Blood-to-brain glucose transport, cerebral glucose metabolism, and cerebral blood flow are not increased after hypoglycemia.

Recent antecedent hypoglycemia has been found to shift glycemic thresholds for autonomic (including adrenomedullary epinephrine), symptomatic, and other responses to subsequent hypoglycemia to lower plasma glucose concentrations. This change in threshold is the basis of the clinical syndromes of hypoglycemia unawareness and, in part, defective glucose counterregulation and the unifying concept of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in type 1 diabetes. We tested in healthy young adults the hypothesis that recent antecedent hypoglycemia increases blood-to-brain glucose transport, a plausible mechanism of this phenomenon. Eight subjects were studied after euglycemia, and nine were studied after approximately 24 h of interprandial hypoglycemia ( approximately 55 mg/dl, approximately 3.0 mmol/l). The latter were shown to have reduced plasma epinephrine (P = 0.009), neurogenic symptoms (P = 0.009), and other responses to subsequent hypoglycemia. Global bihemispheric blood-to-brain glucose transport and cerebral glucose metabolism were calculated from rate constants derived from blood and brain time-activity curves-the latter determined by positron emission tomography (PET)-after intravenous injection of [1-(11)C]glucose at clamped plasma glucose concentrations of 65 mg/dl (3.6 mmol/l). For these calculations, a model was used that includes a fourth rate constant to account for egress of [(11)C] metabolites. Cerebral blood flow was measured with intravenous [(15)O]water using PET. After euglycemia and after hypoglycemia, rates of blood-to-brain glucose transport (24.6 +/- 2.3 and 22.4 +/- 2.4 micromol. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively), cerebral glucose metabolism (16.8 +/- 0.9 and 15.9 +/- 0.9 micromol. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively) and cerebral blood flow (56.8 +/- 3.9 and 53.3 +/- 4.4 ml. 100 g(-1). min(-1), respectively) were virtually identical. These data do not support the hypothesis that recent antecedent hypoglycemia increases blood-to-brain glucose transport during subsequent hypoglycemia. They do not exclude regional increments in blood-to-brain glucose transport. Alternatively, the fundamental alteration might lie beyond the blood-brain barrier.

Symptoms of hypoglycemia, thresholds for their occurrence, and hypoglycemia unawareness.

Ultimately traceable to neural glucose deprivation, symptoms of hypoglycemia include neurogenic (autonomic) and neuroglycopenic symptoms. Neurogenic symptoms (tremulousness, palpitations, anxiety, sweating, hunger, paresthesias) are the results of the perception of physiologic changes caused by the autonomic nervous system's response to hypoglycemia. Neuroglycopenic symptoms (confusion, sensation of warmth, weakness or fatigue, severe cognitive failure, seizure, coma) are the results of brain glucose deprivation itself. Glycemic thresholds for symptoms of hypoglycemia shift to lower plasma glucose concentrations following recent episodes of hypoglycemia, leading to the syndrome of hypoglycemia unawareness--loss of the warning symptoms of developing hypoglycemia. Thus, patients with recurrent hypoglycemia (e.g., those with tightly controlled diabetes or with an insulinoma) often tolerate abnormally low plasma glucose concentrations without symptoms.

Impact of nocturnal hypoglycemia on hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction in type 1 diabetes.

