Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 120, 2024 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446250

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Management of a failed kidney allograft, and the question whether it should be removed is a challenging task for clinicians. The reported risks for transplant nephrectomy (TN) vary, and there is no clear recommendation on indications or surgical approach that should be used. This study gives an overview of indications, compares surgical techniques, and identifies risk factors for higher morbidity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on all transplant nephrectomies performed between 2005 and 2020 at Charité Hospital Berlin, Department of Urology. Patient demographics, laboratory parameters, graft survival data, indication for TN, and surgical complications were extracted from medical reports. RESULTS: A total of 195 TN were performed, with graft intolerance syndrome being the most common indication in 52 patients (26.7%), acute rejection in 36 (18.5%), acute infection in 30 (15.4%), and other reasons to stop immunosuppression in 26 patients (13.3%). Rare indications were vascular complications in 16 (8.2%) and malignancies in the allograft in six (3.1%) cases. Extracapsular surgical approach was significantly more often used in cases of vascular complications and earlier allograft removal, but there was no difference in complication rates between extra- and intracapsular approach. Acute infection was identified as an independent risk factor for a complication grade IIIb or higher according to Clavien-Dindo classification, with a HR of 12.3 (CI 2.2-67.7; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Transplant nephrectomy should only be performed when there is a good indication, and non-elective surgery should be avoided, when possible, as it increases morbidity.


Assuntos
Rim , Nefrectomia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Transplante Homólogo , Sobrevivência de Enxerto
2.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 114, 2024 Mar 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466477

RESUMO

No studies have reported on the impact at team level of the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS system. We described the work patterns and learning curves of an experienced robotic nurse team adapting to the new robotic system. We prospectively recorded the robotic nurse team's preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative tasks on the first 30 robotic procedures performed. The data were descriptively analyzed, and Gantt Charts were created for a timeline overview of the work patterns. We compared the operative times between the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS and the Davinci® system. The preoperative phase seemed to improve with a median time of 94 min (IQR 81-107). After 20 surgeries, the work pattern became more consistent where the scrub and circulating nurses worked simultaneously. There was no noticeable improvement for the perioperative and postoperative phases with a stable median time of 170 min (IQR 135-189) and 26 min (IQR 22-31). We found that the work pattern seemed to stabilize after 20 surgeries but with a continued decrease in preoperative time without a learning curve plateau. The robotic nurse team suffered from few breaks and long working hours because only a few nurses at our facility were trained in the Hugo™ system.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Curva de Aprendizado , Duração da Cirurgia
3.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 161, 2024 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488940

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Accurate surgical reconstruction of arterial vascular supply is a crucial part of living kidney transplantation (LDKT). The presence of multiple renal arteries (MRA) in grafts can be challenging. In the present study, we investigated the impact of ligation versus anastomosis of small accessory graft arteries on the perioperative outcome. METHODS: Clinical and radiological outcomes of 51 patients with MRA out of a total of 308 patients who underwent LDKT with MRA between 2011 and 2020 were stratified in two groups and analyzed. In group 1 (20 patients), ligation of accessory arteries (ARAs) and group 2 (31 patients) anastomosis of ARAs was performed. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the anastomosis-, surgery-, and warm ischemia time (WIT) in favor of group 1. Students t-test showed comparable serum creatinine levels of 2.33 (± 1.75) to 1.68 (± 0.83) mg/dL in group 1 and 2.63 (± 2.47) to 1.50 (± 0.41) mg/dL in group 2, were seen from 1 week to 1 year after transplant. No increased rates of Delayed graft function (DGF), primary transplant dysfunction and transplant rejection were seen, but graft loss and revision rates were slightly higher when the ARAs were ligated. Analysis of Doppler sonography revealed that segmental perfusion deficits tend to regenerate during the clinical course. CONCLUSION: Ligation of smaller accessory renal arteries may not affect the outcome of living kidney transplantation, except for a minor increase in the reoperation rate. Segmental perfusion deficits of the graft seem to regenerate in most cases as seen in Doppler sonography.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Artéria Renal/cirurgia , Doadores Vivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim/cirurgia , Rim/irrigação sanguínea , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 56(2): 389-397, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37773578

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Recently, the robotic surgical system, Hugo™ was approved for clinical use. The transfer of skills is important for understanding the implementation of surgical innovation. We explored the transfer of skills from the DaVinci® to the Hugo™ by studying the learning curve and short-term patient outcomes during radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: We examined the transfer of skills from one surgeon performing RARP from the first case with the Hugo™ system in April 2022. The surgeon had previously performed > 1000 RARPs using DaVinci®. Perioperative and clinical outcomes were collected for procedures on both Hugo™ and DaVinci®. Patient follow-up time was 3 months. RESULTS: Nineteen Hugo™ cases and 11 DaVinci® cases were recorded. No clinically relevant difference in procedure time was found when transferring to Hugo™. Patients operated using Hugo™ had more contacts postoperatively compared to the DaVinci®, all Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade 1 (53% vs 18%). Three patients from the Hugo™ group were re-admitted within 30 days with catheter malfunction (CD grade 1), infection without a focus (CD grade 2), and ileus due to a hernia in the port hole (CD grade 3b). The 3-month follow-up showed similar results in prostate-specific antigen levels (PSA) and erectile dysfunction between the two robotic systems, but a higher incidence of incontinence was found for the Hugo™. CONCLUSION: We observed that the skills of an experienced robotic surgeon are transferable from DaVinci® to Hugo™ when performing RARP. No obvious benefits were found for using Hugo™ compared to DaVinci® for RARP although this needs confirmatory studies.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia
5.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 52: 115-122, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37284043

