Staged circumferential lumbar fusions have less intraoperative complications and shorter operative time with no difference in 30-, 90-, and 1-year complications: a propensity-matched cohort analysis of 190 patients.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Circumferential lumbar fusions (cLFs) are becoming more common with increasing and more minimally invasive anterior access techniques. Staging allows reassessment of indirect decompression and alignment prior to the posterior approach, and optimization of OR time management. Safety of staging has been well documented in deformity surgery but has yet to be delineated in less extensive, degenerative cLFs. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative complications and outcomes between staged versus single-anesthetic circumferential fusions in the lumbar spine. STUDY DESIGN: Propensity-matched comparative observational cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent cLFs for lumbar degenerative disease. OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year complications. METHODS: From 123 patients undergoing single-anesthetic and 154 patients undergoing staged cLF, 95 patients in each group were propensity-matched based on age, sex, BMI, ASA score, smoking, revision, and number of levels. We compared perioperative, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year complications between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Mean days between stages was 1.58. Single-anesthetic cLF had longer total surgery time (304 vs 240 minutes, p<.001) but shorter total PACU total time (133 vs 196 minutes, p<.001). However, there was no difference in total anesthesia time (368 vs 374 minutes, p=.661) and total EBL (357 vs 320cc, p=.313). Intraoperative complications were nine incidental durotomies in the single-anesthetic and one iliac vein injury in the staged group (9% vs 1%, p=.018). There was no difference of in-hospital (38 vs 31, p=.291), 30-day (16 vs 23, p=.281), 90-day (10 vs 15, p=.391), 1-year complications (9 vs 12, p=.644), and overall cumulative 1-year complications (54 vs 56, p=.883) between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: There is a decrease in total surgical time and intraoperative complications during staged compared with single-anesthetic cLF with no difference in in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year complications between approaches.

Opioid-sparing Anesthesia Decreases In-hospital and 1-year Postoperative Opioid Consumption Compared With Traditional Anesthesia: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Propensity-matched cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) reduces in-hospital and 1-year postoperative opioid consumption. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The recent opioid crisis highlights the need to reduce opioid exposure. We developed an OSA protocol for lumbar spinal fusion surgery to mitigate opioid exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions over one to four levels were identified. Patients taking opioids preoperatively were excluded. OSA patients were propensity-matched to non-OSA patients based on age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and revision versus primary procedure. Standard demographic and surgical data, daily in-hospital opioid consumption, and opioid prescriptions 1 year after surgery were compared. RESULTS: Of 296 OSA patients meeting inclusion criteria, 172 were propensity-matched to non-OSA patients. Demographics were similar between cohorts (OSA: 77 males, mean age=57.69 yr; non-OSA: 67 males, mean age=58.94 yr). OSA patients had lower blood loss (326 mL vs. 399 mL, P =0.014), surgical time (201 vs. 233 min, P <0.001) emergence to extubation time (9.1 vs. 14.2 min, P< 0.001), and recovery room time (119 vs. 140 min, P =0.0.012) compared with non-OSA patients. Fewer OSA patients required nonhome discharge (18 vs. 41, P =0.001) compared with the non-OSA cohort, but no difference in length of stay (90.3 vs. 98.5 h, P =0.204). Daily opioid consumption was lower in the OSA versus the non-OSA cohort from postoperative day 2 (223 vs. 185 morphine milligram equivalents, P =0.017) and maintained each day with lower total consumption (293 vs. 225 morphine milligram equivalents, P =0.003) throughout postoperative day 4. The number of patients with active opioid prescriptions at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative was statistically fewer in the OSA compared with the non-OSA patients. CONCLUSIONS: OSA for lumbar spinal fusion surgery decreases in-hospital and 1-year postoperative opioid consumption. The minimal use of opioids may also lead to shorter emergence to extubation times, shorter recovery room stays, and fewer discharges to nonhome facilities.

Improved Resource Utilization Using WALANT Hand Surgery in Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Cost, efficiency, patient preference, and safety have driven utilization of wide awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) in hand surgery. This is not well documented in adolescents. We hypothesize that the use of WALANT with adolescents reduced time spent in the operating room (OR) and in the hospital when compared with patients who underwent surgery with traditional anesthesia (TA). METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of patients aged 10 to 17 who underwent surgery at a regional hospital system including the level 1 pediatric trauma hospital. Operative notes were assessed for use of WALANT. We excluded those operations not traditionally amenable to WALANT. Using a propensity matched cohort, hospital time, OR time, and perioperative complications were recorded and compared to evaluate efficiency and perioperative safety. RESULTS: There were 28 cases in the WALANT group and 28 cases in the TA group after excluding cases not amenable to WALANT, and cases were propensity matched. Although the operative time (incision to closure) was similar, for WALANT patients, the in-room to procedure time (15 vs 22 minutes), procedure end to out-room time (5 vs 10 minutes), total room time (52.81 vs 63.68), and length of hospital stay (222 vs 342 minutes) were shorter than patients in the TA group. CONCLUSION: Our case series demonstrates time-savings both in the OR and in the hospital overall. Avoiding TA when WALANT is feasible may result in significant savings to hospital systems, patients, and payers while also freeing up anesthesia staff and perioperative nurses.

