Role of US Contrast Agents in the Assessment of Indeterminate Solid and Cystic Lesions in Native and Transplant Kidneys.

Ultrasonography (US) is often the initial imaging modality employed in the evaluation of renal diseases. Despite improvements in B-mode and Doppler imaging, US still faces limitations in the assessment of focal renal masses and complex cysts as well as the microcirculation. The applications of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in the kidneys have dramatically increased to overcome these shortcomings with guidelines underlining their importance. This article describes microbubble contrast agents and their role in renal imaging. Microbubble contrast agents consist of a low solubility complex gas surrounded by a phospholipid shell. Microbubbles are extremely safe and well-tolerated pure intravascular agents that can be used in renal failure and obstruction, where computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agents may have deleterious effects. Their intravascular distribution allows for quantitative perfusion analysis of the microcirculation, diagnosis of vascular problems, and qualitative assessment of tumor vascularity and enhancement patterns. Low acoustic power real-time prolonged imaging can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation and at lower cost than CT or MR imaging. CEUS can accurately distinguish pseudotumors from true tumors. CEUS has been shown to be more accurate than unenhanced US and rivals contrast material-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal lesions and can upstage the Bosniak category. CEUS can demonstrate specific enhancement patterns allowing the differentiation of benign and malignant solid tumors as well as focal inflammatory lesions. In conclusion, CEUS is useful in the characterization of indeterminate renal masses and cysts.

Quantitative Maximum Shear-Wave Stiffness of Breast Masses as a Predictor of Histopathologic Severity.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare quantitative maximum breast mass stiffness on shear-wave elastography (SWE) with histopathologic outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From September 2008 through September 2010, at 16 centers in the United States and Europe, 1647 women with a sonographically visible breast mass consented to undergo quantitative SWE in this prospective protocol; 1562 masses in 1562 women had an acceptable reference standard. The quantitative maximum stiffness (termed "Emax") on three acquisitions was recorded for each mass with the range set from 0 (very soft) to 180 kPa (very stiff). The median Emax and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were determined as a function of histopathologic diagnosis and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. We considered the impact of mass size on maximum stiffness by performing the same comparisons for masses 9 mm or smaller and those larger than 9 mm in diameter. RESULTS: The median patient age was 50 years (mean, 51.8 years; SD, 14.5 years; range, 21-94 years), and the median lesion diameter was 12 mm (mean, 14 mm; SD, 7.9 mm; range, 1-53 mm). The median Emax of the 1562 masses (32.1% malignant) was 71 kPa (mean, 90 kPa; SD, 65 kPa; IQR, 31-170 kPa). Of 502 malignancies, 23 (4.6%) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) masses had a median Emax of 126 kPa (IQR, 71-180 kPa) and were less stiff than 468 invasive carcinomas (median Emax, 180 kPa [IQR, 138-180 kPa]; p = 0.002). Benign lesions were much softer than malignancies (median Emax, 43 kPa [IQR, 24-83 kPa] vs 180 kPa [IQR, 129-180 kPa]; p < 0.0001). Usual benign lesions were soft, including 62 cases of fibrocystic change (median Emax, 32 kPa; IQR, 24-94 kPa), 51 cases of fibrosis (median Emax, 36 kPa; IQR, 22-102 kPa), and 301 fibroadenomas (median Emax, 45 kPa; IQR, 30-79 kPa). Eight lipomas (median Emax, 14 kPa; IQR, 8-15 kPa), 154 cysts (median Emax, 29 kPa; IQR, 10-58 kPa), and seven lymph nodes (median Emax, 17 kPa; IQR, 9-40 kPa) were softer than usual benign lesions (p < 0.0001 for lipomas and cysts; p = 0.007 for lymph nodes). Risk lesions were slightly stiffer than usual benign lesions (p = 0.002) but tended to be softer than DCIS (p = 0.14). Fat necrosis and abscesses were relatively stiff. Conclusions were similar for both small and large masses. CONCLUSION: Despite overlap in Emax values, maximum stiffness measured by SWE is a highly effective predictor of the histopathologic severity of sonographically depicted breast masses.

Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound distinguish malignant from reactive lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A consecutive series of 17 patients with known head and neck malignancy scheduled for neck surgery and lymph node clearance were recruited for contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation. Sonographic signal intensity as a function of time, comparing features of time to peak, time to arrival and time to wash-out, was quantified. The selected node was removed surgically and submitted for histology. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination had 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for lymph node involvement. Functional analysis revealed contrast peaks significantly earlier in the malignant nodes (mean ± standard deviation) of 24.14 ± 2.7 s compared with 29.33 ± 3.4 s (p = 0.0128). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound holds promise in the detection and characterization of metastatic nodes that would not be diagnosed as abnormal on the basis of conventional ultrasound criteria.

Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging is a radiation-free diagnostic tool that uses biocompatible ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to improve image clarity. UCAs, which do not contain dye, often salvage "technically difficult" ultrasound scans, increasing the accuracy and reliability of a front-line ultrasound diagnosis, reducing unnecessary downstream testing, lowering overall health care costs, changing therapy, and improving patient care. Two UCAs currently are approved and regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. They have favorable safety profiles and risk/benefit ratios in adult and pediatric populations, including compromised patients with severe cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, these UCAs are contraindicated in patients with known or suspected right-to-left, bidirectional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts. These patients, who constitute 10% to 35% of the general population, typically receive no UCAs when they undergo echocardiography. If their echocardiographic images are suboptimal, they may receive inappropriate diagnosis and treatment, or they may be referred for additional diagnostic testing, including radiation-based procedures that increase their lifetime risk for cancer or procedures that use contrast agents containing dye, which may increase the risk for kidney damage. An exhaustive review of current peer-reviewed research demonstrated no scientific basis for the UCA contraindication in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts. Initial safety concerns were based on limited rodent data and speculation related to macroaggregated albumin microspheres, a radioactive nuclear imaging agent with different physical and chemical properties and no relation to UCAs. Radioactive macroaggregated albumin is not contraindicated in adult or pediatric patients with cardiac shunts and is routinely used in these populations. In conclusion, the International Contrast Ultrasound Society Board recommends removal of the contraindication to further the public interest in safe, reliable, radiation-free diagnostic imaging options for patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts and to reduce their need for unnecessary downstream testing.

Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS.

Initially, a set of guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004 dealing only with liver applications. A second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some non-liver applications. Time has moved on, and the need for international guidelines on the use of CEUS in the liver has become apparent. The present document describes the third iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using contrast specific imaging techniques. This joint WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative has implicated experts from major leading ultrasound societies worldwide. These liver CEUS guidelines are simultaneously published in the official journals of both organizing federations (i.e., Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology for WFUMB and Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound for EFSUMB). These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of all currently clinically available ultrasound contrast agents (UCA). They are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis and improve the management of patients worldwide.

Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for breast masses. METHODS: For intraobserver reproducibility, each observer obtained three consecutive SWE images of 758 masses that were visible on ultrasound. 144 (19%) were malignant. Weighted kappa was used to assess the agreement of qualitative elastographic features; the reliability of quantitative measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). For the interobserver reproducibility, a blinded observer reviewed images and agreement on features was determined. RESULTS: Mean age was 50 years; mean mass size was 13 mm. Qualitatively, SWE images were at least reasonably similar for 666/758 (87.9%). Intraclass correlation for SWE diameter, area and perimeter was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.94). Intraobserver reliability for maximum and mean elasticity was almost perfect (ICC = 0.84 and 0.87) and was substantial for the ratio of mass-to-fat elasticity (ICC = 0.77). Interobserver agreement was moderate for SWE homogeneity (κ = 0.57), substantial for qualitative colour assessment of maximum elasticity (κ = 0.66), fair for SWE shape (κ = 0.40), fair for B-mode mass margins (κ = 0.38), and moderate for B-mode mass shape (κ = 0.58), orientation (κ = 0.53) and BI-RADS assessment (κ = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: SWE is highly reproducible for assessing elastographic features of breast masses within and across observers. SWE interpretation is at least as consistent as that of BI-RADS ultrasound B-mode features. KEY POINTS: • Shear wave ultrasound elastography can measure the stiffness of breast tissue • It provides a qualitatively and quantitatively interpretable colour-coded map of tissue stiffness • Intraobserver reproducibility of SWE is almost perfect while intraobserver reproducibility of SWE proved to be moderate to substantial • The most reproducible SWE features between observers were SWE image homogeneity and maximum elasticity.

Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

PURPOSE: To determine whether adding shear-wave (SW) elastographic features could improve accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) assessment of breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2008 to September 2010, 958 women consented to repeat standard breast US supplemented by quantitative SW elastographic examination in this prospective multicenter institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol. B-mode Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) features and assessments were recorded. SW elastographic evaluation (mean, maximum, and minimum elasticity of stiffest portion of mass and surrounding tissue; lesion-to-fat elasticity ratio; ratio of SW elastographic-to-B-mode lesion diameter or area; SW elastographic lesion shape and homogeneity) was performed. Qualitative color SW elastographic stiffness was assessed independently. Nine hundred thirty-nine masses were analyzable; 102 BI-RADS category 2 masses were assumed to be benign; reference standard was available for 837 category 3 or higher lesions. Considering BI-RADS category 4a or higher as test positive for malignancy, effect of SW elastographic features on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity after reclassifying category 3 and 4a masses was determined. RESULTS: Median participant age was 50 years; 289 of 939 (30.8%) masses were malignant (median mass size, 12 mm). B-mode BI-RADS AUC was 0.950; eight of 303 (2.6%) BI-RADS category 3 masses, 18 of 193 (9.3%) category 4a lesions, 41 of 97 (42%) category 4b lesions, 42 of 57 (74%) category 4c lesions, and 180 of 187 (96.3%) category 5 lesions were malignant. By using visual color stiffness to selectively upgrade category 3 and lack of stiffness to downgrade category 4a masses, specificity improved from 61.1% (397 of 650) to 78.5% (510 of 650) (P<.001); AUC increased to 0.962 (P=.005). Oval shape on SW elastographic images and quantitative maximum elasticity of 80 kPa (5.2 m/sec) or less improved specificity (69.4% [451 of 650] and 77.4% [503 of 650], P<.001 for both), without significant improvement in sensitivity or AUC. CONCLUSION: Adding SW elastographic features to BI-RADS feature analysis improved specificity of breast US mass assessment without loss of sensitivity.

Perihepatic lymph nodes as markers of disease response in patients with hepatitis C-related liver disease: a prospective clinical evaluation.

AIM: To assess the clinical feasibility of utilizing the presence of perihepatic lymphadenopathy, seen on ultrasound, as a marker of response to antiviral treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with HCV-related liver disease [51 men and 34 women; mean age 47 years (range 26-67)] underwent liver biopsy and baseline ultrasound scans. Twenty-two of these patients were followed up longitudinally with 6-monthly ultrasound scans, whereas they were receiving anti-HCV eradication therapy with interferon and ribavirin. Perihepatic lymph nodes detected in the coeliac axis and peripancreatic region were noted, with the largest node size on maximal diameter recorded. The patients were subsequently assessed in the light of long-term virological response to treatment. RESULTS: Perihepatic lymph nodes were detected in 26 of the 85 patients. Of the 22 patients followed up longitudinally, 11 responded to antiviral treatment, nine failed to respond and two did not complete a course of treatment. No significant difference was found between patients with detectable lymphadenopathy and those without according to age, sex, disease severity and genotype. There was a general reduction in size of lymph nodes in both responders and nonresponders to treatment, although this reduction was only significant in the responder group (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: The presence of perihepatic lymphadenopathy when detected in patients with viral hepatitis can potentially serve as an indicator of response to treatment. However, as only 30-40% of patients have detectable lymphadenopathy, its clinical utility is limited.

Renal transplants: what ultrasound can and cannot do.

Renal transplantation has emerged as the most cost-effective and patient-supportive way to treat chronic renal failure, with excellent graft survival rates thanks to improved surgical techniques and rejection management. Its success has placed a heavy burden on imaging, especially ultrasound, which is used in the selection of live donors and in monitoring each stage of the postoperative care of the recipient. Ultrasound is particularly useful for detecting vascular complications such as early occlusions and arterial stenosis. It can detect and monitor perinephric complications and transplant hydronephrosis, all clinically significant complications that affect management. Ultrasound can detect many of the late acquired diseases, especially intercurrent tumors that require surgery. It is the best method to guide interventions such as aspiration of collections and insertion of nephrostomy drains. It can also detect postbiopsy arteriovenous shunts and the end-stage kidney of chronic rejection. These, however, are of no great clinical significance, and the findings rarely affect clinical decisions. Ultrasound fails to discriminate between the important causes of early graft dysfunction, especially acute tubular necrosis, rejection, and drug toxicity: these important distinctions still rely on biopsy. There is hope that some of the newer ultrasound methods, especially the functional data from microbubble contrast agent dynamics, might supply useful information for their detection and differentiation.

Measurement of the reflectivity of the intima-medial layer of the common carotid artery improves the discriminatory value of intima-medial thickness measurement as a predictor of risk of atherosclerotic disease.

Our aim was to assess the predictive value of a measurement of intima-medial layer (IML) reflectivity in the differentiation of pathological from physiological increases in intima-medial thickness (IMT). Both common carotid arteries (CCA) of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients and age- and sex-matched controls (no cardiovascular risk factors) were imaged using a 10- to 15-MHz linear array transducer (n = 30). Images of the CCA far wall were analyzed in the IMT "plug-in" of "HDI Lab." The IML reflectivity, averaged over an 8- to 12-mm length of arterial wall, was expressed as a ratio of reflectivity at a point 0.21-mm deep to the intima-medial interface divided by the reflectivity at the intima-medial interface, termed the intima-medial reflectivity index (IMRI). The risk of atherosclerosis was assessed in terms of IMT alone and IMT coupled with IMRI. Defining high risk of atherosclerosis in FH, in terms of both IMT alone and IMT coupled with IMRI, produced an appropriate, when compared with cholesterol-years score, statistically significant stratification (p < 0.01 and p < 0.005). Analysis of the low-risk subjects revealed a tendency to define a subject as "high risk" based on a physiological increase in IMT, but when IMRI is included in the assessment, all controls are correctly identified as low risk. This method of quantifying the reflectivity of the IML improved the discriminatory performance of IMT increase as an indicator of atherosclerotic risk by enabling a smaller, therefore earlier, increase in IMT to be considered pathologic when accompanied by an increase in IMRI.

Hepatic vein transit time of SonoVue: a comparative study with Levovist.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare transit times of Levovist and SonoVue in healthy volunteers and patients with biopsy-proved hepatitis C-related liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Forty patients and 25 healthy volunteers were examined. Subjects fasted, a bolus of SonoVue (0.6 mL) was injected into a cubital fossa vein, and hepatic venous time-intensity profiles were measured with spectral Doppler tracing. This was repeated with two injections of Levovist (2 g) and another injection of SonoVue. Time-intensity curves of spectral Doppler signals of right and middle hepatic veins were analyzed. A sustained signal intensity increase of 10% above baseline levels indicated hepatic vein transit time (HVTT). Carotid artery audio intensity was measured in volunteers. Analysis of variance and t tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients had mild hepatitis; 18, moderate or severe hepatitis; and 10, cirrhosis. Mean HVTTs in control, mild hepatitis, moderate or severe hepatitis, and cirrhosis groups were 38.3 seconds +/- 2.4 (standard error), 47.5 seconds +/- 6.5, 29.5 seconds +/- 10.8, and 17.6 seconds +/- 5.0, respectively, with Levovist (P < .001) and 29.4 seconds +/- 6.9, 27.4 seconds +/- 9.3, 22.9 seconds +/- 4.7, and 16.4 seconds +/- 4.9, respectively, with SonoVue (P < .001). HVTT decreased as severity increased at imaging with both contrast agents. There was no significant difference in HVTT between mild and moderate hepatitis groups with SonoVue; however, there were significant differences in HVTT between all patient groups with Levovist. HVTT of SonoVue was shorter than that of Levovist in all groups (P < .001) except the cirrhosis group; in this group, HVTT of the two contrast agents was similar (P = .05). No difference was observed in mean cardiopulmonary transit time for SonoVue or Levovist (9.1 seconds +/- 2.4 [standard error] and 8.4 seconds +/- 2.5, respectively, P = .18). CONCLUSION: HVTT was significantly shorter with SonoVue than with Levovist; there was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary transit time.

