Single Surgeon Comparison of Midline Versus Overlapping Locoregional Flap Closure Following Spinal Instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Two techniques for paraspinous muscle flap closure of spine surgeries have been described: one with tension-free mobilization of the muscle flaps approximated at the midline and one with perforators more aggressively dissected to allow for overlapping of the flaps. We seek to compare the surgical outcomes in patients who underwent either type of complex spinal closure as no investigation has yet evaluated a superior technique. METHODS: An institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent spine surgery followed by locoregional muscle flap complex closure performed by a single plastic surgeon between January 2016 and July 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on which closure method was employed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed by multivariable logistic regression with Firth's correction. RESULTS: One hundred and 10 patients with similar baseline demographics were included. There were significantly more smokers (15% vs. 0%, P = 0.02) and a significantly greater rate of postoperative radiation (40% vs. 17%, P = 0.009) in the overlapping group. After controlling for smoking and postoperative radiation, the incidence of surgical site infection, skin necrosis, dehiscence, hematoma, and seroma did not differ between the groups. The procedure length per centimeter of closure was shorter in the midline approximation group, although this data fell just short of significance (3.2 vs. 3.8 minutes/cm, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that both the overlapping and midline approximation of muscle flaps are equally safe and effective strategies for locoregional closure of spinal wounds.

Mandible Fractures Undergoing Transfer Rarely Require Acute Intervention.

Study Design: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with mandibular fractures who were evaluated by plastic surgery at a Level I trauma center between January 1, 2017 and May 1, 2020. Data including demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, type of presentation (e.g., primary or transfer), treatment plan, and time to intervention were recorded. Objective: Mandibular fractures are common traumatic injuries. Because these injuries are managed by surgical specialists, these patients are often emergently transferred to tertiary care hospitals. This study aims to assess the benefits of emergent transfer in this patient group. Methods: Variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. The relationship with initial disposition was assessed via tests of association, including Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, or chi-square tests. Significance was set to p values less than 0.05. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine predictors of presentation to outside hospital followed by transfer to our institution. Results: Records from 406 patients with isolated mandibular fractures were evaluated. 145 (36%) were transferred from an outside hospital specifically for specialty evaluation. One patient required intervention in the Emergency Department (ED). Of the 145 patients that were transferred to our facility, eight (5.5%) were admitted for operative management. Patients with open injuries and pediatric patients showed benefit from transfer. Conclusions: Patients are frequently transferred to tertiary care facilities for specialty service evaluation and treatment. However, when isolated mandible fractures were evaluated, only one patient required intervention in the ED. Patients with grossly open fractures and pediatric patients were more frequently admitted specifically for operative management. This practice of acute interfacility transfer represents an unnecessary cost to our health system as isolated mandible fractures can be managed on an outpatient basis. We suggest that pediatric patients and patients with open fractures be transferred for urgent evaluation and management, whereas most patients would be appropriate for outpatient evaluation.

Single Oral Z-Plasty: A Clinical Validation of a Technique for Palatal Lengthening in Primary and Secondary Cleft Palate Repair.

BACKGROUND: In cleft palate repair, palate length is associated with improved speech outcomes. Although direct closure offers poor palatal lengthening, use of two opposing Z-plasties may reorient palatal musculature and lengthen the velum. The authors previously described a novel overlapping intravelar veloplasty to achieve longitudinal closure of the nasal mucosa with a single oral Z-plasty (1ZP), lengthening the palate in cadaver studies. This study aims to corroborate this finding in clinical cases. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of patients with a cleft palate was conducted. Patients underwent cleft palate closure with 1ZP or intravelar veloplasty with straight-line closure. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of the palate along four dimensions were recorded. Analysis was conducted on preoperative and postoperative measurements within and between groups using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon or chi-square test. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included (1ZP, n = 65; straight-line closure, n = 20). 1ZP increased soft palate length (SPL) by 33% ( P < 0.001) and total palate length (TPL) by 10% ( P < 0.001). Primary 1ZP increased SPL by 33% ( P < 0.001) and TPL by 10% ( P < 0.001). Secondary 1ZP increased SPL by 28% ( P < 0.001) and TPL by 8% ( P < 0.001). When comparing between primary and secondary 1ZP, 1ZP was equal with regard to percentage lengthening in SPL ( P > 0.9) and TPL ( P > 0.3). When compared with straight-line closure, 1ZP showed superior percentage lengthening in SPL ( P < 0.001) and TPL ( P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: 1ZP results in a statistically significant increase in palate length in both primary and secondary cleft palate repair. This technique provides an effective alternative in patients for whom 2ZP is not feasible. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

A Cost-effective, 3D Printed Simulation Model Facilitates Learning of Bilobed and Banner Flaps for Mohs Nasal Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

SUMMARY: Flap design for Mohs reconstruction is a complex 3-dimensional decision-making process. Simulation offers trainees the chance to practice techniques safely, prior to opportunities in the operating room. To aide in teaching, we developed a high-fidelity, cost-effective model of the face using three-dimensional (3D) printing to simulate flap reconstruction following Mohs surgery. We describe the design of this model and its impact on the comfort and proficiency of trainees.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Clinical Outcomes of Profunda Artery Perforator Versus Gracilis Thigh Flap as a Second Choice for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Autologous breast reconstruction remains a versatile option to produce a natural appearing breast after mastectomy. The deep inferior epigastric perforator remains the most commonly used flap choice, but when this donor site is unsuitable or unavailable, the transverse upper gracilis (TUG) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps are popular secondary alternatives. We conduct a meta-analysis to better understand patient outcomes and adverse events in secondary flap selection in breast reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase for all articles published on TUG and/or PAP flaps for oncological breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted to statistically compare outcomes between PAP and TUG flaps. RESULTS: The TUG and PAP flaps were noted to have similar reported rates of success and incidences of hematoma, flap loss, and flap healing (P > 0.05). The TUG flap was noted to have significantly more vascular complications (venous thrombosis, venous congestion, and arterial thrombosis) than the PAP flap (5.0% vs 0.6%, P < 0.01) and significantly greater rates of unplanned reoperations in the acute postoperative period (4.4% vs 1.8%, P = 0.04). Infection, seroma, fat necrosis, donor healing complications, and rates of additional procedures all exhibited high degree of heterogeneity precluding mathematical synthesis of outcomes across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TUG flaps, PAP flaps have fewer vascular complications and fewer unplanned reoperations in the acute postoperative period. There is need for greater homogeneity in reported outcomes between studies to enable for synthesis of other variables important in determining flap success.

Quantifying the Effective Lift of Skin-Only, SMAS Plication, and Extended SMAS Face-Lift Techniques in a Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Rhytidectomies are performed to rejuvenate the aging face. Various techniques exist to achieve soft-tissue elevation and skin tightening. This study analyzes three common face-lift techniques: skin-only, superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, and extended SMAS lifts. The authors characterize effective facial changes with each procedure in a cadaver model. METHODS: The authors performed face-lift procedures on 18 cadaver hemifaces. Each face was measured along horizontal and vertical vectors. The primary outcome was change along these vectors. Skin-only, SMAS plication, and extended SMAS lifts were performed sequentially on each hemiface. SMAS plication was used to approximate a lateral SMASectomy procedure. Parameter measurements were compared. RESULTS: All three procedures exhibited a significant tightening along horizontal vectors. SMAS procedures provided a significant lift along all vertical vectors, whereas the skin-only lift failed to demonstrate significant vertical elevation. SMAS procedures achieved significantly greater composite horizontal and vertical lifts compared to the skin-only operation. There was only an incremental increase in lift between the SMAS plication and extended SMAS procedures in the upper and midface regions. The extended SMAS led to the greatest lift in the lower face. CONCLUSIONS: SMAS procedures provided a greater lift along both horizontal and vertical vectors than the skin lift alone. The increased dissection in the extended SMAS technique resulted in only a modest increase in lift compared to SMAS plication. The extended SMAS approach appears to offer the most benefit at the lower face and may be the best choice for targeting this region.

Surgeon Gender-Related Differences in Operative Coding in Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies in the medical and surgical literature have discussed the income gap between male and female physicians, but none has adequately accounted for the disparity. METHODS: This study was performed to determine whether gender-related billing and coding differences may be related to the income gap. A 10 percent minimum difference was set a priori as statistically significant. A cohort of 1036 candidates' 9-month case lists for the American Board of Plastic Surgery over a 5-year span (2014 to 2018) was evaluated for relationships between surgeon gender and work relative value units, coding information, major and minor cases performed, and work setting. Data were deidentified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery before evaluation. The authors hypothesized that work relative value units, average codes per case, major cases, and minor cases would be at least 10 percent higher for male than for female physicians. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between male and female surgeons in work relative value units billed, work relative value units billed per case, and the numbers of major cases performed. The average total work relative value units for male surgeons was 19.34 percent higher than for female surgeons [3253.2 (95 percent CI, 3090.5 to 3425.8) versus 2624.1 (95 percent CI, 2435.2 to 2829.6)]. Male surgeons performed 14.28 percent more major cases than female surgeons [77.6 percent (95 percent CI, 72.7 to 82.7 percent) versus 90.5 percent (95 percent CI, 86.3 to 94.9 percent); p = 0.0002]. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings support the hypothesis that billing and coding practices can, in part, account for income differences between male and female plastic surgeons. Potential explanations include practices focusing on larger and more complex operative cases and differences in coding practices.

Patient-Provider Communication on Concerns Related to Sexuality Following Upper Extremity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Sexuality and sexual health are important components of overall quality of life that can be affected by injuries, operations, and disease processes. Much of the research into health-related sexuality has been devoted to patients with spinal cord injuries and urogenital disease processes. There is very little research on the relationship of upper extremity injuries and their impact on a patient's sex life. The purposes of this study are to assess the proportion of patients who experience sexual limitation following upper extremity surgery and to assess the frequency of discussions regarding their sexual function with their surgeons. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a cohort of patients who had hand, shoulder, or arm surgery more than 6 weeks prior to study recruitment. Patients were approached during a follow-up visit with their hand surgeon and were provided with an deidentified survey that focused on upper extremity function, impact of upper extremity injury or surgery on sexual satisfaction, and patient-physician communication surrounding the topic. RESULTS: Of the patients surveyed, 11 (39%) reported that their upper extremity injury frequently negatively affected their sexual satisfaction. In addition, 9 patients (35%) reported that they wanted their surgeon to initiate discussion about recovery from surgery and its impact on sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity injuries may negatively affect sexual well-being. Many people want their physician to discuss this with them. Additional research is necessary to qualitatively assess what interventions may be useful for this population as well as how to integrate these discussions into hand surgery clinic visits.

Rethinking the Need for Nail Plate Removal: A Comparison of the Risks Between Standard Nail Bed Repair and Nonoperative Management.

PURPOSE: Nail bed injuries are commonly treated with nail plate removal and repair due to concern for future nail deformity. There is controversy whether this is necessary. We compared the outcomes for adult patients with simple nail bed lacerations who underwent either formal nail bed repair or nonoperative management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of adult patients with nail bed lacerations from 2012 to 2019. Nail bed lacerations were diagnosed in patients with fingertip injuries resulting in subungual hematoma greater than 50% or in any subungual hematoma in the setting of a distal phalanx fracture. All patients included had an intact nail plate. Patients were treated with nail bed laceration repair or nonoperatively without nail plate removal. The primary outcome was the development of a nail deformity. Secondary outcomes included infection, fracture nonunion, and patient-reported functional outcomes using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with nail bed lacerations were treated nonoperatively, and 40 patients were treated with nail bed repair. The average follow-up time was 4.5 weeks in the office. In addition, 1-year evaluation of patients was performed through telephone interview. The patients in the nonoperative group exhibited no statistically significant difference in the calculated risk for nail deformities compared with the nail bed repair group (13% vs 23%, relative risk = 0.58, P = 0.40, 95% confidence interval = 0.42-1.25). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes or quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The authors observed no meaningful difference in the rate of nail deformities in adult patients who underwent nail bed repair compared with those managed nonoperatively.

Evidence of Linear Bone Flap Resorption in Patients Undergoing Autologous Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy: A 3D Slicer Segmented Analysis of Serial Computed Tomography Images.

OBJECTIVE: Autologous cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) carries a risk of bone flap resorption (BFR). The current literature offers limited information regarding the natural progression of BFR and the rate at which it occurs. We aim to characterize the progression of BFR over time and elucidate risk factors for accelerated BFR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent DC and autologous CP. Serial computed tomography (CT) images were used to quantify the degree of BFR over time. Risk factors included age, diabetes, smoking status, flap fragmentation, defect size, and DC-CP time interval. χ2 analyses and Student's t-tests were performed to examine differences between patients who experienced BFR and those who did not. RESULTS: Overall, 82% of patients demonstrated evidence of clinically relevant resorption on CT. On average, the bone flap decreased in volume by 36.7% within the first year, with a linear loss in volume after multiple years of follow-up. Individuals who developed greater BFR were significantly younger (43 ± 17 vs. 56 ± 12, P = 0.022), had a lower incidence of diabetes (5.9% vs. 43%, P = 0.037), and had more bone flap fragments (1.4 ± 0.67 vs. 1.00 ± 0, P < 0.001) than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Resorption following CP with cryopreserved bone appears to progress in a fairly linear and continuous fashion over time. Using serial CT images, we found a resorption rate of 82% at our institution. We identified several possible risk factors for resorption, including flap fragmentation, younger age, and absence of diabetes.

