Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Surg ; 110(4): 1919-1928, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329091

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the survival differences between uterine and extrauterine low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS). Survival outcomes, consisting of disease-free survivals and overall survivals (OS), were compared in these two entities. METHODS: From February 2012 to June 2019, all primary LGESS cases and LGESS cases with first recurrence in the study center were reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of extrauterine and uterine LGESS patients were compared for both primary and recurrent diseases. RESULTS: During the study period, 143 patients with primary LGESS and 56 patients with recurrent LGESS were included and followed up to 1 June 2020, among whom 8 (5.6%) and 10 (17.8%) patients were identified as having extrauterine LGESS. Patients with primary and recurrent extrauterine LGESS had similar clinicopathological characteristics to those of patients with uterine LGESS. In primary or in recurrent LGESS cases, in univariate analysis, patients with uterine and extrauterine LGESS had similar disease-free intervals after the last treatment, and they also had similar OSs after the diagnosis. Ovarian preservation led to significantly increased recurrence for primary LGESS [hazard ratio (HR) 4.9, 95% CI: 2.3-10.1, P <0.001) and repeated recurrence for recurrent LGESS (HR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3-7.3, P =0.009). Surgical treatment for recurrent LGESS decreased repeated recurrence after the first recurrence (HR 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7, P =0.006). No factors were found to be associated with the OS of primary or recurrent LGESS. CONCLUSION: The clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of extrauterine LGESS are similar to those of uterine LGESS. Surgery is the treatment of choice for recurrent LGESS. Ovarian preservation is detrimental to disease-free survival but not to OS in both uterine and extrauterine LGESS.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial , Humanos , Feminino , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial/patologia , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial/mortalidade , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial/cirurgia , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial/terapia , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Adulto , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Idoso
2.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 16(1): 160, 2021 04 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. METHODS: Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2-30.8) and 75.0% (68.0-82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5-13.1, 1.3-7.3, and 0.1-0.7; and p = 0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-1.0 and 0.1-1.0, p = 0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse. CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial , Neoplasias do Endométrio/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial/diagnóstico , Sarcoma do Estroma Endometrial/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA