Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trials ; 25(1): 601, 2024 Sep 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252106

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30). METHODS: SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Apendicectomia , Apendicite , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Humanos , Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Apendicite/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Adolescente , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , França , Resultado do Tratamento , Feminino , Fatores de Tempo , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Estudos de Equivalência como Asunto , Qualidade de Vida , Satisfação do Paciente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256234, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34398928

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery (BS) might be a nephroprotective treatment in obese patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the non-linear relation between body surface area (BSA) and extracellular fluid volume (ECFV) in obese people raises the question of the most relevant way to scale glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for assessing renal function changes after BS. METHODS: We screened 1774 BS candidates and analysed 10 consecutive participants with CKD stage 3. True GFR (mGFR), measured by the renal clearance of 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), was scaled either to BSA (mGFRBSA) or to ECFV measured by 51Cr-EDTA distribution volume (mGFRECFV) before and one year after BS. RESULTS: The 10 candidates for BS had a mean body mass index of 43.3 ± 3.6 kg/m2 and a mean GFR of 48 ± 8 mL/min/1.73 m2. Six participants had a sleeve gastrectomy and four had a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. One year after BS, ECFV decreased (23.2 ± 6.2 to 17.9 ± 4.3 L, p = 0.001), absolute mGFR was not significantly modified (74 ± 23 versus 68 ±19 mL/min), mGFRBSA did not change significantly (53 ± 18 versus 56 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m2) whereas mGFRECFV significantly increased (42 ± 13 versus 50 ± 14 mL/min/12.9 L, p = 0.037). The relation between mGFRECFV and mGFRBSA was different from the identity line before (p = 0.014) but not after BS (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: There is a difference between mGFRBSA and mGFRECFV following BS and the latter might better reflect the adequacy between renal function and corpulence.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Líquido Extracelular/metabolismo , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Biomarcadores/análise , Superfície Corporal , Radioisótopos de Cromo/farmacocinética , Ácido Edético/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidade Mórbida/metabolismo , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/metabolismo , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Neurosurgery ; 88(2): 375-383, 2021 01 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32985662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been proposed to treat refractory chronic cluster headache (rCCH) but its efficacy has only been showed in small short-term series. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ONS long-term efficacy in rCCH. METHODS: We studied 105 patients with rCCH, treated by ONS within a multicenter ONS prospective registry. Efficacy was evaluated by frequency, intensity of pain attacks, quality of life (QoL) EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ5D), functional (Headache Impact Test-6, Migraine Disability Assessment) and emotional (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale [HAD]) impacts, and medication consumption. RESULTS: At last follow-up (mean 43.8 mo), attack frequency was reduced >50% in 69% of the patients. Mean weekly attack frequency decreased from 22.5 at baseline to 9.9 (P < .001) after ONS. Preventive and abortive medications were significantly decreased. Functional impact, anxiety, and QoL significantly improved after ONS. In excellent responders (59% of the patients), attack frequency decreased by 80% and QoL (EQ5D visual analog scale) dramatically improved from 37.8/100 to 73.2/100. When comparing baseline and 1-yr and last follow-up outcomes, efficacy was sustained over time. In multivariable analysis, low preoperative HAD-depression score was correlated to a higher risk of ONS failure. During the follow-up, 67 patients experienced at least one complication, 29 requiring an additional surgery: infection (6%), lead migration (12%) or fracture (4.5%), hardware dysfunction (8.2%), and local pain (20%). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that long-term efficacy of ONS in CCH was maintained over time. In responders, ONS induced a major reduction of functional and emotional headache-related impacts and a dramatic improvement of QoL. These results obtained in real-life conditions support its use and dissemination in rCCH patients.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Histamínica/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nervos Periféricos/fisiologia , Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA