Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Cardio-Oncology: Antineoplastic Drug Cardiotoxicity and Beyond.

Serum biomarkers represent a reproducible, sensitive, minimally invasive and inexpensive method to explore possible adverse cardiovascular effects of antineoplastic treatments. They are useful tools in risk stratification, the early detection of cardiotoxicity and the follow-up and prognostic assessment of cancer patients. In this literature review, we aim at describing the current state of knowledge on the meaning and the usefulness of cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with cancer; analyzing the intricate relationship between cancer and cardiovascular disease (especially HF) and how this affects cardiovascular and tumor biomarkers; exploring the role of cardiovascular biomarkers in the risk stratification and in the identification of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity; and providing a summary of the novel potential biomarkers in this clinical setting.

Flow Mediated Dilation in Systemic Sclerosis: Association with clinical findings, capillaroscopic patterns and endothelial circulating markers.

AIM: Endothelial dysfunction represents a key feature of the pathological process underlying micro and macro-vascular damage in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). This study aims to improve knowledge of the physiopathology of vascular damage in SSc through the assessment of the endothelial dysfunction by Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) and serum levels of circulating endothelial dysfunction markers and the correlation of macrovascular damage with clinical findings and microvascular capillaroscopic patterns. METHODS: 57 SSc patients and 37 healthy subjects were recruited. All included subjects underwent radial artery FMD test and Nailfold Video-Capillaroscopy; serum levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and angiopoietin-2 were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared to healthy subjects, in SSc patients lower FMD and higher time needed to obtain the maximal FMD responsewere observed, whereas serum levels of VEGF, VCAM-1, and angiopoietin-2 were significantly higher. The impairment of FMD values was associated with disease duration, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and digital ulcers and correlates with greater microvascular damage evaluated by Nailfold Video-Capillaroscopy… An inverse relationship between VEGF, angiopoietin-2, VCAM-1 levels and FMD was observed, but only VEGF and angiopoietin-2 were significantly higher in patients with digital ulcers and pulmonary arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: FMD ultrasound test and circulating levels of endothelial dysfuncion markers could be useful as biomarkers of vasculopathy and could be a helpful tool in the overall assessment of vascular injury in Systemic Sclerosis patients.

Rationale and design of the Biventricular Evaluation of Gliflozins effects In chroNic Heart Failure: BEGIN-HF study.

AIMS: Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) represent a unique class of anti-hyperglycaemic agents for type 2 diabetes mellitus that selectively inhibit renal glucose reabsorption, thereby increasing urinary excretion of glucose. Several studies have demonstrated the cardioprotective effects of SGLT-2i in patients with heart failure (HF), unrelated to its glucosuric effect. It is unclear whether the benefits of SGLT-2i therapy also rely on the improvement of left ventricular (LV) and/or right ventricular (RV) function in patients with HF. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SGLT-2i on LV and RV function through conventional and advanced echocardiographic parameters with a special focus on RV function in patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Biventricular Evaluation of Gliflozins effects In chroNic Heart Failure (BEGIN-HF) study is an international multicentre, prospective study that will evaluate the effect of SGLT-2i on echocardiographic parameters of myocardial function in patients with chronic stable HF across the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) spectrum. Patients with New York Heart Association Class II/III symptoms, estimated glomerular filtration rate > 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 , age > 18 years, and those who were not previously treated with SGLT-2i will be included. All patients will undergo conventional, tissue-derived imaging (TDI), and strain echocardiography in an ambulatory setting, at time of enrolment and after 6 months of SGLT-2i therapy. The primary endpoint is the change in LV function as assessed by conventional, TDI, and myocardial deformation speckle tracking parameters. Secondary outcomes include changes in RV and left atrial function as assessed by conventional and deformation speckle tracking echocardiography. Univariate and multivariate analyses will be performed to identify predictors associated with primary and secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The BEGIN-HF will determine whether SGLT-2i therapy improves LV and/or RV function by conventional and advanced echocardiography in patients with HF irrespective of LVEF.

Revisiting a Prognosticating Algorithm from Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Chronic Heart Failure (from the MECKI Score Population).

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a prognostic tool in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Prognosticating algorithms have been proposed, but none has been validated. In 2017, a predictive algorithm, based on peak oxygen consumption (VO2), ventilatory response to exercise (ventilation [VE] carbon dioxide production [VCO2], the VE/VCO2 slope), exertional oscillatory ventilation (EOV), and peak respiratory exchange ratio, was recommended, according treatment with ß blockers: patients with HFrEF registered in the metabolic exercise test data combined with cardiac and kidney indexes (MECKIs) database were used to validated this algorithm. According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 4,683 MECKI patients with HFrEF were enrolled. At 3 years follow-up, the end point was cardiovascular death and urgent heart transplantation (cardiovascular events [CV]). CV events occurred in 25% in patients without ß blockers, whereas those with ß-blockers had 11% (p <0.0001). In patients without ß blockers, 36%, 24%, and 7% CV events were observed in those with peak VO2 ≤10, with peak VO2 >10 <18, and with peak VO2 ≥18 ml/kg/min (p = 0.0001), respectively; in MECKI patients with peak VO2 ≤10 and patients with intermediate exercise capacity, a peak respiratory exchange ratio (≥1.15) and VE/VCO2 slope (≥35) were diriment, respectively (p = 0.0001). EOV, when occurred, increased risk. In MECKI patients on ß blockers, 29%, 17%, and 8% CV events were noticed in those with a peak VO2 ≤8, with peak VO2 = 8 to 12, and patients with peak VO2 ≥12 ml/kg/min, respectively (p = 0.0000); when EOV was monitored an increment of risk was witnessed. In conclusion, the outcome of this algorithm was confirmed with the MECKI cohort.

Pick Your Threshold: A Comparison Among Different Methods of Anaerobic Threshold Evaluation in Heart Failure Prognostic Assessment.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, anaerobic threshold (AT) is used to guide training and rehabilitation programs, to define risk of major thoracic or abdominal surgery, and to assess prognosis in heart failure (HF). AT of oxygen uptake (V.O2; V.O2AT) has been reported as an absolute value (V.O2ATabs), as a percentage of predicted peak V.O2 (V.O2AT%peak_pred), or as a percentage of observed peak V.O2 (V.O2AT%peak_obs). A direct comparison of the prognostic power among these different ways to report AT is missing. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the prognostic power of these different ways to report AT? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this observational cohort study, we screened data of 7,746 patients with HF with a history of reduced ejection fraction (< 40%) recruited between 1998 and 2020 and enrolled in the Metabolic Exercise Combined With Cardiac and Kidney Indexes register. All patients underwent a maximum cardiopulmonary exercise test, executed using a ramp protocol on an electronically braked cycle ergometer. RESULTS: This study considered 6,157 patients with HF with identified AT. Follow-up was median, 4.2 years (25th-75th percentiles, 1.9-5.0 years). Both V.O2ATabs (mean ± SD, 823 ± 305 mL/min) and V.O2AT%peak_pred (mean ± SD, 39.6 ± 13.9%), but not V.O2AT%peak_obs (mean ± SD, 69.2 ± 17.7%), well stratified the population regarding prognosis (composite end point: cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplant, or left ventricular assist device). Comparing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values, V.O2ATabs (0.680) and V.O2AT%peak_pred (0.688) performed similarly, whereas V.O2AT%peak_obs (0.538) was significantly weaker (P < .001). Moreover, the V.O2AT%peak_pred AUC value was the only one performing as well as the AUC based on peak V.O2 (0.710), with an even a higher AUC (0.637 vs 0.618, respectively) in the group with severe HF (peak V.O2 < 12 mL/min/kg). Finally, the combination of V.O2AT%peak_pred with peak V.O2 and V. per CO2 production shows the highest prognostic power. INTERPRETATION: In HF, V.O2AT%peak_pred is the best way to report V.O2 at AT in relationship to prognosis, with a prognostic power comparable to that of peak V.O2 and, remarkably, in patients with severe HF.

