Development of methods for the bioanalysis of RRx-001 and metabolites.

BACKGROUND: Bioanalytical methods were required to study the novel anticancer drug, RRx-001 preclinically and for clinical pharmacokinetic analysis; however, RRx-001 quickly and completely disappeared on intravenous administration in preclinical species. RESULTS: Quantification of RRx-001 directly or by derivatization was unsuccessful. On exposure to whole blood, RRx-001 formed the glutathione (GSH) adduct very rapidly, suggesting this metabolite as the bioanalyte. However, rapid enzymatic degradation in the blood matrix of RRx-001-GSH posed significant technical problems. Herein, we describe a novel and broadly applicable solution to stabilize GSH conjugates in blood samples by inhibiting the degrading enzyme. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods for analysis of RRx-001-GSH in rat, dog and human plasma were developed and successfully validated to good laboratory practice standards. CONCLUSION: Extensive breakdown of RRx-001-GSH was effectively stopped by addition of the enzyme inhibitor, acivicin. The developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for RRx-001-GSH was validated for use in preclinical toxicology studies and the Phase I first-in-human clinical trial.

Pharmacokinetics of histamine dihydrochloride in healthy volunteers and cancer patients: implications for combined immunotherapy with interleukin-2.

Recent clinical trials in melanoma and leukemia have demonstrated potential for increased survival time and improved remission when histamine dihydrochloride is added to cytokine monotherapy. In the present study, the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous histamine (1 mg) in 21 healthy subjects and 12 melanoma patients was determined via model-dependent methods. Drug-drug interactions with subcutaneous interleukin-2 (1.1 mg) were evaluated in a combined cohort of patients with melanoma (n = 8) or renal cell carcinoma (n = 4). Histamine dihydrochloride administered over 10 minutes in healthy subjects peaked at 18 minutes (Cmax 38 nmol/L), attained a distribution volume of 59 L, and was eliminated at 6%/min. The results were similar in a 20-minute infusion in melanoma patients. No gender effects were observed (p > 0.05). Interleukin-2 injected either 10 minutes prior to or 10 minutes following histamine dihydrochloride had no effect on histamine kinetics. Histamine dihydrochloride administered 10 minutes prior to injection of interleukin-2 also had no effect on interleukin-2 kinetics. Maximal concentration of interleukin-2 (2,442 pg/ml) occurred at 2.5 hours with an elimination half-life of 1.7 hours, area under the curve (AUC) of 15,746 pg x h/ml, and volume of distribution and plasma clearance of 194 L and 74 L/h, respectively. However, interleukin-2 Cmax (1,758 pg/ml) and AUC (12,448 pg x h/ml) were reduced when histamine dihydrochloride was infused 10 minutes following interleukin-2, likely due to the pharmacodynamic effects of histamine, including increased heart rate and reduced blood pressure. It is concluded that histamine dihydrochloride and interleukin-2 can be safely coadministered with minimal interaction.