Comparing diagnosis of midfacial fractures by radiologists and plastic surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians who manage facial fractures often rely on radiologist interpretations to help with assessment and management. Among treating physicians, facial fractures are categorized into clinically relevant patterns of injury. On the other hand, while radiologists are unsurpassed at identifying individual breaks in the bone, larger fracture patterns are not always conveyed in radiology reports. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the frequency with which the terminology describing midfacial fracture patterns is concordant among radiologists and treating clinicians. METHODS: The authors identified patients with different patterns of midfacial injury including Le Fort I, Le Fort II, Le Fort III, naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE), and zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. Plastic surgery consult notes and radiological imaging reports were reviewed for concordance in documentation of injury patterns. Identification of individual fractures consistent with the diagnosed fracture pattern was also recorded. RESULTS: Radiologists were noted to be highly successful in describing individual fractures of the facial bones, identifying at least two defining components of a fracture pattern in 96% of Le Fort, 88% of NOE, and 94% of ZMC injuries. However, when injury patterns were considered, only 32% of Le Fort, 28% of ZMC, and 6% of NOE fractures were explicitly identified in radiology reports. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists are highly skilled in discerning individual fractures in facial trauma cases. However, less reliability was seen in the identification of fracture patterns in midfacial injury, with particular weaknesses in descriptions of NOE and ZMC fractures. This data suggests that greater focus on patterns of midfacial injury would improve the clinical applicability of radiological reports.

Sinestre, deviance, or biology? An investigation of hand dominance in relation to tendon absence.

The present study aimed to examine the relationship between hand dominance and the presence or absence of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) in the fifth digit to add to the current body of knowledge. We hypothesized that the absence of the FDS in the right small finger is more prevalent in left-handed individuals. This was a prospective study conducted from January 2020 to April 2021 and performed at the plastic surgery department of a university hospital. The sample consisted of volunteers with no history of upper limb trauma, surgery, or any other condition. The study included male and female individuals over 18 years old at a local Rhode Island university campus. The FDS tendons of the bilateral fifth fingers were evaluated through clinical testing by an independent examiner. A total of 236 hands from 118 volunteers were analyzed. Left-hand dominant participants composed of 5% of the population. For these participants, the prevalence of absence of the fifth finger FDS tendon in the right hand was significantly higher than that of right-hand dominant participants (71.4% vs. 28.8%). No significant difference between sex assigned at birth (male vs. female) was noted and the absence of the FDS in either hand, regardless of hand dominance. The results from the current study demonstrate that anatomy may contribute to one's preference for left-handedness. For children who have difficulty using their right hand, perhaps, an assessment of their FDS status may result in earlier acceptance of using their left hand.

An analysis of publication trajectory in plastic surgery across the decades.

The classic canonical publication trajectory for academicians has been well-described by a rapid increase followed by a slower decrease in productivity, leading to a plateau. This trajectory has not been investigated in plastic surgery. In this communication, we aimed to: (1) visualize the publication trajectory per decade for plastic surgeons certified from 1980 to 2010, and (2) characterize and quantify the changes in publishing trends across decades. A list of plastic and reconstructive surgeons board certified between 1980 and 2010 was obtained. Number of publications per year was recorded for each plastic surgeon. The median cumulative publication trajectory was graphed for each decade. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was performed to determine whether there were differences in number of publications across generations. The trajectory for a surgeon from the 1980s follows the established canonical trajectory. Surgeons from the 1990s and 2000s had significantly more publications by board certification than those from the 1980s (7 and 8 vs. 5, respectively, p < 0.01). Surgeons from the 2010s on average achieved 8 publications by board certification. It is clear that the publication arc for plastic surgeons from successive generations has greatly changed. Over the last 40 years, there has been a trend for increasing productivity and involvement in research at a much earlier stage in career, potentially due to increasing demands for matching into residency programs.

Using 3D Printing and Mirror Image Modeling in Orbital Floor Reconstruction.

ABSTRACT: Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing technologies are increasingly utilized as tools to assist in complex craniofacial reconstructions. Herein, the authors report the intraoperative use of sterilized 3D models printed in-house to mold a custom resorbable implant in the case of a pediatric patient with a unilateral complex orbital fracture. The imaging was processed with open-source software. Two patient-specific orbital models were 3D-printed (Fig. 2): a life-size print of the patient's preoperative CT scan and a left orbit reconstructed to resemble its uninjured state using mirrored-imaging of the uninjured side. This construct ultimately served as a sterilized template to mold a resorbable implant intraoperatively. Post-operatively, the patient experienced no complications. At the 18-month follow-up, the patient had done well without diplopia, headaches or visual problems. The authors report a case of a successful orbit reconstruction assisted by mirrored-image computer modeling and patient-specific 3D printing.

Refining Indications for Orbital Floor Fracture Reconstruction: A Risk-Stratification Tool Predicting Symptom Development and Need for Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Challenges in orbital floor fracture management include delayed symptom onset and controversial surgical indications based on radiographic findings. This study assessed which imaging characteristics most reliably predict symptomatology to generate a tool quantifying individual need for surgery on initial presentation. METHODS: The clinical course for all patients with isolated orbital fractures at a single institution from 2015 to 2017 were reviewed. Trauma mechanism, computed tomographic scan findings, and symptoms necessitating surgery (diplopia, enophthalmos) were noted. Univariable and multivariable regression modeling was used to generate a predictive risk model for operative fractures. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients with isolated orbital fractures were identified. Mechanism of injury included falls (41 percent), assault (37 percent), and vehicular trauma (17 percent). Patient follow-up averaged 4.4 ± 4.8 months. Average orbital floor fracture area was 2.4 cm2 (range, 0.36 to 6.18 cm2), and orbital volume herniation averaged 0.70 cm3 (range, 0.01 to 4.23 cm3). Twenty-one patients (17.3 percent) required surgical intervention for symptomatic fractures. The strongest predictors of symptoms were orbital volume increase greater than 1.3 cm3 (OR, 10.5; p = 0.001) and inferior rectus displacement within/below the fracture line (OR, 3.7; p = 0.049). Mechanical fall was risk-reducing (OR, 0.08; p = 0.005). Symptom risk was stratified from low (3.6 percent) to high risk (71 percent) (C-statistic = 0.90). The volume of herniated orbital contents was significantly more predictive of symptoms than fracture area (C-statistic = 0.81 versus C-statistic = 0.66; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed risk tool allows highly accurate, early prediction of symptomatic orbital floor fractures. Findings suggest that orbital volume change, not fracture area, more reliably informs operative indications, along with inferior rectus muscle caudal malposition. A simplified stepwise decision algorithm demonstrates the potential utility of this risk-assessment tool. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery Crowdfunding and Access to Care.

ABSTRACT: A total of 169 ACPA approved teams treat cleft deformities in the United States. These centers are unevenly distributed, and families may disproportionally pay extra travel costs to consult a multidisciplinary cleft team. Families experiencing hardships are able to create campaigns on GoFundMe to advertise their fundraiser publicly. The authors sought to establish whether a correlation exists between patients asking for support for cleft treatment and their geographic location in the US.A total of 635 crowdfunding campaigns for cleft lip and/or palate were reviewed from GoFundMe. Google searches for cleft lip and palate were evaluated utilizing Google Trends, with values reported as Relative Search Volumes (RSV). Driving distances and travel time to the nearest approved ACPA center were calculated using Google Maps data.There was a statistically significant difference in average driving distance and travel duration between the different subregions of the US (P  =  0.0059 and 0.026, respectively). The South subregion had the highest proportion of campaigns (n = 259, 40.9%), mean driving distance (105.75 km) and mean driving duration (1 hour 8 minutes). The number of approved teams per state was negatively correlated to both RSV scores (r = -0.38, P  =  0.048) and the number of campaigns (r = -0.34, P  =  0.014).There is an uneven distribution of ACPA centers among the US subregions. The South seems to have the highest need for care, as identified by proportionate number of campaigns, adjusted driving distances and travel time. This data suggests that underserved areas for cleft care are correlated with greater numbers of hardship campaigns and more internet searches regarding cleft lip and palate.