Long-term evaluation of a fully magnetically levitated circulatory support device for advanced heart failure-two-year results from the HeartMate 3 CE Mark Study.

AIM: This study aimed to assess safety and outcomes of patients, 2 years after implantation with the HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist System. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 50 adults with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IIIB or IV symptoms or American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage D heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤25% and a cardiac index ≤2.2 L/min/m2 without inotropes, or inotrope-dependent with optimal medical management, or listed for heart transplant. The median duration of left ventricular assist device support was 694 days (range: 19-833 days). At baseline, cardiac index was 1.8 ±0.5 L/min/m2 , 58% of patients were receiving inotropes, and 92% were INTERMACS profiles 2-4. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier survival was 74 ±6%, 5 (10%) patients were transplanted, and 32 patients (64%) remain with support. Adverse event rates include bleeding requiring surgery (16%), gastrointestinal bleeding (20%), driveline infection (24%), ischaemic stroke (16%), haemorrhagic stroke (8%), right heart failure (14%), and outflow graft thrombosis (2%). Notably, no haemolysis, pump thrombosis, or pump malfunction events occurred. At 2 years, 47% of patients remained in NYHA class I and 41% in NYHA class II (P <0.0001). From baseline to 2 years, the mean six-minute walk distance increased from 239 m to 347 m (P <0.0001), and the mean EQ-5D quality of life score improved from 48.2 to 70.6 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Two years post-HeartMate 3 implantation, results show expected and acceptable survival, enhanced haemocompatibility, improved patient functional status and quality of life. This corroborates the success of HeartMate 3 since its first-in-man implantation case in Germany. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02170363.

Heartmate 3 fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device for the treatment of advanced heart failure -1 year results from the Ce mark trial.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) (St. Jude Medical Inc., St Paul, MN) with full magnetic levitation allows for wide and consistent blood flow paths and an artificial pulse designed for enhanced hemocompatibility. The HeartMate 3 received market approval in the European Union in 2015 following completion of a multicenter study. After reaching the 6-month study endpoint, patients continue to be followed for 2 years with the 1-year results presented herein. METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized study included adults with advanced heart failure and ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 25%, cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.2 L/min/m2 while not on inotropes, or inotrope dependent, or on optimal medical management for 45/60 days. RESULTS: Fifty patients-54% bridge to transplant (BTT) and 46% destination therapy (DT)-were enrolled and implanted with the HeartMate 3. At baseline, 92% of the patients were INTERMACS profiles 2-4, with cardiac index 1.8 + 0.5 L/min/m2 and 58% were supported with inotropes. At 1 year, 74% of the patients remain on support, 18% expired, 6% transplanted, and 2% explanted. The adverse events include 12% gastrointestinal bleeding, 16% driveline infections, 18% strokes, and 2% outflow graft thrombosis. There was no hemolysis, pump thrombosis or pump malfunction through 1 year. The six-minute walk test distance increased from a mean of 273 m to 371 m (P <0.0001). EQ-5D quality-of-life score increased from a mean of 52.7 to 70.8 (P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year HeartMate 3 LVAS results show survival and adverse-event profile are similar to other approved devices, with no pump thrombosis or pump failure. Patient's functional status and quality of life significantly improved over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02170363 . Registered June 19, 2014.

Outcomes in HeartMate II Patients With No Antiplatelet Therapy: 2-Year Results From the European TRACE Study.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations of antithrombotic therapy for HeartMate II (HMII) patients include the use of both an anticoagulant and an antiplatelet agent. Because bleeding is still the most frequent adverse event, the TRACE (STudy of Reduced Anti-Coagulation/Anti-platelet Therapy in Patients with the HeartMatE II) study was initiated to evaluate the incidence of adverse events in HMII patients on reduced antithrombotic (RT) therapy. METHODS: HMII patients (n = 101) from nine centers were enrolled in the European arm of TRACE and were managed on a single anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonist) with no antiplatelet agents. An analysis of bleeding and thrombotic adverse events from all 101 patients with 2-year follow-up after initiation of RT therapy is reported here. RESULTS: Median age was 56 years (range, 18 to 72 years), 93% were men, 70% had an Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 to 3, and 82% received the HMII as a bridge to transplantation. Ninety-two percent were placed on RT therapy as a center standard of care or due to physician preference and 6% as a response to bleeding. Median HMII support duration on RT therapy was 25 months (range, 1 to 93 months). Median international normalized ratio was 2.31 [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 2.07 to 2.60]. At 2 years, freedom from bleeding, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and pump thrombosis after initiation of RT therapy was 81% ± 6%, 96% ± 2%, 94% ± 3%, and 94% ± 3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year analysis of the observational European TRACE study suggests that managing HMII patients with a vitamin K antagonist with a target international normalized ratio of 2.3 without antiplatelet therapy may help to reduce the incidence of major bleeding without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events, including ischemic stroke and pump thrombosis.

