Pemphigus-like hypereosinophilic syndrome with FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene: A challenging and uncommon clinical presentation.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is often associated with cutaneous manifestations, mostly pruritic lesions, urticaria and angioedema. Mucosal lesions are rarely seen in HES but, when present, are usually the first manifestation of the disease. The clinical presentation may be heterogeneous, including erosions, aphthae or ulcers, and can be easily confused with other mucocutaneous disorders. Here, we present the case of a 64-year-old man with severe chronic erosive oral mucositis simulating pemphigus in which the finding of persistent eosinophilia and elevation of B12 vitamin serum levels raised the suspicion of HES. The FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene (4q12) was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization and the patient was treated with imatinib mesylate with complete response of the disease.

Basophil Activation Test identifies the patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria suffering the most active disease.

INTRODUCTION: The basophil activation test showing CD63 up regulation could be a specific and sensitive in vitro complementary text to the in vivo autologous serum skin test for the activity assessment of the patients suffering autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. The aim of this study is to define the basophil activation test as a useful tool in clinical practice in order to identify those patients with more active disease. METHODS: We screened 139 patients (96 women) diagnosed of chronic spontaneous urticaria using simultaneously autologous serum skin test and basophil activation test and their relationship with disease activity. RESULTS: Positive autologous serum skin test was found in 56.8%; from them, 31.6% were basophil activation test positive. Negative autologous serum skin test result was found in the 43.2% of the sample that showed negative CD63 expression results in all cases, except one. Patients with positive autologous serum skin test and positive CD63 by basophil activation test showed significant higher Urticaria Activity Score of 7 days (P = 0.004) and of 3 weeks (P = 0.001) than patients with positive autologous serum skin test and negative CD63 (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 26.57 ± 10.56 versus 18.40 ± 12.05 for the Urticaria Activity Score of 7 days and 56.47 ± 23.78 versus 39.88 ± 25.44 for the Urticaria Activity Score of 3 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: The CD63 expression on basophils appears as a reliable in vitro marker, useful in clinical practice in combination with autologous serum skin test to define chronic spontaneous urticaria patients with the highest urticaria activity that impairs a normal life.

Epidermal Choristoma of the Tongue Mimicking a Congenital Melanotic Macule.

We report the fifth case of epidermal choristoma of the oral cavity in a Caucasian newborn with a congenital melanotic macule on the dorsum of the tongue. Epidermal choristoma is an exceedingly rare and benign condition probably caused by a developmental abnormality. It is identified according to the presence of normal skin in an abnormal location. Histologically it is identified according to areas of stratified epithelium and hyperpigmentation of the basal layer along with cutaneous adnexal structures (hair follicles, sebaceous or sweat glands). The clinical presentation is variable, but most of the cases described presented with a congenital lingual pigmented macule. These lesions should be included within the differential diagnosis of congenital lingual macules and distinguished from other entities such as congenital lingual melanotic macules and melanocytic lesions. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice. Epidermal choristoma is a benign condition that probably is underdiagnosed because it is a new and rare entity, and dermatologists should be aware of it.

Verruciform xanthoma developing in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A sheep in wolf's clothing.

A 23-year-old male affected of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa presented with a 2-month history of a growing verrucous plaque on the right flank. The clinical features and evolution suggested the diagnosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathological examination showed hyperkeratosis, parakeratossis, and verrucous acanthosis and numerous large xanthoma cells in the papillary dermis. Reflectance confocal microscopy disclosed the absence of epidermal atypia and the presence of aggregates of reflecting cells at dermal-epidermal junction and upper dermis. These cells were ultrastructurally characterized and corresponded to foamy histiocytes. Verruciform xanthoma is a benign reactive lesion that has occasionally been reported to develop in chronically eroded areas in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. In this group of patients, verruciform xanthoma may clinically mimic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and a correct diagnosis is crucial to avoid inappropriate aggressive therapeutic approaches. In vivo noninvasive image technologies such as reflectance confocal microscopy may be helpful diagnostic tools in this clinical setting.