The Impact of Donor Smoking on Primary Graft Dysfunction and Mortality after Lung Transplantation.

Rationale: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Prior studies implicated proxy-defined donor smoking as a risk factor for PGD and mortality. Objectives: We aimed to more accurately assess the impact of donor smoke exposure on PGD and mortality using quantitative smoke exposure biomarkers. Methods: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients enrolled in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group cohort between 2012 and 2018. PGD was defined as grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours after lung reperfusion. Donor smoking was defined using accepted thresholds of urinary biomarkers of nicotine exposure (cotinine) and tobacco-specific nitrosamine (4-[methylnitrosamino]-1-[3-pyridyl]-1-butanol [NNAL]) in addition to clinical history. The donor smoking-PGD association was assessed using logistic regression, and survival analysis was performed using inverse probability of exposure weighting according to smoking category. Measurements and Main Results: Active donor smoking prevalence varied by definition, with 34-43% based on urinary cotinine, 28% by urinary NNAL, and 37% by clinical documentation. The standardized risk of PGD associated with active donor smoking was higher across all definitions, with an absolute risk increase of 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 19.2%) by urinary cotinine, 5.7% (95% CI, -3.4% to 14.9%) by urinary NNAL, and 6.5% (95% CI, -2.8% to 15.8%) defined clinically. Donor smoking was not associated with differential post-lung transplant survival using any definition. Conclusions: Donor smoking associates with a modest increase in PGD risk but not with increased recipient mortality. Use of lungs from smokers is likely safe and may increase lung donor availability. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00552357).

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Solid Organ Transplantation.

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a life-saving procedure for people with end-stage organ failure. However, patients experience significant symptom burden, complex decision making, morbidity, and mortality during both pre- and post-transplant periods. Palliative care (PC) is well suited and historically underdelivered for the transplant population. This article, written by a team of transplant specialists (surgeons, cardiologists, nephrologists, hepatologists, and pulmonologists), PC clinicians, and an ethics specialist, shares 10 high-yield tips for PC clinicians to consider when caring for SOT patients.

The impact of HLA-DR mismatch status on retransplant-free survival and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome‒free survival among sensitized lung transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Donor‒recipient HLA-DR locus matching may be protective against bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung transplant recipients. It is unknown whether this benefit is more significant among sensitized (calculated panel reactive antibodies (CPRAs) of >0%) and highly sensitized (CPRAs of ≥80%) recipients who may be at a higher risk for BOS. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients who underwent lung transplantation between May 5, 2005 and May 31, 2019. Retransplant-free survival and BOS-free survival were compared among recipients with 0 vs ≥1 DR mismatches, grouped according to sensitization. RESULTS: Among all 20,355 included recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was associated with improved retransplant-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74-0.93, p = 0.002) and BOS-free survival (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77-0.96, p = 0.007). Among sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was also associated with improved retransplant-free survival (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.97, p = 0.02) and BOS-free survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.67-1.00, p = 0.04). There was however no difference in retransplant-free or BOS-free survival between sensitized and non-sensitized recipients with 0 DR mismatches. Among highly sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was not associated with retransplant-free or BOS-free survival. Among sensitized and highly sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was not associated with reduced use of plasmapheresis or reduced biopsy-proven, treated acute cellular rejection compared with non-sensitized recipients. CONCLUSIONS: HLA-DR matching is associated with a similar improvement in retransplant-free and BOS-free survival among non-sensitized and sensitized lung transplant recipients. DR matching does not confer a more substantial retransplant-free or BOS-free survival benefit to highly sensitized recipients than to non-sensitized recipients.

A phase II clinical trial of the Safety Of Simvastatin (SOS) in patients with pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis and with tuberous sclerosis complex.

INRODUCTION: The mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) sirolimus and everolimus stabilize lung function in patients with pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) but do not induce remission. Pre-clinical studies suggest that simvastatin in combination with sirolimus induces LAM cell death. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of simvastatin with either sirolimus or everolimus in LAM patients. METHODS: This was a phase II single arm trial evaluating the safety of escalating daily simvastatin (20-40 mg) in LAM patients already treated with sirolimus or everolimus. Adverse events and changes in lipid panel profile, pulmonary function tests, and VEGF-D were assessed. RESULTS: Ten LAM patients on a stable dose of mTORi for >3 months were treated with 20 mg simvastatin for two months followed by 40 mg for two months. The most common adverse events were peripheral edema (30%), cough (30%), and diarrhea (30%). No patients withdrew or had a reduction in simvastatin dose because of adverse events. Two patients required sirolumus dose reduction for supratherapeutic trough levels following simvastatin initiation. Total cholesterol and low density lipoproteins declined over the study period (-46.0 mg/dL±20.8, p = 0.008; -41.9 mg/dL±22.0, p = 0.01, respectively). There was also a decline in FEV1 (-82.0 mL±86.4, p = 0.02) but no significant change in FVC, DLCO, or VEGF-D. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of simvastatin with mTORi in LAM patients is safe and well-tolerated from an adverse events perspective. The addition of simvastatin, however, was associated with decline in FEV1 and the efficacy of this combination should be explored in larger trials.

Telomeres in Interstitial Lung Disease: The Short and the Long of It.

Telomeres are repetitive nucleotide sequences that cap linear chromosomes, thereby limiting progressive chromosomal shortening during cell replication. In conjunction with environmental factors, common single-nucleotide polymorphisms and rare and ultra-rare telomere-related mutations are associated with accelerated telomere shortening resulting in organ dysfunction, including interstitial lung disease (ILD). The most common telomere-related mutation-associated ILD is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Up to one-third of individuals with familial IPF have shortened telomeres and/or carry a telomere-related mutation, and 1 in 10 individuals with sporadic IPF have telomere-related mutations. Regardless of ILD phenotype, individuals with short telomeres and/or known telomere-related mutations have more rapid disease progression and shorter lung transplant-free survival. Management should include initiation of antifibrotic agents for those with an IPF phenotype and early referral to a transplant center. Patients with ILD being considered for transplant should be screened for short telomeres if there is a significant family history of pulmonary fibrosis or evidence of extrapulmonary organ dysfunction associated with a short telomere syndrome. Post-transplant management of recipients with telomere-related mutations should include careful adjustment of immunosuppression regimens on the basis of bone marrow reserve. Data on the impact of shortened telomeres on post-transplant outcomes, however, remain mixed.

Characterization of lymphangioleiomyomatosis patients with discordance between spirometric and diffusion measurements of pulmonary function.

Background: A subset of lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) patients present with normal FEV1 and FVC but with reduced DLCO. Patients with an isolated reduction in DLCO in other diseases appear to be at higher risk for pulmonary hypertension and worse survival but this has not been previously described in LAM patients. Objective: To characterize the prevalence and clinical progression of LAM patients who present with discordantly low DLCO. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of LAM patients in two centers in the United States and Brazil. Discordant DLCO was defined as FEV1 >80% predicted, FVC >80% predicted, and DLCO<80% predicted. We compared the rate of decline in pulmonary function, pulmonary artery to aorta (PA-A) ratio, and VEGF-D levels in patients with concordant and discordant DLCO. Results: The overall prevalence of discordant DLCO was 26.0%. Patients with discordant DLCO did not have a higher rate of yearly decline in FEV1 (-1.0±0.6 vs -1.0±0.6, p=0.50), FVC (-1.0±0.7 vs -0.3±0.8, p=0.54), or DLCO (-2.2±0.9 vs -1.6±0.6, p=0.79). They did not have higher rates of PA-A ratio>1 (23.3% vs 20.1%, p=1.00). Patients with discordant DLCO did not have higher levels of VEGF-D (1214±1256 pg/mL vs 1706±1214 pg/mL, p=0.07). Conclusions: LAM patients who present with a discordantly low DLCO do not appear to have different rates of decline in pulmonary function. Additional biological and radiographic markers are needed to more fully characterize this population. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2018; 35: 206-212).

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Epstein-Barr Virus Donor Positive/Recipient Negative Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) donor positive/recipient negative (D+/R-) status is a significant risk factor for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in lung transplant. There are, however, no studies that identify the risk factors for PTLD in the EBV D+/R- lung transplant population to guide the decision to proceed with an EBV-positive donor. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults listed in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between May 5, 2005, and August 31, 2016. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of EBV D+/R- status on the development of PTLD, the impact of PTLD on survival, and survival differences between EBV D+/R- and EBV D-/R- recipients. RESULTS: The incidence of PTLD was 6.2% (79 of 1,281) versus 1.4% (145 of 10,352) in EBV D+/R- versus all other recipients (adjusted odds ratio 4.0; 95% confidence interval: 2.8 to 5.9, p < 0.001). Among EBV D+/R- recipients, age less than 40 years and white race were associated with PTLD. The EBV D+/R- patients who had PTLD had increased adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.35 to 2.71; p < 0.001). Compared with EBV D+/R- recipients, EBV D-/R- recipients did not have improved adjusted survival (hazard ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.18; p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased rates of PTLD and associated mortality in the EBV D+/R- population, EBV seronegative patients did not have worse mortality when transplanted with lungs from EBV seropositive donors compared with lungs from EBV seronegative donors. Consideration should be given for close monitoring for PTLD among EBV D+/R- recipients, particularly those who are white and less than 40 years of age.

Survival and outcomes after lung transplantation for non-scleroderma connective tissue-related interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-scleroderma connective tissue-related lung disease (NS-CTLD), including rheumatoid arthritis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, Sjögren syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus, may be at risk for worse outcomes after lung transplantation because of immune dysregulation or extrapulmonary manifestations of their underlying disease. We compared survival, acute and chronic rejection, and extrapulmonary organ dysfunction after transplantation in patients with NS-CTLD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with NS-CTLD and IPF who were listed in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and underwent lung transplantation from May 5, 2005, to March 1, 2016. RESULTS: Patients with NS-CTLD (n = 275) were younger, a higher percentage female and non-white than patients with IPF (n = 6,346). NS-CTLD patients did not have worse adjusted survival (hazard ratio, 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.42; p = 0.24). They were not more likely to have an episode of acute cellular rejection (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72-1.28; p = 0.77) or to develop bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60-1.12; p = 0.21). Patients with NS-CTLD were not more likely to require plasmapheresis or dialysis or to develop a lymphoproliferative malignancy or liver disease after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in survival, acute or chronic rejection, or extrapulmonary organ dysfunction in patients who underwent lung transplantation for NS-CTLD compared with IPF. In appropriately selected candidates, NS-CTLD should not be considered a contraindication to lung transplantation.

The effect of mTOR inhibitors on respiratory infections in lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a destructive cystic lung disease. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are the primary treatment for LAM but it is unknown whether these immunosuppressing medications increase the risk for or the severity of respiratory infections in LAM patients.We searched multiple databases for original articles that reported the rate of respiratory infections in LAM patients treated with mTOR inhibitors or placebo. We calculated incidence rates for respiratory infections in these groups and incidence rate ratios for respiratory infections and severe respiratory infections in mTOR inhibitors treated versus placebo treated patients.11 studies were included. There were 294 patients in the treatment groups and 93 patients in the placebo groups. Among subjects in placebo arms, the incidence rate of respiratory infections was 58.8 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 35.3-82.3 per 100 patient-years). The incidence-rate ratio (IRR) for respiratory infection among treated subjects was 0.71 (95% CI 0.50-1.02; p=0.06 compared to placebo subjects). The IRR for severe respiratory infections among treated subjects was 1.56 (95% CI 0.43-8.55; p=0.52).We found that respiratory infections are common in patients with LAM. Importantly, treatment with mTOR inhibitors does not increase the incidence of these infections and may be protective.

Ethics Committee Consultation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

RATIONALE: The clinical ethics literature on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been focused primarily on identifying hypothetical ethical dilemmas that may arise with the use of this technology. Little has been written on the actual experience with ECMO-related ethical questions. OBJECTIVES: To describe the role of an ethics consultation service during the expansion of a single-center ECMO program in a cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit (CSICU) and to identify common ethical themes surrounding the use of ECMO. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive cohort study of all ECMO ethics consultation cases in the CSICU at a large academic hospital between 2013 and 2015. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, 113 patients were placed on ECMO in the CSICU, 45 (39.5%) of whom were seen by the ethics committee. In 2013, 10 of 46 (21.7%) patients received ethics consults. By 2015, 28 of 30 (93.3%) of patients were seen by ethics consultants. Initial consultation occurred at a median of 2 days (interquartile range, 1-6 d) following initiation of ECMO. The most common ethical issue involved disagreement about the ongoing use of ECMO, which included multiple axes: Disagreement among health care providers, disagreement among surrogates, and disagreement between health care providers and surrogates over stopping or continuing ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience with integrating ethics consultation into the routine care of ECMO patients, most of the ethical questions more closely resembled traditional concerns about the appropriate use of any life-sustaining treatment rather than the novel dilemmas imagined in the current literature.