RESUMO

Background: Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are common after renal transplantation (RTx), and the impact on graft and patient survival remains controversial. Objective: In this study, we investigate the incidence and risk factors for rUTIs in a cohort of RTx recipients and evaluate the effect on graft and patient survival. Design setting and participants: A retrospective cohort of adult patients who underwent RTx at Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between 2014 and 2021 was evaluated in this study. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Risk factors for rUTIs were explored with a multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazard analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to assess overall survival. Results and limitations: A total of 571 RTx recipients were included. The median age was 52 yr (interquartile range: 42-62 yr). Of the cases, 62% were deceased donor RTx. A total of 103 recipients experienced rUTIs. We found increasing age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02 per year increase, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.00-1.04, p = 0.02), female gender (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-3.3, p < 0.001), history of lower urinary tract symptoms (HR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-3.5, p = 0.001), and a UTI within 30 d of surgery (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 2.1-5.9, p < 0.001) were associated with rUTIs. No influence of rUTIs on overall or graft survival was observed. Conclusions: One in six patients experience rUTIs after RTx. Pre- and postoperative variables affect the risk of rUTIs, but none are easily modifiable. In this cohort, rUTIs did not affect the graft function or survival. The etiology of rUTIs remains poorly understood, and there is a continuous need to study how rUTIs can be reduced and treated optimally. Patient summary: In this study, we looked at the risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infections in patients after kidney transplantation. We conclude that 21.5% of patients experience recurrent urinary tract infections 5 years after kidney transplantation. Multiple risk factors were found and should be taken into consideration by clinicians.

7.
Heliyon ; 6(1): e03086, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31922043

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training allows trainees to experiment during training and end-of-training tests could increase motivation and retention. The aim of this trial was to determine if a simulation-based training program including directed self-regulated learning and post-testing improved clinical outcomes compared to a traditional simulation-based training program. METHODS: A randomized trial was conducted involving 32 participants without prior experience in endoscopic procedures. The intervention group practiced independently in a simulation centre and got a post-test whereas the control group received traditional instructions and demonstrations before being allowed to practice. Three weeks after the intervention the participants performed cystoscopies on two consecutive patients. Clinical performance was assessed using a global rating scale (GRS) with established evidence of validity. Independent samples t-test, Cronbach's α, Pearson's r, and paired samples t-test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants performed two cystoscopies on patients. There was no significant difference between the two study groups with respect to mean GRS of performance (p = 0.63, 95 % CI; -2.4-3.9). The internal consistency of the global rating scale was high, Cronbach's α = 0.91. Participants from both study groups demonstrated significant improvement between the first and second clinical procedures (p = 0.004, 95 % CI, 0.8-3.5). Eight (32%) and 15 (60%) participants demonstrated adequate clinical skills in their first and second procedure, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found on the clinical transfer when comparing the two programs. Neither of our training programs was able to ensure consistent, competent performance on patients and this finding could serve as an important argument for simulation-based mastery learning where all training continues until a pre-defined level of proficiency is met. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: The trial was submitted before enrolment of participants to the Regional Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region which established that ethical approval was not necessary (H-4-2014-122). The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02411747).

8.
J Surg Educ ; 75(3): 671-677, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102559

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Direct observation in assessment of clinical skills is prone to bias, demands the observer to be present at a certain location at a specific time, and is time-consuming. Video-based assessment could remove the risk of bias, increase flexibility, and reduce the time spent on assessment. This study investigated if video-based assessment was a reliable tool for cystoscopy and if direct observers were prone to bias compared with video-raters. DESIGN: This study was a blinded observational trial. Twenty medical students and 9 urologists were recorded during 2 cystoscopies and rated by a direct observer and subsequently by 2 blinded video-raters on a global rating scale (GRS) for cystoscopy. Both intrarater and interrater reliability were explored. Furthermore, direct observer bias was explored by a paired samples t-test. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability calculated by Pearson's r was 0.86. Interrater reliability was 0.74 for single measure and 0.85 for average measures. A hawk-dove effect was seen between the 2 raters. Direct observer bias was detected when comparing direct observer scores to the assessment by an independent video-rater (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found that video-based assessment was a reliable tool for cystoscopy with 2 video-raters. There was a significant bias when comparing direct observation with blinded video-based assessment.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Educação Baseada em Competências/métodos , Cistoscopia/educação , Urologia/educação , Gravação em Vídeo , Cistoscópios , Cistoscopia/métodos , Dinamarca , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Maleabilidade , Método Simples-Cego , Estudantes de Medicina , Urologistas/educação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA