia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fundoplicatura/efeitos adversos , Fundoplicatura/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Reino Unido
6.
Farm Hosp ; 30(6): 370-3, 2006.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17298194

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze registry quality in centralized cytostatic therapy units in Andalusian hospitals, and the availability of data to analyze the use of these drugs. METHOD: An ad hoc questionnaire was designed using variables related to information coverage on patients and their treatments, data processing extent, and organization. Questionnaires were completed in September 2005 by surveying people responsible for chemotherapy in all 19 pharmacy departments in Andalusian hospitals that treat oncologic patients. RESULTS: Response rate was 100%, but one department had no centralized cytostatic therapy unit. Centralized preparation coverage was 89% for the day hospital, 84% for inpatients, 79% for hematologic patients, and 69% for pediatric patients. Registries are computerized in only 13 hospitals (68%) with a variety of software programs. Temozolamide and capecitabine dispensation has a separate registry in 68% and 42% of cases, respectively. Patient name, and cytostatic name and dosage are the only data recorded in all instances, while protocol name is only recorded in 47%, and diagnosis, staging, and TNM categorization in 58%, 31%, and 16% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability regarding information systems for cytostatic use management, and a relevant shortage of patient data available for prescription use and adaptation studies.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos/normas , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/normas , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Formulários e Registros/organização & administração , Controle de Formulários e Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Registros Hospitalares , Humanos , Serviço Hospitalar de Registros Médicos/organização & administração , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Software , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA