Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(4): 1021-1029.e3, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35700858

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Females with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) treated with endovascular interventions have increased limb-based procedural complications compared with males. Little is known regarding long-term bleeding risk in these patients who often require long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. We hypothesize that females have a higher incidence of bleeding events compared with males in the year after endovascular intervention for PAD. METHODS: Adults (aged ≥65 years) who underwent endovascular revascularization for PAD between 2008 and 2015 in Medicare claims data were identified. Patients were allocated by prescribed postprocedural antithrombotic therapy, including (1) antiplatelet therapy, (2) anticoagulation therapy, (3) dual antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, and (4) no prescription antithrombotic therapy. Bleeding events were classified as gastrointestinal, intracranial, hematoma, airway, or other. Crude and covariate-standardized 30-, 90-, and 365-day cumulative incidence of bleeding events, overall and by sex, were estimated using Aalen-Johansen estimators accounting for death as a competing risk. Sex differences were identified using Gray's test. RESULTS: Of 31,593 eligible patients, 54% were females. Females were older (77.9 years vs 75.5 years) and tended to use antiplatelet therapy more often at 30, 90, and 365 days after the intervention. Clopidogrel was the most prescribed antiplatelet, and 32% of patients continued its use at 365 days. Anticoagulants were prescribed to 26.0% of patients at the time of the procedure, and only 8.8% continued anticoagulation at 365 days. Thirty-one percent of patients were diagnosed with a bleeding event within 1 year after the intervention. The cumulative incidence of any bleeding event during the postintervention period was higher in females compared with males with a risk difference of 3% between the sex cohorts (P < .01). Specifically, females had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and hematoma (P < .01), but a lower incidence of airway-related bleeding at each time point as compared with males (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Sex disparities in bleeding complications after endovascular intervention for PAD persist in the long term. Females are more likely to be readmitted with a bleeding complication up to 1 year after the procedure. Antithrombotic therapy disproportionately increases the risk of bleeding in females. Further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms responsible for abnormal coagulopathy in females after endovascular therapy.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Cardiovasculares , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Doença Arterial Periférica , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Hematoma , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 22(10): 564-77, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17135036

RESUMO

Oral administration of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) with and without the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in postmenopausal women is associated with side-effects that include increased risk of stroke and breast cancer. The current evidence that transdermal administration of estradiol may provide a safer alternative to orally administered CEE is reviewed. Transdermally administered estradiol has been shown to be an efficacious treatment for hot flushes possibly without the increase in blood clotting that is associated with administration of oral CEE. Further, natural progesterone may have a more beneficial spectrum of physiological effects than synthetic progestins. The substantial differences between CEE compared with estradiol and estriol, as well as the differences between synthetic MPA and natural progesterone, are detailed. Estriol is an increasingly popular alternative hormone therapy used for menopausal symptoms. There is evidence that estriol, by binding preferentially to estrogen receptor-beta, may inhibit some of the unwanted effects of estradiol. New clinical trials are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically or transdermally administered combinations of estradiol, estriol and progesterone. Future studies should focus on relatively young women who begin estrogen supplement use near the start of menopause.


Assuntos
Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/tendências , Menopausa/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Estriol/administração & dosagem , Estriol/fisiologia , Estrogênios Conjugados (USP)/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Previsões , Guias como Assunto , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/efeitos adversos , Fogachos/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Efeito Placebo , Progesterona/administração & dosagem , Esteroides/administração & dosagem
4.
Altern Med Rev ; 10(3): 216-21, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16164376

RESUMO

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is contraindicated in women with a history of breast cancer or a high risk of breast cancer development. Recent results from large clinical trials, such as the Women's Health Initiative, have demonstrated increased risks of thromboembolic events and a moderate increased risk of breast cancer in women using conjugated estrogens and progestogens. There is a need for viable non-hormonal alternative treatments to HRT, such as nutritional and botanical therapies, in this population of women, who tend to experience more significant vasomotor symptoms. Safe and effective therapies that do not stimulate breast cell proliferation could prove extremely useful for the management of such symptoms for women in both low- and high-risk breast cancer populations. As a non-hormonal treatment, anti-depressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), have been shown to improve hot flash symptoms in women. The proposed mechanism is related to an increase in serotonin allowing for an increase in the set point of the brain's thermoregulator. In small clinical studies, the administration of tryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5HTP), the precursors of serotonin, have been shown to reduce depressive symptoms, possibly by enhancing the synthesis of serotonin. Thus, increased serotonin levels may have the ability to decrease hot flashes in a mechanism similar to that of SSRIs without the risks of breast cell stimulation. This would be particularly desirable for menopausal women with breast cancer or with risks of breast cancer. This article discusses the background information on hot flashes, SSRIs, tryptophan, and 5HTP, and possible clinical application of 5HTP for menopausal women with breast cancer risk.


Assuntos
5-Hidroxitriptofano/uso terapêutico , Fogachos/tratamento farmacológico , 5-Hidroxitriptofano/metabolismo , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias da Mama/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Fogachos/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Serotonina/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA