Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pain Pract ; 16(3): 327-33, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25564757

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Analyzing hospital naloxone use may assist in identification of areas for quality and safety improvement. Our primary objective is to quantitate the incidence of hospital naloxone use and to assess certain patient populations at risk. METHODS: During the years 2008 to 2011, each clinical scenario where naloxone was administered on an in-patient care ward was reviewed. The events were assessed to separate situations where naloxone rescue was effective in reversing opioid-induced intoxication vs. others. Further analysis was conducted to stratify patient populations at greatest risk. RESULTS: Naloxone was administered for well-defined opioid-induced respiratory depression and oversedation 61% of the time, the remainder used for patient deterioration of other etiology. Surgical populations are at risk with an incidence of 3.8/1,000 hospitalized patients, and this is the greatest within 24 hours of surgery. General surgical patients represent the highest surgical patient risk at 5.5/1,000. Medical patients represent lower risk at 2.0/1,000. Patients with patient-controlled analgesia and epidural opioid infusion are high risk at 12.1 and 13.1/1,000 patients, respectively. Many quality and safety interventions were gradually implemented in response to this data and are summarized. These include nursing and provider education, electronic medical record modification, and more stringent patient monitoring practices. CONCLUSION: Examination of naloxone use can assist in the identification and stratification of patients at risk for opioid-induced respiratory depression and oversedation and can serve as a driver for improvements in hospital patient safety. This information can also guide other institutions interested in similar improvements.


Assuntos
Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos Opioides/antagonistas & inibidores , Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/antagonistas & inibidores , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naloxona/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/efeitos adversos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Segurança do Paciente , Insuficiência Respiratória/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Respiratória/tratamento farmacológico , Medição de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 29(3): 670-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25704325

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality after noncardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to assess patient understanding of the potential benefits of perioperative statins in a select population already on chronic therapy. A secondary aim was to determine the frequency with which patients recalled having a discussion with their provider regarding perioperative statins. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients taking daily statins presenting to a preoperative medical evaluation clinic were offered a 12-question survey that assessed their understanding of the potential benefit of taking the medication in the perioperative period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients completed the questionnaire. The mean age was 68.3 years (standard deviation, 9.0); 42% were female. The most frequent surgical referral to the clinic was orthopedics, at 36%. The most common statin prescribed was atorvastatin, in 35% of patients. Twenty-seven percent of patients (n = 36) recognized that perioperative statins are beneficial; 44% of these patients (n = 14) cited decreased cholesterol during the procedure as the reason, representing 12% of the total sampled population. Twenty-two percent (n = 8) of those recognizing the benefit of perioperative statins identified a decrease in the risk of heart attack or death as the reason. This represented only 6% of the total sample. One percent of surgeons mentioned statins in relation to the planned surgery; 2% of primary or prescribing physicians mentioned the medication in relation to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested low patient understanding of the potential importance and reasons for perioperative statins. In addition, this study also suggested that the information regarding the importance of perioperative statins is not being relayed to the patient at the level of the surgeon or primary care physician. All physicians involved in perioperative care can offer improved patient education to promote compliance with statin therapy in hopes of a favorable impact on perioperative outcomes.


Assuntos
Compreensão , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Adesão à Medicação , Participação do Paciente/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Atorvastatina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA