Can neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume be used to predict metastasis in individuals with lung cancer?

Chronic inflammation plays an important role in the etiopathogenesis of many life-threatening chronic diseases, including cancer. Currently, the relationship between inflammation, native immunity and cancer is widely accepted; however, many of the mechanisms mediating this relationship remain undetermined and the clinical significance of these markers is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and mean platelet volume (MPV) to indicate the existence of metastasis in lung cancer. This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated patients with lung cancer of any pathological type who was admitted to the Palliative Care Unit of the referral hospital in the region between January 2019 and February 2020. Patient characteristics, distant organ metastasis, treatments, NLR and MPV values were noted. Patients were grouped as with or without metastasis. Characters, NLR, MPV values were compared. One hundred twenty-six patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 61.17 ± 9.4 years and 7.9% (n = 10) were female. The patients with a history of chemotherapy were 47% (n = 60) and distant organ metastases were present in 38.9% (n = 49) of the patients. The mean MPV value of 49 patients with distant metastasis was 8.34 ± 0.8 fL. MPV values of those with metastasis were found to be significantly higher than those without (P = .010). There was no significant difference in NLR values between groups (P = .920). Lung cancer patients with metastasis were found with higher MPV values. MPV can be effective and most accessible test in prediction of metastasis in lung cancer patients regardless of the pathological type.

Evaluation of the quality of life in patients with arsenic keratosis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic exposure to inorganic arsenic is an important public health problem and leads to hyperpigmentation, hyperkeratosis, Bowen's disease and non-melanoma skin cancers in humans. Arsenic keratosis is the most common skin change that is associated with arsenic exposure. It may be an indicator of arsenic induced health hazards. OBJECTIVE: To determine the needs of patients with arsenic keratosis by evaluating the impact of disease on the quality of life with respect to treatment and provide rehabilitation services. METHODS: A total of 47 subjects with arsenic hyperkeratosis, were enrolled in this crossover study. The demographics, smoking status and the presence of chronic diseases diagnosed by the physician were recorded. Weight and height of the subjects were measured and BMI was calculated. The patients were asked to respond the visual analogue scale and EuroQoL-5D scales for assessing the pain and quality of life impairment associated with arsenic hyperkeratosis. RESULTS: In the study group, moderate to severe problems were reported in 78.7% of patients for pain/uncomfortable condition domains and in 91.5% in anxiety/depression domains. Lower quality of life was reported in those with associated chronic disorders, at an advanced age, in thin patients and in those with severe lesions. CONCLUSION: According to our knowledge, our study is the first one measuring the quality of life in patients with arsenic keratosis in the literature. By this study, we tried to underline the guidance of health services to be developed towards the needs of patients and the need for the development of new health policies by determining the requirements of these patients.

Assessment of arsenic levels in body samples and chronic exposure in people using water with a high concentration of arsenic: a field study in Kutahya.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of skin lesions, which is a health effect of chronic arsenic (As) exposure, and determine the hair/blood arsenic concentrations of people living in Kutahya villages who are using and drinking tap water with a high concentration of arsenic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 303 people were included in the present cross-sectional study. A prepared questionnaire form was used to collect the participants' information and environmental history. Skin examination was performed on all participants. Hair, blood and water samples were analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy. The cumulative arsenic index (CAI) was calculated for all participants. RESULTS: Villages were divided into two groups according to the arsenic level (<20 µg/L, Group I; >20 µg/L, Group II) in their water. The prevalence of skin lesions, hair and blood arsenic level, and CAI were found to be higher in the Group II participants. There was a positive association between body arsenic levels and CAI in the participants of each group. CONCLUSIONS: The number of skin lesions and arsenic concentrations in body samples were found to increase with the water arsenic level and exposure time. We hope that sharing this study's results with local administrators will help accelerate the rehabilitation of water sources in Kutahya.