Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease: An Update on New Treatment Options.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in approximately 50% of patients and remains a primary driver of non-relapse and transplant-related mortality. The best treatment remains prevention with either in vivo or ex vivo T-cell depletion, with multiple strategies used worldwide based on factors such as institution preference, ability to perform graft manipulation, and ongoing clinical trials. Predicting patients at high risk for developing severe acute GVHD based on clinical and biomarker-based criteria allows for escalation or potential de-escalation of therapy. Modern therapies for treatment of the disease include JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors, which are standard of care in the second-line setting and are being investigated for upfront management of non-severe risk based on biomarkers. Salvage therapies beyond the second-line remain suboptimal. In this review, we will focus on the most clinically used GVHD prevention and treatment strategies, including the accumulating data on JAK inhibitors in both settings.

Management of acute promyelocytic leukemia in the setting of acute COVID-19 infection.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) often presents with significant coagulopathy which may result in both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has complicated the initial treatment and diagnosis of APL owing to the viral infection's own associated coagulopathy. Here we report two cases of APL newly diagnosed in the setting of COVID-19 infection and considerations in their management. Included is a discussion of strategies for the dosing of arsenic trioxide in patients with significant obesity and renal insufficiency. The case series submitted does not represent a study on patients and thus no specific informed consents or permissions were required. All images included in our manuscript have been deidentified and all authors certify that personal details that could potentially be used to identify the patients in the cases described have been removed. The corresponding author has personally confirmed that both patients included in this study have given verbal permission to present their cases in the de-identified manner as described above.

Letermovir Discontinuation at Day 100 After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Is Associated With Increased CMV-Related Mortality.

Letermovir is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in CMV seropositive recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) up to day 100. Letermovir use up to day 100 after alloSCT has demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) at 24 weeks and an overall mortality benefit as far as 48 weeks after transplantation. We report data on csCMVi incidence beyond 24 weeks and overall survival (OS) beyond 48 weeks and outcomes for patients who had a prior alloSCT, are CMV seronegative with seropositive donor (D+/R-), or are high risk (defined as those receiving haploidentical transplants, mismatched transplants, T-cell-depleted grafts, umbilical cord blood transplants, prednisone ≥1 mg/kg or equivalent steroid use, or the use of 2 or more immunosuppressants). Additionally, risk factors for CMV-related mortality and possible extended duration of letermovir are reported. This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 333 alloSCTs with CMV seropositive donors or recipients performed at Siteman Cancer Center and Barnes-Jewish Hospital from January 2016 to June 2019. The primary endpoint of csCMVi at day 180 was 19.46% with letermovir and 39.13% without letermovir (P < .0001). The secondary endpoints are as follows: day 100 csCMVi was 8.1% with letermovir and 34.8% without (P < .0001), day 365 csCMVi was 24.8% with letermovir and 41.3% without (P = .001). Our multivariate analyses demonstrated that exposure to letermovir was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.77), nonrelapse mortality (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.27-0.94) and CMV-related mortality (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.95) during day 0 to day 99 but worse CMV-related mortality during day 180 to day 364 (HR 3.19; 95% CI 1.29-7.92). Patients with serum IgG levels <400 mg/dL at day 100, high-risk transplants (P = .004), post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy; P = .001), and mismatched-unrelated donors (MMUD; P = .02) experienced increased CMV reactivation. The CMV D+/R- cohort demonstrated no difference in CMV reactivation overall (P = .19), but the subset receiving PTCy showed decreased reactivation with letermovir (P = .03). Discontinuation of letermovir at day 100 leads to increased incidence of late CMV reactivation and CMV-related mortality. Letermovir use in CMV recipient seropositive alloSCT may need to be extended. Serum IgG levels <400 mg/dL at day 100 was associated with increased CMV reactivation. Patients with subclinical CMV viremia before transplantation, high-risk transplants, PTCy, or MMUD had decreased CMV reactivation with letermovir. Although there was no difference in CMV reactivation in the CMV D+/R- cohort, the subset treated with PTCy for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis had decreased CMV reactivation with letermovir.

Multicenter comparison of high-dose cytarabine-based regimens versus liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351) gained FDA approval for secondary AML after demonstrating improved outcomes over daunorubicin and cytarabine (7 + 3). A number of study limitations prompted a comparison of safety/efficacy of CPX-351 against regimens containing a purine analogue and high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC). This retrospective study compared complete response rates with/without count recovery (CR/CRi) between HIDAC-based regimens and CPX-351 in 169 patients with newly diagnosed sAML. The CR/CRi rate was 62.7% in the HIDAC-based therapy arm vs. 47.9% in the CPX-351 arm (p = 0.002 [one-sided for non-inferiority]). Median time to absolute neutrophil and platelet count recovery was shorter after HIDAC-based therapy (18 and 23 days, respectively) compared to CPX-351 (36 and 38 days; p < 0.001). Median overall survival was 9.8 months in the HIDAC-based group and 9.14 months in the CPX-351 group. 30-day mortality was greater with CPX-351 (8.5%) compared to HIDAC-based (1.3%; p = 0.039). These results reveal comparable efficacy and favorable safety with HIDAC-based regimens.