Health Services Utilization and Specialist Care in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multiprovince Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of health services utilization among children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are important to understand as the number of children with IBD continues to increase. We compared health services utilization and surgery among children diagnosed <10 years of age (Paris classification: A1a) and between 10 and <16 years of age (A1b). METHODS: Incident cases of IBD diagnosed <16 years of age were identified using validated algorithms from deterministically linked health administrative data in 5 Canadian provinces (Alberta, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) to conduct a retrospective cohort study. We compared the frequency of IBD-specific outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations across age groups (A1a vs A1b [reference]) using negative binomial regression. The risk of surgery was compared across age groups using Cox proportional hazards models. Models were adjusted for sex, rural/urban residence location, and mean neighborhood income quintile. Province-specific estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Among the 1165 (65.7% Crohn's) children with IBD included in our study, there were no age differences in the frequency of hospitalizations (rate ratio [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.06) or outpatient visits (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16). A1a children had fewer emergency department visits (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.97) and were less likely to require a Crohn's-related surgery (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92). The risk of colectomy was similar among children with ulcerative colitis in both age groups (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of health services utilization are generally similar when comparing children diagnosed across age groups.

Among 1165 children with inflammatory bowel disease, health services utilization was similar for children diagnosed <10 years of age and those diagnosed ≥10 years of age, except younger children had fewer emergency department visits and Crohn's disease­related surgeries.

Gabapentinoids and Risk for Severe Exacerbation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease : A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: North American and European health agencies recently warned of severe breathing problems associated with gabapentinoids, including in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although supporting evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether gabapentinoid use is associated with severe exacerbation in patients with COPD. DESIGN: Time-conditional propensity score-matched, new-user cohort study. SETTING: Health insurance databases from the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec in Canada. PATIENTS: Within a base cohort of patients with COPD between 1994 and 2015, patients initiating gabapentinoid therapy with an indication (epilepsy, neuropathic pain, or other chronic pain) were matched 1:1 with nonusers on COPD duration, indication for gabapentinoids, age, sex, calendar year, and time-conditional propensity score. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was severe COPD exacerbation requiring hospitalization. Hazard ratios (HRs) associated with gabapentinoid use were estimated in subcohorts according to gabapentinoid indication and in the overall cohort. RESULTS: The cohort included 356 gabapentinoid users with epilepsy, 9411 with neuropathic pain, and 3737 with other chronic pain, matched 1:1 to nonusers. Compared with nonuse, gabapentinoid use was associated with increased risk for severe COPD exacerbation across the indications of epilepsy (HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.08 to 2.30]), neuropathic pain (HR, 1.35 [CI, 1.24 to 1.48]), and other chronic pain (HR, 1.49 [CI, 1.27 to 1.73]) and overall (HR, 1.39 [CI, 1.29 to 1.50]). LIMITATION: Residual confounding, including from lack of smoking information. CONCLUSION: In patients with COPD, gabapentinoid use was associated with increased risk for severe exacerbation. This study supports the warnings from regulatory agencies and highlights the importance of considering this potential risk when prescribing gabapentin and pregabalin to patients with COPD. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Canadian Lung Association.

