RESUMO
(1) Background: Despite the prognostic improvements achieved with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a minority of patients still fail TKIs. The recent introduction of asciminib may be a promising option in intolerant patients, as it is a first-in-class inhibitor with a more selective mechanism of action different from the ATP-competitive inhibition that occurs with TKIs. Therefore, our goal was to analyze toxicities shown with asciminib as well as to study cross-toxicity with previous TKIs. (2) Methods: An observational, multicenter, retrospective study was performed with data from 77 patients with CML with therapeutic failure to second-generation TKIs who received asciminib through a managed-access program (MAP) (3) Results: With a median follow-up of 13.7 months, 22 patients (28.5%) discontinued treatment: 32% (7/22) due to intolerance and 45% (10/22) due to resistance. Fifty-five percent of the patients reported adverse effects (AEs) with asciminib and eighteen percent grade 3-4. Most frequent AEs were: fatigue (18%), thrombocytopenia (17%), anemia (12%), and arthralgias (12%). None of the patients experienced cardiovascular events or occlusive arterial disease. Further, 26%, 25%, and 9% of patients required dose adjustment, temporary suspension, or definitive discontinuation of treatment, respectively. Toxicities under asciminib seemed lower than with prior TKIs for anemia, cardiovascular events, pleural/pericardial effusion, diarrhea, and edema. Cross-toxicity risk was statistically significant for thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, vomiting, and pancreatitis. (4) Conclusion: Asciminib is a molecule with a good safety profile and with a low rate of AEs. However, despite its new mechanism of action, asciminib presents a risk of cross-toxicity with classical TKIs for some AEs.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The predictive value of interim PET/computed tomography (I-PET/CT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of I-PET/CT for an event-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients with DLBCL included in a prospective clinical trial who were treated with six cycles of dose-dense R-CHOP followed by pegfilgrastim and who had undergone an I-PET/CT (after two cycles) and a final PET [F-PET/CT (60 days after the sixth cycle)]. Event was defined as nonresponse, relapse, or death. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Their median age was 60 years; 54% were male, 25% had bulky disease, and 67% had an International Prognostic Index of 0-2. The median follow-up duration was 28.8 months. I-PET/CT was positive in 34 (49%) patients and F-PET/CT was positive in 12 (17.4%). The 3-year event-free survival was 86% for patients who were I-PET/CT negative as against 64% for those who were I-PET/CT positive (P=0.036). The negative and positive predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity of I-PET/CT for an event were 83, 32, 65, and 56%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis including baseline characteristics, I-PET/CT, and F-PET/CT, F-PET/CT was the only significant predictor (P<0.0005). CONCLUSION: In patients with DLBCL treated with dose-dense R-CHOP plus pegfilgrastim, a negative I-PET/CT is highly predictive of a favorable outcome and a positive I-PET/CT is of limited clinical value. These results do not support treatment intensification after a short course of chemotherapy based solely on a positive I-PET/CT.