Pharmacological Anti-Remodelling Effects of Disease-Modifying Drugs in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Cardiac remodelling is an adverse phenomenon linked to heart failure progression and an important contributor to heart failure severity. Cardiac remodelling could represent the real therapeutic goal in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, being potentially reversed through different pharmacotherapies. Currently, there are well-established drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers and ß-blockers with anti-remodelling effects; recently, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor effects on inhibiting cardiac remodelling (improving N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, echocardiographic parameters of reverse cardiac remodelling and right ventricular function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) were demonstrated. More recently, hemodynamic consequences of gliflozins, reduced cardiac hydrostatic pressure as a possible cause of ventricular remodelling and hypertrophy were proposed to explain potential anti-remodelling effects of gliflozins. Gliflozins exert their cardioprotective effects by attenuating myofibroblast activity and collagen-mediated remodelling. Another postulated mechanism is represented by the reduction in sympathetic activity, through the reduction in renal afferent nervous activity and the suppression of central reflex mechanisms. Benefits of gliflozins on left ventricular hypertrophy, dilation, and systolic and diastolic function were also described. In this review, we aimed to provide a wide overview on cardiac remodelling with a particular focus on possible anti-remodelling effects of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors and gliflozins.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition in patients affected by heart failure: efficacy, mechanistic effects and practical use of sacubitril/valsartan. Position Paper of the Italian Society of Cardiology.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition is a mainstay of the pharmacological treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In the last years RAAS blockade has been improved by the introduction of the Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan, that combines RAAS inhibition with the block of neprilysin, boosting the positive effects of natriuretic peptides. The PARADIGM-HF trial demonstrated a significant advantage of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril on the reduction of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and heart failure hospitalizations rates. Then, several randomized clinical trials and observational studies investigated its role in different clinical settings and its efficacy has been fully recognized in the most recent HFrEF European and USA guidelines. The effects of sacubitril/valsartan on major CV outcomes are associated with reduction of NT-proBNP levels and reverse cardiac remodeling and mitral regurgitation, recognized as one of the mechanistic effects of the drug explaining the favorable prognostic effects. A careful evaluation of patients' clinical profile is relevant to implement the use of ARNI in the clinical practice and to obtain the maximal treatment efficacy. The present Position Paper reports the opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology on the optimal blockade of the RAAS system in HF patients with the aim of fostering widespread implementation of scientific evidence and practice guidelines in the medical community.

Trend of perceived quality of life and functional capacity in outpatients with chronic heart failure and in treatment with sacubitril/valsartan: a real-life experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of optimal medical therapy, heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The introduction of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) had a revolutionary impact on the treatment of patients with HFrEF. The aim of the study was to monitor over time the perceived quality of life, the physical performance, the trend of BNP and NT-ProBNP and the NYHA functional class in patients with HFrEF during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS: We enrolled 37 patients (63±10 years old, 76% men) who underwent a total of one-year follow-up. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, 6MWT, blood analysis (in particular, NT-pro-BNP and BNP, renal function test); Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the NYHA functional class assessment were also performed, at the beginning of the study and after 3, 6 and 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: We observed at each follow-up a significant improvement of KCCQ score, 6MWT, NT-ProBNP, BNP and NYHA class. However, analyzing the ∆% of variation of each single parameter, the improvement was not uniform in time. We also observed that only 37% of patients tolerated the full recommended dose of sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg b.i.d.); of the remaining, 40% tolerated the intermediate dose (49/51 mg b.i.d.) and 23% the minimum (24/26 md b.i.d.). CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan therapy improves significantly quality of life, physical effort resistance, BNP and NT-ProBNP and NYHA functional class in patients with HFrEF. Although not all the patients tolerated the maximum recommended dose, the beneficial effects were significant even at lower doses.

Survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension under therapy with nintedanib or pirfenidone.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a specific form of chronic, progressive, fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause that leads to respiratory failure and death within few years of diagnosis. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication in IPF, where it is strongly associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients with IPF and PH have particularly poor prognosis, despite current best medical therapies and the anti-fibrotic therapy with pirfenidone or nintedanib. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical and prognostic impact of PH in patients affected by IPF, already treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Seventy-four consecutive outpatients with a diagnosis of IPF, in therapy with pirfenidone or nintedanib, were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent pulmonary and cardiology assessment by clinical exam, spirometry, DLCO test, chest CT, 6MWT and echocardiography performed by a cardiologist experienced in PH in an ambulatory setting under resting conditions. GAP index has been determinate for all patients. During follow-up, all patients were evaluated every 6 months, or less if necessary. Data about mortality were then collected in a 3-year follow-up. Of the seventy-four patients enrolled, 38 were treated with pirfenidone and 36 with nintedanib. The two groups were comparable for age, gender, FVC, DLCO and PAPS. The patients were also divided in four groups, based on presence of mild/moderate/severe PH by echocardiography at baseline. Significant differences were found for DLCO and the GAP index. Severity of PH was significantly associated with a reduction of DLCO and with an increased GAP index. Survival was directly correlated with 6MWT (R = 0.48), DLCO (R = 0.29, p < 0.01), and reversely with tGAP index (- 0.31, p < 0.01 in all cases), while no significant correlation was found with PAsP. 36-month survival analysis showed an HR of 4.05 (95% CI 1.07-7.34, p = 0.02) for DLCO < 50% and of 1.56 (95% CI 1.02-2.39, p = 0.03) for GAP index. The development and progression of PH in patients affected by IPF reduce the survival and the severity of PH is associated with a reduction of DLCO value and an increase of the GAP index. Echocardiographic stratification based on PAsP values may be useful in stratifying prognosis in IPF patients and deciding specific PAH drugs.

Efficacy of new medical therapies in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and chronic kidney disease already receiving neurohormonal inhibitors: a network meta-analysis.

AIMS: We assessed the efficacy of the drugs developed after neurohormonal inhibition (NEUi) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS AND RESULTS: The literature was systematically searched for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving ≥90% patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, of whom <30% were acutely decompensated, and with published information about the subgroup of estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Six RCTs were included in a study-level network meta-analysis evaluating the effect of NEUi, ivabradine, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), vericiguat, and omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) on a composite outcome of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF. In a fixed-effects model, SGLT2i [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.69-0.89], ARNI (HR 0.79, 95% CrI 0.69-0.90), and ivabradine (HR 0.82, 95% CrI 0.69-0.98) decreased the risk of the composite outcome vs. NEUi, whereas OM did not (HR 0.98, 95% CrI 0.89-1.10). A trend for improved outcome was also found for vericiguat (HR 0.90, 95% CrI 0.80-1.00). In indirect comparisons, both SLGT2i (HR 0.80, 95% CrI 0.68-0.94) and ARNI (HR 0.80, 95% CrI 0.68-0.95) reduced the risk vs. OM; furthermore, there was a trend for a greater benefit of SGLT2i vs. vericiguat (HR 0.88, 95% CrI 0.73-1.00) and ivabradine vs. OM (HR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.68-1.00). Results were comparable in a random-effects model and in sensitivity analyses. Surface under the cumulative ranking area scores were 81.8%, 80.8%, 68.9%, 44.2%, 16.6%, and 7.8% for SGLT2i, ARNI, ivabradine, vericiguat, OM, and NEUi, respectively. CONCLUSION: Expanding pharmacotherapy beyond NEUi improves outcomes in HFrEF with CKD.