Quantitative Romberg using a force plate: an objective measure for cervical myelopathy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical decision making for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) relies on evaluation of symptoms and physical examination. The Romberg test is a clinical exam used to identify balance issues with CSM. However, the Romberg test has a subjective interpretation and has a binary (positive or negative) result. PURPOSE: This study aims to compare force plate pressure readings during a standard Romberg test in patients with CSM to age-matched normal healthy volunteers. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective cross sectional observational comparative cohort from a single multi-surgeon spine center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who were clinically diagnosed with CSM were compared to age-matched healthy volunteers without a clinical history of spine pathology. OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative Romberg Force Plate Measurements METHODS: Patients with CSM requiring surgery and healthy normal volunteers were asked to perform the Romberg test while on a force plate measuring the center of pressure (COP): standing up straight with arms extended for 30 seconds with eyes open, followed by 30 seconds with eyes closed. The change for total sway area, sway frequency and sway speed with eyes closed and eyes open were calculated and compared between patients with CSM and healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Thirty-four CSM patients were age-matched to 34 healthy volunteers. There was a larger change in quantitative Romberg measurements with eyes open versus eyes closed in CSM patients compared to normal volunteers for maximum lateral movement (10.79 cm vs. 0.94 cm, p=.003), maximum anterior-posterior movement (15.06 cm vs. 10.00 cm p=.201), total lateral CoP movement (89.82cm vs. 18.71cm, p=.007), total AP CoP movement (154.68 cm vs. 87.47 cm, p=.601), total CoP trace movement (199.79 cm vs. 88.44 cm, p=.014), sway area (284.74 cm2 vs. 57.76 cm2, p=.006), and average speed (7.00 cm/s vs. 2.91 cm/s, p=.006). DISCUSSION: Poor standing balance can be quantified in patients with CSM. Quantifying standing balance in patients with CSM shows significantly worse objective measures than age-matched healthy volunteers. The Romberg test on a force plate may help diagnose and evaluate patients with CSM, guide patient management and potentially grade the severity of spinal pathology. Further studies are needed to determine its utility in monitoring disease progression and measure treatment effectiveness.

Propensity-Matched Comparison of 90-Day Complications in Robotic-Assisted Versus Non-Robotic Assisted Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single center propensity-matched observational cohort study that included patients who underwent 1- to 3-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. OBJECTIVE: To compare 90-day complication rates between robotic-assisted and non-robotic-assisted lumbar spinal fusions in propensity-matched cohorts. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A recent administrative database (PearlDiver) study reported increased 30-day complications with the utilization of robotic-assisted enabling technology. METHODS: Of 146 robotic-assisted cases that met inclusion criteria, 114 were successfully propensity matched to 114 patients from 214 cases who had 1 to 3 level lumbar fusion without robotic assistance based on age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, number of surgical levels, primary versus revision, and surgical approach (posterior-only or anterior-posterior). We excluded tumor, trauma, infection, or deformity cases. Outcomes included surgical and medical (major/minor) complications at intraoperative, immediately postoperative, 30- and 90-day postoperative intervals, including reoperations, and readmissions within 90 days. RESULTS: All cause intraoperative complication rates were similar between non-robotic-assisted (5.3%) and robotic-assisted groups (10.5%, P = 0.366). Immediate postoperative medical complication rate was also similar between non-robotic-assisted (6.1%) and robotic-assisted groups (1.8%, P = 0.089). Thirty-day complication rates, 90-day complication rates, reoperation rates, and readmission rates showed no difference between non-robotic-assisted and robotic-assisted groups. There was no difference between return to OR for infection between the cohorts (non-robotic-assisted: 6 [5%] vs. robotic-assisted: 1 [0.8%], P = 0.119). There was however improved length of stay (LOS) in the robotic-assisted group compared with non-robotic-assisted group (2.5 vs. 3.17 days, P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In propensity-matched cohorts, patients undergoing 1- to 3-level robotic-assisted posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions did not have increased 90-day complication rate, and had a shorter length of stay compared with non-robotic-assisted patients. There findings differ from a prior administrative database study as the robotic-assisted group in the current study had 0% return to OR for malpositioned screws and 0.8% return to OR for infection.Level of Evidence: 2.