Multicentre clinical trial experience with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device: 30-day outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the operative experience and 30-day outcomes of patients implanted with the HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) during the Conformité Européenne (CE) Mark clinical trial. METHODS: Adult patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria defining advanced-stage heart failure and included the indications of bridge to transplant and destination therapy. Operative parameters, outcomes, adverse events, physical status and quality-of-life parameters were assessed in the first 30 days after LVAS implant. RESULTS: Fifty patients were implanted with the HeartMate 3 at 10 centres in 6 countries. The 30-day survival rate was 98%. The median operative and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 200 (range: 95-585) min and 84 (range: 47-250) min, respectively. Patients required transfusion with packed red blood cells (3.6 ± 2.3 units), fresh frozen plasma (6.5 ± 5 units) and platelets (2 ± 1 units). Six patients (12%) required reoperation for postoperative bleeding and 10 patients (20%) did not require blood transfusion. The median intensive care time was 6 days (range: 1-112 days) and the total hospital stay was 28 days (range: 14-116 days). The most common adverse events were bleeding (15, 30%), arrhythmia (14, 28%) and infection (10, 20%). There were 2 (4%) strokes. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day outcomes following implantation of the HeartMate 3 demonstrates excellent survival with low adverse event rates. The LVAD performed as intended with no haemolysis or device failure. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02170363. HeartMate 3™ CE Mark Clinical Investigation Plan (HM3 CE Mark).

Left ventricular assist device performance with long-term circulatory support: lessons from the REMATCH trial.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) failure and malfunction rates are critical gauges for establishing LVADs as a long-term therapy for end-stage heart failure patients. These device performance measures, however, have been inadequately characterized in the bridge-to-transplantation literature. METHODS: REMATCH is a randomized trial that compares optimal medical management with LVAD implantation for patients with end-stage heart failure. An independent committee adjudicated patient outcomes. The primary endpoint--survival--was analyzed by intention to treat using the log-rank statistic. Frequency of event occurrence was analyzed by Poisson regression. The time to first event was analyzed by the product limit method. Device performance was disaggregated into confirmed malfunctions and system failures. The latter were events in which patients could not be rescued with backup circulatory support measures. RESULTS: The 1-year survival rate was 52% (95% confidence limit [CL]; 40%-63%) for LVAD patients versus 28% (95% CL; 17%-39%) for medical patients and the 2-year survival rate was 29% (95% CL; 19%-40%) for LVAD patients versus 13% (95% CL; 5%-22%) for medical patients. System failure was 0.13 per patient per year and the confirmed LVAD malfunction rate was 0.90. Freedom from device replacement was 87% at 1 year and 37% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the observed rates of device malfunction and replacement, LVAD implantation confers clinically significant improvement with regard to survival as compared with medical management. Device modifications and innovations for infection management exhibit great promise of improving device performance in the near future.

Surgical management of patients in the REMATCH trial.

The donor shortage makes cardiac transplantation a less than ideal treatment for end-stage heart failure. The utility of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a permanent form of circulatory support has recently been established in the REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure) trial. In this report, we describe the surgical management of LVAD patients in REMATCH and their short-term outcomes. Between 1998 and 2001, 129 patients with end-stage heart failure, who were excluded from consideration for transplantation, were enrolled in the REMATCH clinical trial. Patients were randomized to two treatment arms: optimal medical management or HeartMate vented electric LVAD implantation. The primary end point of the study was death from any cause. Secondary end points included the incidence of serious adverse events, the duration of hospitalization, quality of life, and functional status. Sixty-eight patients received an LVAD, 55 (81%) of whom survived for longer than 1 month. The median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) for those that survived at least 1 month were 15 and 34 days, respectively. Sixty-seven (99%) patients had a serious adverse event. The rates of perioperative bleeding, late bleeding, right heart failure, and sepsis were 0.42, 0.53, 0.15, and 0.53 events/patient-year, respectively. Factors predictive of a longer LOS for the implant hospitalization included sepsis, age, and late bleeding (p < 0.0001). The patients' New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly at 1 month compared with base line (p < 0.001). Functional class improved in LVAD-supported patients despite a high adverse event rate. Most adverse events occurred within 30 days of device implantation. Sepsis, age, and late bleeding were the major determinants of LOS.