Non-cardiovascular comorbidities in heart failure patients and their impact on prognosis.

With the aging of the population and improvement of life expectancy of patients with heart disease, there is an increase in non-cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities affecting chronic heart failure (HF) patients. The increased prevalence of different CV and non-CV comorbidities is a rising problem in the management of patients with HF, mostly because these comorbidities may lead to poor prognosis, increase of hospitalizations and mortality rate. Recently, important data from multicenter randomized studies point to diabetes mellitus or iron deficiency as new pharmacological targets, and this highlights the need of broad expertise for the 21st-century cardiologist. The management of HF should take into account non-CV comorbidities. In this review, we discuss novel aspects of non-CV comorbidities in HF patients and emphasize the impact on prognosis.

Ventilatory power, a cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameter for the prediction of pulmonary hypertension at right heart catheterization.

BACKGROUND: Several cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) parameters (peak VO2, PetCO2 and VE/VCO2) emerged as tools for the prediction of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Less is known on ventilatory power (VP) in patients with suspect PAH. AIM: To ascertain possible correlations between VP derived at CPET and hemodynamic parameters at right heart catheterization (RHC) indicative of PH. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive outpatients with suspect of PAH were assessed by CPET and RHC; VP was defined as peak SBP divided by the minute ventilation-CO2 production slope at CPET and Diastolic Pressure Gradient (DPG), Trans-pulmonary Pressure Gradient (TPG), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) at RHC were also assessed and compared with VP. RESULTS: VP values were inversely related to mPAP (r -0.427, p 0.003), DPG (r -0.36, p 0.019), TPG (r: -0.43, p 0.004), and PVR (r -0.52, p 0.001). Correlations remained significant even after correction at multivariate analysis for age and gender. VP values below median identified subjects with mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg with an odds ratio of 4.5 (95% confidence interval 1.05-19.36, p < 0.05), an accuracy of 0.712 at ROC curve analysis (95% confidence interval 0.534-0.852, p < 0.05) and a positive predictive power 82%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected PAH, VP assessed at CPET might provide further information in predicting PAH at RHC. Correlations with PVR and DPG may be helpful in differentiating patients with isolated post-capillary PH from those with combined post-capillary and pre-capillary.

[Selection criteria to cardiac surgery, transcatheter valvular interventions, electrophysiology and pacing procedures in patients with advanced heart failure]. / Criteri per la selezione del paziente con scompenso cardiaco avanzato alle procedure di cardiochirurgia, interventistica valvolare, elettrofisiologia ed elettrostimolazione.

Prognosis of advanced heart failure (HF) patients, often elderly, frail and with multiple comorbidities, has significantly improved due to recent advancements in interventional cardiology. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in order to better identify patients that could benefit from invasive procedures, avoiding futility. For patients with HF, the Multidimensional Prognostic Index could help the clinician in predicting not only the prognosis but also future quality of life. For cardiac surgical candidates, predictive scores should combine traditional mortality scores with geriatric parameters including nutritional status, screening of delirium, disabilities and comorbidities, in order to help the Heart Team in taking the right approach (i.e. conservative vs invasive strategies). Similarly, the indication to the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator or to ablative procedures should consider both the complication rates and the real impact on the quality of life considering the expected net clinical benefit.In the terminal stages of HF the therapeutic target should be oriented to a palliative care approach. In this perspective, the figure of the palliativist plays a role of growing interest and should be integrated into the HF multidisciplinary team.

[Palliative inotrope therapy in advanced heart failure: organization and management]. / Inotropi palliativi nello scompenso cardiaco avanzato: organizzazione e gestione.

A few patients in advanced or end-stage (stage D or NYHA functional class IV) heart failure are transplant or ventricular assist device eligible. Particularly for the non-operative patients (elderly or with significant comorbidities), intravenous palliative inotropes can be utilized for symptom control, for functional class and quality of life improvement. The authors report evidence-based medicine data about palliative inotrope therapy in advanced heart failure patients and they suggest a possible multidisciplinary approach in order to guarantee the best care to these patients.

Liver disease and heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Several systemic conditions, inflammatory disease, infections and alcoholism, may affect both the heart and the liver. Common conditions, such as the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), may increase the risk of cardiac dysfunction. Patients with acute decompensated HF (ADHF) may develop acute ischemic hepatitis and, chronic HF patients may develop congestive hepatopathy (CH). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Laboratory anomalies of hepatic function may predict the outcome of patients with advanced HF and the evaluation of both cardiac and hepatic function is very important in the management of these patients. In clinically apparent ischemic hepatitis more than 90% of patients have some right-sided HF. There are systemic disorders characterized by the accumulation of metals or by metabolism defects that may affect primarily the liver but also the heart leading to symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Abnormal LFTs indicate the mechanism of liver injury: liver congestion or liver ischemia. In AHF, it's important an adequate evaluation of heart and liver function in order to choose the treatment in order to ensure stable hemodynamic as well as optimal liver function. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of LFTs should be recommended in the early phase of ADHF management. Physicians with interest in HF should be trained in the evaluation of LFTs. It's very important for cardiologists to know the systemic diseases affecting both heart and liver and the first imaging or laboratory findings useful for a diagnosis. it is very important for internists, nephrologists, cardiologists, primary physicians and any physicians with interest in treating HF to recognize such signs and symptoms belong to rare diseases and liver diseases that could be mistaken for HF.

Direct oral anticoagulants more effective than low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thrombo-embolism in cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.

In the recent past, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the first choice in the treatment of cancer related venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). Evidence supporting the preferential use of direct anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer, instead, is less robust so far. We therefore aimed to assess in an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials whether the use of DOACs may be associated with a more favorable profile when compared to LMWH. We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs enrolling patients with VTE and cancer. We assessed Mantel-Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for recurrence of VTE, major bleeding, and mortality comparing subjects treated with DOACs with those with LMWH. After study selection, three RCTs (HOKUSAI-Cancer, SELECT-D and ADAM-VTE) were included for the analysis with an overall population of 1739 patients. DOACs patients had a lower incidence of 6-month recurrent VTE when compared to LMWHs (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79; p < 0.001). Incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between DOACs and LMWH treated patients (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.95-2.47, p = n.s.), and mortality rates were comparable (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-2.47, p = n.s.). In a meta-analysis of RCTs therapy with DOACs was superior to LMWH in terms of efficacy and lower recurrence of VTE with a comparable safety profile in terms of bleeding events and complications.

Comorbidities in chronic heart failure: An update from Italian Society of Cardiology (SIC) Working Group on Heart Failure.

The increasing number of patients with heart failure HF and comorbidities is due to aging population and increase of life expectancy of patients with cardiovascular disease. Encouraging results derived by recent trials may suggest some comorbidities as new targets for new drugs, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the comorbidities' effects in HF patients and the need of a multidisciplinary approach for the management of chronic HF with comorbidities. We report a brief review about main cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities in HF patients in order to update physicians and researchers engaged in the HF research or in "fight against heart failure."

Malignancies and outcome in Takotsubo syndrome: a meta-analysis study on cancer and stress cardiomyopathy.

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) can be induced by a large variety of physical/emotional triggers; several cases, however, are related to either an overt or occult malignancy, as shown in retrospective studies and case reports. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with TTS and cancer in a meta-analysis study. In June 2018, a Pubmed systematic research was conducted for studies assessing outcome in patients with TTS and cancer. We assessed Mantel-Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for adverse events at follow-up. After paper retrieval, four studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 123,563 patients. The prevalence of current or previous malignancy among patients admitted with TTS was 6.7% (8258 patients). When compared to control patients, patients with cancer showed an increased risk of clinical events (RR 3.24, 95% CI 3.04-3.45, p < 0.01). The risk of in-hospital events was significantly higher in the cancer group (RR 2.08 95% CI, 1.50-2.87, p < 0.01) and was mainly due to higher need for respiratory support (RR 1.67, 95% CI, 1.58-1.77, p < 0.01). The risk of adverse events at follow-up was also higher in the cancer group (RR 3.30, 95% CI 3.09-3.51, p < 0.01). Cancer, either history or active, is associated with an increased risk of adverse events in TTS.

[Palliative care in the cardiac setting: a consensus document of the Italian Society of Cardiology/Italian Society of Palliative Care (SIC/SICP)]. / Documento di consenso sulle cure palliative in ambito cardiologico a cura del Gruppo di Lavoro congiunto della Società Italiana di Cardiologia (SIC) e della Società Italiana di Cure Palliative (SICP).

Palliative care is recognized as an approach that improves quality of life of patients and families facing life-threatening illnesses. This is achieved through prevention, early identification, assessment and treatment of symptoms and other psycho-social, spiritual and economic issues. Palliative care is not dependent on prognosis and can be delivered as "simultaneous care", together with disease-modifying treatments and adequate symptom relief. Palliative care relies on coordination across settings of care and offers open communication to patients and caregivers. Recently, there is increasing interest in the potential role of palliative care in refractory, advanced heart failure treated with optimal, maximized therapy.Heart failure is a chronic progressive syndrome characterized by periods of stability interrupted by acute exacerbations, usually leading to reduced functional status. It accounts for approximately one-third of deaths in industrialized countries and is a common cause of hospitalization. Fifty percent of patients with advanced heart failure die within 1 year of diagnosis and 50% of the remainder within 5 years. The trajectory of heart failure is often unpredictable and approximately 30% to 50% of patients die suddenly. Patients with heart failure suffer from numerous symptoms, often resistant to conventional treatments, frequently under-recognized and under-treated. Symptom assessment and control improve quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure; this can be managed at best by collaboration between specialistic teams.Although heart failure is a life-shortening condition, therapeutic and technological advances (such as left ventricular assist devices, coronary revascularization, percutaneous valve implantation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators) can help healthcare professionals in the management of patients with advanced heart failure, improving global condition and reducing the risk of sudden death. On the other hand, it has to be acknowledged that management of cardiovascular implanted electronic devices towards end of life requires awareness of legal, ethical, religious principles regarding potential withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies.Adequate communication with patients regarding adverse events, end of life, benefits vs burdens of therapies and interventions, treatment preferences, and decision-making should be an issue in early stages of disease. The process of advanced care planning should be clearly documented and regularly reviewed.Barriers to the provision of palliative care in heart failure include clinical issues (disease trajectory), prognostic uncertainty, failure in identification of patients who need palliative care and timing of referral to specialist services, but also misconceptions of patients, families and sanitary staff regarding the role of palliative care, organization problems, and finally educational and time issues.This document focuses on the need of further, coordinated research and work-out on: (i) identification of heart failure patients eligible for palliative care, in terms of clinical and social-psychological issues, (ii) identification of trigger events and timing of referral; (iii) identification of adequate performance indicators/scales for measurement, assessment and follow-up of symptoms and quality of life in end-stage heart failure, including patient-reported outcome measures; (iv) treatment, care and organization strategies and models for advanced/end-stage heart failure ("care management"); and (v) implementation of knowledge and education of healthcare professionals in the fields of communication, ethics, and advanced care planning in heart failure.

Don't stop at first glance: pulmonary artery angiosarcoma mimicking chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

We report the case of an incomplete diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, with relevant prognostic implications, missing the presence of a primary pulmonary artery angiosarcoma. After the late neoplasm diagnosis, the patient, treated for months with riociguat, was considered inoperable and died soon after. This case highlights the need to manage patients with suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension by expert referral centers with specific and multi-professional expertise (heart and thoracic imaging) in order to avoid incomplete or delayed diagnoses.