Can Doppler sonography grade the severity of hepatitis C-related liver disease?

OBJECTIVE: Many authors have claimed that Doppler sonography indexes are of value in grading and assessing diffuse liver disease. However, there is much controversy regarding the reliability and reproducibility of these techniques. We performed a prospective study to evaluate whether these methods can grade disease in a well-stratified cohort of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with biopsy-proven HCV-related liver disease were recruited, and Doppler sonography was performed by one operator. The patients were classified into one of the following three groups on the basis of the Ishak-modified histologic activity index (HAI) fibrosis (F) and necroinflammatory (NI) scores: mild hepatitis (F < or = 2 and NI < or = 3), moderate or severe hepatitis (3 < or = F < 6 or NI > or = 4), or cirrhosis (F = 6/6). We measured the following Doppler indexes: main hepatic artery peak velocity (Vmax) and resistive index, main portal vein peak velocity (Vmax), and maximal portal vein diameter and circumference that allowed calculation of the portal vein congestive index (portal vein area and portal vein velocity). The ratio of the hepatic artery velocity (Vmax) to the portal vein velocity (Vmax) was also calculated, and the phasicity (triphasic, biphasic, or monophasic) of the hepatic veins of each patient was recorded. We also measured the maximal spleen length longitudinally. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients with liver disease (mild hepatitis, n = 20; moderate or severe hepatitis, n = 25; cirrhosis, n = 20) with biopsy-proven HCV-related liver disease were studied. Optimal hepatic arterial traces were obtained in only 30 patients and portal vein circumference in 18 patients. No significant differences were observed in the Doppler indexes with increasing severity of liver disease. Five (29%) of 17 patients with mild hepatitis had an abnormal hepatic vein trace (i.e., biphasic or monophasic) compared with 11 (55%) of 20 patients with moderate or severe hepatitis and 12 (60%) of 20 patients with cirrhosis. The only index to show a significant intergroup difference was splenic length (analysis of variance, p < 0.001), but there was still overlap between the groups. CONCLUSION: Doppler-derived indexes, which have previously been recommended for the assessment of severity in chronic liver disease, are difficult to reproduce reliably and therefore have a limited clinical role in the noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis or inflammation.

Angiogenesis imaging in the management of prostate cancer.

Angiogenesis is an integral part of benign prostatic hyperplasia, is associated with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and is a key factor in the growth and metastasis of prostate cancer. This review focuses on ultrasound and dynamic MRI in the evaluation of prostate cancer angiogenesis, and compares these techniques to functional CT and hydrogen magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Image-based evaluation of angiogenesis in the prostate has established clinical roles in lesion detection, tumor staging and the detection of suspected tumor recurrence. One limitation of all these imaging techniques, however, is inadequate lesion characterization, particularly in differentiating prostatitis from cancer in the peripheral zone of the prostate, and in distinguishing between benign prostatic hyperplasia and central-gland tumors. Ultimately, local availability, expertise and the need to minimize patients' radiation burden will influence which technique is used in prostatic evaluations.

Improved characterization of liver lesions with liver-phase uptake of liver-specific microbubbles: prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in a prospective multicenter study whether conventional ultrasonographic (US) characterization of liver lesions can be improved by imaging during the liver-specific phase of SH U 508A uptake in the microbubble-specific agent detection imaging mode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-two patients with liver lesions underwent conventional gray-scale and color Doppler US and SH U 508A-enhanced US. Two radiologists blindly read digital cine clips and assigned scores for confidence in diagnosis of benignancy or malignancy, diagnosis of specific lesion types, and relative difference in SH U 508A uptake between the lesion and the liver parenchyma (ie, subjective conspicuity score [SCS]). Comparisons were made to see whether the addition of agent detection imaging led to improved diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions for readers 1 (P =.049) and 2 (P <.001). The number of patients with a correct diagnosis of benignancy or malignancy assigned by readers 1 and 2, respectively, improved from 114 and 113 to 125 and 128 with agent detection imaging (reader 1: P =.027; reader 2: P =.008; McNemar test). Specific diagnoses were made more accurately with agent detection imaging: At McNemar testing, the number of correct lesion type determinations increased from 83 to 92 (P =.022) for reader 1 and from 85 to 99 (P <.001) for reader 2. Both readers assigned high scores for differences in SH U 508A uptake between the liver parenchyma and the lesion for metastases and cholangiocarcinomas and low scores for uptake differences in most of the benign lesions. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), hemangiomas, and adenomas had more variable uptake differences. Fourteen of 22 hemangiomas were assigned an SCS of less than 50%, and 22 (reader 1) and 15 (reader 2) of 31 HCCs were assigned an SCS of greater than 50%. CONCLUSION: With use of SH U 508A-enhanced agent detection imaging, liver lesion characterization and diagnostic performance are significantly improved.

Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To compare conventional B-mode ultrasonography (US) alone with the combination of conventional B-mode US and contrast material-enhanced (SHU 508A) late-phase pulse-inversion US for the detection of hepatic metastases by using dual-phase spiral computed tomography (CT) as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients underwent conventional US, US in the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A, and single-section spiral CT. US and CT images were assessed by blinded readers. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and the number and smallest size of metastases at conventional and contrast-enhanced US were compared by using CT as the standard of reference. Lesion conspicuity was assessed objectively (quantitatively) and subjectively by one reader before and after contrast material administration. RESULTS: In 45 of 80 (56%) patients with metastases, more metastases were seen at contrast-enhanced US than at conventional US. In three of these patients, conventional US images appeared normal. The addition of contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity for the detection of individual metastases from 71% to 87% (P <.001). On a patient basis, sensitivity improved from 94% to 98% (P =.44), and specificity improved from 60% to 88% (P <.01). Contrast enhancement improved the subjective conspicuity of metastases in 66 of 75 (88%) patients and the objective contrast by a mean of 10.8 dB (P <.001). Contrast-enhanced US showed more metastases than did CT in seven patients, and CT showed more than did contrast-enhanced US in one of 22 patients in whom an independent reference (magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative US, or pathologic findings) was available. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity and specificity in the detection of hepatic metastases.

Quantitative microbubble enhanced transrectal ultrasound as a tool for monitoring hormonal treatment of prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We quantified changes in prostate carcinoma vascularity treated with anti-androgens using color Doppler and power transrectal ultrasound in combination with microbubble contrast agent Levovist. METHODS: Thirty-six men with prostate carcinoma were studied at baseline and at intervals during treatment. At each attendance, Levovist((R)) (10 ml, 300 mg/ml) was given as an iv bolus. Using quantitative analysis, we calculated the pre-enhancement scores, arrival time, time to peak, peak value, and area under the time-enhancement curve (AUC). These were compared to pre-treatment values and serial PSA measurements. RESULTS: The pre-enhancement, peak value, and AUC each showed a marked response with reductions within one week. The average AUC declined to 68% +/- 9% (mean +/- standard error) by week 1, 56% +/- 9% by week 3, and 20% +/- 4% by week 6. A strong correlation with changes in the mean PSA (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) was also measured. In four patients, Doppler indices did not fall with PSA: two patients with the most marked discrepancy relapsed at 6 months. CONCLUSION: The vascular enhancement declined with therapy, similar to PSA. Microbubble enhanced ultrasound can show early response to treatment.

Which continuous US scanning mode is optimal for the detection of vascularity in liver lesions when enhanced with a second generation contrast agent?

OBJECTIVES: Microbubble echo-enhancers help in the assessment of focal liver masses by enhancing the signal from blood vessels. A variety of linear and nonlinear scanning modes are now available, but it is unclear which is optimal. A controlled comparison was performed during the infusion of such an agent (SonoVue: Bracco, Milan, Italy). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with known focal liver lesions were studied. The diagnoses, confirmed on dual phase helical computed tomography (CT) at the same attendance were metastasis (n = 7), haemangioma (n = 2) and focal nodular hyperplasia FNH (n = 1). A dose of 12 ml SonoVue concentrated at 5 mg/ml was infused intravenously at a rate of 1 ml/min. The enhancement level was monitored with a continuous wave (CW) Doppler probe over the right radial artery and the intensity of the signal was registered at 1 s intervals. When a plateau of enhancement was reached, a single lesion in each patient was imaged using five different continuous scanning modes, fundamental grey scale (FGS); fundamental colour Doppler (FCD); fundamental power Doppler (FPD); second harmonic grey scale (HGS); and pulse inversion mode (Pim) using an HDI5000 scanner and C5-2 probe (ATL, Bothell, WA). The order of scanning modes was varied between patients using a predefined randomisation protocol. The videos (super video home system (SVHS)) were analysed offsite by two blinded readers, both experienced in contrast ultrasound of the liver. The readers were asked to score each mode in terms of its ability to detect vessels within/around the lesion at optimal enhancement. This was done using a ranking system (1, worst; 5, best) for each patient. RESULTS: Both observers scored FPD as the optimal imaging method, followed by Pim. (Scores summed across all patients, observer 1: FPD 48, Pim 42, FCD 37, HGS 21, FGS 10; observer 2: FPD 49, Pim 40, FCD 38, HGS 21, FGS 10). The differences from FPD were significant for FCD, HGS and FGS using a unpaired analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparison, with Bonferroni multiple corrections, (P<0.01, both observers). The differences between FPD and Pim were also significant both for observer 2 and for both observers combined (P<0.01), but did not reach significance for observer 1 (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FPD performed best, and the non-linear modes, performed continuously (pulse inversion and second HGS), showed no clear advantage.

Initial observations on the effect of irradiation on the liver-specific uptake of Levovist.

The aim of this pilot study was to see if the biodistribution of the microbubble Levovist (SHU 508 A; Schering AG, Berlin) during its liver specific phase is altered by radiotherapy. The mechanism of this liver-specific phase of this agent remains poorly understood. One way of investigating this is to see what effect radiotherapy has on liver uptake, as both Kupffer cell function and vascular endothelial integrity are selectively damaged by irradiation. The regional liver specific uptake of Levovist was evaluated in eight patients undergoing radiotherapy to the hepatic area. Ultrasound (US) sweeps were made 4 min after Levovist injection using the phase inversion mode (PIM) which is specific for microbubbles. Differences between irradiated and non-irradiated areas were observed in 2/8 subjects completing the study. Both subjective and objective evaluations in these subjects showed a significantly reduced grey scale unit in non-irradiated versus irradiated liver regions (average values 99 vs. 89, P < 0.0045 and 75 vs. 62, P < 0.0001). These findings are somewhat inconclusive, but given the difficulty in defining areas of irradiated and non-irradiated liver, because multiple radiotherapy portals were used in all patients, tentatively suggests a radiotherapy induced effect in at least some patients. The two likely mechanisms would be damage to the Kupffer cells and or the vascular endothelium, although the relative contribution of these is unclear.

Detection of an occult hepatocellular carcinoma using ultrasound with liver-specific microbubbles.

The radiological surveillance of cirrhosis to detect the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is problematic because no highly sensitive and specific imaging investigation is available. Ultrasound is typically the first modality used but is less accurate than other imaging modalities. We report the first case of a patient with cirrhosis in whom US imaging with liver-specific microbubbles detected an HCC prior to its detection by MR. The use of liver-specific microbubble US contrast agents is an exciting development in the detection of HCC in chronic liver disease and may help to rectify some of the shortcomings of US.