Ocular infections associated with atypical mycobacteria: A review.

Atypical mycobacteria or non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are a group of acid-fast bacteria that are pathogenic to different parts of the eye. The organisms can cause a spectrum of ocular infections including keratitis, scleritis, uveitis, endophthalmitis and orbital cellulitis. Trauma, whether surgical or nonsurgical, has the highest correlation with development of this infection. Common surgeries after which these infections have been reported include laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and scleral buckle surgery. The organism is noted to form biofilms with sequestration of the microbe at different inaccessible locations leading to high virulence. Collection of infective ocular material (corneal scraping/necrotic scleral tissue/abscess material/vitreous aspirate, etc.) and laboratory identification of the organism through microbiologic testing are vital for confirming presence of the infection and initiating treatment. In cluster infections, tracing the source of infection in the hospital setting via testing of different in-house samples is equally important to prevent further occurrences. Although the incidence of these infections is low, their presence can cause prolonged disease that may often be resistant to medical therapy alone. In this review, we describe the various types of NTM-ocular infections, their clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, management, and outcomes.

Early postoperative infection following lamellar keratoplasty: a review.

With the growing popularity of lamellar keratoplasty for selective replacement of diseased corneal tissue, it is important to understand the risk of developing an infection after the procedure. Although lesser than that postpenetrating keratoplasty, the reports on post lamellar keratoplasty infectious keratitis are not negligible. Trends of acute infections arising within 2 months of surgery are a subject of interest. Most of these infections are reported post Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with a preponderance of Candida species. A donor to host transmission of infection is not uncommon. Among the Candida cases, about 80% seem to occur due to a donor to host transmission. Infections presenting as or progressing to endophthalmitis lead to a poor visual outcome. Strict aseptic measures and protocols during corneal tissue harvesting, tissue processing, tissue storage and surgery are essential to prevent occurrence of these infections. After the infection has occurred, determining the aetiology and drug susceptibility through microbiological testing is vital. This helps to guide treatment protocols and hence determines final outcome of these cases. Most cases require some form of surgical management for resolution of infection, most often a graft removal and therapeutic keratoplasty. Secondary surgical interventions are performed to restore graft clarity and achieve a good final visual outcome.

Keratitis following laser refractive surgery: Clinical spectrum, prevention and management.

Laser refractive surgery (LRS) is one of the most demanding areas of ophthalmic surgery and high level of precision is required to meet outcome expectations of patients. Post-operative recovery is of vital importance. Keratitis occurring after LRS can delay visual recovery. Both surface ablations [Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)] as well as flap procedures [Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)/Small incision lenticule extraction] are prone to this complication. Reported incidence of post-LRS infectious keratitis is between 0% and 1.5%. The rate of infections after PRK seems to be higher than that after LASIK. Staphylococci, streptococci, and mycobacteria are the common etiological organisms. About 50-60% of patients present within the first week of surgery. Of the non-infectious keratitis, diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) is the most common with reported rates between 0.4% and 4.38%. The incidence of DLK seems to be higher with femtosecond LASIK than with microkeratome LASIK. A lot of stress is laid on prevention of this complication through proper case selection, asepsis, and use of improved protocols. Once keratitis develops, the right approach can help resolve this condition quickly. In cases of suspected microbial keratitis, laboratory identification of the organism is important. Most lesions resolve with medical management alone. Interface irrigation, flap amputation, collagen cross-linking and therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) are reserved for severe/non-resolving cases. About 50-75% of all infectious keratitis cases post LRS resolve with a final vision of 20/40 or greater. Improved awareness, early diagnosis, and appropriate intervention can help limit the damage to cornea and preserve vision.

Acute endophthalmitis after penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty at a tertiary eye care center over a 13-year period.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinico-microbiological profile, donor cornea risk factors, and outcomes of postkeratoplasty endophthalmitis at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of charts of 28 consecutive patients (28 eyes) of acute endophthalmitis following either an endothelial keratoplasty (EK) or an optical penetrating keratoplasty (PK) surgery, performed between 2006 and 2018 (13-year period). Positive microbiology, identification and classification of predisposing factors, surveillance of utilized paired donors, treatment outcomes, and differences in the rate and severity of the event between optical penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty. RESULTS: The estimated incidence of endophthalmitis was 0.23% in the entire cohort; it was 0.34% and 0.15%, after EK and PK, respectively (P = 0.049). The median time of endophthalmitis was 4.5 days postsurgery. Donor-related endophthalmitis was recognized in 7/28 (25%) eyes. Culture positivity was 68% (n = 19 of 28). Bacteria was isolated in 84% (n = 16 of 19) instances; Gram-negative bacilli were more common (87.5%; 14 of 16), and Pseudomonas species (50%; 7 of 14) was the most common Gram-negative bacterium. Majority (>75%) of the Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to all fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, 3rd generation cephalosporins, and meropenam; 1/3rd were resistant to imipenem; and 90% were sensitive to colistin. Treatment included intraocular antibiotic injections (96.4%), vitrectomy (42.9%), and therapeutic keratoplasty (50%). In 85.7% (24 of 28), globe was salvaged. The final vision was 20/200 or better in 39.1% (9 of 23) eyes. CONCLUSION: EK carried a higher risk of endophthalmitis than PK in this cohort. Bacterial infection was more common in this series, with Gram negative bacilli being the commonest organisms. Multidrug resistance was common (~75%) in Gram negative isolates.

Cataract surgery in ocular surface diseases: clinical challenges and outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cataracts are a significant cause of blindness and visual impairment worldwide. With the recent advances in cataract surgery techniques, outcomes have improved significantly in uncomplicated cases. This article discusses the challenges and outcomes of cataract surgery in complex cases targeting eyes with ocular surface diseases like Stevens-Johnson syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, Mooren's ulcer, vernal keratoconjunctivitis and limbal stem cell deficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: Ocular surface diseases are commonly associated with corneal scarring and vascularization, conjunctival inflammation, symblepharon and forniceal shortening. Any surgical intervention in a hostile ocular surface environment may worsen the disease, which may result in visual deterioration. In recent past, with the use of immunosuppressants and with the introduction of different ocular surface reconstruction surgeries; stabilization of ocular surface can be achieved prior to planning cataract surgery. This kind of step-wise approach can considerably improve visual outcomes in such cases. SUMMARY: Cataract surgery in ocular surface diseases needs careful preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative planning. Performed in a staged manner under favorable ocular environment, it has good visual outcomes and can improve the quality of life in such patients.

Clinical course and outcomes in patients with Mooren ulcer who had cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with Mooren ulcer. SETTING: L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The medical records of patients with Mooren ulcer who had cataract surgery between 2000 and 2015 were assessed. The main outcome measures were the role of preoperative immunosuppression and disease inactivity, cataract surgery safety, visual outcomes, and postoperative ulcer recurrence. RESULTS: Of 22 patients (26 eyes), the mean corneal ulceration was 6.8 clock hours ± 2.9 (SD). Corticosteroids were the most commonly used (84.6% of the 26 eyes) preoperative immunosuppression agents and 38.5% of the 26 eyes were under maintenance immunosuppression. The median disease inactivity before surgery was 7 months. Cataract surgery was extracapsular in 10 patients, small incision in 3 patients, and phacoemulsification in 13 patients. Twenty-two eyes had scleral incisions. The median follow-up was 6 months (interquartile range, 10 months). The median corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved from 1.48 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) before surgery to 0.30 and 0.35 logMAR at 1 month and at the last follow-up after surgery, respectively (P ≤ .0001). Mooren ulcer recurred in 5 eyes between 3 months and 7 years after surgery. No disease activity was seen in the immediate postoperative period. No significant risk factors for disease recurrence were noted. CONCLUSIONS: With adequate immunosuppression, cataract surgery in eyes with Mooren ulcer was safe and CDVA improved significantly with no disease reactivation immediately after surgery. No proven role of maintenance immunosuppression was observed. The type of cataract surgery had no influence on ulcer reactivation. Patients with a disease-free interval of 6 months or more before surgery and those who had scleral incisions had favorable outcomes.

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis: culmination of management using immunosuppression, surgical and prosthetic therapy over quarter century.

A 22-year-old male patient presented in 1988 with active vernal keratoconjunctivitis. He was treated with topical mast cell stabilisers and corticosteroids. Chronic inflammation despite topical treatment necessitated oral immunosuppressants. Active disease came under control with this; however, the patient gradually developed limbal stem cell deficiency. He underwent bilateral pannus resection with amniotic membrane transplantation that resulted in improved ocular surface. In 2007, patient was found to have significant bilateral posterior subcapsular cataracts and underwent bilateral cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation with good visual outcome. In 2016, he was provided with scleral lens prosthetic device, which further improved vision. At last follow-up, more than 25 years after his initial visit, his visual acuity was 20/25 in both eyes with a stable surface. With a comprehensive approach using immunosuppression, surgical therapy and scleral lens prosthetic device, chronic vernal keratoconjunctivitis can be well managed as illustrated in this case.

Molten metal ocular burn: long-term outcome using simple limbal epithelial transplantation.

One day after molten aluminium had fallen into his right eye, a young man presented to our clinic with a vision of counting fingers at 1 m, conjunctival and corneal epithelial defects, and limbal involvement. He was diagnosed with grade 4 thermal burn and managed medically. Subsequently, the inflammation resolved, however, he developed pannus with conjunctivalisation and scarring of cornea suggestive of partial unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. He was treated surgically with autologous simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET). Postoperatively, his vision improved along with corneal clarity. He achieved a best corrected vision of 20/50 at the last follow-up 27 months postsurgery, with maintenance of a healthy corneal epithelium. This case describes the different management strategies employed in two different stages of an ocular burn. It highlights the long-term success of SLET in a case of ocular surface thermal burn.