Geometric Cuts by an Autonomous Laser Osteotome Increase Stability in Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Grafts: A Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Nonunion and plate exposure represent a major complication after mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps. These drawbacks may be resolved by geometric osteotomies increasing intersegmental bone contact area and stability. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare intersegmental bone contact and stability of geometric osteotomies to straight osteotomies in mandibular reconstructions with free fibula grafts performed by robot-guided erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser osteotomy. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This cadaveric in-vitro study was performed on fresh frozen human skull and fibula specimens. Computed tomography (CT) scans of all specimens were performed for virtual planning of mandibular resections and three-segment fibula reconstructions. The virtual planning was implemented in a Cold Ablation Robot-guided Laser Osteotome. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: For predictor variables, straight and geometric puzzle-shaped osteotomies were designed at resection of the mandible and corresponding fibula reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was the stability of the reconstructed mandible investigated by shearing tests. Moreover, secondary outcome variables were the duration of the laser osteotomies, the contact surface area, and the accuracy of the reconstruction, both evaluated on postsurgical CT scans. COVARIATES: Covariables were not applicable. ANALYSES: Data were reported as mean values (± standard deviation) and were statistically analyzed using an independent-sample t-test at a significance level of α = 0.05. Root mean square deviation was tested for accuracy. RESULTS: Eight skulls and 16 fibula specimens were used for the study. One hundred twelve successful laser osteotomies (96 straight and 16 geometrical) could be performed. Geometric osteotomies increased stability (110.2 ± 36.2 N vs 37.9 ± 20.1 N, P < .001) compared to straight osteotomies. Geometric osteotomy of the fibula took longer than straight osteotomies (10.9 ± 5.1 min vs 5.9 ± 2.2 min, P = .028) but could provide larger contact surface (431.2 ± 148.5 mm2 vs 226.1 ± 50.8 mm2, P = .04). Heat map analysis revealed a mean deviation between preoperational planning and postreconstructive CT scan of -0.8 ± 2.4 mm and a root mean square deviation of 2.51 mm. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Mandibular resection and reconstruction by fibula grafts can be accurately performed by a Cold Ablation Robot-guided Laser Osteotome without need for cutting guides. Osteotomy planning with geometric cuts offers higher stability and an increased bone contact area, which may enhance healing of the reconstructed mandible.

Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants.

Recent advancements in medical imaging, virtual surgical planning (VSP), and three-dimensional (3D) printing have potentially changed how today's craniomaxillofacial surgeons use patient information for customized treatments. Over the years, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has emerged as the biomaterial of choice to reconstruct craniofacial defects. With advancements in additive manufacturing (AM) systems, prospects for the point-of-care (POC) 3D printing of PEEK patient-specific implants (PSIs) have emerged. Consequently, investigating the clinical reliability of POC-manufactured PEEK implants has become a necessary endeavor. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a quantitative assessment of POC-manufactured, 3D-printed PEEK PSIs for cranial reconstruction through characterization of the geometrical, morphological, and biomechanical aspects of the in-hospital 3D-printed PEEK cranial implants. The study results revealed that the printed customized cranial implants had high dimensional accuracy and repeatability, displaying clinically acceptable morphologic similarity concerning fit and contours continuity. From a biomechanical standpoint, it was noticed that the tested implants had variable peak load values with discrete fracture patterns and failed at a mean (SD) peak load of 798.38 ± 211.45 N. In conclusion, the results of this preclinical study are in line with cranial implant expectations; however, specific attributes have scope for further improvements.