Perioperative cardiac arrests - A subanalysis of the anesthesia -related cardiac arrests and associated mortality.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, risk factors, and predictors of survival of perioperative cardiac arrests (PCAs) occurring in patients who underwent non-cardiac and non-obstetric surgery from January 2008 to May 2015 at a tertiary hospital; determine the incidence and risk factors of anesthesia-related PCA. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Operating room and postoperative recovery area. PATIENTS: Sixty-two PCA cases from an anesthesia database of 122,289 anesthetics. INTERVENTIONS: Each PCA was classified as anesthesia-related, partially anesthesia-related, or anesthesia unrelated. The main outcome variables were occurrence of PCA, survival at least 1 h after initial resuscitation and survival to hospital discharge. To determine the risk factors for PCA, for each patient who suffered a PCA, two other patients that underwent anesthesia on the same day and in the same operating suite were selected. MEASUREMENTS: Three sets of variables were collected; patient-related, surgical procedure-related, and PCA-related. MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of PCAs of all causes was 5.07 per 10,000 anesthetics, and the associated mortality was 2.9 per 10,000 anesthetics. The independent risk factors for occurrence were: ASA PS score higher than 3, diagnosed cardiac disease, and the use of vasopressors. Decreased survival was associated with: higher ASA PS score, urgent surgical procedures of a higher complexity, use of vasopressors, documented hypotension prior to PCA, and arrests due to bleeding. The incidence of anesthesia-related PCAs was 0.74 per 10,000 anesthetics, and the associated mortality was 0.08 per 10,000 anesthetics. The main causes of anesthesia-related PCAs were associated with medication and airway/ventilation, and the independent risk factors for occurrence were: ASA PS score higher than 3 and diagnosed cardiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most PCAs were not due to anesthesia-related causes, and anesthesia-related PCAs were associated with improved survival. Improvements in the management of high-risk patients, medication administration, and airway/ventilation management may result in better outcomes.

Post-operative pain after ultrasound transversus abdominis plane block versus trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective study / Dor no período pós-operatório de nefrectomia laparoscópica com bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal guiado por ultrassom versus infiltração do sítio do trocarte: um estudo prospectivo

Abstract Background Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is useful in reducing post-operative pain in laparoscopic nephrectomy compared to placebo. The purpose of this work is to compare post-operative pain and recovery after TAP block or trocar site infiltration (TSI) in this surgery. Methods A prospective, single blinded study on patients scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Patients were assigned to two groups: TSI Group: trocar site infiltration at the end of surgery; TAP Group: unilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block after induction. Sevoflurane and remifentanil, in a target controlled infusion mode, were used for maintenance of general anesthesia. Before the end of surgery paracetamol, tramadol and morphine were administered. Visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100 mm) at rest and with cough was applied in three moments: in recovery room (T1 at admission and T2 before discharge) and 24 h after surgery (T3). Pain scores with incentive spirometer were also evaluated at T3. In recovery, morphine was administered as a rescue drug whenever VAS > 30 mm. Time to oral intake, chair sitting, ambulation and length of hospital stay were evaluated 24 h after surgery. Statistical analysis: Student's t-test and Chi-square test, and linear regression models. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as mean (SD). Results Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome variable, VAS pain scores did not show a statistical significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). VAS at rest (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T1 = 33 ± 29 vs. 39 ± 32, T2 = 10 ± 9 vs. 17 ± 18 and T3 = 7 ± 12 vs. 10 ± 18. VAS with cough (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T1 = 51 ± 34 vs. 45 ± 32, T2 = 24 ± 24 vs. 33 ± 23 and T3 = 20 ± 23 vs. 23 ± 23. VAS with incentive spirometer (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T3 = 21 ± 27 vs. 21 ± 25. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was similar between TAP (0.16 ± 0.07 mcg.kg-1.min-1) and TSI (0.18 ± 0.9 mcg.kg-1.min-1) groups. There were no differences in opioid consumption between TAP (4.4 ± 3.49 mg) and TSI (6.87 ± 4.83 mg) groups during recovery. Functional recovery parameters were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions Multimodal analgesia with TAP block did not show a significant clinical benefit compared with trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomies.

Resumo Justificativa O bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal (TAP) é útil para reduzir a dor no pós-operatório de nefrectomia laparoscópica comparado com o placebo. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a dor no pós-operatório e a recuperação após bloqueio TAP ou infiltração do sítio do trocarte (TSI) nesse tipo de cirurgia. Métodos Estudo prospectivo e cego com pacientes agendados para nefrectomia laparoscópica. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo TSI: infiltração do sítio do trocarte ao final da cirurgia; Grupo TAP: bloqueio TAP unilateral guiado por ultrassom após a indução. Sevoflurano e remifentanil administrado em perfusão alvo-controlada foram usados para a manutenção da anestesia geral. Paracetamol, tramadol e morfina foram administrados antes do fim da cirurgia. Escala analógica visual (VAS 0-100 mm), para avaliar a dor em repouso e durante a tosse, foi aplicada em três momentos: na sala de recuperação [na admissão (T1) e antes da alta (T2)] e 24 horas após a cirurgia (T3). Os escores de dor com espirômetro de incentivo também foram avaliados em T3. Durante a recuperação, morfina foi administrada como medicamento de resgate, sempre que VAS > 30 mm. Os tempos até a ingestão oral, sentar em cadeira, deambulação e de permanência hospitalar foram avaliados 24 horas após a cirurgia. Análise estatística: teste t de Student, teste do qui-quadrado e modelos de regressão linear. Um valor de p < 0,05 foi considerado significativo. Os dados foram expressos em média (DP). Resultados Quarenta pacientes foram incluídos no estudo. Os escores do desfecho primário e da VAS não apresentaram diferença estatística significativa entre os grupos (p > 0,05). Os escores VAS em repouso (TAP vs. TSI) foram: T1 = 33 ± 29 vs. 39 ± 32; T2 = 10 ± 9 vs. 17 ± 18 e T3 = 7 ± 12 vs. 10 ± 18. Os escores VAS durante a tosse (TAP vs. TSI) foram: T1 = 51 ± 34 vs. 45 ± 32; T2 = 24 ± 24 vs. 33 ± 23 e T3 = 20 ± 23 vs. 23 ± 23. Os escores VAS com espirômetro de incentivo (TAP vs. TSI) foram: T3 = 21 ± 27 vs. 21 ± 25. O consumo de remifentanil no intraoperatório foi semelhante entre os grupos TAP (0,16 ± 0,07 mcg.kg-1.min-1) e TSI (0,18 ± 0,9 mcg.kg-1.min-1). Não houve diferença no consumo de opioides entre os grupos TAP (4,4 ± 3,49 mg) e TSI (6,87 ± 4,83 mg) durante a recuperação. Os parâmetros funcionais de recuperação não foram estatisticamente diferentes entre os grupos. Conclusões A analgesia multimodal com bloqueio TAP não mostrou benefício clínico significativo comparado com a infiltração do sítio do trocarte em nefrectomia laparoscópica.

[Post-operative pain after ultrasound transversus abdominis plane block versus trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective study]. / Dor no período pós­operatório de nefrectomia laparoscópica com bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal guiado por ultrassom versus infiltração do sítio do trocarte: um estudo prospectivo.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is useful in reducing post-operative pain in laparoscopic nephrectomy compared to placebo. The purpose of this work is to compare post-operative pain and recovery after TAP block or trocar site infiltration (TSI) in this surgery. METHODS: A prospective, single blinded study on patients scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Patients were assigned to two groups: TSI Group: trocar site infiltration at the end of surgery; TAP Group: unilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block after induction. Sevoflurane and remifentanil, in a target controlled infusion mode, were used for maintenance of general anesthesia. Before the end of surgery paracetamol, tramadol and morphine were administered. Visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100mm) at rest and with cough was applied in three moments: in recovery room (T1 at admission and T2 before discharge) and 24h after surgery (T3). Pain scores with incentive spirometer were also evaluated at T3. In recovery, morphine was administered as a rescue drug whenever VAS>30mm. Time to oral intake, chair sitting, ambulation and length of hospital stay were evaluated 24h after surgery. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Student's t-test and Chi-square test, and linear regression models. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as mean (SD). RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome variable, VAS pain scores did not show a statistical significant difference between groups (p>0.05). VAS at rest (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T1=33±29 vs. 39±32, T2=10±9 vs. 17±18 and T3=7±12 vs. 10±18. VAS with cough (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T1=51±34 vs. 45±32, T2=24±24 vs. 33±23 and T3=20±23 vs. 23±23. VAS with incentive spirometer (TAP vs. TSI groups) was: T3=21±27 vs. 21±25. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was similar between TAP (0.16±0.07mcg.kg-1.min-1) and TSI (0.18±0.9mcg.kg-1.min-1) groups. There were no differences in opioid consumption between TAP (4.4±3.49mg) and TSI (6.87±4.83mg) groups during recovery. Functional recovery parameters were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia with TAP block did not show a significant clinical benefit compared with trocar site infiltration in laparoscopic nephrectomies.