Management of cavernous sinus meningiomas: Consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Introduction: The evolution of cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) might be unpredictable and the efficacy of their treatments is challenging due to their indolent evolution, variations and fluctuations of symptoms, heterogeneity of classifications and lack of randomized controlled trials. Here, a dedicated task force provides a consensus statement on the overall management of CSMs. Research question: To determine the best overall management of CSMs, depending on their clinical presentation, size, and evolution as well as patient characteristics. Material and methods: Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we included literature from January 2000 to December 2020. A total of 400 abstracts and 77 titles were kept for full-paper screening. Results: The task force formulated 8 recommendations (Level C evidence). CSMs should be managed by a highly specialized multidisciplinary team. The initial evaluation of patients includes clinical, ophthalmological, endocrinological and radiological assessment. Treatment of CSM should involve experienced skull-base neurosurgeons or neuro-radiosurgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, ophthalmologists, and endocrinologists. Discussion and conclusion: Radiosurgery is preferred as first-line treatment in small, enclosed, pauci-symptomatic lesions/in elderly patients, while large CSMs not amenable to resection or WHO grade II-III are candidates for radiotherapy. Microsurgery is an option in aggressive/rapidly progressing lesions in young patients presenting with oculomotor/visual/endocrinological impairment. Whenever surgery is offered, open cranial approaches are the current standard. There is limited experience reported about endoscopic endonasal approach for CSMs and the main indication is decompression of the cavernous sinus to improve symptoms. Whenever surgery is indicated, the current trend is to offer decompression followed by radiosurgery.

Association of Medical Comorbidities With Objective Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.

STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of a prospective 2-center database. OBJECTIVES: Medical comorbidities co-determine clinical outcome. Objective functional impairment (OFI) provides a supplementary dimension of patient assessment. We set out to study whether comorbidities are associated with the presence and degree of OFI in this patient population. METHODS: Patients with degenerative diseases of the spine preoperatively performed the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test and a battery of questionnaires. Comorbidities were quantified using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grading. Crude and adjusted linear regression models were fitted. RESULTS: Of 375 included patients, 97 (25.9%) presented at least some degree of medical comorbidity according to the CCI, and 312 (83.2%) according to ASA grading. In the univariate analysis, the CCI was inconsistently associated with OFI. Only patients with low-grade CCI comorbidity displayed significantly higher TUG test times (p = 0.004). In the multivariable analysis, this effect persisted for patients with CCI = 1 (p = 0.030). Regarding ASA grade, patients with ASA = 3 exhibited significantly increased TUG test times (p = 0.003) and t-scores (p = 0.015). This effect disappeared after multivariable adjustment (p = 0.786 and p = 0.969). In addition, subjective functional impairment according to ODI, and EQ5D index was moderately associated with comorbidities according to ASA (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The degree of medical comorbidities appears only weakly and inconsistently associated with OFI in patients scheduled for degenerative lumbar spine surgery, especially after controlling for potential confounders. TUG testing may be valid even in patients with relatively severe comorbidities who are able to complete the test.

How I do it: minimally invasive resection of a sub-ependymoma of the fourth ventricle.

BACKGROUND: A 54-year-old female was referred to our clinic with a lesion of the lower fourth ventricle extending to the median aperture. Here, we report the use a minimally invasive sub-occipital approach (MISA) as a safe and effective surgical management. METHOD: We performed a MISA using a short midline incision and a 1-cm sub-occipital craniectomy. Dissection of the lesion was performed, and "en bloc" resection could be achieved. The lesion was confirmed to be a grade I sub-ependymoma. CONCLUSION: MISA can be safely used when confronted to a lesion of the lower fourth ventricle.

How I do it: the trans-laminar, facet-joint sparing minimal invasive approach for ventral dural repair in spontaneous intracranial hypotension-a 2-dimensional operative video.

