RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the effects of different nutritional support methods on nutritional status and immune function of patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Patients with HNC were divided into the control (nutritional counseling and routine dietary guidance), parenteral nutrition (PN) (PN support on top of the control group), enteral nutrition (EN) (EN support on top of the control group), and EN + PN (EN combined with PN and routine dietary guidance) groups. After nutrition evaluation, the four groups were subjected to radiotherapy and nutritional support. Body mass index (BMI), serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), transferrin (TRF), hemoglobin (Hb), CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+, natural killer (NK) and quality of life were compared among the four groups before radiotherapy and after radiotherapy dose irradiation completion. The incidence of adverse reactions was assessed and recorded at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS: The four groups experienced some degree of malnutrition during radiotherapy and the EN + PN group possessed the lowest degree of malnutrition. After radiotherapy dose irradiation completion (T1), the PN, EN, and EN + PN groups possessed improved BMI (21.42 ± 1.62, 21.40 ± 1.68, 22.98 ± 1.87 vs. 20.18 ± 1.32), serum ALB (31.59 ± 3.49, 32.24 ± 4.23, 37.58 ± 3.23 vs. 26.67 ± 3.03), PA (182.63 ± 13.57, 183.43 ± 14.19, 201.59 ± 10.53 vs. 165.36 ± 20.13), TRF (162.46 ± 24.34, 157.36 ± 18.58, 182.36 ± 20.37 vs. 137.56 ± 23.19), and Hb (128.54 ± 9.21, 125.36 ± 10.23, 140.26 ± 7.23 vs. 103.24 ± 9.47) levels, higher CD3+ (63.59 ± 2.88, 63.25 ± 3.17, 66.54 ± 1.32 vs. 59.36 ± 3.24), CD4+ (39.92 ± 3.16, 39.87 ± 3.23, 43.36 ± 2.87 vs. 37.12 ± 4.29), CD4+/CD8+ (1.80 ± 0.06, 1.78 ± 0.06, 2.07 ± 0.03 vs. 1.54 ± 0.10) and NK-cells (33.87 ± 3.62, 33.26 ± 3.59, 36.82 ± 3.19 vs. 27.36 ± 4.21) levels, lower CD8+ (22.18 ± 1.07, 22.36 ± 1.04, 20.46 ± 1.09 vs. 24.09 ± 1.21) levels, and improved quality of life (79.97 ± 7.96, 80.13 ± 7.98, 91.78 ± 7.38 vs. 71.53 ± 11.70) versus the control group, and the EN + PN group possessed the most pronounced effects (All P < 0.05). During radiotherapy, the incidence of radiotherapy adverse reactions was increased with time (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PN and EN, alone or in combination, can improve the nutritional status, immune function and quality of life of patients undergoing radiotherapy for HNC, and PN combined with EN has the best improvement effect.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have been designed to predict the survival of Chinese patients initially diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). Therefore, the objective of this study was to construct and validate a new nomogram model to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in Chinese patients. METHODS: We collected 328 patients with mGC from Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital as the training cohort and 60 patients from Xinyuan County People's Hospital as the external validation cohort. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify risk factors, and a nomogram was created to predict CSS. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the consistency index (C-index), the calibration curve, and the decision curve analysis (DCA) in the training cohort and the validation cohort. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression identified differentiation grade (P < 0.001), T-stage (P < 0.05), N-stage (P < 0.001), surgery (P < 0.05), and chemotherapy (P < 0.001) as independent predictors of CSS. Nomogram of chemotherapy regimens and cycles was also designed by us for the prediction of mGC. Thus, these factors are integrated into the nomogram model: the C-index value was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70-0.85) for the nomogram model and 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.86) for the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves and DCA also demonstrated adequate fit and ideal net benefit in prediction and clinical applications. CONCLUSIONS: We established a practical nomogram to predict CSS in Chinese patients initially diagnosed with mGC. Nomograms can be used to individualize survival predictions and guide clinicians in making therapeutic decisions.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and risk factors of cardiovascular complications amongst patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 2085 patients diagnosed with CRC in two tertiary hospitals in China between 2015 and 2020. The patients' medical records were reviewed to identify cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmia. The incidence rate of cardiovascular complications was calculated, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 2085 CRC patients, 329 (15.8%) experienced cardiovascular complications during the follow-up period, with an incidence rate of 17.4 cases per 1000 person-years. The risk was significantly higher in patients who were older than 60 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-3.41), had a higher level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (adjusted HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.31-4.10), had higher levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21-2.04), or who underwent chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CRC patients with cardiovascular complications had significantly higher levels of oxidative stress markers, including malondialdehyde (MDA) (5.8 ± 1.2 µmol/L vs. 3.4 ± 0.9 µmol/L, p < 0.001), lower levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (85.2 ± 15.6 U/mg protein vs. 112.5 ± 21.3 U/mg protein, p < 0.001), and lower levels of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (15.6 ± 3.2 U/mg protein vs. 20.4 ± 4.1 U/mg protein, p < 0.001) compared to those without complications. A progressive increase was observed in the proportion of CRC patients with cardiovascular complications over time, rising from 10% in the first year to 38% by the tenth year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular complications pose a high risk in CRC patients, particularly amongst older patients and those with higher levels of LDL-C or CRP. Regular monitoring of cardiovascular function should be considered in the management of patients with CRC.