Off-label use of cinacalcet in pediatric primary hyperparathyroidism: A French multicenter experience.

Background: Cinacalcet is a calcimimetic approved in adults with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Few cases reports described its use in pediatric HPT, with challenges related to the risk of hypocalcemia, increased QT interval and drug interactions. In this study, we report the French experience in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 18 pediatric patients from 7 tertiary centers who received cinacalcet for PHPT. The results are presented as median (interquartile range). Results: At a median age of 10.8 (2.0-14.4) years, 18 patients received cinacalcet for primary HPT (N = 13 inactive CASR mutation, N = 1 CDC73 mutation, N = 1 multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, N=3 unknown etiology). Cinacalcet was introduced at an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 120 (111-130) mL/min/1.73 m2, plasma calcium of 3.04 (2.96-3.14) mmol/L, plasma phosphate of 1.1 (1.0-1.3) mmol/L, age-standardized (z score) phosphate of -3.0 (-3.5;-1.9), total ALP of 212 (164-245) UI/L, 25-OHD of 37 (20-46) ng/L, age-standardized (z score) ALP of -2.4 (-3.7;-1.4), PTH of 75 (59-123) ng/L corresponding to 1.2 (1.0-2.3)-time the upper limit for normal (ULN). The starting daily dose of cinacalcet was 0.7 (0.6-1.0) mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 1.0 (0.9-1.4) mg/kg per day. With a follow-up of 2.2 (1.3-4.3) years on cinacalcet therapy, PTH and calcium significantly decreased to 37 (34-54) ng/L, corresponding to 0.8 (0.5-0.8) ULN (p = 0.01), and 2.66 (2.55-2.90) mmol/L (p = 0.002), respectively. In contrast, eGFR, 25-OHD, ALP and phosphate and urinary calcium levels remained stable. Nephrocalcinosis was not reported but one patient displayed nephrolithiasis. Cinacalcet was progressively withdrawn in three patients; no side effects were reported. Conclusions: Cinacalcet in pediatric HPT can control hypercalcemia and PTH without significant side effects.

Glucose Derivative Induced Vasculopathy in Children on Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis.

[Figure: see text].

Detection of PD-L1 in the urine of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

There are currently five programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder. For platinum-ineligible patients, testing of tumor specimens for PD-L1 expression is required. However, scoring of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is complex due to different antibodies used, the requirement to score expression in different cellular compartments and intratumoral heterogeneity. It can also be difficult to obtain and test longitudinal tumor samples, which would be desirable to monitor treatment responses and tumor evolution under treatment-induced selective pressure. In the present proof-of concept study, we provide evidence that PD-L1 can be detected in the urine of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Urine PD-L1 levels were significantly higher in NMIBC and MIBC patients when compared to patients with various non-malignant urological diseases. Further prospective and independent studies are required to assess the value of PD-L1 in the urine as a novel biomarker with potential for the early detection, prediction and therapeutic monitoring of patients with UC of the bladder.

Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze urinary continence outcome following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for aggressive prostate cancer in men aged ≥ 70 and < 70 years. METHODS: Retrospective analyses of prospectively collected long-term data from a monocentric cohort of 350 men with D'Amico high-risk prostate cancer undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single institution between 2005 and 2016. The association between time since operation and zero-pad urinary continence recovery was comparatively analyzed by separate pre-operative and post-operative Cox proportional-hazard regression models. RESULTS: Median age in the age group ≥ 70 years was 73 years compared with 62 years in the < 70 year age group. Distribution of men receiving adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy/hormonal therapy was similar in both age groups. Urinary continence recovery rate at 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery of men aged ≥ 70 years was 66, 79 and 83%, respectively, and statistically similar to that of men < 70 years: 71, 81, and 85% (log-rank test p = 0.24). Multivariable analyses demonstrated no significant difference in return to continence between the two age groups (p = 0.28 and p = 0.17). In addition, clinical stage and type of nerve sparing (unilateral, bilateral or non-nerve sparing) were found to be independently predictive of pad-free continence recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age, return to continence in men with aggressive prostate cancer undergoing RARP continues to improve way beyond the first 12 months after surgery. Considering the dire effects of post-operative radiotherapy on continence in this aggressive cancer cohort, advanced age alone should not discourage recommending multimodal therapy involving RARP.