Every cloud has a silver lining: COVID-19 chest-CT screening prevents unnecessary cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Unenhanced chest CT can identify incidental findings (IFs) leading to management strategy change. We report our institutional experience with routine chest-CT as preoperative screening tool during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the impact of IFs. METHODS: All patients scheduled for cardiac surgery from May 1st to December 31st 2020, underwent preoperative unenhanced chest-CT according to COVID-19 pandemic institutional protocol. We have analyzed IFs incidence, reported consequent operative changes, and identified IFs clinical determinants. RESULTS: Out of 447, 278 patients were included. IFs rate was 7.2% (20/278): a solid mass (11/20, 55%), lymphoproliferative disease (1/20, 5%), SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (2/20, 10%), pulmonary artery chronic thromboembolism (1/20, 5%), anomalous vessel anatomy (2/20, 10%), voluminous hiatal hernia (1/20, 5%), mitral annulus calcification (1/20, 5%), and porcelain aorta (1/20, 5%) were reported. Based on IFs, 4 patients (20%-4/278, 1.4%) were not operated, 8 (40%-8/278, 2.9%) underwent a procedure different from the one originally planned one, and 8 (40%-8/278, 2.9%) needed additional preoperative investigations before undergoing the planned surgery. At univariate regression, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and history of cancer were significantly more often present in patients presenting with significant IFs. History of malignancy was identified as the only independent determinant of significant IFs at chest-CT (OR=4.27 IQR: [1.14-14.58], P=0.0227). CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced chest-CT as a preoperative screening tool in cardiac surgery led to incidental detection of significant clinical findings, which justified even procedures cancellation. Malignancy history is a determinant for CT incidental findings and could support a tailored screening approach for high-risk patients.

Atrioventricular node ablation and pacing for atrial tachyarrhythmias: A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) and pacemaker (PM) is performed in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) unresponsive to medical treatment and percutaneous ablation. This meta-analysis evaluated results after AVNA and PM. METHODS: Primary and secondary endpoints were early/late overall/cardiac-related mortality and early/late postoperative complications. Meta-regression explored mortality and preoperative characteristics relation. RESULTS: We selected 93 studies with 11,340 patients: 9105 right ventricular (RV)-PM, and 2235 biventricular PM (cardiac resynchronization therapy, CRT). Malignant arrhythmia (2.5%), heart failure (2.4%), and lead dislodgement (2.0%) were most common periprocedural complications. Pooled estimated 30-day mortality was 1.08% (95%CI:0.65-1.77). At 19.9 months median follow-up (IQR: 10.3-34 months), rehospitalization (0.79%/month) and heart failure (0.48%/month) were the most frequent complications. Overall mortality incidence rate (IR) was 0.43%/month (95%CI:0.36-0.51), and cardiac death IR 0.27%/month (95%CI:0.22-0.32). No mortality determinants emerged in the AVNA CRT subgroup. AVNA RV-PM subgroup univariable meta-regression showed inverse relationship between age, ejection fraction (EF), and late cardiac death (Beta = -0.0709 ± 0.0272; p = 0.0092 and Beta = -0.0833 ± 0.0249; p = 0.0008). Coronary artery disease (CAD) was directly associated to follow-up overall/cardiac mortality at univariable (Beta = 0.0550 ± 0.0136, p < 0.0001; Beta = 0.0540 ± 0.0130, p < 0.0001) and multivariable (Beta = 0.0460 ± 0.0189, p = 0.152; Beta = 0.0378 ± 0.0192, p = 0.0491) meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS: Solid long-term evidence supporting AVNA and pace is lacking. Younger patients with reduced LVEF% have increased follow-up cardiac mortality after AVNA RV and may require CRT. Alternative strategies to maintain sinus rhythm and ventricular synchronism should be compared to AVNA to support future treatment strategies.

A multicentre roadmap to restart elective cardiac surgery after COVID-19 peak in an Italian epicenter.

BACKGROUND: During the Italian Phase-2 of the coronavirus pandemic, it was possible to restart elective surgeries. Because hospitals were still burdened with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, it was focal to design a separate "clean path" for the surgical candidates and determine the possible effects of major surgery on previously infected patients. METHODS: From May to July 2020 (postpandemic peak), 259 consecutive patients were scheduled for elective cardiac surgery in three different centers. Our original roadmap with four screening steps included: a short item questionnaire (STEP-1), nasopharyngeal swab (NP) (STEP-2), computed tomography (CT)-scan using COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO-RADS) scoring (STEP-3), and final NP swab before discharge (STEP-4). RESULTS: Two patients (0.8%) resulted positive at STEP-2: one patient was discharged home for quarantine, the other performed a CT-scan (CO-RADS: <2), and underwent surgery for unstable angina. Chest-CT was positive in 6.3% (15/237) with mean CO-RADS of 2.93 ± 0.8. Mild-moderate lung inflammation (CO-RADS: 2-4) did not delay surgery. Perioperative mortality was 1.15% (3/259), and cumulative incidence of pulmonary complications was 14.6%. At multivariable analysis, only age and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time were independently related to pulmonary complications composite outcome (age >75 years: odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-5.57; p = 0.011; CPB >90 min. OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.84-10.16; p = 0.001). At 30 days, no periprocedural contagion and rehospitalization for COVID-19 infections were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our structured roadmap supports the safe restarting of an elective cardiac surgery list after a peak of a still ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in an epicenter area. Mild to moderate CT residuals of coronavirus pneumonia do not justify elective cardiac surgery procrastination.

Gender-Dependent Clinical Outcome and Other Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality Following Out-Of-Center Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Extracorporeal Life Support: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-center extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) implantation for the treatment of acute cardiorespiratory failure with subsequent transport to a tertiary care center has been introduced successfully into the medical practice. However, due to the very specific and resource intensive nature of this therapeutic concept, it seems important to generate algorithms for adequate patient selection. The aim of our study was to analyze the impact of patients' gender on early clinical outcome in this specific therapeutic scenario. METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients treated by out-of-center ECMO/ECLS implantation and subsequent transport and treatment in our tertiary care cardiovascular center within the Hallesche Extracorporeal Life Support Program (HELP) retrospectively were analyzed, regarding the impact of patients' gender on early clinical outcome. RESULTS: Mechanical circulatory support successfully was weaned in two-thirds of the male patients. This result was achieved in only one-third of the female patients (59.4% in male vs. 33.3% in female, P = .0267). Overall survival significantly was higher in the male group (62.5% in male versus 30.3% in female, P = .0052). In uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis, female gender was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (uni: OR:3.833, CI:1.597-9.745, P = .0034; multi: OR:3.477, CI:1.146-11.494, P = .0322). Worse outcome also was associated with following independent predictors, age, SOFA score, lactate and ventilation time pre-ECMO/ECLS implantation. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates a worse early survival for women, following emergent out-of- center ECMO/ECLS implantation and subsequent transport and treatment in our tertiary care cardiovascular center. Gender should be included in patient selection algorithms while basic research approaches are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying these gender- specific outcome disparities.

Aortic annulus angulation does not attenuate procedural success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a novel self-expanding bioprosthesis.

The objectives of the study were to evaluate the impact of aortic angulation (AA) on success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a new generation self-expandable prosthesis (Medtronic Evolut R®). Specific anatomical conditions, such as for example the presence of a horizontal aorta with elevated AA, have seemed to pose a significant challenge for the correct positioning and consequent functioning of self-expandable TAVR prostheses. We assessed 146 patients treated with Evolut R. AA was measured at computed tomography and two groups were identified using as cutoff the mean AA value. Acute outcomes were collected and compared. AA mean value was 49.6 ± 9.4° (AA ≥ 50°: 76 and AA < 50°: 70 patients). Risk profile (Logistic euroSCORE: AA ≥ 50°: 15.7; 75% IQR: 11.1-22.1 vs. AA < 50°: 14.7; 75% IQR: 10.7-24.0; p = 0.8) was equivalent. Perioperative results were similar: valve resheathing (AA ≥ 50°: 21.0% vs. AA < 50°: 24.2%; p = 0.6), recapturing (AA ≥ 50°: 19.7% vs. AA < 50°: 25.7%; p = 0.3), fluoroscopy time (AA ≥ 50°: 11.1 IQR: 8.6-17.0 min. vs. AA < 50°: 11.0 IQR: 8.0-15.7 min.; p = 0.9), and contrast agent use (AA ≥ 50°: 99.0 ± 41.8 ml. vs. AA < 50°: 104.2 ± 38.5 ml.; p = 0.4). At discharge, moderate paravalvular leak was present in 8/76 (10.5%) of the AA ≥ 50° and 6/70 (8.6%) of the AA < 50° (p = 0.7) patients. Severe paravalvular leak, implantation of a second valve, and/or conversion to surgery did not occur. Early safety (AA ≥ 50°: 7.8% vs. AA < 50°: 5.7%; p = 0.6) was similar in the two groups. AA did not affect procedural outcomes and valve performance of the Evolut R prosthesis.

Transaortic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Learning Curve, Perioperative, and Midterm Follow-Up Results of a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: We present our initial institutional experience with transaortic (TAo) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a self-expanding aortic bioprosthesis. METHODS: A total of 106 patients underwent TAo TAVI with Medtronic CoreValve through a small partial upper sternotomy. We focus our analysis on the overall perioperative results, procedural learning curve (first 30 patients), and midterm follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: VARC-2 device success was achieved in 95 patients (89%), and there were no intraoperative deaths. Nine patients (8.4%) required a second valve and conversion to standard surgery was required in 2 patients (1.8%). The final aortic insufficiency was grade 0 in 65 patients (62%) and grade 1 in 39 (37%). Although patients treated in the TAo TAVI learning phase required a significantly longer radiation time and contrast agent use, device success (93.4% versus 88.2%, P = .7) and prostheses hemodynamics were similar. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 12% (13/106). At a median follow-up of 392 days (IQR: 216-494 days) estimated overall 1-year survival was 72%. No significant differences were reported in terms of 30-day and 1-year observed mortality, and estimated 1-year survival in the learning and later phase of TAo TAVI. CONCLUSION: TAo TAVI can be performed safely even in the very early phase of the learning curve. Although satisfactory results can be achieved from the beginning, a significant reduction in contrast agent use and radiological exposure are expected as the technique is mastered. Good hemodynamics have been documented and should be further improved with modifications achieved in the TAVI self-expandable valves technology.

Shocks after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in idiopathic cardiomyopathy patients: a myocardial biopsy study.

Prediction of follow-up shock is crucial to stratify patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) requiring implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The objective of the article is to assess the predictive value of endo-myocardial biopsy (EMB) towards ICD shock and follow-up mortality. A series of patients with DCM scheduled for ICD implantation underwent EMB to further determine the genesis of DCM. Presence of fibrosis and inflammation was documented and related to outcomes. A total of 240 patients were referred for ICD as primary (56%) and secondary (44%) prophylaxis. EMB showed myocardial fibrosis in 55.4%, inflammation in 55.7%, and viral genomic material in 60%. Median follow-up was 39 months (1-209). Appropriate and inappropriate shocks occurred in 29.2 and 20.4%. At logistic regression, determinants of appropriate shock were ICD indication for secondary prophylaxis (direct relationship: p = 0.009, OR 3.4, CI 1.3-8.8) and presence of inflammation at EMB (inverse relationship: p = 0.04, OR 0.4, CI 0.1-0.9). Moreover, the sole determinant of inappropriate shock was age at implant (inverse relationship: p = 0.003, OR = 0.9, CI 0.90-0.98). Overall mean estimated survival was 168 months and 5-year survival was 83%. Degree of improvement in LVEF% was the sole determinant of follow-up mortality (inverse relationship p = 0.02; HR = 0.9; CI 0.88-0.99). Present selection criteria for ICDs implant rely mainly on LVEF% that lacks sensitivity and specificity. EMB can identify the substrate of increased or reduced life-threatening arrhythmias. Presence of inflammation is a positive prognostic factor for reduced arrhythmogenic risk, independently by the ICD implantation indication.

New generation cardioverter-defibrillator lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole: Long-term performance.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim is to present the long-term performance of a new generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) electrode with floating atrial dipole (Linox S DX, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). BACKGROUND: The single ICD electrode with a floating dipole in the atrial chamber was introduced about 15 years ago to overcome risk of inappropriate shock. METHODS: After implantation, internal electrocardiogram data were prospectively collected via telemonitoring (Home Monitoring, Biotronik). RESULTS: A total of 93 patients (81.5% male, 18.5% female; 58.9 ± 12.3 years) were implanted with a single-chamber ICD using the Linox S DX. Patients were followed up for a median of 693 days (33-2,460 days). At time of implantation average p-wave value was 3.5 ± 1.7 mV and remained stable throughout follow-up with an average value of 3.7 ± 1 mV (P = 0.2). A total of 460 arrhythmic episodes were recorded and 185 (40.2%) were incorrectly stratified by the device software. Seven patients (7.5%) experienced inappropriate ICD therapy. In three patients, VT episodes were not detected and remained untreated. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Linox S DX lead presents a satisfactory long-term stability of the atrial sensing, many of the messages sent to the device during follow-up were incorrectly classified by the ICD software. As a result, inappropriate therapy occurred with a rate similar to that observed with dual-chamber ICDs, but some malignant arrhythmias remained undiagnosed and untreated while occurring. Results in larger prospective cohorts should be analyzed and software improvements of the device should be suggested to overcome these potential drawbacks.

Previous malignancy is an independent predictor of follow-up mortality after percutaneous treatment of mitral valve regurgitation by means of MitraClip.

AIMS: To investigate the prognostic burden of previously diagnosed and treated malignancies in candidates for percutaneous mitral valve repair (MVR) with MitraClip. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 165 patients underwent MVR and 19 (11.5%) had been previously treated for malignancy and considered healed with life expectancy over 1 year at time of percutaneous MVR. There was a significant trend for an increased overall risk profile (euroSCORE II 14.0±11.4 vs 10.0±6.7, P=.01) in patients with a previous diagnosis of neoplasia. Moreover, neoplastic patients had lower device success rates (78.9% vs 97.3%; P=.001), longer hospitalization (12.3±10.6 vs 7.5±4.9 days, P=.001), and higher 30-day mortality (10.5% vs 2.7%, P=.09). Kaplan-Meier overall estimated 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year survival of the overall cohort was 72%, 61%, 48%, and 44%, respectively. Estimated 1- and 2-year survival were 44.4% and 22.2 % in patients with previous neoplasia and 75.3% and 65% in the remaining patients (P<.0001). Median survival was 312 days in the neoplastic group (CI 95%: 182.6-441.4 days) and 1209 days in the remaining patients (CI 95%: 758.8-1659.2 days) (P<.0001). At Cox regression, the strongest determinant for mortality was an anamnesis for neoplasia (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.3, P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Previous neoplasm is a significant independent predictor of increased mortality after MVR with MitraClip. This association is even stronger than that of other cardiac and overall comorbidities and should be kept into consideration when referring patients for treatment.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the direct flow medical prosthesis: Impact of native aortic valve calcification degree on outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: We present our single center experience with the direct flow medical (DFM) prosthesis addressing the impact of native aortic valve (AV) calcification degree on outcomes. BACKGROUND: The DFM® has been introduced for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The valve has a nonmetallic and inflatable support structure. METHODS: Patients were divided in two groups according to preoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT): group I moderate calcification and group II heavy calcification of the total AV area. We evaluated 118 patients: 53 (45%) group I and 65 (55%) group II. RESULTS: Preoperative trans-AV gradient and calcification extension across the aortic unit were significantly higher in group II (P = 0.008 and P < 0.0001). CT perimeter derived annular diameter (group I 24.7 ± 2.1 mm vs. group II 24.8 ± 1.9; P = 0.6) and implanted prosthesis size (group I 26.1 ± 1.5 mm vs. group II 25.7 ± 1.5; P = 0.1) were similar. Hemodynamics were similar: mean gradient 16.1 ± 5.9 mm Hg (group I) vs. 17.3 ± 6.5 mm Hg (group II) (P = 0.3). Total aortic regurgitation (AR) was mild in 5.7% in group I and 20% in group II (P = 0.03). None developed moderate/severe AR. Heavy AV calcification was the sole independent determinant for mild regurgitation (P = 0.02; OR = 7; 95% CI: 1.2-37.6). Follow-up (289 days; 40-760 days) estimated survival was 88.1% (group I) and 93.8% (group II) (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Independent of AV calcification degree, adequate sizing and implantation can be achieved with the DFM®. Although higher burden of calcification increases the rate of mild AR, no patient developed moderate and severe AR. Short-term estimated survival was not influenced by calcification degree. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in obese patients: Overcoming technical challenges and maintaining adequate hemodynamic performance using new generation prostheses.

BACKGROUND: Second-generation TAVI prostheses may enhance the procedure reducing operative time and complications rate, maintaining adequate valve hemodynamic performance. We present our results with 2 new generation trans-catheter aortic valve (TAVI) prostheses in obese patients. METHODS: A series of 172 patients underwent trans-femoral TAVI with new generation prostheses (Direct Flow Medical, DFM®, and LOTUS®). Two groups were identified according to body mass index (BMI): group NO (125) BMI<30kg/m(2) and group O (47) BMI≥30kg/m(2). RESULTS: Trans-femoral approach was possible in all patients without conversion to conventional surgery/cardiopulmonary bypass. Operative/fluoroscopy time and contrast use were comparable. Vascular and bleeding complications were also equally represented in the 2 groups. Thirty-day mortality was 7.2% in group NO and 6.4% in group O (p=0.9). At discharge, aortic regurgitation was absent/mild in 96% of group NO and in all patients in group O (p=0.3). Mild prosthetic stenosis was reported in 3.8% of the patients in group NO and 2.2% in group O. No moderate/severe prosthetic stenosis was reported. Estimated 1-year survival was 93.1% in group NO and 83.2% in group O (p=0.6). Estimated 1-year freedom from MACCE was 74.7% in group NO and 62.8% in group O (p=0.4). At follow-up echocardiography no significant differences were noticed in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Second generation TAVI prostheses allow for safe and effective procedures in obese patients. In spite of patient's body habitus, agile prosthesis placement will lead to optimized hemodynamics. Valve and clinical performance are confirmed at follow-up.

Early distal remodeling after elephant trunk repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Hemodynamic alterations occur when the elephant trunk (ET) technique is adopted to treat extensive aortic aneurysms. In planning the 2nd stage operation to complete ET repair, surgeons must weigh an adequate recovery time after initial surgery against the risk of postoperative ET-related complications. The purpose of this study was to understand the mechanistic link between the flow alteration caused by the ET graft and the development of premature aortic rupture before the 2nd stage operation. Specifically, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis was performed using the CT imaging data of aorta at different stages of ET repair, and then computational variables were compared to those observed in patients who underwent a prophylactic 2nd stage operation to complete aortic repair. Results show that intramural stress exerted near the distal ET anastomosis (IMS=37.5kPa) at the time of urgent intervention was comparable to that of the extensive aortic aneurysm (IMS=47.4kPa) at initial in-hospital admission, but was considerably higher than that occurring after the 1st stage procedure (IMS=3.5kPa). Pressure index suggested higher peri-graft pressurization than aortic lumen pressure during diastole, imparting an apparent risk of aortic dilatation. These critical hemodynamic and structural parameters are related to the impending rupture of descending aorta observed clinically and can thus guide prophylactic intervention and optimal timing for the 2nd stage operation of a ET technique.

Stanford Type A Acute Retrograde Aortic Dissections: From Surgical to Endovascular Strategy?

Acute type A retrograde aortic dissection is characterized by a port of entry located in the descending aorta near the subclavian take-off, and is currently treated with surgery. Our experience with two patients who underwent a complicated postoperative course stimulated a review of the current literature and discussion of possible alternative strategies in light of recent advances in endovascular treatment.

Transcatheter, inflatable, and fully repositionable aortic valve: Preliminary results using a modified implantation technique.

OBJECTIVES: We present our experience with an inflatable, non-metallic, fully retrievable, and repositionable transcatheter aortic valve [Direct Flow® Medical (DFM)] focusing on technical features adopted during implantation. BACKGROUND: Implantation techniques of new generation percutaneous aortic valves are still developing and with experience implementations are described. METHODS: The "low pressure" (initial valve inflation at 4 ATM, lower than the recommended 12 ATM) and the "alternate aortic curve" techniques (initial valve pulling either from the wire running on the side of the inner or from the one on the outer aortic curve) are part of our modified protocol for DFM® implantation. RESULTS: Forty-two consecutive patients underwent TAVI with DFM. The "low pressure" technique was used in all patients. In 27 (64.3%) patients the bulkiest calcifications were on the inner aortic curve side, and an inner curve technique was used to initiate valve pulling toward the annular hinge point. In the remaining 15 (35.7%) patients, an outer curve technique was used. Neither pull-through nor re-valving was reported. Valve performance showed mean gradient of 8.9 mm Hg. Mild paravalvular leak was reported in seven (16%) patients. No one experienced moderate or severe aortic insufficiency. Thirty-day mortality was 9.5% (4/42). CONCLUSION: The "low pressure technique" and the "alternate curve technique" guarantee an anatomy and patient tailored approach to achieve controlled and finely tuned valve seating.

Perioperative and mid-term results of endovascular management of complicated type B aortic dissection using a proximal thoracic endoprosthesis and selective distal bare stenting.

OBJECTIVES: To present results of endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection. METHODS: Patients with acutely complicated type B aortic dissection extending from the left sub-clavian artery to the abdominal aorta were treated. The strategy involved the placement of a covered endoprosthesis to seal the primary entry tear and, in cases where malperfusion persisted, distal extension with uncovered stents, to enhance true lumen (TL) expansion and reperfusion of the ischaemic arterial branches originating from the TL. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included. Mean age was 63.1 (37-79) years and malperfusion syndrome occurred in 71.4%. Average aortic coverage with endoprostheses was 220.6 mm (136-355 mm). In 17 cases (48.5%), distal extension with uncovered stents was necessary. Thirty-day major morbidity was 28.5%, and mortality 2.8%. At follow-up (25.6 ± 19.5 months; 4-73 months), overall mortality was 15.2%, and aortic mortality 12.1%. Additional aortic intervention was necessary in 18.2%. Although patients undergoing distal extension with bare metal stents suffered most often from preoperative malperfusion, no significant differences were noted in the 30-day and follow-up clinical results. Follow-up angio-computed tomography showed complete thrombosis of the false lumen in the proximal half of the thoracic aorta in 76.4%. Patients treated with bare stents had significantly larger aortic TL sizes, at the different abdominal aorta levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with complicated type B aortic dissection, tailored elongation with uncovered stents is a safe treatment of persistent malperfusion. Although the results presented are encouraging, randomized data and a longer follow-up are required to confirm benefits and complications of this strategy.

Complicated type B aortic dissection should not be treated with uncovered stents: a lesson not yet learned.

Whenever some basic rules for endovascular aortic repair of type B aortic dissection are not followed, iatrogenic complications may develop. A 64-year-old gentleman was referred to our institution for revision of previous treatment of complex type B aortic dissection with 2 bare stents. At 3 months, the most proximal aortic bare stent had entered, via the proximal tear, the false lumen. Aortic expansion and dynamic obstruction at the level of the renal arteries had also developed. In a first step, we removed the proximal aortic bare stent surgically. Few days later, 2 covered endografts were implanted into the true lumen of the thoracic aorta with clinical success. The rationale for using endovascular treatment in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection is coverage of the entry tear with covered nonoversized endografts. Negative results are achieved whenever these very simple rules are not strictly followed.