Lead damage after cardiac implantable device replacement procedure: Comparison between electrical plasma tool and electrocautery.

BACKGROUND: Lead damage is a complication caused by lead manipulation or heating damage from conventional electrocautery (EC) after cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) replacement. Application of electrical plasma (PEAK PlasmaBlade) is a new technology that reportedly reduces this risk. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the effect of EC versus PEAK PlasmaBlade on lead parameters and complications after generator replacement procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 410 consecutive patients (840 leads) who underwent CIED replacement using EC (EC group) and 410 consecutive patients (824 leads) using PEAK PlasmaBlade (PlamaBlade group). Pacing lead impedance, incidence of lead damage, and complications were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Lead impedance increased in 393 leads (46.8%) in the EC group versus 282 leads (34.2%) in the PlasmaBlade group (p < .01) with average percent changes of 6.7% and 4.0% (p < .01), respectively. Lead impedance decreased in 438 leads (52.1%) in the EC group versus 507 leads (61.5%) in the PlasmaBlade group (p < .01) with average percent changes of -5.7% and -7.1% (p < .01), respectively. Lead damage requiring lead revision occurred in five leads (0.6%) or after five procedures (1.2%) in the EC group compared to three leads (0.4%, p = .50) or after three procedures (0.7%, p = .48) in the PlasmaBlade group. There were no significant differences in the procedural-related complications between the EC group (nine patients, 2.2%) and the PlasmaBlade group (five patients, 1.2%, p = .28). CONCLUSION: Conventional electrocautery can potentially damage lead insulations. However, this study shows that when used carefully electrocautery is as safe as the PEAK PlasmaBlade™.

Hybrid venous recanalization and cardiac implantable electronic device lead revision procedures: A single-center retrospective analysis of 38 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of hybrid recanalization procedures in a series of patients with obstructed central veins requiring cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) revision. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, 38 consecutive patients (24 M; age 60.5 ±â€¯16.2 years; range 25-87 years) with central venous obstruction underwent 42 recanalization interventions performed in conjunction with CIED revision or extraction. Fifty percent of patients (19/38) presented with veno-occlusive symptoms, and 13% (5/38) of patients had CIED leads with an ipsilateral upper extremity dialysis conduit. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent (38/42) of all procedures resulted in successful recanalization and CIED revision. Twenty-four percent (9/38) of all patients required secondary procedures due to recurrent stenosis, and 78% (7/9) of those requiring secondary procedures had indwelling dialysis conduits and/or clinical symptoms related to venous occlusion before the initial procedure. There were complications in 2 patients related to recanalization, and in 3 related to CIED revision. CONCLUSIONS: Recanalization of central venous stenosis/occlusion in patients with CIED can be technically challenging but is successful in most patients. Symptomatic patients and those with dialysis conduits often require more aggressive revascularization interventions and may be at increased risk of complication or need for secondary interventions.

Relationship of non-invasive quantification of myocardial blood flow to arrhythmic events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia contributes to arrhythmogenesis though its role is incompletely understood. Abnormal myocardial perfusion measured by PET imaging may predict ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in a high-risk population. METHODS: Patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators who had undergone rubidium-82 cardiac PET imaging were identified. Patients were stratified by median MBF and MFR values for analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the impact of myocardial perfusion on survival free of VT independent of critical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (124 (78%) males, median age 65.9 years, IQR [56.76-72.63]) were followed for 1.43 years IQR [0.83-2.21]. VA occurred in 29 patients (23.7%). After adjustment for ejection fraction, age, and sex, impaired stress MBF was associated with an increased risk of VA (adjusted HR per ml/min/g 1.52, 95% CI (1.01-2.31), P = 0.04). Summed rest and stress scores were not predictive of VA. Among patients with severe LV dysfunction, stress MBF remained an independent predictor of VA (adjusted HR per 1 ml/min/g HR 1.69, 95% CI (1.03-11.36), P = 0.03), while residual EF, summed rest, and summed stress scores were not (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired stress myocardial blood flow was associated with less survival free of ventricular arrhythmias.

Cryoballoon antral pulmonary vein isolation vs contact force-sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein and posterior left atrial isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The role of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) has not been well established in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Isolation of the left atrial posterior wall (BOX) after APVI has been suggested to improve the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) in PerAF. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare characteristics and clinical outcomes of APVI by CBA vs APVI + BOX by contact force-guided RFA (CF-RFA) in patients with PerAF. METHODS: APVI was performed in 167 consecutive patients with PerAF (mean age 64 ± 9 years; left atrial diameter 46 ± 6 mm) using CBA (n = 90) or CF-RFA (n = 77). After APVI, a roofline was created in 33 of 90 patients (37%) in the CBA group and BOX was performed in all 77 patients in the CF-RFA group. RESULTS: During 21 ± 10 months of follow-up after a single ablation procedure, 37 of 90 patients (41%) in the CBA group (APVI) and 39 of 77 (51%) in the CF-RFA group (APVI + BOX) remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) (P = .22). During repeat ablation, APVI + BOX using CF-RFA was performed in 20 of 90 patients (22%) and in 18 of 77 patients (23%) who initially underwent CBA or CF-RFA, respectively. At 19 ± 10 months after repeat ablation, sinus rhythm was maintained in 55 of 90 patients (61%) and 52 of 77 patients (68%) in the CBA and CF-RFA groups without AADs, respectively (P = .39). CONCLUSION: In PerAF, an initial approach of APVI by CBA or APVI + BOX by CF-RFA has a similar efficacy of 40%-50% without AADs. After repeat ablation for APVI + BOX by CF-RFA in ∼25%, sinus rhythm is maintained in 60%-70% of patients without AADs.

Techniques for successful early retrieval of the Micra transcatheter pacing system: A worldwide experience.

BACKGROUND: Experience with retrieval of the Micra transcatheter pacing system (TPS) is limited because of its relatively newer technology. Although abandonment of the TPS at end of life is recommended, certain situations such as endovascular infection or device embolization warrant retrieval. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report the worldwide experience with successful retrieval of the Micra TPS. METHODS: A list of all successful retrievals of the currently available leadless pacemakers (LPs) was obtained from the manufacturer of Micra TPS. Pertinent details of retrieval, such as indication, days postimplantation, equipment used, complications, and postretrieval management, were obtained from the database collected by the manufacturer. Other procedural details were obtained directly from the operators at each participating site. RESULTS: Data from the manufacturer consisted of 40 successful retrievals of the Micra TPS. Operators for 29 retrievals (73%) provided the consent and procedural details. Of the 29 retrievals, 11 patients underwent retrieval during the initial procedure (immediate retrieval); the other 18 patients underwent retrieval during a separate procedure (delayed retrieval). Median duration before delayed retrieval was 46 days (range 1-95 days). The most common reason for immediate retrieval was elevated pacing threshold after tether removal. The most common reasons for delayed retrieval included elevated pacing threshold at follow-up, endovascular infection, and need for transvenous device. Mean procedure duration was 63.11 ± 56 minutes. All retrievals involved snaring via a Micra TPS delivery catheter or steerable sheath. No serious complications occurred during the reported retrievals. CONCLUSION: Early retrieval of the Micra TPS is feasible and safe.

Ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using a second-generation cryoballoon catheter or contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter: A comparison of costs and long-term clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Although noninferiority of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency catheter ablation for antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) has been reported in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), it is not clear whether contact force sensing (CF-RFA) and CBA with the second-generation catheter have similar procedural costs and long-term outcomes. The objective of this study is to compare the long-term efficacy and cost implications of CBA and CF-RFA in patients with PAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A first APVI was performed in 146 consecutive patients (age: 63 ± 10 years, men: 95 [65%], left atrial diameter: 42 ± 6 mm) with PAF using CBA (71) or CF-RFA (75). Clinical outcomes and procedural costs were compared. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter with CBA than with CF-RFA (98 ± 39 vs. 158 ± 47 minutes, P < 0.0001). Despite a higher equipment cost in the CBA than the CF-RFA group, the total procedure cost was similar between the two groups (P = 0.26), primarily driven by a shorter procedure duration that resulted in a lower anesthesia cost. At 25 ± 5 months after a single ablation procedure, 51 patients (72%) in the CBA, and 55 patients (73%) in the CF-RFA groups remained free from atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy (P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: The procedure duration was approximately 60 minutes shorter with CBA than CF-RFA. The procedural costs were similar with both approaches. At 2 years after a single procedure, CBA and CF-RFA have similar single-procedure efficacies of 72-73%.