Fellow-Eye Comparison Of Monocular Visual Outcomes Following Monofocal EDOF And Trifocal EDOF IOL Implantation.

PURPOSE: To compare intraindividual monocular visual performance of a monofocal EDOF and a trifocal EDOF IOL following bilateral cataract surgery. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, fellow-eye comparison clinical trial. METHODS: All patients received uneventful bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL in the dominant eye and the trifocal EDOF FineVision Triumf IOL in the non-dominant eye. Intraindividual monocular comparison included visual acuity at various distances, defocus curves, internal total higher-order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration (SA) Z(4.0), IOL decentration and tilt. Additionally, subjective outcomes were evaluated using Halo and Glare simulation and the VF-7 questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 25 patients (50 eyes) were included. Intraindividual monocular BCDVA, DCIVA, and BCNVA were comparable (p> .05). However, monocular contrast acuity (p= .019), DCNVA (p< .001) and defocus curves at defocus levels of 0.0D (p= .005) and between -1.5 and -4.0D (p< .001) differed significantly. At 5mm, internal HOA and SA Z(4.0) were significantly different (p< .001) and comparable at 3mm pupil diameter, as were IOL tilt and decentration (p> .05). CONCLUSION: In this combined fellow-eye comparison, near vision was significantly better with the trifocal EDOF IOL. The monofocal EDOF IOL demonstrated similar distance and intermediate visual performance as the trifocal EDOF IOL. Overall, low values of photic phenomena and visual impairment was observed.

Functional and Radiologic Outcomes of Degenerative Versus Traumatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Involving the Supraspinatus Tendon.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is among the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Several factors-including age, sex, and tear severity-have been identified as predictors for outcome after repair. The influence of the tear etiology on functional and structural outcome remains controversial. PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of tear etiology (degenerative vs traumatic) on functional and structural outcomes in patients with supraspinatus tendon tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients undergoing ARCR from 19 centers were prospectively enrolled between June 2020 and November 2021. Full-thickness, nonmassive tears involving the supraspinatus tendon were included. Tears were classified as degenerative (chronic shoulder pain, no history of trauma) or traumatic (acute, traumatic onset, no previous shoulder pain). Range of motion, strength, the Subjective Shoulder Value, the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) were assessed before (baseline) and 6 and 12 months after ARCR. The Subjective Shoulder Value and the OSS were also determined at the 24-month follow-up. Repair integrity after 12 months was documented, as well as additional surgeries up to the 24-month follow-up. Tear groups were compared using mixed models adjusted for potential confounding effects. RESULTS: From a cohort of 973 consecutive patients, 421 patients (degenerative tear, n = 230; traumatic tear, n = 191) met the inclusion criteria. The traumatic tear group had lower mean baseline OSS and CMS scores but significantly greater score changes 12 months after ARCR (OSS, 18 [SD, 8]; CMS, 34 [SD,18] vs degenerative: OSS, 15 [SD, 8]; CMS, 22 [SD, 15]) (P < .001) and significantly higher 12-month overall scores (OSS, 44 [SD, 5]; CMS, 79 [SD, 9] vs degenerative: OSS, 42 [SD, 7]; CMS, 76 [SD, 12]) (P≤ .006). At the 24-month follow-up, neither the OSS (degenerative, 44 [SD, 6]; traumatic, 45 [SD, 6]; P = .346) nor the rates of repair failure (degenerative, 14 [6.1%]; traumatic 12 [6.3%]; P = .934) and additional surgeries (7 [3%]; 7 [3.7%]; P = .723) differed between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with degenerative and traumatic full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears who had ARCR show satisfactory short-term functional results. Although patients with traumatic tears have lower baseline functional scores, they rehabilitate over time and show comparable clinical results 1 year after ARCR. Similarly, degenerative and traumatic rotator cuff tears show comparable structural outcomes, which suggests that degenerated tendons retain healing potential.

The role of serum C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of literature regarding serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in the evaluation of a shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of the current study was to establish cutoff values for diagnosing shoulder PJI and evaluate the influence of the type of infecting microorganism and the classification subgroups according to last proposed International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria on the CRP level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all 136 patients, who underwent septic or aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty in our institution between January 2010 and December 2019, was performed. Shoulder PJI was defined according to the last proposed definition criteria of the ICM. Serum CRP levels were compared between infected and non-infected cases, between infection subgroups, as well as between different species of infecting microorganisms. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to display sensitivity and specificity of serum CRP level for shoulder PJI. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (38%) were classified as infected, 18 meeting the criteria for definitive infection, 26 for probable infection and 8 for possible infection. According to the ROC curve, an optimized serum CRP threshold of 7.2 mg/l had a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 74% (area under curve = 0.72). Patients with definitive infection group demonstrated significantly higher median serum CRP levels (24.3 mg/l), when compared to probable, possible infection groups and PJI unlikely group (8 mg/l, 8.3 mg/l, 3.6 mg/l, respectively, p < 0.05). The most common isolated microorganism was Cutibacterium acnes in 25 patients (48%) followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) in 20 patients (39%). Patients with a PJI caused by high-virulent microorganisms had a significantly higher median serum CRP level compared to patients with PJI caused by low-virulent microorganisms (48 mg/l vs. 11.3 mg/l, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Serum CRP showed a low sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI, even applying cutoffs optimized by receiver-operating curve analysis. Low-virulent microorganisms and patients with probable and possible infections are associated with lower CRP levels compared to patients with definitive infection and infections caused by high-virulent microorganisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

Glenoid vault and humeral head alignment in relation to the scapular blade axis in young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: Static posterior subluxation of the humeral head is a pre-osteoarthritic deformity preceding posterior erosion in young patients. Its etiology remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in scapular morphology between young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head and healthy controls with a centered humeral head. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head who were treated in our institution between January 2018 and November 2019. Fourteen shoulders in 12 patients were included in this study and then matched according their age, sex, and affected side with controls. Computed tomography images of both groups were compared in the standardized axial imaging plane for differences in scapular morphology. The following parameters were measured: glenoid version relative to the Friedman line and scapular blade axis, scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation index, and neck angle, as well as glenoid and humeral offset. RESULTS: The patients in the subluxation group showed significantly higher scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation indexes than controls (0.76 vs. 0.55 [P < .0001] and 0.58 vs. 0.51 [P = .016], respectively). The mean measurements of glenoid version according to the Friedman line and relative to the scapular blade axis were significantly higher in the subluxation group than in controls (19° vs. 4° [P < .0001]and 14° vs. 2° [P = .0002], respectively). The glenoid vault was significantly more anteriorly positioned with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group than in controls (neck angle, 166° vs. 173° [P = .0003]; glenoid offset, 9.2 mm vs. 4.6 mm [P = .0005]). The midpoint of the humeral head showed a posterior offset with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group, whereas controls had an anteriorly placed midpoint of the humeral head (-2 mm vs. 3.1 mm, P = .01). A higher scapulohumeral subluxation index showed significant correlations with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.493, P = .008 and decreased neck angle: r = -0.554, P = .002), a posterior humeral offset (r = -0.775, P < .0001), and excessive glenoid retroversion measured by both methods (Friedman line: r = 0.852, P < .0001; scapular blade axis: r = 0.803, P < .0001). A higher glenohumeral subluxation index also correlated significantly with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.403, P = .034; decreased neck angle: r = -0.406, P = .032) and posterior humeral offset (r = -0.502, P = .006). CONCLUSION: Young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head have significant constitutional differences in scapular morphology in terms of an increased anterior glenoid offset, excessive glenoid retroversion, and increased posterior humeral offset in relation to the scapular blade compared with healthy matched controls.

Shoulder-Pacemaker Treatment Concept for Posterior Positional Functional Shoulder Instability: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pathological muscle activation patterns of the external rotators and periscapular muscles can result in posterior positional functional shoulder instability (PP-FSI). In several patients, physical therapy and surgical treatment are not successful. PURPOSE: The shoulder-pacemaker treatment concept was evaluated prospectively in patients with PP-FSI and previously failed conventional therapy attempt. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A negative selection of 24 consecutive cases of noncontrollable PP-FSI in 16 patients with previously failed conventional therapy were included in this prospective study. The shoulder-pacemaker treatment consisted of an electrical muscle stimulation-based therapy protocol with 9 to 18 one-hour treatment sessions. Two patients were excluded because of nonadherence to the training schedule, leaving a final study cohort of 21 cases in 14 patients. Follow-up included assessment of clinical function, impairment during daily activities and sports, satisfaction, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe score, and Subjective Shoulder Value at 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after intervention. RESULTS: WOSI, Subjective Shoulder Value, and Rowe score showed a highly significant improvement at all time points of follow-up (P < .001). Young age (P = .005), low weight (P = .019), shoulder activity level (P = .003), unilateral affliction (P = .046), and higher baseline WOSI score (P = .04) were associated with a better treatment effect. Cases with increased glenoid retroversion, posterior scapulohumeral decentering, and dysplastic bony glenoid shape showed a trend toward shorter treatment effect duration. No complications during the intervention or follow-up period were observed. CONCLUSION: The shoulder-pacemaker therapy concept is an effective treatment with rapid improvement and sustained outcome over the course of 2 years in patients with noncontrollable PP-FSI with previously failed conventional treatment. Young and more athletic patients with lower weight and unilateral pathology respond best to the treatment.

Characteristics of functional shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic activation pattern of muscles can cause shoulder instability. We propose to call this pathology functional shoulder instability (FSI). The purpose of this prospective study was to provide an in-detail description of the characteristics of FSI. METHODS: In the year 2017, a total of 36 consecutive cases of FSI presenting to our outpatient clinic were prospectively collected. Diagnostic investigation included a pathology-specific questionnaire, standardized clinical scores, clinical examination, psychological evaluation, video and dynamic fluoroscopy documentation of the instability mechanism, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In a final reviewing process, the material from all collected cases was evaluated and, according to the observed pattern, different subtypes of FSI were determined and compared. RESULTS: Based on the pathomechanism, positional FSI (78%) was distinguished from nonpositional FSI (22%). Controllable positional FSI was observed in 6% of all cases and noncontrollable positional FSI in 72%, whereas controllable and noncontrollable nonpositional FSI were each detected in 11% of the cases. The different subtypes of FSI showed significant differences in all clinical scores (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index: P = .002, Rowe Score: P = .001, Subjective Shoulder Value: P = .001) and regarding functional impairment (shoulder stability: P < .001, daily activities: P = .001, sports activities: P < .001). Seventy-eight percent had posterior, 17% anterior, and 6% multidirectional instability. Although several patients showed constitutional glenoid shape alterations or soft tissue hyperlaxity, only few patients with acquired minor structural defects were observed. CONCLUSION: FSI can be classified into 4 subtypes based on pathomechanism and volitional control. Depending on the subtype, patients show different degrees of functional impairment. The majority of patients suffer from unidirectional posterior FSI.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Head-Split Component.

BACKGROUND: Head-split fractures are a subgroup of proximal humeral fractures in which the fracture line affects the articular surface. Limited data are available regarding outcomes and risk factors for failure following surgical treatment of this rare fracture type. METHODS: Of 45 patients with head-split fractures identified, a total of 30 (67%) were included in this retrospective study, with a mean follow-up of 49 ± 18 months (range, 12 to 83 months). Of those 30, 24 were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 4 with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), and 2 with hemiarthroplasty. Subjective Shoulder Value, Simple Shoulder Test, Constant score, and biplanar radiographs were assessed. Fracture pattern, quality of reduction, eventual complications, revision procedures, and clinical failure (adjusted Constant score < 40) were analyzed, and risk factors for failure were calculated. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 83% (ORIF: 21 of 24 [88%]; RTSA: 3 of 4 [75%]; and hemiarthroplasty: 1 of 2 [50%]). The most common complications following ORIF were humeral head osteonecrosis (42%), malunion of the lesser tuberosity (33%), and screw protrusion (29%), whereas all complications following RTSA were related to tuberosity problems. Revision was performed in 7 of 24 (29%) of initial ORIF patients, and no revisions were performed in RTSA or hemiarthroplasty patients. Four patients (17%) who underwent primary ORIF underwent conversion to RTSA, and 3 patients (12.5%) had screw removal due to penetration. The overall clinical failure rate was 50% (ORIF: 12 of 24 [50%]; RTSA: 1 of 4 [25%]; and hemiarthroplasty: 2 of 2 [100%]). No significant association was found between preoperative factors and clinical failure. ORIF and primary RTSA showed higher average clinical outcome scores than primary hemiarthroplasty and secondary RTSA. In general, patients who required revision had worse Subjective Shoulder Value (p = 0.014), Simple Shoulder Test (p = 0.028), and adjusted Constant scores (p = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS: Head-split fractures of the humerus treated with ORIF showed high complication and revision rates. RTSA resulted in comparable clinical outcomes and complication rates; however, the complications associated with RTSA were mostly related to tuberosity problems, which in this small series did not require revision. Therefore, RTSA may be the most predictable treatment option for head-split fractures in elderly patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete list of levels of evidence.