A plain language summary of the PHAROS study: the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib for people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of the results of a study called PHAROS. This study looked at combination treatment with encorafenib (BRAFTOVI®) and binimetinib (MEKTOVI®). This combination of medicines was studied in people with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC is the most common type of lung cancer. Metastatic means that the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. All people in this study had a type of NSCLC that has a change in a gene called BRAF termed a BRAF V600E mutation. A gene is a part of the DNA that has instructions for making things that your body needs to work, and the BRAF V600E mutation contributes to the growth of the lung cancer. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In this study, 98 people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC were treated with the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib (called encorafenib plus binimetinib in this summary). Before starting the study, 59 people had not received any treatment for their metastatic NSCLC, and 39 people had received previous anticancer treatment. At the time of this analysis, 44 (75%) out of 59 people who did not receive any treatment before taking encorafenib plus binimetinib had their tumors shrink or disappear. Eighteen (46%) out of 39 people who had received treatment before starting encorafenib plus binimetinib also had their tumors shrink or disappear. The most common side effects of encorafenib plus binimetinib were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and vomiting. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: These results support the use of encorafenib plus binimetinib combination treatment as a new treatment option in people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC. The side effects of encorafenib plus binimetinib in this study were similar to the side effects seen with encorafenib plus binimetinib in people with a type of skin cancer called metastatic melanoma.

Targeted Approaches to Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma: A Review.

Pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive disease that is enriched for inactivating alterations in tumor suppressor genes. Systemic therapeutic strategies for pleural mesothelioma generally involve chemotherapies and immunotherapies that are chosen without consideration of the tumor's molecular profile. As this generalized approach to treatment rarely yields durable responses, alternative therapeutic regimens are urgently indicated. Preclinical studies have identified synthetic lethal protein and metabolic interactions, recurrently overexpressed proteins, and frequent pathway perturbations that may be therapeutically exploited in mesothelioma. This review discusses the mechanism of action of emerging investigational therapies and summarizes findings from phase I-II clinical trials exploring selective, biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies for mesothelioma, with a focus on five common targets. Finally, using lessons learned from these clinical trials, imperatives for successful implementation of targeted therapy in mesothelioma are discussed.

Molecular heterogeneity and co-altered genes in MET-amplified ALK-positive lung cancer: Implications for MET targeted therapy.

OBJECTIVES: MET amplification is a common mechanism of resistance to second- and third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. In case series of MET-amplified ALK-rearranged (ALK + ) lung cancer, durability of responses to combinations targeting ALK and MET is variable, suggesting heterogeneity across tumors. However, little is known about the molecular composition of this subset of ALK-rearranged (ALK + ) NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried tissue and plasma databases to compile a group of > 50 specimens with ALK rearrangements and concurrent MET amplification. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were utilized to quantify the range of MET copies and describe the global molecular landscape of co-altered genes. RESULTS: By FISH, high-level amplification (overall MET/centromere 7 probe ratio ≥ 5) was detected in 75 % of MET-amplified ALK + NSCLC tissue specimens. Intralesional heterogeneity of MET copies was observed, with high-level amplification identified even in cells from tumors with overall low-level MET amplification. Analysis of 48 MET-amplified ALK + NSCLC plasma specimens suggested that high-level amplification is rarely (17 %) detected in plasma. In both tissue and plasma, EML4-ALK variant 1 was the predominant variant (51 %) identified in MET-amplified specimens. ALK kinase domain mutations were only present in a minority of MET-amplified ALK + NSCLCs. MET-amplified ALK + NSCLC plasma specimens were enriched for TP53 mutations (81 % vs 45 %, p = 0.002), EGFR amplification (17 % vs 4 %, p < 0.001), and MYC amplification (21 % vs 3 %, p < 0.001) compared to ALK + NSCLC specimens lacking MET amplification. CONCLUSIONS: MET-amplified, ALK + NSCLC often presents with high-level and heterogeneous amplification in tissue, seldom overlaps with ALK mutations, and frequently co-occurs with alterations associated with aggressive tumor biology.

Extrathoracic Metastases in Pleural Mesothelioma.

Introduction: Guidelines recommend obtaining a computed tomography scan of the chest for the staging of pleural mesothelioma and for assessing response to treatment. Consensus is lacking regarding the necessity of serial imaging of distant extrathoracic sites. In this study, we determined the prevalence of extrathoracic metastases in patients with pleural mesothelioma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pleural mesothelioma treated at Massachusetts General Hospital between 1999 and 2022 who were referred for extrathoracic imaging during their disease course. Imaging reports were reviewed to determine sites of metastasis and calculate the time to development of extrathoracic metastasis. Overall survival and prevalence of extrathoracic metastasis were compared for patients with epithelioid versus nonepithelioid mesothelioma. Results: The study included 148 patients, 69 (47%) of whom had undergone cytoreductive surgery. Histologic types included epithelioid (n = 82, 55%), biphasic (n = 49, 33%), and sarcomatoid (n = 10, 7%) mesothelioma. The median overall survival for the cohort was 24.0 months, specifically 34.7 months and 16.7 months for patients with epithelioid and nonepithelioid tumors, respectively (p < 0.001). There were 65 (44%) patients who developed extrathoracic metastases, with a median time to extrathoracic metastasis of 11.5 months. The most common sites of involvement were extrathoracic nodes (22%), peritoneum (20%), bone (11%), and liver (11%). Of the 76 patients referred for brain imaging, seven (9%) had brain metastases. The frequency of extrathoracic metastasis was identical for epithelioid and nonepithelioid mesothelioma (44%). Overall survival was shorter for patients who developed extrathoracic metastases (hazard ratio 5.9, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with pleural mesothelioma often develop extrathoracic metastases, providing a rationale for routinely obtaining imaging that encompasses sites outside of the thoracic cavity.

Efficacy and Tolerability of ALK/MET Combinations in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancer With Acquired MET Amplification: A Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction: MET amplification is a potentially actionable resistance mechanism in ALK-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancer. Studies describing treatment outcomes of this molecular subgroup are lacking. Methods: We assembled a cohort of patients with ALK+ lung cancer and acquired MET amplification (identified by tissue or plasma) who received regimens targeting both ALK and MET. Efficacy and safety were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, respectively. Results: A total of 12 patients were included in the series. MET amplification was detected after a median of 1.5 (range 1-5) lines of therapy. Four distinct regimens were implemented to address MET amplification: crizotinib (n = 2), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = 6), alectinib plus capmatinib (n = 3), and alectinib plus crizotinib (n = 1). Partial responses were observed in five (42%) of 12 patients, including patients who received crizotinib (n = one of two), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = three of six), and alectinib plus capmatinib (n = one of three). Primary progression was observed in four patients (33%). Grades 1 to 2 peripheral edema, occurring in seven (58%) patients, was found with both crizotinib and capmatinib. One patient required dose reduction of capmatinib plus alectinib for persistent grade 2 edema. Across the regimens, one patient discontinued therapy for toxicity, specifically neurocognitive toxicity from lorlatinib plus crizotinib. At progression on ALK+ MET therapy, potential resistance mechanisms included MET copy number changes and ALK kinase domain mutations. Conclusions: Combined ALK and MET inhibition is associated with moderate antitumor activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC with concurrent MET amplification. Prospective studies are indicated to confirm activity and identify individuals most likely to benefit from the treatment.

B-Cell Infiltrate in the Tumor Microenvironment Is Associated With Improved Survival in Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Introduction: Relapse is common after resection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Features of the tumor microenvironment (TME) which influence postsurgical survival outcomes are poorly characterized. Here, we analyzed the TME of more than 1500 LUAD specimens to identify the relationship between B-cell infiltration and prognosis. Methods: Whole exome sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing were performed on LUADs and adjacent normal lung tissue. Relapse-free survival and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively correlated with characteristics of the tumor and TME in three data sets. Results: High B-cell content (defined as >10% B cells) was associated with improved OS in both a The Cancer Genome Atlas-resected LUAD data set (p = 0.01) and a separate institutional stage II LUAD data set (p = 0.04, median not reached versus 89.5 mo). A validation cohort consisting of pooled microarray data representing more than 1400 resected stage I to III LUADs confirmed the association between greater B-cell abundance, specifically higher B-cell expression, and longer postsurgical survival (median OS 90 versus 71 mo, p < 0.01). Relapse-free survival was longer for patients with adenocarcinomas with high B-cell content across data sets, but it did not reach statistical significance. Subcategorization of B-cell subsets indicated that high naive B-cell content was most predictive of survival. There was no correlation between programmed death-ligand 1 expression, lymphoid aggregates, or overall immune infiltrate density and survival outcomes across the cohorts. Conclusions: The growing adjuvant immunotherapy repertoire has increased the urgency for identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Comprehensive profiling of more than 1500 LUADs suggests that high tumor-infiltrating B-cell content is a favorable prognostic marker.

Integrated Radiology, Pathology, and Pharmacy Program to Accelerate Access to Osimertinib.

PURPOSE: Targeted therapy yields superior outcomes relative to genotype-agnostic therapy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer. Workflows that facilitate timely detection of EGFR mutations and early dispensation of osimertinib can improve management of this disease. METHODS: We developed an Integrated Radiology, Pathology, and Pharmacy Program to minimize delays in initiating osimertinib. The intervention consisted of parallel workflows coupling interventional radiology, surgical pathology, and analysis of nucleic acids from frozen tissue with early pharmacy engagement. We compared time to EGFR testing results and time to treatment for participating patients with those of historical cohorts. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and December 2021, 222 patients participated in the intervention. The median turnaround time from biopsy to EGFR results was 1 workday. Forty-nine (22%) tumors harbored EGFR exon 19 deletions or EGFR L858R. Thirty-one (63%) patients were prescribed osimertinib via the intervention. The median interval between osimertinib prescription and osimertinib dispensation was 3 days; dispensation occurred within 48 hours for 42% of patients. The median interval between biopsy and osimertinib dispensation was 5 days. Three patients received osimertinib within 24 hours of EGFR results. Compared with patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer who were diagnosed through routine workflows, the intervention led to a significant reduction in median time between biopsy and EGFR results (1 v 7 days; P < .01) and median time to treatment initiation (5 v 23 days; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Combining radiology and pathology workflows with early parallel pharmacy engagement leads to a significant reduction in time to initiating osimertinib. Multidisciplinary integration programs are essential to maximize clinical utility of rapid testing.

Phase II, Open-Label Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) plus binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) has demonstrated clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with BRAFV600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this ongoing, open-label, single-arm, phase II study, patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC received oral encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent radiology review (IRR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, time to response, and safety. RESULTS: At data cutoff, 98 patients (59 treatment-naïve and 39 previously treated) with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC received encorafenib plus binimetinib. Median duration of treatment was 9.2 months with encorafenib and 8.4 months with binimetinib. ORR by IRR was 75% (95% CI, 62 to 85) in treatment-naïve and 46% (95% CI, 30 to 63) in previously treated patients; median DOR was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 23.1 to NE) and 16.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 to NE), respectively. DCR after 24 weeks was 64% in treatment-naïve and 41% in previously treated patients. Median PFS was NE (95% CI, 15.7 to NE) in treatment-naïve and 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.2 to NE) in previously treated patients. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (50%), diarrhea (43%), and fatigue (32%). TRAEs led to dose reductions in 24 (24%) and permanent discontinuation of encorafenib plus binimetinib in 15 (15%) patients. One grade 5 TRAE of intracranial hemorrhage was reported. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at the PHAROS dashboard (https://clinical-trials.dimensions.ai/pharos/). CONCLUSION: For patients with treatment-naïve and previously treated BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC, encorafenib plus binimetinib showed a meaningful clinical benefit with a safety profile consistent with that observed in the approved indication in melanoma.

Primary Resistance to Larotrectinib in a Patient With Squamous NSCLC With Subclonal NTRK1 Fusion: Case Report.

The NTRK genes encode the TRK proteins. NTRK fusions lead to constitutively active, ligand-independent downstream signaling. NTRK fusions are implicated in up to 1% of all solid tumors and 0.2% of NSCLC. Larotrectinib, a highly selective small molecule inhibitor of all three TRK proteins, has a response rate of 75% across a wide range of solid tumors. Mechanisms of primary resistance to larotrectinib are not well understood. We report a case of a 75-year-old male with minimal smoking history with NTRK fusion-positive metastatic squamous NSCLC with primary resistance to larotrectinib. We suggest subclonal NTRK fusion as a possible mechanism contributing to primary resistance to larotrectinib.

B cell-dependent subtypes and treatment-based immune correlates to survival in stage 3 and 4 lung adenocarcinomas.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgery and chemoradiation are the standard of care in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while immunotherapy is the standard of care in late-stage NSCLC. The immune composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is recognized as an indicator for responsiveness to immunotherapy, although much remains unknown about its role in responsiveness to surgery or chemoradiation. In this pilot study, we characterized the NSCLC TME using mass cytometry (CyTOF) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) with deconvolution of RNA-Seq being performed by Kassandra, a recently published deconvolution tool. Stratification of patients based on the intratumoral abundance of B cells identified that the B-cell rich patient group had increased expression of CXCL13 and greater abundance of PD1+ CD8 T cells. The presence of B cells and PD1+ CD8 T cells correlated positively with the presence of intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). We then assessed the predictive and prognostic utility of these cell types and TLS within publicly available stage 3 and 4 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) RNA-Seq datasets. As previously described by others, pre-treatment expression of intratumoral 12-chemokine TLS gene signature is associated with progression free survival (PFS) in patients who receive treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Notably and unexpectedly pre-treatment percentages of intratumoral B cells are associated with PFS in patients who receive surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Further studies to confirm these findings would allow for more effective patient selection for both ICI and non-ICI treatments.

Management of Lung Cancer in the Patient with Interstitial Lung Disease.

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially those with pulmonary fibrosis, are at increased risk of developing lung cancer. Management of lung cancer in patients with ILD is particularly challenging. Diagnosis can be complicated by difficulty differentiating lung nodules from areas of focal fibrosis, and percutaneous biopsy approaches confer an increased risk of complications in those with pulmonary fibrosis. Lung cancer treatment in these patients pose several specific considerations. The degree of lung function impairment may preclude lobectomy or surgical resection of any type. Surgical resection can trigger an acute exacerbation of the underlying ILD. The presence of ILD confers an increased risk of pneumonitis with radiotherapy, and many of the systemic therapies also carry an increased risk of pneumonitis in this population. The safety of immunotherapy in the setting of ILD remains to be fully elucidated and concerns remain as to triggering pneumonitis. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence regarding consideration for tissue diagnosis, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, in this patient population and discuss emerging areas of research. We also propose a multidisciplinary approach and practical considerations for monitoring for ILD progression during lung cancer treatment.

Factors Associated With Developing Neurocognitive Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Lorlatinib After Progression on Other Targeted Therapies.

INTRODUCTION: The safety profile of lorlatinib includes neurocognitive adverse events (NAEs). Baseline factors associated with developing NAEs remain poorly characterized. METHODS: Records from patients who received lorlatinib through prospective studies at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH, n = 124) or the phase 1/2 B7461001 (NCT01970865; n = 248) study were reviewed to identify potential associations between comorbidities, baseline medications, and NAEs. RESULTS: Most patients experienced a NAE (MGH: 60%, B7461001: 49%). Cognitive effects occurred in 40% and 29% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain metastases (p = 0.008), brain radiation (p = 0.033), psychiatric illness (p = 0.008), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), antiepileptics (p < 0.001), and stimulants (p = 0.026) were associated with developing cognitive effects in B7461001. Mood effects occurred in 36% and 23% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. In the MGH cohort, psychiatric illness (p = 0.02) and stimulants (p = 0.01) were associated with developing mood effects whereas brain surgery (p = 0.020), psychiatric medications (p < 0.001), benzodiazepines (p = 0.002), and sedatives (p = 0.034) were associated with developing mood effects in B7461001. Psychotic effects were infrequent (MGH: 3%, B7461001: 9%) and were associated with brain surgery in the MGH cohort (p = 0.001) and age in B7461001 (p = 0.014). Speech effects were observed in 23% and 11% of patients in the MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively. Brain radiation (p = 0.012) and antiepileptics (p < 0.001) were associated with speech effects in B7461001. Dose reductions were implemented for 52% and 18% of patients with NAEs in MGH and B7461001 cohorts, respectively, with mitigating effect. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive effects from lorlatinib are common. Lorlatinib-related NAEs may be influenced by multiple factors, including brain metastases, brain radiation, psychiatric illness, and use of neurotropic medications.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes for Patients With KRAS G12D-Mutant NSCLC.

Introduction: Co-occurring mutations in KRAS-mutant NSCLC are associated with discrete biological properties and modulate therapeutic susceptibilities. As G12D-specific inhibitors are expected to enter the clinic, we sought to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC. Methods: This was a retrospective single-institution study. Patients with NSCLC and KRAS G12D mutations detected by the Massachusetts General Hospital SNaPshot next-generation sequencing assay were identified. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were collected by chart review. Results: A total of 107 patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC were identified. Most patients were former smokers (80, 74.8%) and had tumors with adenocarcinoma pathologic subtype (93, 86.9%). Among 56 patients evaluated for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor proportion score was less than 50% in 43 (76.8%). Concomitant mutations were identified in STK11 (17 of 107, 15.9%), KEAP1 (10 of 58, 17.2%), TP53 (36 of 107, 33.6%), and SMARCA4 (11 of 107, 10.3%). Among 57 patients treated with first-line therapy, patients with STK11 co-mutations had shorter progression-free survival (1.2 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.9 versus 4.1 mo, 95% CI: 2.5-6.0, p = 0.0235) and overall survival (4.3 mo, 95% CI: 1.2-10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 8.6-31.1, p = 0.0018) compared with wild type. Patients with KEAP1 co-mutations had shorter overall survival (4.6 mo, 95% CI: 1.2-10.6 versus 17.9 mo, 95% CI: 7.1-30.1, p = 0.0125) than those without. TP53 co-mutations exerted no influence on survival. Conclusions: Co-occurring mutations were common in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC. STK11 and KEAP1 co-mutations were associated with worse clinical outcomes, whereas co-occurring TP53 did not affect survival.

Clinical Activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Targeted Therapies in Patients With Non-V600 BRAF-Mutant Tumors.

PURPOSE: Non-V600 mutations comprise approximately 35% of all BRAF mutations in cancer. Many of these mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and can be classified into three classes according to molecular characteristics. Consensus treatment strategies for class 2 and 3 BRAF mutations have not yet been established. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with published reports of individual patients with cancer harboring class 2 or 3 BRAF mutations from 2010 to 2021, to assess treatment outcomes with US Food and Drug Administration-approved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway targeted therapy (MAPK TT) according to BRAF class, cancer type, and MAPK TT type. Coprimary outcomes were response rate and progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 18,167 studies were screened, identifying 80 studies with 238 patients who met inclusion criteria. This included 167 patients with class 2 and 71 patients with class 3 BRAF mutations. Overall, 77 patients achieved a treatment response. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, response rate and progression-free survival were higher among patients with class 2 compared with class 3 mutations, findings that remain when analyses are restricted to patients with melanoma or lung primary cancers. MEK ± BRAF inhibitors demonstrated greater clinical activity in class 2 compared with class 3 BRAF-mutant tumors than BRAF or EGFR inhibitors. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that MAPK TTs have clinical activity in some class 2 and 3 BRAF-mutant cancers. BRAF class may dictate responsiveness to current and emerging treatment strategies, particularly in melanoma and lung cancers. Together, this analysis provides clinical validation of predictions made on the basis of a mutation classification system established in the preclinical literature. Further evaluation with prospective clinical trials is needed for this population.

Implementation and Clinical Adoption of Precision Oncology Workflows Across a Healthcare Network.

BACKGROUND: Precision oncology relies on molecular diagnostics, and the value-proposition of modern healthcare networks promises a higher standard of care across partner sites. We present the results of a clinical pilot to standardize precision oncology workflows. METHODS: Workflows are defined as the development, roll-out, and updating of disease-specific molecular order sets. We tracked the timeline, composition, and effort of consensus meetings to define the combination of molecular tests. To assess clinical impact, we examined order set adoption over a two-year period (before and after roll-out) across all gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary (GI) malignancies, and by provider location within the network. RESULTS: Development of 12 disease center-specific order sets took ~9 months, and the average number of tests per indication changed from 2.9 to 2.8 (P = .74). After roll-out, we identified significant increases in requests for GI patients (17%; P < .001), compliance with testing recommendations (9%; P < .001), and the fraction of "abnormal" results (6%; P < .001). Of 1088 GI patients, only 3 received targeted agents based on findings derived from non-recommended orders (1 before and 2 after roll-out); indicating that our practice did not negatively affect patient treatments. Preliminary analysis showed 99% compliance by providers in network sites, confirming the adoption of the order sets across the network. CONCLUSION: Our study details the effort of establishing precision oncology workflows, the adoption pattern, and the absence of harm from the reduction of non-recommended orders. Establishing a modifiable communication tool for molecular testing is an essential component to optimize patient care via precision oncology.

Analysis of lorlatinib analogs reveals a roadmap for targeting diverse compound resistance mutations in ALK-positive lung cancer.

Lorlatinib is currently the most advanced, potent and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in the clinic; however, diverse compound ALK mutations driving therapy resistance emerge. Here, we determine the spectrum of lorlatinib-resistant compound ALK mutations in patients, following treatment with lorlatinib, the majority of which involve ALK G1202R or I1171N/S/T. We further identify structurally diverse lorlatinib analogs that harbor differential selective profiles against G1202R versus I1171N/S/T compound ALK mutations. Structural analysis revealed increased potency against compound mutations through improved inhibition of either G1202R or I1171N/S/T mutant kinases. Overall, we propose a classification of heterogenous ALK compound mutations enabling the development of distinct therapeutic strategies for precision targeting following sequential tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Molecular Characterization of Mesothelioma: Impact of Histologic Type and Site of Origin on Molecular Landscape.

PURPOSE: Mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy with heterogeneous outcomes that are partly driven by the differential efficacy of existing therapies across histologic types and sites of origin. Large-scale molecular analysis of mesothelioma and its subtypes has the potential to inform future therapeutic strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1,294 mesotheliomas {980 pleural (malignant pleural mesothelioma [MPM]) and 314 peritoneal (malignant peritoneal mesothelioma [MPeM])} using next-generation sequencing, determined programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and histology in a subset of cases, and assessed MTAP/CDKN2A copy-number status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and T-cell infiltration in an independent cohort. RESULTS: The molecular landscape of MPM was characterized by inactivating alterations in CDKN2A (49%), BAP1 (44%), CDKN2B (42%), MTAP (34%), and NF2 (33%). Compared with epithelioid MPM, nonepithelioid (ie, biphasic and sarcomatoid) MPM had identical tumor mutational burden (median 1.25 mut/Mb, P = .63), more commonly expressed PD-L1 (74% v 51%, P = .02), and was more likely to harbor MTAP, CDKN2A, and CDKN2B copy loss (P < .05). Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed that homozygous MTAP loss was enriched in nonepithelioid MPM. Relative to MPM, MPeM had comparable tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression. The molecular profile of MPeM was similar to MPM, with the distinction that PBRM1 alterations occurred at higher frequency (16% v 7%, P < .01). ALK rearrangements were only observed in MPeM. CONCLUSION: Regardless of histology and location, the molecular landscape of mesothelioma primarily consists of inactivating alterations in tumor suppressor genes, with enrichment of certain alterations in distinct subsets (eg, MTAP loss in nonepithelioid tumors). Given the limited efficacy of current therapies for this disease, novel approaches targeting recurring alterations should be explored.