RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe initial experience with use of the Glidescope Go videolaryngoscope by an Australian neonatal pre-hospital and retrieval service. METHODS: We conducted a 31-month retrospective review of an airway registry for neonates intubated by MedSTAR Kids clinicians. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were intubated using the Glidescope Go, compared with 50 using direct laryngoscopy. First-pass success was 17/22 (77.3%) with the Glidescope Go and 38/50 (76%) with direct laryngoscopy. Complications occurred in 7/22 (32%) and 8/50 (16%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On initial review of this practice change, videolaryngoscopy allows neonatal tracheal intubation with a comparable success rate to direct laryngoscopy in a pre-hospital and retrieval setting.
Assuntos
Intubação Intratraqueal , Laringoscopia , Gravação em Vídeo , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recém-Nascido , Laringoscopia/métodos , Laringoscopia/instrumentação , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Masculino , Feminino , Gravação em Vídeo/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Laringoscópios , AustráliaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adrenaline is the standard treatment for anaphylaxis but appropriate administration remains challenging, and iatrogenic overdose is easily overlooked. Despite the established importance of pediatric blood pressure measurement, its use remains inconsistent in clinical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of adrenaline overdose in a 9-year-old white boy with anaphylaxis, where signs of adrenaline overdose were indistinguishable from progressive shock until blood pressure measurement was taken. CONCLUSIONS: The consequences of under-dosing adrenaline in anaphylaxis are well-recognized, but the converse is less so. Blood pressure measurement should be a routine part of pediatric assessment as it is key to differentiating adrenaline overdose from anaphylactic shock.