BACKGROUND: We describe the minimally invasive, facet-sparing postero-lateral approach to the thoracic spine for a ventral dural repair in a patient with intracranial hypotension secondary to a spontaneous dural breach. METHODS: We performed a minimally invasive approach using a short paramedian posterior skin incision followed by a 10 × 10 mm targeted trans-laminar approach, to achieve a microsurgical repair of a symptomatic ventral dural defect causing severe disability. CONCLUSION: The facet-sparing postero-lateral approach is safe and effective in the surgical management of thoracic dural tears, even in the most anterior ones, and avoids the traditional costotransversectomy.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery strategies for elective craniotomy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has led to a paradigm shift in perioperative care through multimodal interventions. Still, ERAS remains a relatively new concept in neurosurgery, and there is no summary of evidence on ERAS applications in cranial neurosurgery. METHODS: The authors systematically reviewed the literature using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for ERAS protocols and elements. Studies had to assess at least one pre-, peri-, or postoperative ERAS element and evaluate at least one of the following outcomes: 1) length of hospital stay, 2) length of ICU stay, 3) postoperative pain, 4) direct and indirect healthcare cost, 5) complication rate, 6) readmission rate, or 7) patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A final 27 articles were included in the qualitative analysis, with mixed quality of evidence ranging from high in 3 cases to very low in 1 case. Seventeen studies reported a complete ERAS protocol. Preoperative ERAS elements include patient selection through multidisciplinary team discussion, patient counseling and education to adjust expectations of the postoperative period, and mental state assessment; antimicrobial, steroidal, and antiepileptic prophylaxes; nutritional assessment, as well as preoperative oral carbohydrate loading; and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis. Anesthesiology interventions included local anesthesia for pin sites, regional field block or scalp block, avoidance or minimization of the duration of invasive monitoring, and limitation of intraoperative mannitol. Other intraoperative elements include absorbable skin sutures and avoidance of wound drains. Postoperatively, the authors identified early extubation, observation in a step-down unit instead of routine ICU admission, early mobilization, early fluid de-escalation, early intake of solid food and liquids, early removal of invasive monitoring, professional nutritional assessment, PONV management, nonopioid rescue analgesia, and early postoperative imaging. Other postoperative interventions included discharge criteria standardization and home visits or progress monitoring by a nurse. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of evidence-based interventions are available to improve recovery after elective craniotomy, although there are few published ERAS protocols. Patient-centered optimization of neurosurgical care spanning the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods is feasible and has already provided positive results in terms of improved outcomes such as postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, reduced length of stay, and cost reduction with an excellent safety profile. Although fast-track recovery protocols and ERAS studies are gaining momentum for elective craniotomy, prospective trials are needed to provide stronger evidence.

Functional outcome and quality of life after meningioma surgery: a systematic review.

Assessment of long-term functional outcomes after meningioma surgery is important. We systematically reviewed the literature on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and functional disability (FD) of patients after surgery for intracranial meningiomas. Using PRISMA 2015 guidelines, we screened 289 abstracts and 43 titles were retained for full-paper screening. 15 articles did not present enough data to meet the inclusion criteria and 7 articles failed to assess functional assessment and HrQoL. Twenty-two articles were included in our review. HrQol was assessed in N = 18 publications, most frequently using SF-36 (N = 10), followed by EQ5D-5L (N = 4), EORTC-QLQ (N = 4), and the FACT questionnaire (N = 2). The assessment of FD was reported in N = 11 publications, mostly using the KPS (N = 8). The Barthel index was used in N = 2 publications. Follow-up was reported in N = 12 publications, ranging from 6 months to 9 years. Scientific publications assessing long-term postoperative HrQol and FD in patients undergoing meningioma surgery are scarce and the data are heterogeneously reported, using various scales and follow-up protocols. Efforts should be undertaken to uniformly assess long-term post-operative functional outcomes in meningioma patients.

Visual field restoration after Simpson grade I resection of symptomatic occipital lobe meningioma: illustrative case and review of the literature.

Intracranial meningiomas mostly affect patients in their fifth decade and beyond, raising pertinent questions regarding the risk of surgery, particularly in the elderly. Here, we describe the case of a septuagenarian patient with occipital meningioma causing severe visual field cuts that experienced full recovery of the visual function after a Simpson I resection of the lesion. This case illustrates the potential of recovery of the brain, even in the case of severely impaired function in elderly patients. To complete the picture, we review the literature on occipital meningiomas, advocating for systematic reports and increase data collection on post-operative neurological recovery in the elderly.

Resection of meningiomas in octogenarians: a comparison with a younger geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial meningiomas (ICMs) may be diagnosed in octogenarians. Since the lesions are rarely life-threatening, surgery is a questionable choice in this age group. The authors' aim in this study was to analyze factors associated with the extent of resection (EOR), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications in octogenarians undergoing ICM surgery, by using a cohort of septuagenarians as a reference. METHODS: All patients ≥ 70 years of age who underwent surgery at Oslo University Hospital for an ICM between 1990 and 2010 were included in this study. Data on these cases were retrospectively (1990-2002) and prospectively (2003-2010) acquired from a databank belonging to Oslo University Hospital. All related preoperative imaging studies or reports (earlier cases) were reviewed to confirm tumor location, the presence of bone invasion, and the postoperative EOR. RESULTS: In this study, 49 octogenarians (29 females [59.2%], mean age 83.3 ± 2.5 years) were compared with 272 septuagenarians (173 females [63.6%], mean age 74.3 ± 2.7 years). Forty octogenarians (81.6%) and 217 septuagenarians (79.8%) underwent gross-total resection. Simpson grade IV resection was achieved in 9 octogenarians (18.4%) and 4 septuagenarians (1.4%), while Simpson grade V resection was obtained in 4 septuagenarians (1.4%). Postoperative complications were similar in both groups, and 4 octogenarians (8.2%) and 11 septuagenarians (4.1%) died within 30 days after surgery (p = 0.25). No octogenarian underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The OS was 4.2 ± 2.8 years in the octogenarians and 5.8 ± 4.4 years in the septuagenarians (p < 0.001). Female sex (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.93; p = 0.03) and a preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score ≥ 70 (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.72; p = 0.009) were correlated to the OS. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians undergoing surgery for ICMs had an overall reduced OS compared to septuagenarians. However, the clinical relevance of this difference in OS is debatable and has to be put in perspective with expected survival without surgery. Data on symptoms upon admission, EOR, invasive tumor features, and postoperative complications in octogenarians are similar to those observed in septuagenarians. Therefore, the decision concerning whether surgery should be performed must be based on a case-by-case discussion, and surgery should not be immediately dismissed when it comes to ICMs in octogenarians.

Histological transformation in recurrent WHO grade I meningiomas.

Atypical or malignant transformation (AT/MT) has been described in WHO grade I meningiomas. Our aim was to identify predictive factors of AT/MT at recurrence. A total of N = 15 WHO grade increases were observed in N = 13 patients (0.96% of the study population, risk of transformation of 0.12% per patient-year follow-up). Patients with and without progression at recurrence were similar regarding age, gender distribution, skull-base location, bone infiltration, and Simpson grades. Recurrence-free survival was lower in patients with transformation (5 ± 4.06 years versus 7.3 ± 5.4 years; p = 0.03). Among patient age, gender, skull base location, extent of resection or post-operative RT, no predictor of AT/MT was identified, despite a follow-up of 10,524 patient-years. The annual risk of transformation of WHO grade I meningiomas was 0.12% per patient-year follow-up. Despite the important number of patients included and their extended follow-up, we did not identify any risk factor for transformation. A total of 1,352 patients with surgically managed WHO grade I meningioma from a mixed retro-and prospective database with mean follow-up of 9.2 years ± 5.7 years (0.3-20.9 years) were reviewed. Recurring tumors at the site of initial surgery were considered as recurrence.

Thoracic aggressive vertebral hemangiomas: multidisciplinary management in a hybrid room.

PURPOSE: Vertebral hemangiomas (VH) account for 2-3% of all spinal tumors. The majority is incidentally found on radiographic studies: 1% present with pain and/or neurologic deficits. We report our experience with the multidisciplinary management of aggressive symptomatic thoracic VH by concomitant intraoperative sclerotization with sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS), vertebroplasty, posterior decompression (with/without fusion) and surgical resection in a hybrid operating room (HR) equipped with a rotational scanner and a radiolucent operating table. METHODS: Patients admitted with aggressive spinal VH between 2007 and 2018 were included. Data regarding demographics, presenting symptoms, location of the lesion, preoperative embolization, length of the surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL) as well as follow-up (FU) were retrieved. RESULTS: Five patients were included (three females, mean age 65 years; range 59-75). Three patients presented with a myelopathy and two mechanical thoracic pain. All patients underwent a single-stage percutaneous sclerotization and vertebroplasty followed by a surgical decompression associated with epidural intralesional injection of STS and subtotal resection of the epidural lesion. Two patients had preoperative embolization. Mean procedural duration was 338 min (range 210-480 min). Four patients had marginal EBL, one patient had 500 ml EBL. Patients had no evidence of lesion recurrence or progression at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The single-stage multimodal management of aggressive symptomatic VH is safe and effective. It allows for a direct intraoperative sclerotherapy combined with maximal tumor resection, resulting in reduced blood loss. The use of STS as a direct intraoperative sclerotizing agent is safe and reliable.

Enhanced recovery after spine surgery-a multinational survey assessing surgeons' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is the object of numerous publications in various surgical fields. Still, its value in spine surgery is not as recognized as it is in other surgical domains. Our aim was to report neurosurgeons' opinions about ERAS in spine surgery. METHODS: From December 2019 to January 2020, members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies were asked to complete an online questionnaire regarding ERAS in spine surgery. RESULTS: N = 234 participants responded to the survey (60% spine neurosurgeons; 22.6% working in private practice). Thirty-two percent reported to have more than 20 years of experience, followed by surgeons having between 5 and 10 (27.4%), 10-15 (17.9%), 15-20 (12%), and 0-5 years (10.7%). Gender distribution (12% vs 27% female gender, p = 0.04), private practice activity (28% vs 14%, p = 0.01), familiarity with the ERAS concept (57.4% vs 27%, p < 0.0001), and its implementation in the daily clinical practice (47.5% vs 18.3%, p < 0.0001) were statistically different between spine and general neurosurgeons. 54.7% of the surgeons were unfamiliar with ERAS in spine surgery. 63.7% considered ERAS as a progress; 36% declared to implement ERAS in their daily clinical practice. 1.7% reported ERAS as a decrease in the quality of management. 6.8% considered ERAS as not having an impact on patient care; 27.8% had no opinion. There were no differences in opinion on ERAS and its implementation between surgeons working in private and public hospitals. 69.5% of the spine surgeons considered ERAS having a positive impact on patient management, versus 55% of non-spine surgeons (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts are necessary to promote minimal invasive pre-, intra-, and postoperative workflow to improve patient management and reduce complications or side effects particularly adapted to spinal surgery. Specificities of spine patients, in terms of chronic pain, pre- and postoperative pain management, and psychological issues have to be considered.

Augmented reality in intracranial meningioma surgery: report of a case and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Augmented reality (AR) is as a useful and reliable tool in cranial surgery. We report the case of a left fronto-temporal meningioma in contact with the left Sylvian bifurcation, managed surgically with the aid of AR. We complete the picture with a systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Preoperatively, a careful segmentation of the tumor and the neighboring vessels was performed using our AR navigation software. A left fronto-temporal craniotomy was performed. Using the augmented optics technology, AR images injected into the microscope binocular during the surgery, allowed easy identification of the MCA branches and bifurcation. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA-P guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A Simpson I resection was obtained, with no new neurological deficit and an uneventful recovery after surgery. The literature review identified eight separate articles published between 1998-2019, totaling 20 meningiomas surgically managed with the use of AR. Different AR systems are described in neurosurgery, with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Augmented optics allow the surgeon to focus on the procedure. No systematic data on postoperative radiological and clinical outcome were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AR in meningioma surgery might help surgeons when confronted to lesions surrounded by complex structures. However, little data is available so far to support its routine use.

[Intra-cranial meningiomas - Management of the patients in the microsurgery era]. / Méningiomes intracrâniens†: prise en charge des patients à l'ère microchirurgicale.

Intracranial meningiomas account for 30 to 40 % of the primary lesions of the central nervous system. In most of the cases, the diagnosis of an intracranial meningioma requires a neurosurgical management, in a multi-disciplinary perspective involving radiation therapists, pathologists and, in some cases, oncologists. The variety of clinical presentations and localizations, as well as the varying degrees of aggressiveness, make intracranial meningiomas a protean surgical entity, requiring a case-by-case management tailored to each patient.

Les méningiomes intracrâniens représentent 30 à 40 % des lésions primaires du système nerveux central. La découverte d'un méningiome intracrânien nécessite, dans la plupart des cas, une prise en charge neurochirurgicale, dans une perspective multidisciplinaire impliquant radiothérapeutes, pathologues et, dans certains cas, oncologues. La variété des présentations cliniques et de localisations, ainsi que les degrés d'agressivité variables des lésions font des méningiomes intracrâniens une entité chirurgicale protéiforme, imposant une prise en charge discutée au cas par cas, adaptée à chaque patient.

Benefits of re-do surgery for recurrent intracranial meningiomas.

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial extra-axial tumor. While the literature is abundant on the therapeutic management of meningioma recurrence after the initial surgery, the natural history of repeated recurrences is poorly described, as well as and their respective management. A partly retrospective, partly prospective review was conducted in a Norwegian cohort of 1469 consecutive cases of meningioma surgically treated, totaling 11 414 patient-years of follow-up. 114 recurrences (7.7%) were treated surgically with a risk a surgical retreatment of 1% per patient-year of follow-up. 36 patients were operated on 3 times or more. The time-to-retreatment (TTR) decreased significantly and steadily between surgeries, from 4.3 ± 4 years after the first surgery to 2.4 ± 2.9 years after the third surgery. The primary driver for recurrence was the WHO grade (OR 7.13 [4.40;11.55], p < 0.001 for the first recurrence and OR 4.13 [1.49;12.15], p 0.008 for the second), the second predictive factor being a skull base location (OR 2.76 [1.95;3.99] p < 0.001 and OR 0.24 [0.09;0.65], p0.006 respectively). The rates of postoperative hematomas and infections were not influenced by the number of surgeries, whereas the rate of postoperative neurological worsening increased from 3.9% to 16.6% and 13.9%, respectively, after the first, second, and third surgeries. We observed that the TTR decreased significantly between surgeries in patients requiring repeated resections, indicating that surgical treatment of recurrences does not reset the clock but is indeed a "race against time". This should be considered when assessing the benefit-to-risk ratio of patients undergoing repeated surgeries for a recurrent meningioma.

Lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas without bone invasion-still skull base surgery?

Sphenoid wing meningiomas are generally considered as skull base meningiomas (SBMs). However, given their surgical similarities with non-skull base meningiomas (NSBMs), we hypothesized that lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas (LSWMs) without bone invasion (BI) should be considered as NSBMs. N = 65 LSWMs without BI operated between 1990 to 2010 at a single-center were compared to N = 352 NSBMs, represented by convexity meningiomas (CMs), and to N = 23 SBMs, represented by spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs), with respect to baseline demographics, clinical presentations, Simpson grades, complications, adjuvant therapies, as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Only WHO grade I meningiomas were included. No significant differences in baseline demographics, clinical presentation, or pre-operative KPS were found between the three groups. Simpson grade 1-3 was achieved in 90.1% of LSWMs, 97.1% in CMs (p = 0.05), and 82.6% in SOMs (p = 0.23). There were no significant differences in postoperative infection, hematoma, neurological worsening, 30-day mortality, or OS between the three groups. Lower re-treatment rates were observed in LSWMs and CMs compared to SOMs (p = 0.06). With respect to PFS, there was no significant difference between LSWMs and CMs (89.1% and 88.5% at 5 years, respectively), whereas PFS was significantly higher in LSWMs than in SOMs (79% at 5 years) (p = 0.05). LSWMs without BI should be considered as an intermediate entity between NSBMs and SBMs. LSWMs are similar to SOMs with respect to extent of resection, but more similar to CMs with respect to re-treatment rates and PFS.

Posterior Fossa Arteriovenous Malformations: Experience with 14 Patients and a Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations (pfAVMs) is a matter of debate. To advance this discussion, we present our clinical series and the results of a systematic literature review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients with pfAVMs were admitted between 2007 and 2018. Preoperative status, radiologic parameters, and outcome were assessed. A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA-P guidelines. RESULTS: Ten patients presented with rupture (71%), of whom three had associated aneurysms (AAs). The treatments were microsurgery (n = 4), endovascular (n = 3), radiosurgery (n = 2), a combination of two or three treatment modalities (n = 3), or conservative (n = 2). At discharge, all four patients (100%) with unruptured pfAVMs had a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]: 0-2). In contrast, in ruptured pfAVM cases, mRS was 0 to 2 in four patients (40%), mRS 3 to 4 in two (20%), mRS 5 in three (30%), and one patient (10%) died within 30 days after gamma knife treatment due to pancreatitis secondary to chronic alcohol abuse. At discharge, four patients (29%) had persistent preinterventional cranial nerve and/or focal neurologic deficits. The literature review identified 63 articles with 1,753 pfAVM patients. Overall, 66% of pfAVMs presented with rupture, and AAs were found in 20% of the cases, which is higher than in supratentorial AVMs (stAVMs). CONCLUSIONS: Because pfAVMs are associated with higher rates of hemorrhagic presentation, higher rates of morbidity and mortality when ruptured, and have a higher incidence of AAs compared with stAVMs, early curative treatment is recommended as soon as the diagnosis is established, regardless of rupture status.

Early Postoperative Complications in Meningioma: Predictive Factors and Impact on Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Craniotomies carry inherent risks of postoperative complications that may have a negative impact on patients' status. Recognizing and preventing surgical complications is of paramount importance, especially in meningioma surgery, where most of these tumors are benign and current management protocols are effective in terms of disease control and maintenance of higher quality of life. The objective of this study was to describe the early complications after surgery and their predictive factors in patients undergoing resection of intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: A partly retrospective, partly prospective review was conducted in a Norwegian population-based cohort of 1469 consecutive cases of meningioma surgery treated at the university hospitals of Oslo, totaling 11,414 patient-years of follow-up. RESULTS: 2.6% of patients had a postoperative hematoma, 2.7% a postoperative infection, 3.9% a postoperative worsening of neurologic status; 5.4% of patients died during a 30-day period after surgery. Predictive factors of increased risk of postoperative complications were patient's age for the hematoma, a non-skull base meningioma for infection, and postoperative hematoma for the risk of neurologic worsening or 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative complications in meningioma surgery have a negative impact on patient survival and postoperative neurologic status, in a disease where survival is usually not limited by the meningioma itself. In this study, we identified risk factors for early postoperative complications, the identification of at-risk populations may help to prevent the occurrence of these risk factors.