Management of a giant uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential in a 32-year-old woman: case report and review of the literature.

Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) represent a group of rare uterine smooth muscle tumors not diagnosed unequivocally as benign or malignant. To data, diagnostic criteria, malignant potential, surgical management, and follow-up of these neoplasms remain controversial. Considering that STUMP and leiomyoma are not significantly different in terms of clinical presentation and preoperative sonographic characteristics, it might be difficult to distinguish between the two affections prior to pathological confirmation at surgery. All cases should be managed by multidisciplinary tumor teams and patients' follow-up should comprise consultation with a gynecologic oncologist and a close surveillance because of the possibility of recurrence or metastasis. We present the case of a 32-year-old nulliparous woman admitted to our gynecology clinic. She was asymptomatic and only complained an increase in abdominal volume started during the past 6 months. A transabdominal and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound revealed a large heterogeneous tumor mass measuring 190×163 mm, color score 2, expanded in the left iliac fossa, suspected for benign uterine myoma. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a large pelvic-abdominal tumor located near the left posterior-lateral uterine wall with areas of necrosis, suggestive of subserosal leiomyoma with cystic degeneration. The patient underwent a median longitudinal laparotomy for excision of the pelvic mass. The patient was normally discharged five days after surgery in good health conditions. The final histological examination was compatible with STUMP. At present, the patient has had no relapses or metastases and she is undergoing follow-up.

Failed diagnostic hysteroscopy: Analysis of 62 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the presented study is to improve the office hysteroscopy success rate identifying some of the factors associated to an unsuccessful procedure. Moreover it would highlight the importance of an adequate patients follow up after office hysteroscopy failure enlightening the uterine pathologies missed at the first attempt. STUDYDESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study. The Authors reviewed the medical records related to 516 office hysteroscopies performed from January 2016 to November 2018, extrapolating the data from the failed hysteroscopies occurred during this period. After the procedure failure all patients were offered to repeat the hysteroscopy under regional anesthesia in order to identify and treat uterine pathologies. Those patients, who declined to repeat the procedure, received an appropriate follow up. Each failure case is correlated with patient clinical characteristics, indications to hysteroscopy, risk factors presence, hysteroscopy patient compliance, pathology result and patient follow up. RESULTS: The presented study shows an office hysteroscopy failure rate of about 12 %. Severe pain due to cervical stenosis, previous uterine surgery, postmenopausal status and marked uterine ventrifixation/retroflexion, represent the main reason why the procedure was not completed in an office setting. The uterine cavity was subsequently examined in only 26 (42 %) out of 62 patients who reported hysteroscopy failure, mostly repeating the procedure under regional anesthesia (24 cases) or performing vaginal hysterectomy for associated benign gynaecological pathology (2 cases). Endometrial malign pathology (endometrioid carcinoma) was diagnosed in 2 cases of them (7.7 %). Moreover the endometrial cavity remained so far unexplored in 36 (58 %) out of 62 patients, due to the patient refuse to repeat the hysteroscopy under anesthesia. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Results of the present study suggest that office hysteroscopy should be sussessful at the first attempt due to the patients' refuse, in majority of cases, to repeat the procedure after a failure. To not repeat the hysteroscopy may lead to lose or delay important diagnosis, such as that of endometrial cancer. In this context, to counsel all patients prior the procedure may singnificanly help to identify those who may benefit of pharmacological cervical softening, local anesthetic injection or small caliber hysteroscopes usage, increasing the procedure success rate.

Male PCOS equivalent and nutritional restriction: Are we stepping forward?

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder characterized by alteration of menses, polycystic ovaries, clinical and or biochemical signs of hyper-androgenism in the context of metabolic abnormalities such as obesity and insulin resistance that play a fundamental role in pathogenesis of the disease as well as in development of long-term complications including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type II diabetes mellitus (DM II). Latest evidence supports the hypothesis of a genetic component in the aetiology of PCOS that seems to be inherited through an oligo-genic mechanism and cluster in families. Recent studies identified the existence of a male PCOS correspondent syndrome in which the genes responsible for PCOS susceptibility in women may be inherited by male relatives of women with PCOS. The same hormonal, clinical and metabolic alterations of women with PCOS have been found in their male relatives suggesting a relation between the syndrome in its male equivalent. Considering clinical manifestations of male PCOS equivalent, the early onset andro-genetic alopecia (AGA) is considered a clinical marker of insulin resistance, supported by the findings of a case-control study that reported an increased prevalence of hyperinsulinemia and insulin-resistance-associated disorders such as dyslipidaemia, hypertension and obesity, in men with early onset of alopecia (<35), compared with age-matched controls. Moreover, AGA and insulin resistance show higher levels of active androgens, highlighting that low SHBG levels occur in both the diseases and that the two conditions may concur to a worsening of the disease. With regards to the existence of a male PCOS equivalent syndrome, in particular with refer to its phenotypic hallmark of early onset AGA, our hypothesis supposes a beneficial effect of diet restriction used for PCOS as therapy for male patients affected by PCOS equivalent syndrome. Several observational studies and some randomized trials reported that modest reductions of body weight decrease the risk of development of many diseases, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease and contributes to increase insulin sensitivity in PCOS women. Weight reduction may be adopted for men affected by PCOS equivalent syndrome in order to reduce both levels of circulating androgens, insulin resistance and related-complications such as CVD and DM II.