Point-of-care detection of fibrosis in liver transplant surgery using near-infrared spectroscopy and machine learning.

Introduction: Visual assessment and imaging of the donor liver are inaccurate in predicting fibrosis and remain surrogates for histopathology. We demonstrate that 3-s scans using a handheld near-infrared-spectroscopy (NIRS) instrument can identify and quantify fibrosis in fresh human liver samples. Methods: We undertook NIRS scans on 107 samples from 27 patients, 88 from 23 patients with liver disease, and 19 from four organ donors. Results: Liver disease patients had a median immature fibrosis of 40% (interquartile range [IQR] 20-60) and mature fibrosis of 30% (10%-50%) on histopathology. The organ donor livers had a median fibrosis (both mature and immature) of 10% (IQR 5%-15%). Using machine learning, this study detected presence of cirrhosis and METAVIR grade of fibrosis with a classification accuracy of 96.3% and 97.2%, precision of 96.3% and 97.0%, recall of 96.3% and 97.2%, specificity of 95.4% and 98.0% and area under receiver operator curve of 0.977 and 0.999, respectively. Using partial-least square regression machine learning, this study predicted the percentage of both immature (R 2 = 0.842) and mature (R 2 = 0.837) with a low margin of error (root mean square of error of 9.76% and 7.96%, respectively). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a point-of-care NIRS instrument can accurately detect, quantify and classify liver fibrosis using machine learning.

Early immune pressure initiated by tissue-resident memory T cells sculpts tumor evolution in non-small cell lung cancer.

Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells provide immune defense against local infection and can inhibit cancer progression. However, it is unclear to what extent chronic inflammation impacts TRM activation and whether TRM cells existing in tissues before tumor onset influence cancer evolution in humans. We performed deep profiling of healthy lungs and lung cancers in never-smokers (NSs) and ever-smokers (ESs), finding evidence of enhanced immunosurveillance by cells with a TRM-like phenotype in ES lungs. In preclinical models, tumor-specific or bystander TRM-like cells present prior to tumor onset boosted immune cell recruitment, causing tumor immune evasion through loss of MHC class I protein expression and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In humans, only tumors arising in ES patients underwent clonal immune evasion, unrelated to tobacco-associated mutagenic signatures or oncogenic drivers. These data demonstrate that enhanced TRM-like activity prior to tumor development shapes the evolution of tumor immunogenicity and can impact immunotherapy outcomes.

Australian Donation and Transplantation Biobank: A Research Biobank Integrated Within a Deceased Organ and Tissue Donation Program.

We aimed to facilitate the donation of tissue samples for research by establishing a centralized system integrated in the organ donation program for collection, storage, and distribution of samples (the Australian Donation and Transplantation Biobank [ADTB]). Methods: Feasibility of a research biobank integrated within the deceased organ and tissue donation program was assessed. DonateLife Victoria sought consent for ADTB donation after consent was received for organ donation for transplantation from the donor's senior available next of kin. ADTB samples were collected during donation surgery and distributed fresh to researchers or stored for future research. The main outcome measures were ADTB donation rates, ADTB sample collection, ADTB sample use, and to identify ethical considerations. Results: Over 2 y, samples were collected for the ADTB from 69 donors (28% of 249 donors). Samples were obtained from the spleen (n = 59, 86%), colon (n = 57, 83%), ileum (n = 56, 82%), duodenum (n = 55, 80%), blood (n = 55, 80%), bone marrow (n = 55, 80%), skin (n = 54, 78%), mesenteric lymph nodes (n = 56, 81%), liver (n = 21, 30%), lung (n = 29, 42%), and lung-draining lymph node (n = 29, 42%). Heart (n = 20), breast (n = 1), and lower urinary tract (n = 1) samples were obtained in the second year. Five hundred fifty-six samples were used in 19 ethics-approved research projects spanning the fields of immunology, microbiology, oncology, anatomy, physiology, and surgery. Conclusions: The integration of routine deceased donation and transplantation activities with a coordinated system for retrieval and allocation of donor samples for use in a range of research projects is feasible and valuable.

Common Criteria for Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Have No Significant Impact on Posttransplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although it is intense in health care resources, by facilitating assessment and reconditioning, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has the potential to expand the donor pool and improve lung transplant outcomes. However, inclusion criteria used in EVLP trials have not been validated. METHODS: This retrospective study from 2014 to 2018 reviewed our local state-based donation organization donor records as well as subsequent recipient outcomes to explore the relation between EVLP indications used in clinical trials and recipient outcomes. The primary outcome was primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 24 hours, with 30-day mortality and posttransplant survival time as secondary outcomes, compared with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: From 705 lung donor referrals, 304 lung transplantations were performed (use rate of 42%); 212 of recipients (70%) met at least 1 of the commonly cited EVLP initiation criteria. There was no significant difference in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 or 30-day mortality between recipients with or without an EVLP indication (10.2% versus 7.8%, P = .51; and 2.4% versus 0%, P = .14, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed no significant relationship between commonly cited EVLP criteria and primary graft dysfunction grade 3 or survival time. Recipient outcomes were significantly associated with recipient diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: At least 1 commonly cited criterion for EVLP initiation was present in 70% of the transplanted donors, and yet it did not predict clinical results; acceptable outcomes were seen in both subgroups. To discover the true utility of EVLP beyond good clinical management and focus EVLP on otherwise unacceptable lungs, a reconsideration of EVLP inclusion criteria is required.

A Retrospective Review of Declined Lung Donors: Estimating the Potential of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Even in the extended-criteria era, the reasons for declining lung donors are not always clear. Furthermore, it has not been determined how many actual declined lungs would be retrieved by ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) beyond that already achieved in centers with an existing high utilization rate. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed all lung donor referrals between 2014 and 2018, including detailed formal referrals and preliminary notifications. This study categorized reasons for lung donor non-acceptance and estimated how many declined grafts could have been theoretically retrievable by using EVLP. RESULTS: In total, 966 lung donor candidates were referred, including 313 transplanted donors, 336 declined donors after detailed referrals (group A) and 258 preliminary declined. In group A, the primary reasons for refusal were lung quality issues (49%), general medical issues (25%), and organization issues (26%), combined with secondary reasons in many cases. Main lung quality issues were an extensive smoking history, abnormal chest radiography, and underlying lung disease. Although 73 declined lung donors had indications for EVLP, the retrievable lungs decreased to only 30 cases after considering the details of all clinical contraindications and organizational issues. Nevertheless, 59 intended donation after circulatory death donors did not progress to death after withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support in the required timeframe, and EVLP may have an emerging additional role here. CONCLUSIONS: Based on commonly cited criteria for EVLP indication, the number of EVLP retrievable lung donors represented only a small portion of declined donor lungs referred to our center from the state donation network.

Conflicts of interest in the context of end of life care for potential organ donors in Australia.

End-of-life (EOL) care has become an integral part of intensive care medicine and includes the exploration of possibilities for deceased organ and tissue donation. Donation physicians are specialist doctors with expertise in EOL processes encompassing organ and tissue donation, who contribute significantly to improvements in organ and tissue donation services in many countries around the world. Donation physicians are usually also intensive care physicians, and thus they may be faced with the dual obligation of caring for dying patients and their families in the intensive care unit (ICU), whilst at the same time ensuring organ and tissue donation is considered according to best practice. This dual obligation poses specific ethical challenges that need to be carefully understood by clinicians, institutions and health care networks. These obligations are complementary and provide a unique skillset to care for dying patients and their families in the ICU. In this paper we review current controversies around EOL care in the ICU, including the use of palliative analgesia and sedation specifically with regards to withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support, the usefulness of the so-called doctrine of double effect to guide ethical decision-making, and the management of potential or perceived conflicts of interest in the context of dual professional roles.

Influence of the donor history of tobacco and marijuana smoking on early and intermediate lung transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Donor smoking histories are common in the lung donor pool, which are known to adversely affect post-lung transplant (LTx) outcomes. However, no evidence is available about smoking status (current/former), cumulative dose effect, or the combined effect of tobacco with marijuana. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our local state-based donation organization records and subsequent LTx recipient outcomes. The primary outcome was 3-year graft survival, with cause of death as secondary outcomes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to explore smoking status or cumulative dose effect. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2018, 304 LTxs were performed: 133 (44%) LTxs were from never-smoker donors, 68 (22%) from former-smoker donors, and 103 (34%) from current-smoker donors. Of the current-smoker donors, 48% had a marijuana use history. There was no significant difference in early mortality, although recipients who received transplants from current-smoker donors had a lower 3-year graft survival than those who received transplants from never smokers. Multivariate modeling showed that current tobacco smoking (hazard ratio: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.13-3.99) and a more than 5-year weekly marijuana use (hazard ratio: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.29-6.87) were independent donor factors affecting graft survival. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction accounted for a higher proportion of the causes of death within 3 years after LTx where lungs from current/former smokers were utilized compared with those from never smokers (chronic lung allograft dysfunction-cause mortality: 11%, 7%, 0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of LTx donors had smoking histories. Current tobacco use or more than 5-year weekly marijuana smoking history adversely affected 3-year graft survival. Our findings support the importance of obtaining a detailed donor tobacco and marijuana smoking history.