ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) Analysis of Stromal Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTILs) in Breast Cancer and Its Limitations.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) reflect antitumour immunity. Their evaluation of histopathology specimens is influenced by several factors and is subject to issues of reproducibility. ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) helps in determining the number of observers that would be sufficient for the reliable estimation of inter-observer agreement of TIL categorisation. This has not been explored previously in relation to TILs. ONEST analyses, using an open-source software developed by the first author, were performed on TIL quantification in breast cancers taken from two previous studies. These were one reproducibility study involving 49 breast cancers, 23 in the first circulation and 14 pathologists in the second circulation, and one study involving 100 cases and 9 pathologists. In addition to the estimates of the number of observers required, other factors influencing the results of ONEST were examined. The analyses reveal that between six and nine observers (range 2-11) are most commonly needed to give a robust estimate of reproducibility. In addition, the number and experience of observers, the distribution of values around or away from the extremes, and outliers in the classification also influence the results. Due to the simplicity and the potentially relevant information it may give, we propose ONEST to be a part of new reproducibility analyses.

ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) suggests four or more observers for a reliable assessment of the consistency of histological grading of invasive breast carcinoma: A reproducibility study with a retrospective view on previous studies.

Histological grade is one of the most important prognosticators of breast cancer which is available for nearly all cases. It also makes part of several multivariable analysis derived combined prognostic profiles despite concerns about its reproducibility. The aims included a reproducibility study of grading in the light of a recently described statistical approach, ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) and review earlier reproducibility studies in the light of the ONEST analysis. Nine pathologists reviewed 50 core needle biopsies and 50 slides from different excision specimens and recorded the scores for gland (tubule) formation, nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic activity as well as histological grade. Overall percent agreement, Fleiss kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for the analysis of reproducibility. ONEST data and curves were generated from 100 random permutations of the participants. ONEST suggested a minimum of 4 observers for the reliable evaluation of reproducibility for both the scored components and grade in either type of specimen. Our results suggested moderate or moderate to good reproducibility of grading (kappa values of 0.51 for excisions, and 0.54 for biopsies and ICCs of 0.70 and 0.69, respectively) with gland formation being the most and nuclear pleomorphism the worst consistently evaluated feature. In studies with sufficient participants (at least 4) and non-pairwise comparisons in the analysis, the reproducibility of histological grading is fair to moderate, whereas studies with fewer participants or pairwise kappa analysis suggest moderate to almost prefect agreement of the results. ONEST is a valuable complementation of reproducibility analyses.

"Dum spiro spero": clinicopathologic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection / "Dum spiro spero": a SARS-CoV-2-fertozés klinikopatológiája 26 eset kapcsán.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A kórboncolás hozzájárul a súlyos akut légzoszervi szindrómát okozó koronavírus-2 (SARS-CoV-2-) fertozés klinikopatológiai vonatkozásainak megismeréséhez. Célkituzés: A SARS-CoV-2-fertozöttek boncolása során gyujtött tapasztalatok bemutatása. Módszer: Egymást követoen boncolt, védooltásban nem részesült, SARS-CoV-2-fertozött elhunytak klinikai adatait, makro- és mikroszkópos észleleteit összegeztük; a tüdokimetszéseket SARS-CoV-2-nukleokapszid-immunfestéssel vizsgáltuk. Eredmények: A boncolást a halálok megállapítására (n = 14), tumorgyanú (n = 9), illetve törvényi kötelezettség (n = 3) miatt végeztük. A fertozést a klinikai észlelés vagy a boncolás során (n = 4) végzett SARS-CoV-2-nukleinsav-teszt igazolta. A tünetes betegség átlagos hossza 12,9 nap volt. 21 betegnél (medián életkor 69 év; 18 férfi) állt fenn COVID-19-pneumonia, mely 16 esetben önmagában, 4 esetben bakteriális pneumoniával vagy álhártyás colitisszel szövodve okozott halált; 1 antikoagulált pneumoniás beteg heveny retroperitonealis vérzésben halt meg. 3 betegnél a halált disszeminálódott malignus tumor, 1 betegnél coronariathrombosis, 1 mentálisan retardált betegnél pedig pulmonalis emboliás szövodmény okozta. A COVID-19-pneumoniás tüdok nehezek, tömöttek és vörösen foltozottak voltak. Szövettanilag a betegség idotartamától függoen diffúz alveolaris károsodás korai exsudativ vagy késobbi proliferativ fázisa látszott atípusos pneumocytákkal; gyakori volt a microthrombosis (n = 7), a macrothrombosis (n = 5), illetve a pulmonalis embolia (n = 4). A SARS-CoV-2-immunfestés pozitívnak bizonyult az esetek 38,5%-ában, dominálóan az exsudativ fázisban. Minden elhunyt társbetegség(ek)ben szenvedett, így magasvérnyomás-betegségben (n = 17), érelmeszesedésben (n = 14), 2-es típusú diabetesben (n = 8), rosszindulatú daganatban (n = 6), krónikus obstruktív tüdobetegségben (n = 4), elhízásban (n = 3), vesetranszplantáció utáni immunszuppresszióban (n = 3). Következtetés: Az irodalmi adatokkal összhangban, halálos COVID-19-pneumonia túlnyomóan idos, társbetegség(ek)tol sújtott férfiakban alakult ki. A boncolási gyakorlatban a SARS-CoV-2-nukleokapszid-immunfestéstol a diffúz alveolaris károsodás korai fázisában várható pozitivitás. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1791-1802. INTRODUCTION: Autopsy is an important tool for the evaluation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Objectice: The aim of this study was to present our experience with autopsies of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHOD: Clinical data, macroscopic and microscopic findings of consecutive postmortems of non-vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 patients are summarized. Lung samples were evaluated with SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Autopsies were performed to determine the cause of death (n = 14), suspected tumours (n = 9) or due to legal obligation (n = 3). SARS-CoV-2 infection was verified by ante mortem (n = 22) and post mortem (n = 4) polymerase chain reaction. The mean duration of symptomatic disease was 12.9 days. Of 21 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, 16 died of respiratory failure, 4 had additional bacterial pneumonia or Clostridioides difficile infection, and 1 developed hemorrhagic complication (n = 1). Other causes of death included disseminated malignancies (n = 3), coronary thrombosis (n = 1) and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). The affected lungs were heavy and had patchy red appearance. Exudative or proliferative phases of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) were detected with atypical pneumocytes. Microthrombosis (n = 7), macrothrombosis (n = 5) and pulmonary embolism (n = 4) were frequent. The SARS-CoV-2 immunohistochemical reaction was positive in 38.5% of cases. All patients had co-morbidities, namely, hypertension (n = 17), atherosclerosis (n = 14), diabetes (n = 8), malignancies (n = 6), chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (n = 4), obesity (n = 3) and immunosuppression after kidney transplantation (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Fatal COVID-19 pneumonia occurred mostly in elderly males with co-morbidities. In the autopsy practice, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid immunohistochemical reaction may confirm the infectious etiology in the early phase of DAD. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1791-1802.

The additional value of ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) in assessing reproducibility of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki67 classification in breast cancer.

The reproducibility of assessing potential biomarkers is crucial for their implementation. ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) has been recently introduced as a new additive evaluation method for the assessment of reliability, by demonstrating how the number of observers impact on interobserver agreement. Oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 proliferation marker immunohistochemical stainings were assessed on 50 core needle biopsy and 50 excision samples from breast cancers by 9 pathologists according to daily practice. ER and PR statuses based on the percentages of stained nuclei were the most consistently assessed parameters (intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC 0.918-0.996), whereas Ki67 with 5 different theoretical or St Gallen Consensus Conference-proposed cut-off values demonstrated moderate to good reproducibility (ICC: 0.625-0.760). ONEST highlighted that consistent tests like ER and PR assessment needed only 2 or 3 observers for optimal evaluation of reproducibility, and the width between plots of the best and worst overall percent agreement values for 100 randomly selected permutations of observers was narrow. In contrast, with less consistently evaluated tests of Ki67 categorization, ONEST suggested at least 5 observers required for more trustful assessment of reliability, and the bandwidth of the best and worst plots was wider (up to 34% difference between two observers). ONEST has additional value to traditional calculations of the interobserver agreement by not only highlighting the number of observers needed to trustfully evaluate reproducibility but also by highlighting the rate of agreement with an increasing number of observers and disagreement between the better and worse ratings.

Different methods of pretreatment Ki-67 labeling index evaluation in core biopsies of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to response to therapy.

Increased proliferation activity of breast cancer cells evaluated by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, i.e. a high Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI), may predict better tumor regression in case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Despite recommendations for the evaluation of Ki-67 LI, there are variations in methodology. We assessed the effect of different evaluation methods on the Ki-67 LI in patients with different response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thirty pretreatment core-biopsy samples of patients receiving neoadjuvant docetaxel-epirubicin chemotherapy with or without capecitabine were evaluated for their Ki-67 LI. Pathologic regression was categorized as no regression, partial regression and complete regression, with 10 cases in each category. Three antibodies (MIB1, B56, SP6), 4 observers and 4 methods (counting or estimating on glass slides and counting or estimating on representative digital images) were compared. The Kruskal-Wallis test and analyses of variance were performed to investigate the differences in Ki-67 LIs between different clinical outcomes (tumor regression categories). Breast carcinomas with pathological complete regression had a higher mean Ki-67 LI than tumors not achieving complete regression with any methods, observers and antibodies investigated, although there was a variation between different evaluations in what may represent high proliferation. Estimating the Ki-67 LI on digital images representing the highest proliferation in the core biopsy seemed the best in separating complete responders from non-responders. High Ki-67 LI values were more likely associated with pathological complete regression independently of the method of evaluation used, although the definition of high proliferation is problematic. Estimating the Ki-67 LI may be an adequate method of evaluation.

The use of digital images improves reproducibility of the ki-67 labeling index as a proliferation marker in breast cancer.

The proportion of Ki-67 immunostained cells (Ki-67 labeling index, LI) is one of the most commonly used histology methods for estimating proliferation of breast carcinomas. Although the Ki-67 LI is used in treatment decision making, its reproducibility shows variation in different studies, and is generally less then optimal. The aim of the present study was to investigate how the use of a standardized, partially digitalized counting method could affect reproducibility of determining the Ki-67 LI. Thirty breast cancer core-biopsy samples were stained with B-56, SP-6 and MIB-1 monoclonal Ki-67 antibodies. Each sample was represented by a single digital photograph taken with a x20 objective. Four investigators determined the Ki-67 LI on these digital images by estimation, then by counting with the help of a grid overlaid on the same images. Altogether 720 evaluations were made by 4 independent pathologists. Good to excellent correlation was found between estimations and calculations of each observer. Kappa values >0.6 suggest substantial inter-observer agreement when classifying the cases into a 15 % and 30 % cut-off determined three-tiered or a 4-quarter-based four-tiered categorization, which is better than the fair reproducibility gained on the real slides in a previous study. The results also suggest that the type of the antibody may also impact on the consistency of both estimating and calculating the Ki-67 LIs. The results indicate that counting on digital images may significantly improve reproducibility of determining the KI-67 LI. Interestingly, estimation on the same images is not worse, but is obviously faster and more convenient.

An intra- and interobserver reproducibility analysis of the Ki-67 proliferation marker assessment on core biopsies of breast cancer patients and its potential clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE: The Ki-67 proliferation index has received an important role in treatment tailoring and molecular classification of estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas. The aim was to analyze the reproducibility of assessing proliferation on the basis of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. METHODS: Thirty core biopsy samples of breast cancer patients were analyzed after immunostaining with B56, SP6 and MIB-1 monoclonal Ki-67 antibodies. All samples were evaluated twice and independently by 3 pathologists, with each observer performing his daily routine practice. The ratio of Ki-67-positive cells was estimated with 5% accuracy. Correlation was calculated for the results of each investigator for all pairs of antibodies and for the results of each antibody for all pairs of investigators. Ki-67 scores were divided into categories of either 4 quarters or into 3 groups reflecting the St. Gallen consensus recommendations with 15 and 30% as cutoff values. The reproducibility of classifying the tumors into these categories was assessed with ĸ statistics. RESULTS: Altogether, 540 evaluations were made. Good to excellent correlation (Spearman's and Pearson's coefficient range 0.74-0.92 and 0.73-0.93, respectively) was noted for the pairwise comparison of antibodies by observer and of observers by antibody. The inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the Ki-67 score classification into equal quarters (1-25, 26-50, 51-75 and 76-100%) or into 3 categories with cutoffs at 15 and 30% was fair to poor in the middle categories, but moderate to substantial in the low and high ranges. Interobserver differences in practice potentially impacted on less consistent classification. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the three different Ki-67 antibodies tested do not substantially influence the reproducibility of the estimated proliferation rates. Although reproducibility is better in the clinically more relevant distinction of high versus low proliferation, without standardization, the current practice of Ki-67 assessment in many laboratories does not allow proper and consistent therapeutic decision-making.

Tumour topoisomerase II alpha protein expression and outcome after adjuvant dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

There is a need for the selection of those breast cancers where benefit may be attained from the addition of an anthracycline to the adjuvant chemotherapy. The expression of topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) protein in 3 cohorts of breast cancers treated with adjuvant dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy was determined retrospectively. The TOP2A status was analysed in relation with the other standard tumour features and the outcome. TOP2A IHC results were assessable in 106 patients: with a cut-off value of 15%, 48% of the tumours were classified as TOP2A-positive. The expression of TOP2A correlated with that of Ki67 (R = 0.532, p < 0.001) and a high grade (p = 0.04), but did not correlate with the proportion of ER- or PR-positive cells in the tumour. More tumors were TOP2A-negative among the ER- or PR-positive cancers than among the ER/PR-negative cancers (p = 0.021 and p = 0.002, respectively). After a median follow-up time of 64.5 months, 31 relapses (23.5%) and 23 deaths (17.4%) had occurred in 131 patients. The overall survival was longer in the TOP2A-positive cases than in the TOP2A-negative cases. The recurrence-free survival and the overall survival were significantly more favourable in the ER/PR-negative and TOP2A-positive tumours than in other subgroups. In a Cox proportional hazards model, the grade and TOP2A remained significant determinants in the ER/PR-negative subgroup. TOP2A positivity and grade 3 indicated a decrease in the risk of death with HR = 0.211 (95% CI: 0.042-1.05, p = 0.056) and HR = 0.216 (95% CI: 0.047-0.990, p = 0.048), respectively. A higher sensitivity to anthracycline-containing regimens is suggested in ER/PR-negative and TOP2A-positive cancers.

Tumor topoisomerase II alpha status and response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Individualized chemotherapy for breast cancer improves the outcome. Anthracyclines target the enzyme topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A). We set out to perform a retrospective study of the presence of gene abnormalities and the expression of TOP2A in a cohort of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-three patients with 45 breast cancers were treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel-epirubicin with/without capecitabine chemotherapy. The TOP2A status of the cancers, determined retrospectively by fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, was analyzed in relation to the standard clinical and pathological data. RESULTS: Clinically and pathologically complete remission (pCR) was achieved in 15 (33.3%) and 9 (20%) cases, respectively. The TOP2A gene was amplified in 2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers (8%), and 32 (84.2%) overall exhibited TOP2A expression in >15% of the cells. The expression of TOP2A exhibited a strong correlation with the expression of Ki67 (R = 0.743, p < 0.001), and was negatively correlated with estrogen receptors (ER; R = 0.404, p = 0.012) and progesterone receptors (R = 0.430, p = 0.007). The expression of TOP2A was not related to the amplification of the TOP2A gene or the HER2 status of the tumor. The proportions of Ki67- and TOP2A-positive tumor cells were significantly reduced after chemotherapy (56.1 ± 23.6 vs. 19.0 ± 27.7%, p = 0.004, and 41.0 ± 27.9 vs. 12.7 ± 24.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). The development of pCR was related to a high grade (p = 0.054), ER negativity (p = 0.027) and high TOP2A expression (p = 0.037). The expression of TOP2A was an independent predictor of pCR (OR = 1.460, for every 10% increase, 95% CI: 1.016-2.096, p = 0.041). After a median follow-up time of 31.0 months, neither relapse-free survival nor overall survival was related to the tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: TOP2A expression is a marker of the tumor's proliferation rate and sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and does not depend on the amplification of its gene.