Intraoperative phlebotomies and bleeding in liver transplantation: a historical cohort study and causal analysis.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is associated with major bleeding and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. No well-designed causal analysis on interventions used to reduce transfusions, such as an intraoperative phlebotomy, has been conducted in this population. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study among liver transplantations performed from July 2008 to January 2021 in a Canadian centre. The exposure was intraoperative phlebotomy. The outcomes were blood loss, perioperative RBC transfusions (intraoperative and up to 48 hr after surgery), intraoperative RBC transfusions, and one-year survival. We estimated marginal multiplicative factors (MFs), risk differences (RDs), and hazard ratios by inverse probability of treatment weighting both among treated patients and the whole population. Estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 679 patients undergoing liver transplantations of which 365 (54%) received an intraoperative phlebotomy. A phlebotomy did not reduce bleeding, transfusion risks, or mortality when estimated among the treated but reduced bleeding and transfusion risks when estimated among the whole population (MF, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.99; perioperative RD, -15.2%; 95% CI, -26.1 to -0.8; intraoperative RD, -14.7%; 95% CI, -23.2 to -2.8). In a subgroup analysis on 584 patients with end-stage liver disease, slightly larger effects were observed on both transfusion risks when estimated among the whole population while beneficial effects were observed on the intraoperative transfusion risk when estimated among the treated population. CONCLUSION: The use of intraoperative phlebotomy was not consistently associated with better outcomes in all targets of inference but may improve outcomes among the whole population. STUDY REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04826666); registered 1 April 2021.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La transplantation hépatique est associée à des saignements importants et à de multiples transfusions de globules rouges (GR). Aucune analyse causale bien conçue sur l'effet d'interventions servant à réduire les transfusions, comme une phlébotomie peropératoire, n'a été menée dans cette population. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte historique incluant toutes les transplantations hépatiques réalisées dans un centre canadien de juillet 2008 à janvier 2021. L'exposition d'intérêt était une phlébotomie peropératoire. Les critères d'évaluation étaient le saignement peropératoire, les transfusions de GR périopératoires (peropératoires et jusqu'à 48 heures après la chirurgie), les transfusions de globules rouges peropératoires et la survie à un an. Des facteurs multiplicatifs (FM), des différences de risque (DR) et des rapports de risques instantanés marginaux ont été estimés en utilisant une pondération par l'inverse de la probabilité de traitement parmi les patients traités et parmi l'ensemble de la population. Les effets estimés ont été rapportés avec des intervalles de confiance (IC) à 95 %. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 679 transplantations hépatiques dont 365 (54 %) ont bénéficié d'une phlébotomie peropératoire. La phlébotomie n'a pas réduit les saignements, le risque de transfusion ou la mortalité lorsque ses effets ont été estimés parmi les patients traités, mais a réduit les risques de saignement et de transfusion lorsque ses effets ont été estimés parmi l'ensemble de la population (FM = 0,85 (IC 95 %, 0,72 à 0,99); DR périopératoire = −15,2 % (IC 95 %, −26,1 % à −0,8 %); DR peropératoire = −14,7 % (IC 95 %, −23,2 % à −2,8 %)). Dans une analyse de sous-groupe portant sur 584 patients atteints d'une hépatopathie terminale, des effets légèrement plus importants ont été observés sur les deux risques transfusionnels lorsqu'estimés dans l'ensemble de la population, tandis que des effets bénéfiques ont été observés sur le risque transfusionnel peropératoire lorsqu'estimés parmi les patients traités. CONCLUSION: L'utilisation de la phlébotomie peropératoire n'a pas été systématiquement associée à de meilleurs résultats dans toutes les populations cibles, mais semble améliorer les résultats lorsque les effets sont estimés dans l'ensemble de la population. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04826666); enregistrée le 1er avril 2021.

No Change in Surgical and Hospitalization Trends Despite Higher Exposure to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Québec Provincial Database From 1996 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have high health care expenditures because of medications, hospitalizations, and surgeries. We evaluated disease outcomes and treatment algorithms of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Québec, comparing periods before and after 2010. METHODS: The province of Québec's public health administrative database was used to identify newly diagnosed patients with IBD between 1996 and 2015. The primary and secondary outcomes included time to and probability of first and second IBD-related hospitalizations, first and second major surgery, and medication exposures. Medication prescriptions were collected from the public prescription database. RESULTS: We identified 34,644 newly diagnosed patients with IBD (CD = 59.5%). The probability of the first major surgery increased after 2010 in patients with CD (5 years postdiagnosis before and after 2010: 8% [SD = 0.2%] vs 15% [SD = 0.6%]; P < 0.0001) and patients with UC (6% [SD = 0.2%] vs 10% [SD = 0.6%] ;P < 0.0001). The probability of the second major surgery was unchanged in patients with CD. Hospitalization rates remained unchanged. Patients on anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) medications had the lowest probability of hospitalizations (overall 5-year probability in patients with IBD stratified by maximal therapeutic step: 5-aminosalicylic acids 37% [SD = 0.6%]; anti-TNFs 31% [SD = 1.8%]; P < 0.0001). Anti-TNFs were more commonly prescribed for patients with CD after 2010 (4% [SD = 0.2%] vs 16% [SD = 0.6%]; P < 0.0001) in the public health insurance plan, especially younger patients. Corticosteroid exposure was unchanged before and after 2010. Immunosuppressant use was low but increased after 2010. The use of 5-ASAs was stable in patients with UC but decreased in patients with CD. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of first and second hospitalizations remained unchanged in Québec and the probability of major surgery was low overall but did increase despite the higher and earlier use of anti-TNFs.

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21): Risk factors and a novel scoring system (I-CBFit).

BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis of core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is better than other subtypes of AML, 30% of patients still relapse and may require allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). However, there is no validated widely accepted scoring system to predict patient subsets with higher risk of relapse. METHODS: Eleven centers in the US and Europe evaluated 247 patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22). RESULTS: Complete remission (CR) rate was high (92.7%), yet relapse occurred in 27.1% of patients. A total of 24.7% of patients received alloHCT. The median disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were 20.8 and 31.2 months, respectively. Age, KIT D816V mutated (11.3%) or nontested (36.4%) compared with KIT D816V wild type (52.5%), high white blood cell counts (WBC), and pseudodiploidy compared with hyper- or hypodiploidy were included in a scoring system (named I-CBFit). DFS rate at 2 years was 76% for patients with a low-risk I-CBFit score compared with 36% for those with a high-risk I-CBFit score (P < 0.0001). Low- vs high-risk OS at 2 years was 89% vs 51% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: I-CBFit composed of readily available risk factors can be useful to tailor the therapy of patients, especially for whom alloHCT is not need in CR1 (ie, patients with a low-risk I-CBFit score).