Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery for degenerative cervical disease performed by either single-level locking stand-alone cage (LSC) or anterior plate construct (APC). METHODS: We performed a comprehensive database search of Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews according to PRISMA guidelines and identified six articles that satisfied our inclusion criteria. We excluded all non-English language articles and articles which did not directly compare LSC and APC. Only papers which focussed on single-level ACDF were included in the study. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in blood loss, clinical outcomes (JOA, VAS, NDI scores) or radiological outcomes (cervical lordosis, segmental Cobb angle, subsidence and fusion) between the two groups. Operative time was significantly shorter in the LSC group (MD 7.2 min, 95% CI 0.3-14.1, p = 0.04). APC was associated with a statistically significant increase in dysphagia in the follow-up period (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.0-36.6, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: LSC and APC have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Further blinded randomised trials are required to establish conclusive evidence in favour of LSC with regards to minimising post-operative dysphagia. We also encourage future studies to make use of formalised dysphagia outcome measures in reporting complications.

The Influence of No Fault Compensation on Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study and systematic literature review. OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcomes for lumbar spinal fusion in both compensation and noncompensation patients in an environment of universal no fault compensation and then to compare these outcomes with those in worker's compensation and nonworkers compensation cohorts from other countries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compensation has an adverse effect on outcomes in spine fusion possibly based on adversarial environment, delayed resolution of claims and care, and increased compensation associated with prolonged disability. It is unclear whether a universal no fault compensation system would provide different outcomes for these patients. New Zealand's Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) provides universal no fault compensation for personal injury secondary to accident and offers an opportunity to compare results with differing provision of compensation. METHODS: A total of 169 patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion were assessed preoperatively, at 1 year, and at long-term follow-up out to 14 years, using functional outcome measures and health-related quality-of-life measures. Comparison was made between those covered and not covered by ACC for 3 distinct diagnostic categories. A systematic literature review comparing outcomes in Worker's Compensation and non-Compensation cohorts was also performed. RESULTS: The functional outcomes for both ACC and non-ACC cohorts were similar, with significant and comparable improvements over the first year that were then sustained out to long-term follow-up for both cohorts. At long-term follow-up, the health-related quality-of-life measures were the same between the 2 cohorts.The literature review revealed a marked difference in outcomes between worker's compensation and non-worker's compensation cohorts with a near universal inferior outcome for the compensation group. CONCLUSION: The similarities in outcomes of patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion under New Zealand's universal no fault compensation system, when compared with the dramatically inferior outcomes for these patients under other worker's compensation systems, suggest that the system of compensation has a major influence on patient outcomes, and that change of compensation to a universal no fault system is beneficial for patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Does preoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis in spinal surgery affect the incidence of thromboembolic complications and spinal epidural hematomas?

BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE) remain common surgical complications, often affecting patients without any prior warning. Postoperative spinal epidural hematomas (SEH) may have a devastating impact on a patient's recovery from a routine procedure. The effect of preoperative DVT prophylaxis administration on elective spinal patients has not previously been studied. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the incidence of preoperative DVT prophylaxis administration and the rate of postoperative DVT, PE, and SEH after elective spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Earlier studies have shown a postoperative DVT rate in elective spinal patients of between 0.3% and 31%, a PE rate of 0.2% to 0.9%, and a SEH rate of approximately 0.1%. METHODS: About 3870 patient notes, from 2004 to 2008 elective spinal procedures, were reviewed. DVT, PE, and SEH rates were compared between those patients receiving and not receiving preoperative DVT prophylaxis. RESULTS: The 36.9% of patients received preoperative DVT prophylaxis, and 19 patients suffered and DVT and/or PE. Nine of these had received preoperative prophylaxis, giving an odds ratio of 0.91. Sixteen patients suffered a SEH, and this gave an odds ratio of 1.33. The SEH's presented with a median postoperative time of 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative DVT prophylaxis does not influence the rate of postoperative DVT or PE among elective spinal patients. It probably does not influence SEH rate, and it is noted that SEH may present quite late, in contrast to currently accepted time courses.