To test the hypothesis that glycemic thresholds for cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycemia, like those for autonomic and symptomatic responses, shift to lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), 15 patients were studied on two occasions. Cognitive functions were assessed during morning hyperinsulinemic stepped hypoglycemic clamps (85, 75, 65, 55, and 45 mg/dl steps) after, in random sequence, nocturnal (2330-0300) hypoglycemia (48 +/- 2 mg/dl) on one occasion and nocturnal euglycemia (109 +/- 1 mg/dl) on the other. Compared with nondiabetic control subjects (n = 12), patients with T1DM had absent glucagon (P = 0.0009) and reduced epinephrine (P = 0.0010), norepinephrine (P = 0.0001), and neurogenic symptom (P = 0.0480) responses to hypoglycemia; the epinephrine (P = 0.0460) and neurogenic symptom (P = 0.0480) responses were reduced further after nocturnal hypoglycemia. After nocturnal hypoglycemia, in contrast to nocturnal euglycemia, there was less deterioration of cognitive function overall (P = 0.0065) during hypoglycemia based on analysis of the sum of standardized scores (z-scores). There was relative preservation of measures of pattern recognition and memory (the delayed non-match to sample task, P = 0.0371) and of attention (the Stroop arrow-word task, P = 0.0395), but not of measures of information processing (the paced serial addition task) or declarative memory (the delayed paragraph recall task), after nocturnal hypoglycemia. Thus, glycemic thresholds for hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction, like those for autonomic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia, shift to lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.

Forearm norepinephrine spillover during standing, hyperinsulinemia, and hypoglycemia.

Plasma norepinephrine (NE) concentrations are a fallible index of sympathetic neural activity because circulating NE can be derived from sympathetic nerves, the adrenal medullas, or both and because of regional differences in sympathetic neural activity. We used isotope dilution measurements of systemic and forearm NE spillover rates (SNESO and FNESO, respectively) to study the sympathochromaffin system during prolonged standing, hyperinsulinemic euglycemia, and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in healthy humans. Prolonged standing led to decrements in blood pressure without increments in heart rate, the pattern of incipient vasodepressor syncope. FNESO was not increased (0.58 +/- 0.20 to 0. 50 +/- 0.21 pmol. min-1. 100 ml tissue-1), suggesting that the approximately twofold increments in plasma NE and SNESO were derived from sympathetic nerves other than those in the forearm (with a possible contribution from the adrenal medullas). Hyperinsulinemia per se (euglycemia maintained) stimulated sympathetic neural activity, as evidenced by increments in FNESO (0.57 +/- 0.11 to 1.25 +/- 0.25 pmol. min-1. 100 ml tissue-1, P < 0.05), but not adrenomedullary activity. Hypoglycemia per se stimulated adrenomedullary activity (plasma epinephrine from 190 +/- 70 to 1720 +/- 320, pmol/l, P < 0.01). Although SNESO (P < 0.05) and perhaps plasma NE (P < 0.06) were raised to a greater extent during hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia than during hyperinsulinemic euglycemia, FNESO was not. Thus these data do not provide direct support for the concept that hypoglycemia per se also stimulates sympathetic neural activity.

Blood-to-brain glucose transport and cerebral glucose metabolism are not reduced in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes.

To test the hypothesis that blood-to-brain glucose transport is reduced in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes, we studied seven patients with a mean (+/- SD) HbA1c level of 10.1 +/- 1.2% and nine nondiabetic subjects during hyperinsulinemic, mildly hypoglycemic (approximately 3.6 mmol/l, approximately 65 mg/dl) glucose clamps. Blood-to-brain glucose transport and cerebral glucose metabolism were calculated from rate constants derived from blood and brain time-activity curves--the latter determined by positron emission tomography (PET)--after intravenous injection of [1-(11)C]glucose using a model that includes a fourth rate constant to account for regional egress of 11C metabolites. Cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume were determined with intravenous H2(15)O and inhaled C(15)O, respectively, also by PET. At plateau plasma glucose concentrations of 3.6 +/- 0.0 and 3.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, rates of blood-to-brain glucose transport were similar in the two groups (23.7 +/- 2.2 and 21.6 +/- 2.9 micromol x 100 g(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.569, in the control subjects and the patients, respectively). There were also no differences in the rates of cerebral glucose metabolism (16.8 +/- 0.8 and 16.3 +/- 1.2 micromol x 100 g(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.693, respectively). Plasma epinephrine (1,380 +/- 340 vs. 450 +/- 170 pmol/l, P = 0.0440) and glucagon (26 +/- 5 vs. 12 +/- 1 pmol/l, P = 0.0300) responses to mild hypoglycemia were reduced in the patients with type 1 diabetes. We conclude that neither blood-to-brain glucose transport nor cerebral glucose metabolism is measurably reduced in people with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes.

Brief twice-weekly episodes of hypoglycemia reduce detection of clinical hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

We tested the hypothesis that as few as two weekly brief episodes of superimposed hypoglycemia (i.e., doubling the average frequency of symptomatic hypoglycemia) would reduce physiological and behavioral defenses against developing hypoglycemia and reduce detection of clinical hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Compared with nondiabetic controls, six patients with well-controlled T1DM (HbA1c, 7.5 +/- 0.7% [mean +/- SD]) exhibited absent glucagon responses and reduced epinephrine (P = 0.0027), norepinephrine (P = 0.0007), pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.0030), and neurogenic symptom (P = 0.0451) responses to hypoglycemia as expected. In these patients, 2 h of induced hypoglycemia (50 mg/dl, 2.8 mmol/l) twice weekly for 1 month, compared in a random-sequence crossover design with an otherwise identical 2 h of induced hyperglycemia (150 mg/dl, 8.3 mmol/l) twice weekly for 1 month, further reduced the epinephrine (P = 0.0001) and pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.0030) responses, tended to further reduce the norepinephrine and neurogenic symptom responses to hypoglycemia, and reduced cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycemia (P = 0.0271), all assessed in the investigational setting. In the clinical setting, induced hypoglycemia did not alter overall glycemic control, but did reduce the total number of symptomatic hypoglycemic episodes detected by the patients from 49 to 30 per month and lowered the mean +/- SE self-monitored blood glucose level during symptomatic hypoglycemia from 51 +/- 2 mg/dl (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) to 46 +/- 3 mg/dl (2.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) (P < 0.01). It also reduced the proportion of low regularly scheduled self-monitored values that were symptomatic by approximately 33%. Thus as little as doubling the frequency of symptomatic hypoglycemia further reduced both the key epinephrine response and clinical awareness of developing hypoglycemia, changes reasonably expected to increase the risk of severe iatrogenic hypoglycemia in T1DM.

Impact of recent antecedent hypoglycemia on hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction in nondiabetic humans.

To test the hypothesis that glycemic thresholds for hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction, like those for neuroendocrine responses to and symptoms of hypoglycemia, shift to lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia, 16 healthy young adult subjects (7 women and 9 men) were studied on two separate occasions in random sequence, once with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (2.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, 47 +/- 1 mg/dl) and once with otherwise identical hyperinsulinemic euglycemia (4.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, 86 +/- 5 mg/dl) between 1430 and 1630. Neuroendocrine, symptomatic, and cognitive responses to hyperinsulinemic stepped hypoglycemic (4.7, 4.2, 3.6, 3.0, 2.8, 2.5, and 2.2 mmol/l; 85, 75, 65, 55, 50, 45, and 40 mg/dl) clamps were quantitated the following morning on both occasions. Cognitive function tests included measures of information processing (Serial Addition), attention (Stroop Arrow Word), pattern recognition and memory (Delayed Non-Match to Sample), and declarative memory (Paragraph Recall). As expected, plasma glucagon (P = 0.0094), epinephrine (P = 0.0063), and pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.0046) responses to stepped hypoglycemia were reduced significantly, and symptomatic responses tended to be reduced after afternoon hypoglycemia. Performance on the cognitive function tests deteriorated (P < 0.0001) during stepped hypoglycemic clamps, but there were no significant overall effects of antecedent hypoglycemia on hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction. Although deterioration was reduced (P < 0.05) from the 2.8 mmol/l (50 mg/dl) to the 2.5 mmol/l (45 mg/dl) steps on the Serial Addition and Delayed Non-Match to Sample tasks after afternoon hypoglycemia, comparable differences were not found on the Stroop Arrow Word or Paragraph Recall tasks. Thus, glycemic thresholds for hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction, unlike those for neuroendocrine responses to and symptoms of hypoglycemia, do not seem to shift to substantially lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia in nondiabetic humans.

Muscarinic cholinergic antagonism does not enhance recovery from hypoglycemia in IDDM.

OBJECTIVE: Because muscarinic cholinergic agonism in the absence of an increase in glucagon secretion inhibits hepatic glucose production, we tested the hypothesis that muscarinic cholinergic antagonism enhances glucose recovery from hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight (initially euglycemic) patients with IDDM received overnight infusions of insulin and were studied on three occasions in random order. Hypoglycemia was induced by low-dose insulin infusion (4.0 pmol.kg-1.min-1) from 0 through 80 min; observations were continued through 240 min. At 0 and 80 min, intravenous injections of atropine only (1.0 mg), placebo and then atropine, respectively, or placebo only were administered. RESULTS: Increments in heart rate (P < 0.001) and prevention of the pancreatic polypeptide response to hypoglycemia (P = 0.042) after atropine administration documented muscarinic cholinergic antagonism. The absent glucagon response to hypoglycemia was unaltered, but the epinephrine response was increased (P = 0.010). Nonetheless, rates of glucose production and utilization and plasma glucose concentrations were unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that muscarinic cholinergic antagonism does not enhance glucose recovery from hypoglycemia in patients with IDDM.

Reversal of hypoglycemia unawareness, but not defective glucose counterregulation, in IDDM.

To test the hypothesis that the neuroendocrine (including autonomic) responses to hypoglycemia are dissociated from the symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients with hypoglycemia awareness and during reversal of hypoglycemia unawareness in IDDM, we used the hyperinsulinemic stepped hypoglycemic (5.0, 4.4, 3.9, 3.3, 2.8, and 2.2 mmol/l) clamp technique to quantitate these responses in nondiabetic control subjects and IDDM patients with hypoglycemia awareness and with hypoglycemia unawareness. The latter were restudied after 3 days, 3-4 weeks, and 3 months of scrupulous avoidance of iatrogenic hypoglycemia. At baseline, symptom responses were virtually nil in unaware patients (P = 0.0001 vs. nondiabetic); these were increased in aware patients (P = 0.0183 vs. nondiabetic). In contrast, several neuroendocrine responses were comparably reduced in both unaware and aware patients: epinephrine (P = 0.0222 and 0.0156), pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.0004 and 0.0003), glucagon (P = 0.0112 and 0.0109), and cortisol (P = 0.0214 and 0.0450). In initially unaware patients, symptom responses increased (P = 0.0001) during avoidance of hypoglycemia. Demonstrable after 3 days, these were entirely normal after 3-4 weeks and 3 months. In contrast, none of the neuroendocrine responses increased. Thus, we conclude that several neuroendocrine responses to hypoglycemia (including the adrenomedullary and parasympathetic components of the autonomic response) can be dissociated from symptomatic responses in IDDM patients with hypoglycemia awareness and during reversal of hypoglycemia unawareness in IDDM. Avoidance of iatrogenic hypoglycemia sufficient to reverse the clinical syndrome of hypoglycemia unawareness did not reverse the key elements (deficient glucagon and epinephrine responses) of the clinical syndrome of defective glucose counterregulation. This implies that the mechanisms of hypoglycemia unawareness and of defective glucose counterregulation are, at least in part, different in IDDM.

Effects of estrogen on free fatty acid metabolism in humans.

To determine whether estrogen directly affects effective adipose lipolysis, palmitate rate of appearances ([14C]palmitate) was measured in 15 postmenopausal women. Each volunteer was studied after > or = 2 mo of estrogen treatment and again after > or = 2 mo of estrogen deficiency. Plasma hormone concentrations were controlled and identical on the 2 study days with use of the pancreatic clamp technique, and the lipolytic response to epinephrine and epinephrine + phentolamine was assessed. Results showed that overall palmitate flux was greater (10-20%, P < 0.05) during the estrogen-deficient than during the estrogen-replete study. Adrenergic stimulation of lipolysis was not specifically influenced by estrogen treatment, and control of plasma hormone concentrations did not eliminate the difference in palmitate flux between the estrogen-deficient and estrogen-replete study days. We conclude that estrogen deficiency is associated with increased plasma free fatty acid availability and that estrogen likely has direct, albeit small, effects on adipose tissue lipolysis.

Hypoglycemia-induced autonomic failure in IDDM is specific for stimulus of hypoglycemia and is not attributable to prior autonomic activation.

We hypothesized, first, that recent antecedent hypoglycemia causes reduced autonomic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in patients with well-controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and that the reduced responses are specific for the stimulus of hypoglycemia while the responses to other stimuli are unaltered and, second, that reduced autonomic responses, specifically sympathochromaffin, so-induced are not simply the result of prior activation of the system. To test the first hypothesis, eight patients with IDDM, selected for HbA1c levels < 8.0% and the absence of classic diabetic autonomic neuropathy, were studied twice. On one occasion, clamped hypoglycemia (approximately 2.8 mM) was produced at 1400-1600 on days 2 and 3; on the other occasion clamped euglycemia (approximately 5.6 mM) was produced at those times. On both occasions, autonomic responses to hypoglycemia (approximately 2.8 mM) were determined the morning of day 3 and those to standing, exercise, and a formula meal the morning of day 4. Following afternoon hypoglycemia, 1) the adrenomedullary epinephrine (EPI) response to hypoglycemia was reduced (P = 0.0397) but that to standing, exercise, and a meal were unaltered; 2) the sympathetic neural norepinephrine (NE) response to standing and to exercise was unaltered; and 3) the partially parasympathetic neural-mediated pancreatic polypeptide response to a meal was unaltered. To test the second hypothesis, seven nondiabetic subjects were studied twice, once with cycle exercise (60% peak VO2 x 60 min) and once without exercise 90 min before clamped hypoglycemia (approximately 2.8 mM). Prior exercise had no effect on the EPI, NE, or pancreatic polypeptide responses to hypoglycemia. We conclude, first, that the phenomenon of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure can be induced in patients with well-controlled IDDM and is specific for the stimulus of hypoglycemia and, second, that this is not simply the result of prior activation of the system.

Alanine and terbutaline in treatment of hypoglycemia in IDDM.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that, in contrast to administration of glucose or glucagon, administration of the amino acid Ala or of the beta 2-adrenergic agonist terbutaline produces sustained glucose recovery from hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We developed a model of clinical hypoglycemia using subcutaneous injection of insulin (0.15 U/kg) in patients with IDDM. In comparison with nondiabetic subjects, patients with IDDM exhibited reduced glucagon (P = 0.0001), epinephrine (P = 0.0060), and pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.0001) responses to hypoglycemia. In addition to placebos, the following were administered during hypoglycemia (2 h after insulin injection) in IDDM patients: oral glucose, 10 and 20 g; subcutaneous glucagon, 1.0 mg; oral Ala, 40 g; oral terbutaline, 5.0 mg; and subcutaneous terbutaline, 0.25 mg. RESULTS: Glucose (10 and 20 g) and glucagon raised plasma glucose (P = 0.0163, 0.0060, and 0.0001, respectively) from 3.0-3.3 mM to peaks of 5.4 +/- 0.4, 6.8 +/- 0.7, and 11.8 +/- 0.8 mM within 30, 45, and 60 min, respectively, but the responses were transient. Oral Ala raised glucose levels (P = 0.0401) to 4.0 +/- 0.4 mM within 30 min; glucose levels then rose gradually to a 6-h value of only 7.1 +/- 0.9 mM. Oral terbutaline raised glucose levels (P = 0.0294) to 4.3 +/- 0.3 mM within 30 min; glucose levels then rose substantially. In contrast, subcutaneous terbutaline raised glucose levels (P = 0.0249) to 3.7 +/- 0.1 mM within 15 min; the levels plateaued at 5.0 mM from approximately 60-150 min and then paralleled the placebo curve. CONCLUSIONS: Ala and terbutaline produce sustained glucose recovery from hypoglycemia in IDDM and are therefore potentially useful agents for the treatment of mild or moderate iatrogenic hypoglycemia, or the prevention of iatrogenic hypoglycemia, when food intake is not anticipated over the following several hours.

Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Recent antecedent hypoglycemia reduces autonomic responses to, symptoms of, and defense against subsequent hypoglycemia.

We hypothesize that in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), recent antecedent iatrogenic hypoglycemia is a major cause of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure, a disorder distinct from classical diabetic autonomic neuropathy (CDAN), and that hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure, by reducing both symptoms of and defense against developing hypoglycemia, results in recurrent iatrogenic hypoglycemia, thus creating a vicious cycle. We used the hyperinsulinemic (12.0 pmol.kg-1.min-1) stepped hypoglycemic clamp technique to assess autonomic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia and the insulin infusion test (4.0 pmol.kg-1.min-1) to assess defense against hypoglycemia on mornings before and after clamped afternoon hypoglycemia (approximately 2.8 mmol/liter) and hyperglycemia (approximately 11.1 mmol/liter) in patients with IDDM. Compared with nondiabetic subjects, IDDM with or without CDAN exhibited reduced epinephrine (P = 0.0222 and 0.0040) and pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.0083 and 0.0056) responses to hypoglycemia. After afternoon hypoglycemia, lower plasma glucose concentrations were required to elicit autonomic and symptomatic responses during morning hypoglycemic clamps in patients without CDAN. At the 2.8 mmol/liter step, mean (+/- SE) epinephrine levels were 1,160 +/- 270 and 2,040 +/- 270 pmol/liter (P = 0.0060), pancreatic and total symptom scores were 22 +/- 3 and 41 +/- 7 (P = 0.0475) after afternoon hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, respectively. During morning insulin infusion tests after afternoon hypoglycemia, nadir plasma glucose concentrations were 2.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/liter compared with 3.3 +/- 0.3 mmol/liter (P < 0.001) at the corresponding time points after afternoon hyperglycemia. Thus, we conclude: (a) elevated glycemic thresholds for autonomic responses to hypoglycemia are a feature of IDDM per se, not classical diabetic autonomic neuropathy; and (b) a single episode of afternoon hypoglycemia results in both elevated glycemic thresholds for autonomic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia and impaired physiological defense against hypoglycemia the next morning in IDDM.

Adrenergic receptors are a fallible index of adrenergic denervation hypersensitivity.

In view of evidence that neither interindividual nor induced intra-individual variations of adrenergic receptor status are related to metabolic or haemodynamic sensitivity to adrenaline in vivo, we took an alternative approach to assessment of the relevance of adrenergic receptor measurement by measuring these in a group of subjects with well-documented adrenergic denervation hypersensitivity, patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Mononuclear leukocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptor densities (and binding affinities), measured with 125I-labelled pindolol, and isoproterenol-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation, in samples from patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (n = 8), were no different from those in samples from patients with IDDM without neuropathy (n = 8), or from non-diabetic subjects (n = 8). In addition, platelet alpha 2-adrenergic receptor densities (and binding affinities), measured with 3H-labelled yohimbine, and adrenaline-induced suppression of cyclic AMP contents did not differ among the three groups. Thus, in contrast to idiopathic autonomic failure, there is no generalized increase in adrenergic receptors in autonomic failure due to diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Regardless of the mechanism of adrenergic denervation hypersensitivity in such patients, these data provide further evidence that measurements of cellular adrenergic receptors (and adenylate cyclase) in vitro are a fallible index of sensitivity to catecholamines in vivo.

Higher glycemic thresholds for symptoms during beta-adrenergic blockade in IDDM.

We tested the hypotheses that nonselective beta-adrenergic blockade does not cause absolute hypoglycemia unawareness but shifts the glycemic thresholds for symptoms to lower plasma glucose concentrations and that neither neuroglycopenic symptoms nor cognitive impairments during hypoglycemia are altered by beta-adrenergic blockade. To do so, we applied the euglycemic and stepped hypoglycemic clamp techniques to patients with moderately controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) in the absence (n = 8) and presence (n = 9) of the nonselective beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol. Compared with the corresponding euglycemic clamps, total symptom scores first increased at the 4.4-mM plasma glucose step (a higher level than that of 2.8 mM in nondiabetic subjects studied previously) in the absence of propranolol. Beta-adrenergic blockade did not produce absolute hypoglycemia unawareness. Indeed, at the frankly hypoglycemic step of 2.8 mM, total symptom scores tended to be higher in the presence than in the absence of propranolol. This was largely the result of greater (P less than 0.01) perception of diaphoresis. However, symptom scores did not increase until the 3.3-mM plasma glucose step during beta-adrenergic blockade. The perception of hunger, and perhaps that of tremulousness, was reduced by propranolol at the higher glucose steps. Neuroglycopenic symptoms were not reduced by propranolol. The cognitive function of memory, but not that of attention, was impaired, also starting at the 4.4-mM glucose step. This was not impaired further by propranolol. Thus, we formed the following conclusions. 1) Nonselective beta-adrenergic blockade does not cause absolute hypoglycemia unawareness but shifts the glycemic thresholds for symptoms to lower plasma glucose concentrations in patients with IDDM. 2) Beta-adrenergic blockade does not reduce neuroglycopenic symptoms, and it does not further impair cognitive function during hypoglycemia in IDDM patients.

Multifactorial origin of hypoglycemic symptom unawareness in IDDM. Association with defective glucose counterregulation and better glycemic control.

To assess potential relationships between unawareness of hypoglycemic symptoms and both defective glucose counterregulation and therapy-associated altered glycemic thresholds, symptoms and hormonal responses to hypoglycemia were quantitated during standardized insulin infusion tests in 41 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The glycemic thresholds for both neurogenic and neuroglycopenic symptoms (and those for both epinephrine and pancreatic polypeptide release) were at lower plasma glucose concentrations in both patients with defective (n = 9, 22%) and those with adequate glucose counterregulation and, among the latter, in patients with lower compared with higher glycosylated hemoglobin levels. The data are consistent with the concept that both defective glucose counterregulation and improved glycemic control contribute to excessive hypoglycemia in IDDM by reducing awareness of symptoms of developing hypoglycemia and by impairing physiological defenses against hypoglycemia. Thus, hypoglycemic symptom unawareness is multifactorial in origin and may be partly reversible.

Growth hormone, cortisol, or both are involved in defense against, but are not critical to recovery from, hypoglycemia.

We tested the hypotheses that growth hormone, cortisol, or both are involved in defense against but are not critical to recovery from prolonged hypoglycemia and that the putative roles of these hormones in defense against prolonged hypoglycemia are permissive rather than direct. To do so we studied control subjects (n = 10) and patients with growth hormone and cortisol deficiencies resulting from hypopituitarism both in the untreated state (n = 7) and with prestudy and basal intrastudy growth hormone and cortisol replacement (n = 6). Postabsorptive plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, and epinephrine concentrations were no different in the untreated patients and controls. Twelve-hour insulin infusions, in low doses adjusted over the 1st 2 h to produce plasma glucose concentrations of 3.6 mmol/l (65 mg/dl) and then fixed at that dose, resulted in significantly (P less than 0.0001) lower late plasma glucose concentrations in the patients, without and with replacement. The 12-h plasma glucose concentrations were 2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (53 +/- 1 mg/dl) in the control subjects, 2.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (43 +/- 2 mg/dl; P less than 0.001 vs. control) in the deficient patients, and 2.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (45 +/- 2 mg/dl; P less than 0.01 vs. control) in the replaced patients. Rates of glucose recovery from hypoglycemia after discontinuation of insulin were identical in all three studies. Thus growth hormone, cortisol, or probably both play a demonstrable role in defense against prolonged, in contrast to short-term, hypoglycemia in humans. This does not appear to be the result of permissive actions of the hormones and is therefore best attributed to their increments during hypoglycemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)